Trial Outcomes & Findings for Validation Study for the Alertgy Non-invasive Continuous Glucose Monitor (ANICGM) (NCT NCT04166032)
NCT ID: NCT04166032
Last Updated: 2021-11-09
Results Overview
Hypothesis is that ANICGM device will perform similarly as other blood glucose monitoring devices Mean absolute relative difference (MARD) is computed by taking the arithmetic mean of the absolute relative differences between the ANICGM system measures and the reference standard FS BG, which serves as the denominator of the calculation. The MARD is expressed as a percentage, and a lower MARD signifies better concordance between the two measurements.
COMPLETED
15 participants
2 time points taken over 2 separate days respectively, over a span of up to 14 days
2021-11-09
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
ANICGM
non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring device
Alertgy non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring device (ANICGM): Alertgy non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring device (ANICGM)
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
15
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Validation Study for the Alertgy Non-invasive Continuous Glucose Monitor (ANICGM)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
ANICGM
n=15 Participants
non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring device
Alertgy non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring device (ANICGM): Alertgy non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring device (ANICGM)
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
55.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.0 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2 time points taken over 2 separate days respectively, over a span of up to 14 daysHypothesis is that ANICGM device will perform similarly as other blood glucose monitoring devices Mean absolute relative difference (MARD) is computed by taking the arithmetic mean of the absolute relative differences between the ANICGM system measures and the reference standard FS BG, which serves as the denominator of the calculation. The MARD is expressed as a percentage, and a lower MARD signifies better concordance between the two measurements.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ANICGM
n=15 Participants
non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring device
Alertgy non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring device (ANICGM): Alertgy non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring device (ANICGM)
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) of Glucose Values Between the ANICGM and FDA-approved Glucose Monitoring Device
Day 2
|
18 percentage difference
Interval 12.8 to 42.2
|
|
Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) of Glucose Values Between the ANICGM and FDA-approved Glucose Monitoring Device
Day 3
|
15 percentage difference
Interval 12.3 to 18.4
|
Adverse Events
ANICGM
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Kimberly Jenkins, Research Administrator
Cleveland Clinic
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Company will review any publication submission within 30 days of estimated due date. If CCF does not hear from company we are to assume we are free to publish. If company identities patentable information they can request for CCF to withhold submission for 90 days.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER