Motivational Interviewing Tailored Programme for Promoting Advance Care Planning Behaviours

NCT ID: NCT04162912

Last Updated: 2020-04-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

204 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-01

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This proposed study is designed to test the effects of motivational interviewing (MI) in increasing the uptake of ACP behaviours among patients with palliative care needs. A randomised controlled trial with repeated blinded outcome assessment will be conducted to assess the effects of a MI-tailored ACP (MI-ACP) programme on palliative care patients recruited from the outpatient palliative care clinics and home palliative care services of two hospitals. A total of 204 patients will be recruited and randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The patients in the experimental group will receive a MI-ACP programme facilitated by a trained nurse, whereas the patients in the control group will receive usual care. Primary outcome is the behavioural changes in ACP. Secondary outcomes are perceived stress, decisional conflict and quality of life. Study outcomes will be measured at baseline, 1 month and 3 months after enrolment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

End Stage Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental group

Participants in the experimental group will receive a MotivationaI Interviewing tailored ACP programme.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Motivational Interviewing tailored Advance Care Planning

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The trained interventionist who is experienced in MI techniques will explore their illness experiences, emotions and beliefs about their health conditions and future care in an empathetic manner and explore their ambivalence for ACP behaviours.

Control group

The participants in the control group will receive usual care offered by the palliative care team under study and its affiliated day care centres, home care team and outpatient clinics.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Motivational Interviewing tailored Advance Care Planning

The trained interventionist who is experienced in MI techniques will explore their illness experiences, emotions and beliefs about their health conditions and future care in an empathetic manner and explore their ambivalence for ACP behaviours.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years of age or over
* newly referred to palliative care services
* with a palliative performance scale (PPS) score of 60 or above; and
* with full level of consciousness

Exclusion Criteria

* uncommunicable because of sensory impairment or language barrier
* cognitively impaired
* are receiving active psychiatric treatment
* already had signed an advance directive
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Haven of Hope Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

United Christian Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Food and Health Bureau, Hong Kong

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Helen YL Chan

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Helen N Chan, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

United Christian Hospital

Kwun Tong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Haven of Hope Hospital

Tseung Kwan O, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chan HY, Leung DY, Lam PT, Ko PP, Lam RW, Chan KS. Effect of motivational interviewing to promote advance care planning among palliative care patients in ambulatory care setting: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jan 31;24(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01667-9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39891169 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

14168417

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

UC Health Care Planning Study
NCT04012749 COMPLETED NA