Feasibility of Using Contrast Enhanced Voiding Urosonography (CeVUS) During Urodynamic Studies

NCT ID: NCT04170413

Last Updated: 2020-11-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

25 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-01-01

Study Completion Date

2020-11-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators will assess the feasibility of replacing fluoroscopy/iodinated contrast with ultrasound/sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres during routine urodynamic studies.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Urodynamic studies routinely involve instillation of iohexol (OmnipaqueTM), a low osmolality contrast agent, into the bladder followed by fluoroscopic imaging to assess for reflux or variant anatomy of the genitourinary system. Recently, sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres (LumasonTM), an ultrasound contrast agent, has been approved in the United States for intravesicular administration in the pediatric population. Contrast enhanced voiding urosonography (CEvUS) is being increasingly utilized in the place of voiding cystourethrograms, with the major advantages being decreased (zero) radiation for the patient, as well as decreased cost. Given the similarity in procedure between urodynamic studies (UDS) and voiding cystourethrograms, the investigators hypothesize that a urodynamic study may be performed with contrast enhanced ultrasound instead of fluoroscopy. The investigators plan to conduct a small feasibility study by recruiting a group of 30 patients under the age of 18, who are willing to undergo their normally scheduled UDS in addition to CEvUS. The UDS typically consists of two cycles of bladder filling and voiding; the investigators intend to replace the use of fluoroscopy and iohexol with ultrasound and sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres. This will decrease the time commitment and eliminate radiation exposure for the patient. There will not be a formal analysis of data as the investigators are planning to test the feasibility of the procedure rather than gather any quantitative data. The goal of the study is to eventually implement CEvUS instead of fluoroscopy in all urodynamic and voiding studies if it is found to be a reasonable alternative. This will decrease pediatric radiation exposure, which will be especially important in the patients undergoing several studies each year.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neurogenic Bladder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CeVUS Urodynamic

patients undergoing urodynamic study with CeVUS

CeVUS

Intervention Type DRUG

Contrast enhanced voiding urosonography

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CeVUS

Contrast enhanced voiding urosonography

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 0-18
* Must have had prior urodynamic study at University of Virginia

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women
* Fetuses
* Neonates
* Prisoners
* Subjects with preexisting cardiac conditions (such as heart failure and ventricular arrhythmias)
* Subjects with a known hypersensitivity to Lumason
Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Virginia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Reza Daugherty, MD

Associate Professor of Radiology and Pediatrics

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Reza Daugherty, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Virginia Health System

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Virginia

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

14717

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id