Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy and Safety of LNP023 Compared With Rituximab in Subjects With Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy (NCT NCT04154787)
NCT ID: NCT04154787
Last Updated: 2024-10-09
Results Overview
The primary endpoint of this study is the ratio between UPCR at 24 weeks of treatment measured in 24h urine and baseline UPCR . To assess the primary objective, the log-transformed ratio to baseline in UPCR was analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). The results were back transformed and presented on the original scale.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
37 participants
Baseline, Day 113, Day 169
2024-10-09
Participant Flow
Participants took part in 18 investigative sites in 9 countries/regions: Argentina (3), Czech Republic (1), Germany (4), India (2), Netherlands (1), Spain (2), United Kingdom (3), China (1) and Taiwan (1)
Participant milestones
| Measure |
LNP023 10/50 mg b.i.d.
As per protocol V00, participants took LNP023 10 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks
|
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
Combination of the LNP023 25/200 mg b.i.d. and 50/200 mg b.i.d. groups. Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
Rituximab
Rituximab 1 g i.v. at Day 1 and Day 15
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
3
|
19
|
15
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
3
|
9
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
10
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
LNP023 10/50 mg b.i.d.
As per protocol V00, participants took LNP023 10 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks
|
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
Combination of the LNP023 25/200 mg b.i.d. and 50/200 mg b.i.d. groups. Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
Rituximab
Rituximab 1 g i.v. at Day 1 and Day 15
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Patient Requires Other Treatment
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Study Terminated By Sponsor
|
0
|
6
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Subject Decision
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Suspected Lack Of Efficacy
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Efficacy and Safety of LNP023 Compared With Rituximab in Subjects With Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
LNP023 10/50 mg b.i.d.
n=3 Participants
As per protocol V00, participants took LNP023 10 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks
|
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
n=19 Participants
Combination of the LNP023 25/200 mg b.i.d. and 50/200 mg b.i.d. groups. Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
Rituximab
n=15 Participants
Rituximab 1 g i.v. at Day 1 and Day 15
|
Total
n=37 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
55.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.52 • n=5 Participants
|
48.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.84 • n=7 Participants
|
46.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.33 • n=5 Participants
|
48.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.43 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black Or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 113, Day 169Population: PD set: In line with the protocol, PD (pharmacodynamics) analyses were performed for all participants who received LNP023 200 mg or rituximab and experienced no protocol deviations with relevant impact on PD/efficacy data. Only participants with a value for UPCR at both Baseline and Day 113 or Day 169 were included in the analysis.
The primary endpoint of this study is the ratio between UPCR at 24 weeks of treatment measured in 24h urine and baseline UPCR . To assess the primary objective, the log-transformed ratio to baseline in UPCR was analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM). The results were back transformed and presented on the original scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
n=10 Participants
Combination of the LNP023 25/200 mg b.i.d. and 50/200 mg b.i.d. groups. Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
Rituximab
n=13 Participants
Rituximab 1 g i.v. at Day 1 and Day 15
|
LNP023 50 mg b.i.d. (4-week Administration)
Under Protocol V01, LNP023 50mg taken orally b.i.d. during the first 4 weeks of treatment
|
LNP023 50 mg b.i.d. (20-week Administration)
Under Protocol V00, LNP023 50mg taken orally b.i.d. during the last 20 weeks of treatment
|
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ratio Between Baseline Urine Protein Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) and Urine Protein Creatinine Ratio at 24 Weeks of Treatment (From 24h Urine Collection)
Day 113
|
0.94 ratio to baseline
Interval 0.74 to 1.2
|
0.89 ratio to baseline
Interval 0.71 to 1.1
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Ratio Between Baseline Urine Protein Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) and Urine Protein Creatinine Ratio at 24 Weeks of Treatment (From 24h Urine Collection)
Day 169
|
0.88 ratio to baseline
Interval 0.65 to 1.19
|
0.64 ratio to baseline
Interval 0.48 to 0.86
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 113 and Day 169Population: PD set: In line with the protocol, PD (pharmacodynamics) analyses were performed for all participants who received LNP023 200 mg or rituximab and experienced no protocol deviations with relevant impact on PD/efficacy data. Only participants with values of plasma levels of circulating fragment of factor B at both Baseline and the different time points were included in the analysis.
