Trial Outcomes & Findings for Validation Study for the Alertgy Non-invasive Continuous Glucose Monitor (ANICGM) (NCT NCT04166032)

NCT ID: NCT04166032

Last Updated: 2021-11-09

Results Overview

Hypothesis is that ANICGM device will perform similarly as other blood glucose monitoring devices Mean absolute relative difference (MARD) is computed by taking the arithmetic mean of the absolute relative differences between the ANICGM system measures and the reference standard FS BG, which serves as the denominator of the calculation. The MARD is expressed as a percentage, and a lower MARD signifies better concordance between the two measurements.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

15 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

2 time points taken over 2 separate days respectively, over a span of up to 14 days

Results posted on

2021-11-09

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
ANICGM
non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring device Alertgy non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring device (ANICGM): Alertgy non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring device (ANICGM)
Overall Study
STARTED
15
Overall Study
COMPLETED
14
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Validation Study for the Alertgy Non-invasive Continuous Glucose Monitor (ANICGM)

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
ANICGM
n=15 Participants
non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring device Alertgy non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring device (ANICGM): Alertgy non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring device (ANICGM)
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
55.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.0 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 time points taken over 2 separate days respectively, over a span of up to 14 days

Hypothesis is that ANICGM device will perform similarly as other blood glucose monitoring devices Mean absolute relative difference (MARD) is computed by taking the arithmetic mean of the absolute relative differences between the ANICGM system measures and the reference standard FS BG, which serves as the denominator of the calculation. The MARD is expressed as a percentage, and a lower MARD signifies better concordance between the two measurements.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
ANICGM
n=15 Participants
non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring device Alertgy non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring device (ANICGM): Alertgy non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring device (ANICGM)
Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) of Glucose Values Between the ANICGM and FDA-approved Glucose Monitoring Device
Day 2
18 percentage difference
Interval 12.8 to 42.2
Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) of Glucose Values Between the ANICGM and FDA-approved Glucose Monitoring Device
Day 3
15 percentage difference
Interval 12.3 to 18.4

Adverse Events

ANICGM

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Kimberly Jenkins, Research Administrator

Cleveland Clinic

Phone: 216-445-4791

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Company will review any publication submission within 30 days of estimated due date. If CCF does not hear from company we are to assume we are free to publish. If company identities patentable information they can request for CCF to withhold submission for 90 days.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER