Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
248 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-07-05
2019-08-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Work/ rest scenario: The participants were asked to take planned breaks in the shade during their work shift. The amount of breaks taken ranged between 3 and 10 minutes every hour depending on the current work duties of the employees.
2. Hydration scenario: The participants were advised (not forced) to drink minimum of 750 ml of water or ice - slushies, every hour during their work shift.
3. Clothing scenario: The participants were randomly provided with different types of clothing, i.e. white breathable coveralls, ventilated garments and breathable uniform with water submerging parts, to wear during their work shift.
4. Assisted labor: The participants in agriculture, that were carrying heavy weights were provided with "e-carts" (automated carrying vehicles), during their work shift.
Baseline data \[self-reported age; body stature (Seca 213; seca GmbH \& Co. KG; Hamburg, Germany) and body mass (BC1000, Tanita corporation, Tokyo, Japan)\] were collected one day prior to the measurements. Medical history of all the participants was recorded. During the field study, continuous heart rate, core temperature and mean skin temperature data were collected using wireless heart rate monitors (Polar Team2. Polar Electro Oy, Kempele, Finland), telemetric capsules (BodyCap, Caen, France), and wireless thermistors (iButtons type DS1921H, Maxim/Dallas Semiconductor Corp., USA), respectively. Skin temperature data were collected from four sites (chest, arm, thigh, and leg) and were expressed as mean skin temperature according to the formula of Ramanathan (Tsk = \[0.3(chest + arm) + 0.2(thigh + leg)\]). Furthermore, continuous environmental data \[air temperature (°C), globe temperature (°C), relative humidity (%), and air velocity (m/s)\] were collected using a portable weather station (Kestrel 5400FW, Nielsen-Kellerman, Pennsylvania, USA). Urine samples were collected at the start and the end of the work shift to evaluate the hydration status of each worker. Urine specific gravity was assessed for each urine sample using a refractometer (PAL-10S, ATAGO CO., LTD., Fukaya, Saitama Prefecture, Japan) and was classified as either hydrated (\< 1.020) or dehydrated (≥ 1.020). In addition, urine colour was assessed using a urine color scale. Questionnaires were used to assess workers' perception on exertion (Borg scale), thermal comfort/sensation, humidity comfort/sensation, radiation comfort/sensation, wind speed comfort/sensation, skin wetness, sleepiness, physical demands of the workload. The Heat Strain Score Index (HSSI) was used to assess the perceived heat strain of the workers.
Video cameras installed in close proximity (about 40m) to the workers were used to assessed workers labour effort. Video recordings were analyzed on a second by second basis using time-motion analysis method. Importantly, when video cameras were not feasible to be installed real-time task analysis was used to examine workers capacity for manual labour. For that reason, an android-based application (FAME\_TASK App) was used to record the tasks of the workers on a second by second basis. The App was continuously monitoring the work time spent on irregular work breaks (unplanned breaks), the duration of uninterrupted work and the time spent as lunch time or other breaks provided by management (planned breaks). The unplanned break was divided into two categories: the breaks during which the workers decided to rest in the shade (unplanned break under the shade) and the breaks during which the workers chose to stay under the sun (unplanned break under the sun). Also, the uninterrupted work was divided into nine categories: work in an outdoor environment with a low metabolic rate; work in an outdoor environment with a moderate metabolic rate; work in an outdoor environment with a high metabolic rate; work in a mixed (outdoor and indoor) environment with a low metabolic rate; work in a mixed (outdoor and indoor) environment with a moderate metabolic rate; work in a mixed (outdoor and indoor) environment with a high metabolic rate; work in an indoor environment with a low metabolic rate; work in an indoor environment with a moderate metabolic rate; work in an indoor environment with a high metabolic rate. The labor effort (i.e., low / moderate / high metabolic rate) was defined according to the ISO 8996:1994 as low, moderate and high metabolic rate. Based on these definitions, the recorded tasks were fourteen. During the work-shift, a researcher was following each worker, monitoring them with the FAME\_TASK App, until they end of their work shift.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Work/ rest scenario
For every hour of work, the participants were asked to take 3-10 minutes break in the shade.
Work/ rest scenario
For every hour of work, the participants were asked to take 3-10 minutes break in the shade.
Hydration scenario
Participants were asked to consume at least 750ml of water or ice-slushies for every hour of work.
Hydration scenario
Participants were asked to consume at least 750ml of water or ice-slushies for every hour of work
Clothing scenario
Participants were asked to wear different types of clothing during the work shift i.e. ventilated garments, white breathable coveralls, clothing with water submerged parts.
Clothing scenario
Participants were asked to wear different types of clothing during the work shift i.e. ventilated garments, white breathable coveralls, clothing with water submerged parts
"E-carts" scenario
Participants that were involved in manual labor by carrying heavy weights were provided with "e-carts" (automated carrying vehicles)
"E-carts" scenario
Participants that were involved in manual labor by carrying heavy weights were provided with "e-carts" (automated carrying vehicles)
Business as usual scenario
No interference with the usual work day of the participants.
Business as usual scenario
No interference with the usual work day of the participants
Sham evaluation
Participants were monitored during a usual day of work shift while sham measurements were recorded in order for them to get familiarized with the study environment.
Sham evaluation
Participants were monitored during a usual day of work shift while sham measurements were recorded in order for them to get familiarized with the study environment
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Work/ rest scenario
For every hour of work, the participants were asked to take 3-10 minutes break in the shade.
Hydration scenario
Participants were asked to consume at least 750ml of water or ice-slushies for every hour of work
Clothing scenario
Participants were asked to wear different types of clothing during the work shift i.e. ventilated garments, white breathable coveralls, clothing with water submerged parts
"E-carts" scenario
Participants that were involved in manual labor by carrying heavy weights were provided with "e-carts" (automated carrying vehicles)
Business as usual scenario
No interference with the usual work day of the participants
Sham evaluation
Participants were monitored during a usual day of work shift while sham measurements were recorded in order for them to get familiarized with the study environment
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Petros Dinas
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Petros Dinas
Researcher in human physiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
FAME Lab, Department of Exercise Science, University of Thessaly
Trikala, Thessaly, Greece
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ioannou LG, Tsoutsoubi L, Mantzios K, Gkikas G, Agaliotis G, Koutedakis Y, Garcia-Leon D, Havenith G, Liang J, Arkolakis C, Glaser J, Kenny GP, Mekjavic IB, Nybo L, Flouris AD. The Impact of Workplace Heat and Cold on Work Time Loss. J Occup Environ Med. 2025 Jun 1;67(6):393-399. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000003332. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
7. Workers' heat stress
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id