The drug (LNP023) is expected to block the complement alternative pathway dysregulation and thereby should normalize complement biomarker levels in serum. Bb is a biomarker that accurately reflects the level of complement Alternative Pathway activation. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing measurement prior to randomization. Measurements for LNP023 group were done pre-dose.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
n=17 Participants
Combination of the LNP023 25/200 mg b.i.d. and 50/200 mg b.i.d. groups. Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
Rituximab
n=13 Participants
Rituximab 1 g i.v. at Day 1 and Day 15
|
LNP023 50 mg b.i.d. (4-week Administration)
Under Protocol V01, LNP023 50mg taken orally b.i.d. during the first 4 weeks of treatment
|
LNP023 50 mg b.i.d. (20-week Administration)
Under Protocol V00, LNP023 50mg taken orally b.i.d. during the last 20 weeks of treatment
|
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Plasma Levels of Circulating Fragment of Factor B (Bb)
Day 15
|
1520.59 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 9370.086
|
-417.69 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 701.667
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Plasma Levels of Circulating Fragment of Factor B (Bb)
Day 29
|
-732.00 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1412.633
|
-318.46 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 604.440
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Plasma Levels of Circulating Fragment of Factor B (Bb)
Day 57
|
-545.00 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1379.201
|
-75.38 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 787.545
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Plasma Levels of Circulating Fragment of Factor B (Bb)
Day 113
|
-877.27 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1562.716
|
-219.17 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 703.568
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Plasma Levels of Circulating Fragment of Factor B (Bb)
Day 169
|
-984.00 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1794.419
|
-570.00 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 611.167
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 113, Day 169Population: PD set: In line with the protocol, PD (pharmacodynamics) analyses were performed for all participants who received LNP023 200 mg or rituximab and experienced no protocol deviations with relevant impact on PD/efficacy data. Only participants with a value of plasma levels of sC5b-9 at both Baseline and the different time points were included in the analysis.
Soluble C5b-9 (sC5b-9) is a biomarker of the complement pathway activity that correlate with disease progression. Baseline is defined as the last non-missing measurement prior to randomization. Measurements for LNP023 group were done pre-dose.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
n=17 Participants
Combination of the LNP023 25/200 mg b.i.d. and 50/200 mg b.i.d. groups. Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
Rituximab
n=13 Participants
Rituximab 1 g i.v. at Day 1 and Day 15
|
LNP023 50 mg b.i.d. (4-week Administration)
Under Protocol V01, LNP023 50mg taken orally b.i.d. during the first 4 weeks of treatment
|
LNP023 50 mg b.i.d. (20-week Administration)
Under Protocol V00, LNP023 50mg taken orally b.i.d. during the last 20 weeks of treatment
|
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Plasma Levels of sC5b-9
Day 15
|
-80.40 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 98.229
|
-38.49 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 52.258
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Plasma Levels of sC5b-9
Day 29
|
-82.80 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 118.338
|
-24.51 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 94.826
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Plasma Levels of sC5b-9
Day 57
|
-90.62 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 108.483
|
-14.02 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 107.651
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Plasma Levels of sC5b-9
Day 113
|
-113.32 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 108.118
|
-24.95 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 128.721
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Plasma Levels of sC5b-9
Day 169
|
-84.07 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 96.045
|
-21.76 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 122.654
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85, Day 113, Day 141, Day 169, Day 266 and Day 378Population: PD set: In line with the protocol, PD (pharmacodynamics) analyses were performed for all participants who received LNP023 200 mg or rituximab and experienced no protocol deviations with relevant impact on PD/efficacy data. Only participants with a value of UPCR measured in first morning void at the different time points were included in the analysis.
