Scalp Block Decreases Pain and Side Effects

NCT ID: NCT04133467

Last Updated: 2019-10-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

26 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-01

Study Completion Date

2016-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Postoperative analgesia after corrective surgery of paediatric craniosynostosis is crucial in term of short and long-term outcomes. The objective of this observational case- control study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an analgesic technique based on the scalp block versus traditional pharmacological approach.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Several studies on craniosynostosis and the correlated risk factors have been published, the majority of them focusing on the perioperative management of blood losses and avoidance of haemorrhagic shock. Other issues related to anaesthetic management of the surgical correction of craniosynostosis are metabolic and electrolyte disturbances.

Even if craniosynostosis surgery is an invasive procedure, there is a current misconception that it would be associated with minimal pain, despite the extensive exhibition of the skull and periostea dissection. The Literature about the assessment and management of postoperative pain in this particular surgical setting is scarce. Assessment of pain in infants is challenging, and often relies on clinical observation. To date, there are no evaluative and therapeutic parameters globally accredited in this category of patients. The scalp nerve block (SNB) is a regional anaesthetic technique, performed since several years in children undergoing a variety of procedures, from neurosurgery to eye-nose-throat surgery.SNB has been proposed as a complement to the routine craniosynostosis anaesthetic protocol, and should be associated to a reduced need for opioids.

Thirteen patients, aged between 3 months and 2 years, undergoing cranioplasty for the correction of craniosynostosis were subjected to SNB (Group SB) with Levobupivacaine 0.125% (total dose 2 mg/kg), performed before awakening, in combination with intraoperative intravenous acetaminophen (15 mg/kg if body weight \>10Kg, 7 mg/kg if body weight \< 10 kg). The SNB procedure was performed using the modified Pinosky technique, with levobupivacaine 0,125%(10). A targeted infiltration of 0,75-2ml of local anaesthetic (LA) solution was done at multiple sites with a 23G needle.

This Group of patients were compared with another group of 13 patients, derived from our database, and treated with the traditional pharmacological approach given intraoperatively (intravenous acetaminophen according to the body weight, plus intravenous tramadol 1 mg/kg).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Craniosynostoses Pain, Postoperative

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group SB

Scalp block performed with Levobupivacaine 0.125% (total dose 2 mg/kg) in combination with intraoperative intravenous acetaminophen (15 mg/kg if body weight \>10Kg, 7 mg/kg if body weight \< 10 kg).

scalp block

Intervention Type OTHER

intravenous acetaminophen according to the body weight, plus intravenous tramadol 1 mg/kg)

Group ST

intravenous acetaminophen according to the body weight, plus intravenous tramadol 1 mg/kg

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

scalp block

intravenous acetaminophen according to the body weight, plus intravenous tramadol 1 mg/kg)

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

intravenous pharmacological approach

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients undergoing cranioplasty for the correction of craniosynostosis

Exclusion Criteria

* allergies to local anesthetics and/or analgesics
* specific drug therapies (pain relievers, sedatives and/or epileptic)
* denied consent to the study; development of postoperative intracranical bleeding and/or gastrointestinal bleeding
* need of nasogastric tube
* development of gastrointestinal infections.
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

2 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rossano festa, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fondazione Universitaria Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS roma Italia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rossano Festa

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Stricker PA, Goobie SM, Cladis FP, Haberkern CM, Meier PM, Reddy SK, Nguyen TT, Cai L, Polansky M, Szmuk P, Fiadjoe J, Soneru C, Falcon R, Petersen T, Kowalczyk-Derderian C, Dalesio N, Budac S, Groenewald N, Rubens D, Thompson D, Watts R, Gentry K, Ivanova I, Hetmaniuk M, Hsieh V, Collins M, Wong K, Binstock W, Reid R, Poteet-Schwartz K, Gries H, Hall R, Koh J, Bannister C, Sung W, Jain R, Fernandez A, Tuite GF, Ruas E, Drozhinin O, Tetreault L, Muldowney B, Ricketts K, Fernandez P, Sohn L, Hajduk J, Taicher B, Burkhart J, Wright A, Kugler J, Barajas-DeLoa L, Gangadharan M, Busso V, Stallworth K, Staudt S, Labovsky KL, Glover CD, Huang H, Karlberg-Hippard H, Capehart S, Streckfus C, Nguyen KT, Manyang P, Martinez JL, Hansen JK, Levy HM, Brzenski A, Chiao F, Ingelmo P, Mujallid R, Olutoye OA, Syed T, Benzon H, Bosenberg A; Pediatric Craniofacial Collaborative Group. Perioperative Outcomes and Management in Pediatric Complex Cranial Vault Reconstruction: A Multicenter Study from the Pediatric Craniofacial Collaborative Group. Anesthesiology. 2017 Feb;126(2):276-287. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001481.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27977460 (View on PubMed)

Thomas K, Hughes C, Johnson D, Das S. Anesthesia for surgery related to craniosynostosis: a review. Part 1. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Nov;22(11):1033-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03927.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22928738 (View on PubMed)

Chiaretti A, Pietrini D, Piastra M, Polidori G, Savioli A, Velardi F, Ciano F, Di Rocco C. Safety and efficacy of remifentanil in craniosynostosis repair in children less than 1 year old. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2000 Aug;33(2):83-8. doi: 10.1159/000028981.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11070434 (View on PubMed)

Teo JH, Palmer GM, Davidson AJ. Post-craniotomy pain in a paediatric population. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011 Jan;39(1):89-94. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1103900115.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21375097 (View on PubMed)

Guilfoyle MR, Helmy A, Duane D, Hutchinson PJA. Regional scalp block for postcraniotomy analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2013 May;116(5):1093-1102. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182863c22. Epub 2013 Mar 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23477962 (View on PubMed)

Pinosky ML, Fishman RL, Reeves ST, Harvey SC, Patel S, Palesch Y, Dorman BH. The effect of bupivacaine skull block on the hemodynamic response to craniotomy. Anesth Analg. 1996 Dec;83(6):1256-61. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199612000-00022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8942596 (View on PubMed)

Pardey Bracho GF, Pereira de Souza Neto E, Grousson S, Mottolese C, Dailler F. Opioid consumption after levobupivacaine scalp nerve block for craniosynostosis surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2014 Jun;52(2):64-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 Jun 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25016510 (View on PubMed)

Phillips S, Gift M, Gelot S, Duong M, Tapp H. Assessing the relationship between the level of pain control and patient satisfaction. J Pain Res. 2013 Sep 9;6:683-9. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S42262. eCollection 2013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24049457 (View on PubMed)

Festa R, Tosi F, Pusateri A, Mensi S, Garra R, Mancino A, Frassanito P, Rossi M. The scalp block for postoperative pain control in craniosynostosis surgery: a case control study. Childs Nerv Syst. 2020 Dec;36(12):3063-3070. doi: 10.1007/s00381-020-04661-z. Epub 2020 May 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32418049 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Morphine or Ketamine for Analgesia
NCT06835504 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE3