Trial Outcomes & Findings for An Intraoperative Guidance Platform for Radio Frequency Ablation (NCT NCT04152343)

NCT ID: NCT04152343

Last Updated: 2024-05-21

Results Overview

Technical success is defined as the complete ablation of the target lesion (tumor and 5 mm margin), as determined by operator.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

62 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Success measured at end of RFA procedure, one-time event (lasting up to a few hours)

Results posted on

2024-05-21

Participant Flow

patients referred from multidisciplinary Liver Tumor Clinic from 12/2019-12/2021 with a lesion consistent with HCC (AASLD criteria) \> 2 cm diameter, were offered participation in study

Five enrolled were excluded: 4 based on pre-procedure study demonstrating tumor outside criteria (2 \< 2 cm, 2 \> 6 cm diameter); one patient excluded due to technical factors precluding connection of software.

Unit of analysis: tumors

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
RFA Physics Library- Ablation Simulation Guidance
The RFA Physics Library -- a Planning and Guidance Platform: Research software will be used during percutaneous liver RFA of HCC lesions \>2cm
Overall Study
STARTED
57 68
Overall Study
Completed Procedure
57 68
Overall Study
Completed 2-3 m Imaging for Efficacy
57 68
Overall Study
COMPLETED
29 37
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
28 31

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
RFA Physics Library- Ablation Simulation Guidance
The RFA Physics Library -- a Planning and Guidance Platform: Research software will be used during percutaneous liver RFA of HCC lesions \>2cm
Overall Study
Transplanted
5
Overall Study
Death
20
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
3

Baseline Characteristics

An Intraoperative Guidance Platform for Radio Frequency Ablation

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Patients
n=68 tumors
patients enrolled and had HCC treated with RFA utilizing Ablation Simulation Guidance software
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
68.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.94 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
55 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
57 participants
n=5 Participants
Cirrhosis Etiology
Hepatitis C
28 participants
n=5 Participants
Cirrhosis Etiology
Hepatitis B
3 participants
n=5 Participants
Cirrhosis Etiology
Alcohol
36 participants
n=5 Participants
Cirrhosis Etiology
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis
19 participants
n=5 Participants
Cirrhosis Etiology
other
2 participants
n=5 Participants
Child Turcotte Pugh Class
A
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
Child Turcotte Pugh Class
B
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
Child Turcotte Pugh Class
C
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Functional Status (ECOG)
0
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
Functional Status (ECOG)
1
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
Functional Status (ECOG)
2
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Tumor burden per patient
1 tumor
43 participants
n=5 Participants
Tumor burden per patient
2 tumors
8 participants
n=5 Participants
Tumor burden per patient
3 tumors
4 participants
n=5 Participants
Tumor burden per patient
5 tumors
2 participants
n=5 Participants
Alpha Fetoprotein > 20 ng/ml
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Prior Hepatocellular Carcinoma treatment
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
Within MIlan criteria
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
Tumor Size
2.73 centimeters
n=68 tumors
Biopsy Grade
well-differentiated
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
Biopsy Grade
moderately-differentiated
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
Biopsy Grade
poorly-differentiated
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Biopsy Grade
not available (LIRADS 5)
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
Liver segment location
segment II
3 tumors
n=68 tumors
Liver segment location
segment III
13 tumors
n=68 tumors
Liver segment location
segment IV
7 tumors
n=68 tumors
Liver segment location
segment V
9 tumors
n=68 tumors
Liver segment location
segment VI
8 tumors
n=68 tumors
Liver segment location
segment VII
12 tumors
n=68 tumors
Liver segment location
segment VIII
16 tumors
n=68 tumors

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Success measured at end of RFA procedure, one-time event (lasting up to a few hours)

Population: tumors completely treated (tumor + \>95% of 5 mm margin)

Technical success is defined as the complete ablation of the target lesion (tumor and 5 mm margin), as determined by operator.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tumors Treated With Ablation Simulation Guidance.
n=68 tumors
The RFA Physics Library -- a Planning and Guidance Platform: Research software will be used during percutaneous liver RFA of HCC lesions \>2cm
Rate of Technical Success of Tumor Ablation
incomplete
0 tumors
Rate of Technical Success of Tumor Ablation
complete
68 tumors

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 2 years after RFA treatment

Population: KM evaluation for proportion with local recurrence at 2-year follow-up

Local recurrence at 2 years is defined as the detection of viable malignant tissues at edge of or within a site which was previously treated by RFA.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tumors Treated With Ablation Simulation Guidance.
n=68 tumors
The RFA Physics Library -- a Planning and Guidance Platform: Research software will be used during percutaneous liver RFA of HCC lesions \>2cm
Rate of Local Tumor Recurrence
local recurrence at 2 years
9 tumors
Rate of Local Tumor Recurrence
no local recurrence at 2 years
59 tumors

Adverse Events

Ablation Simulation Guidance

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 4 other events
Deaths: 20 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Ablation Simulation Guidance
n=57 participants at risk
The RFA Physics Library -- a Planning and Guidance Platform software was used to provide ablation simulation guidance to support liver RFA of HCC lesions \>2cm
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
hypotension
1.8%
1/57 • Number of events 1 • within 30 days of procedure
Adverse events were evaluated based on whether suspected/potentially related to the use of guidance software for the ablation versus the ablation procedure versus underlying patient disease/comorbidities. Adverse event collection based on patient clinical follow up during first month and then at 3 month clinic visits.
Nervous system disorders
hypoglycemia
1.8%
1/57 • Number of events 1 • within 30 days of procedure
Adverse events were evaluated based on whether suspected/potentially related to the use of guidance software for the ablation versus the ablation procedure versus underlying patient disease/comorbidities. Adverse event collection based on patient clinical follow up during first month and then at 3 month clinic visits.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Ablation Simulation Guidance
n=57 participants at risk
The RFA Physics Library -- a Planning and Guidance Platform software was used to provide ablation simulation guidance to support liver RFA of HCC lesions \>2cm
Renal and urinary disorders
mild-moderate : urinary retention
7.0%
4/57 • Number of events 4 • within 30 days of procedure
Adverse events were evaluated based on whether suspected/potentially related to the use of guidance software for the ablation versus the ablation procedure versus underlying patient disease/comorbidities. Adverse event collection based on patient clinical follow up during first month and then at 3 month clinic visits.

Additional Information

Dr. Eric Hoffer, Director of Interventional Radiology

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Phone: 603 650 7417

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place