Adjusted geometric mean ratio to baseline of Urine Protein Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) measured in first morning void. First morning void urine sample was collected in the morning of the day before the visit and kept in the fridge.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
n=18 Participants
Combination of the LNP023 25/200 mg b.i.d. and 50/200 mg b.i.d. groups. Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
Rituximab
n=13 Participants
Rituximab 1 g i.v. at Day 1 and Day 15
|
LNP023 50 mg b.i.d. (4-week Administration)
Under Protocol V01, LNP023 50mg taken orally b.i.d. during the first 4 weeks of treatment
|
LNP023 50 mg b.i.d. (20-week Administration)
Under Protocol V00, LNP023 50mg taken orally b.i.d. during the last 20 weeks of treatment
|
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ratio to Baseline of Urine Protein Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) Measured in First Morning Void
Day 15
|
0.94 ratio to baseline
Interval 0.65 to 1.34
|
1.15 ratio to baseline
Interval 0.75 to 1.76
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Ratio to Baseline of Urine Protein Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) Measured in First Morning Void
Day 29
|
0.98 ratio to baseline
Interval 0.7 to 1.36
|
0.90 ratio to baseline
Interval 0.6 to 1.35
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Ratio to Baseline of Urine Protein Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) Measured in First Morning Void
Day 57
|
1.02 ratio to baseline
Interval 0.71 to 1.48
|
0.77 ratio to baseline
Interval 0.51 to 1.16
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Ratio to Baseline of Urine Protein Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) Measured in First Morning Void
Day 85
|
1.03 ratio to baseline
Interval 0.68 to 1.56
|
0.75 ratio to baseline
Interval 0.5 to 1.13
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Ratio to Baseline of Urine Protein Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) Measured in First Morning Void
Day 113
|
1.05 ratio to baseline
Interval 0.68 to 1.63
|
0.92 ratio to baseline
Interval 0.6 to 1.41
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Ratio to Baseline of Urine Protein Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) Measured in First Morning Void
Day 141
|
0.75 ratio to baseline
Interval 0.48 to 1.19
|
0.77 ratio to baseline
Interval 0.48 to 1.23
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Ratio to Baseline of Urine Protein Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) Measured in First Morning Void
Day 169
|
0.72 ratio to baseline
Interval 0.44 to 1.16
|
0.55 ratio to baseline
Interval 0.34 to 0.89
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Ratio to Baseline of Urine Protein Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) Measured in First Morning Void
Day 266
|
0.57 ratio to baseline
Interval 0.33 to 0.99
|
0.34 ratio to baseline
Interval 0.2 to 0.57
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Ratio to Baseline of Urine Protein Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) Measured in First Morning Void
Day 378 (End Of Study)
|
0.37 ratio to baseline
Interval 0.22 to 0.63
|
0.46 ratio to baseline
Interval 0.27 to 0.76
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 169Population: PD set: In line with the protocol, PD (pharmacodynamics) analyses were performed for all participants who received LNP023 200 mg or rituximab and experienced no protocol deviations with relevant impact on PD/efficacy data. Only participants with UP values at both baseline and Day 169 were included in the analysis.
Participants were considered complete responders if at 24 weeks of treatment, they showed complete remission of proteinuria (i.e., Urine Protein (UP) ≤ 0.3 g/24h), partial responders if they showed partial remission (i.e., UP \> 0.3g/24h and ≤ 3.5 g/24h and a reduction of UP by \>50% from baseline), and non-responders if UP \>3.5g/24h and/or reduction of UP from baseline \<50%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
n=9 Participants
Combination of the LNP023 25/200 mg b.i.d. and 50/200 mg b.i.d. groups. Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
Rituximab
n=9 Participants
Rituximab 1 g i.v. at Day 1 and Day 15
|
LNP023 50 mg b.i.d. (4-week Administration)
Under Protocol V01, LNP023 50mg taken orally b.i.d. during the first 4 weeks of treatment
|
LNP023 50 mg b.i.d. (20-week Administration)
Under Protocol V00, LNP023 50mg taken orally b.i.d. during the last 20 weeks of treatment
|
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants by Treatment Response at 24 Weeks of Treatment
Complete
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Treatment Response at 24 Weeks of Treatment
Partial
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Treatment Response at 24 Weeks of Treatment
No response
|
7 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85, Day 113, Day 141, Day 169Population: PD set: In line with the protocol, PD (pharmacodynamics) analyses were performed for all participants who received LNP023 200 mg or rituximab and experienced no protocol deviations with relevant impact on PD/efficacy data. Only participants with a eGFR value at both Baseline and the different time points were included in the analysis.
Changes in renal function were assessed via estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Change in eGFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
n=19 Participants
Combination of the LNP023 25/200 mg b.i.d. and 50/200 mg b.i.d. groups. Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
Rituximab
n=13 Participants
Rituximab 1 g i.v. at Day 1 and Day 15
|
LNP023 50 mg b.i.d. (4-week Administration)
Under Protocol V01, LNP023 50mg taken orally b.i.d. during the first 4 weeks of treatment
|
LNP023 50 mg b.i.d. (20-week Administration)
Under Protocol V00, LNP023 50mg taken orally b.i.d. during the last 20 weeks of treatment
|
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in (eGFR) Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Over Time
Day 15
|
2.3 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 12.07
|
0.3 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 8.33
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in (eGFR) Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Over Time
Day 29
|
-0.5 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 8.53
|
6.1 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 10.44
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in (eGFR) Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Over Time
Day 57
|
2.0 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 11.10
|
9.2 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 21.05
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in (eGFR) Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Over Time
Day 85
|
-1.6 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 11.53
|
10.2 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 16.40
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in (eGFR) Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Over Time
Day 113
|
1.2 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 8.64
|
10.8 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 15.41
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in (eGFR) Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Over Time
Day 141
|
-1.8 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 9.10
|
7.1 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 9.29
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in (eGFR) Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Over Time
Day 169
|
-1.3 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 7.36
|
3.1 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 13.21
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 29 and Day 113 (pre-dose and 0.25 hours, 0.5 hours, 1 hour 2 hours, 4 hours and 6 hours post dose)Population: PK set: PK (pharmacokinetic) analysis set included all participants with at least one available valid PK concentration measurement, who received any LNP023 and experienced no protocol deviations with relevant impact on PK data. Only participants with PK values at the different time points were included in the analysis.
Pharmacokinetics of LNP023 : Tmax is the time to reach maximum (peak) plasma drug concentration after dose administration (time). Actual sampling time points were considered for the calculation of PK parameters.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
n=2 Participants
Combination of the LNP023 25/200 mg b.i.d. and 50/200 mg b.i.d. groups. Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
Rituximab
n=3 Participants
Rituximab 1 g i.v. at Day 1 and Day 15
|
LNP023 50 mg b.i.d. (4-week Administration)
n=10 Participants
Under Protocol V01, LNP023 50mg taken orally b.i.d. during the first 4 weeks of treatment
|
LNP023 50 mg b.i.d. (20-week Administration)
n=2 Participants
Under Protocol V00, LNP023 50mg taken orally b.i.d. during the last 20 weeks of treatment
|
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
n=7 Participants
Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Tmax in Plasma
Day 29
|
2.04 hours
Interval 2.0 to 2.08
|
2.00 hours
Interval 1.0 to 4.0
|
2.03 hours
Interval 1.0 to 4.38
|
—
|
—
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Tmax in Plasma
Day 113
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
2.05 hours
Interval 2.0 to 2.1
|
1.00 hours
Interval 0.25 to 6.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 29 and Day 113 (pre-dose and 0.25 hours, 0.5 hours, 1 hour 2 hours, 4 hours and 6 hours post dose)Population: PK set: PK (pharmacokinetic) analysis set included all participants with at least one available valid PK concentration measurement, who received any LNP023 and experienced no protocol deviations with relevant impact on PK data. Only participants with PK values at the different time points were included in the analysis.
Pharmacokinetics of LNP023: Cmax is the maximum (peak) observed plasma drug concentration after dose administration (mass x volume-1)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
n=2 Participants
Combination of the LNP023 25/200 mg b.i.d. and 50/200 mg b.i.d. groups. Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
Rituximab
n=3 Participants
Rituximab 1 g i.v. at Day 1 and Day 15
|
LNP023 50 mg b.i.d. (4-week Administration)
n=10 Participants
Under Protocol V01, LNP023 50mg taken orally b.i.d. during the first 4 weeks of treatment
|
LNP023 50 mg b.i.d. (20-week Administration)
n=2 Participants
Under Protocol V00, LNP023 50mg taken orally b.i.d. during the last 20 weeks of treatment
|
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
n=7 Participants
Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Cmax in Plasma
Day 29
|
1200 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 799
|
2070 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 938
|
2140 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 917
|
—
|
—
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter Cmax in Plasma
Day 113
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
1220 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 304
|
4810 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 2850
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 29 and Day 113 (pre-dose and 0.25 hours, 0.5 hours, 1 hour 2 hours, 4 hours and 6 hours post dose)Population: PK set: PK (pharmacokinetic) analysis set included all participants with at least one available valid PK concentration measurement, who received any LNP023 and experienced no protocol deviations with relevant impact on PK data. Only participants with PK values at the different time points were included in the analysis.
Pharmacokinetics of LNP023: AUClast is the AUC from time zero to the last measurable concentration sampling time (tlast) (mass x time x volume-1)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
n=2 Participants
Combination of the LNP023 25/200 mg b.i.d. and 50/200 mg b.i.d. groups. Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
Rituximab
n=3 Participants
Rituximab 1 g i.v. at Day 1 and Day 15
|
LNP023 50 mg b.i.d. (4-week Administration)
n=10 Participants
Under Protocol V01, LNP023 50mg taken orally b.i.d. during the first 4 weeks of treatment
|
LNP023 50 mg b.i.d. (20-week Administration)
n=2 Participants
Under Protocol V00, LNP023 50mg taken orally b.i.d. during the last 20 weeks of treatment
|
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
n=7 Participants
Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter AUClast in Plasma
Day 29
|
5970 hr*ng/mL
Standard Deviation 4150
|
8140 hr*ng/mL
Standard Deviation 3080
|
9920 hr*ng/mL
Standard Deviation 3960
|
—
|
—
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter AUClast in Plasma
Day 113
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
5940 hr*ng/mL
Standard Deviation 989
|
22200 hr*ng/mL
Standard Deviation 15600
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 29 and Day 113 (pre-dose and 0.25 hours, 0.5 hours, 1 hour 2 hours, 4 hours and 6 hours post dose)Population: PK set: PK (pharmacokinetic) analysis set included all participants with at least one available valid PK concentration measurement, who received any LNP023 and experienced no protocol deviations with relevant impact on PK data. Only participants with PK values at the different time points were included in the analysis.
Pharmacokinetics of LNP023 : AUCtau is the AUC calculated to the end of a dosing interval (tau) at steady-state (amount x time x volume-1)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
n=2 Participants
Combination of the LNP023 25/200 mg b.i.d. and 50/200 mg b.i.d. groups. Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
Rituximab
n=3 Participants
Rituximab 1 g i.v. at Day 1 and Day 15
|
LNP023 50 mg b.i.d. (4-week Administration)
n=10 Participants
Under Protocol V01, LNP023 50mg taken orally b.i.d. during the first 4 weeks of treatment
|
LNP023 50 mg b.i.d. (20-week Administration)
n=2 Participants
Under Protocol V00, LNP023 50mg taken orally b.i.d. during the last 20 weeks of treatment
|
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
n=7 Participants
Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter AUCtau in Plasma
Day 29
|
9850 hr*ng/mL
Standard Deviation 5790
|
12800 hr*ng/mL
Standard Deviation 3490
|
16500 hr*ng/mL
Standard Deviation 5920
|
—
|
—
|
|
Pharmacokinetic Parameter AUCtau in Plasma
Day 113
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
10700 hr*ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1640
|
36800 hr*ng/mL
Standard Deviation 26100
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 113Population: PK set: PK (pharmacokinetic) analysis set included all participants with at least one available valid PK concentration measurement, who received any LNP023 and experienced no protocol deviations with relevant impact on PK data. Only participants with PK values at Day 113 were included in the analysis.
Pharmacokinetics of LNP023 in urine: Renal plasma clearance derived from 24 hour urine sample
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
n=1 Participants
Combination of the LNP023 25/200 mg b.i.d. and 50/200 mg b.i.d. groups. Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
Rituximab
n=7 Participants
Rituximab 1 g i.v. at Day 1 and Day 15
|
LNP023 50 mg b.i.d. (4-week Administration)
Under Protocol V01, LNP023 50mg taken orally b.i.d. during the first 4 weeks of treatment
|
LNP023 50 mg b.i.d. (20-week Administration)
Under Protocol V00, LNP023 50mg taken orally b.i.d. during the last 20 weeks of treatment
|
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetics in Urine: Renal Plasma Clearance Derived From 24 Hour Urine Sample
|
0.602 L/hr
|
1.19 L/hr
Standard Deviation 0.668
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
LNP023 10/50 mg b.i.d.
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
Pooled LNP023
Rituximab
Total
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
LNP023 10/50 mg b.i.d.
n=3 participants at risk
As per protocol V00, participants took LNP023 10 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks
|
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
n=19 participants at risk
Combination of the LNP023 25/200 mg b.i.d. and 50/200 mg b.i.d. groups. Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks. Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
Pooled LNP023
n=22 participants at risk
Combination of the LNP023 10/50 mg b.i.d., 25/200 mg b.i.d. and 50/200 mg b.i.d. groups.
|
Rituximab
n=15 participants at risk
Rituximab 1 g i.v. at Day 1 and Day 15
|
Total
n=37 participants at risk
Total
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19 pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
6.7%
1/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
13.3%
2/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
8.1%
3/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
6.7%
1/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
LNP023 10/50 mg b.i.d.
n=3 participants at risk
As per protocol V00, participants took LNP023 10 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks
|
LNP023 200 mg b.i.d.
n=19 participants at risk
Combination of the LNP023 25/200 mg b.i.d. and 50/200 mg b.i.d. groups. Under protocol V00, participants took LNP023 25 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks. Under protocol v01, participants took LNP023 50 mg orally b.i.d. for 4 weeks followed by LNP023 200 mg orally b.i.d. for 20 weeks.
|
Pooled LNP023
n=22 participants at risk
Combination of the LNP023 10/50 mg b.i.d., 25/200 mg b.i.d. and 50/200 mg b.i.d. groups.
|
Rituximab
n=15 participants at risk
Rituximab 1 g i.v. at Day 1 and Day 15
|
Total
n=37 participants at risk
Total
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Ear infection
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
13.3%
2/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
8.1%
3/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection viral
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
6.7%
1/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Head injury
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Infusion related reaction
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
6.7%
1/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Limb injury
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
6.7%
1/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post-traumatic pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
6.7%
1/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
6.7%
1/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
6.7%
1/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Investigations
Liver function test increased
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Gout
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
13.3%
2/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.4%
2/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypertriglyceridaemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
6.7%
1/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperuricaemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
10.5%
2/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
9.1%
2/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
6.7%
1/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
8.1%
3/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Vitamin B12 deficiency
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
10.5%
2/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
9.1%
2/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.4%
2/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone hypertrophy
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
9.1%
2/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
6.7%
1/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
8.1%
3/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
10.5%
2/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
9.1%
2/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.4%
2/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
15.8%
3/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
13.6%
3/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
8.1%
3/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypersomnia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Sleep disorder
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrotic syndrome
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
6.7%
1/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Epididymal cyst
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dysphonia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
6.7%
1/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
6.7%
1/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
6.7%
1/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash maculo-papular
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
6.7%
1/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphopenia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
6.7%
1/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Hypothyroidism
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain lower
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
33.3%
1/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
6.7%
1/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.4%
2/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Epigastric discomfort
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal hernia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
6.7%
1/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
6.7%
1/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
10.5%
2/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
9.1%
2/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.4%
2/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
General disorders
Influenza like illness
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
General disorders
Oedema
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
10.5%
2/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
9.1%
2/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.4%
2/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
0.00%
0/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
2.7%
1/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
15.8%
3/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
13.6%
3/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
6.7%
1/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
10.8%
4/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
|
Infections and infestations
Coronavirus infection
|
0.00%
0/3 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
4.5%
1/22 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
6.7%
1/15 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
5.4%
2/37 • Adverse events were reported from first dose of study treatment until end of study treatment plus 29 weeks post treatment, up to maximum duration of 53 weeks.
The LNP023 200mg group is the sum of subjects from v00 (25/200mg, n=4) and v01 (50/200mg, n=15). A separation by subgroup was not justified as Part A doses were similar (25 vs 50mg), short-termed (4 weeks) and below levels expected to be efficacious, while the Part B dose of 200 mg was the same for all for up to 20 weeks. Moreover, if separated, the difference in subject numbers may have carried a risk of under- or over-interpretation of findings
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of the pooled data (i.e., data from all sites) in the clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER