Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of JNJ 73763989+JNJ 56136379+Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA) Regimen Compared to NA Alone in e Antigen Negative Virologically Suppressed Participants With Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection (NCT NCT04129554)
NCT ID: NCT04129554
Last Updated: 2025-02-04
Results Overview
Percentage of participants with HBsAg seroclearance at Week 72 (24 weeks after completion of all study interventions at Week 48) without restarting NA treatment was reported. Seroclearance at Week 72 of the treatment defined as a confirmed loss of HBsAg at Week 72. Loss is defined as a baseline HBsAg with a repeat reactive, confirmed or positive result and a post-baseline assessment with a negative result.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
130 participants
Week 72
2025-02-04
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
85
|
45
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
81
|
40
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
5
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
4
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
0
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of JNJ 73763989+JNJ 56136379+Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA) Regimen Compared to NA Alone in e Antigen Negative Virologically Suppressed Participants With Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=85 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
n=45 Participants
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Total
n=130 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
45.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1 • n=5 Participants
|
47.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.55 • n=7 Participants
|
46 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.27 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
87 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
66 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
107 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
86 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
BELGIUM
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
FRANCE
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
GERMANY
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
ITALY
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
POLAND
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
SPAIN
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
UNITED KINGDOM
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 72Population: Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least one dose of study intervention excluding those participants impacted by the pandemic. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participants with HBsAg seroclearance at Week 72 (24 weeks after completion of all study interventions at Week 48) without restarting NA treatment was reported. Seroclearance at Week 72 of the treatment defined as a confirmed loss of HBsAg at Week 72. Loss is defined as a baseline HBsAg with a repeat reactive, confirmed or positive result and a post-baseline assessment with a negative result.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=79 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
n=39 Participants
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Surface Antigen (HBsAg) Seroclearance at Week 72 Without Restarting NA Treatment
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From screening up to Week 102Population: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant who was administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study. TEAE was defined as the AEs occurring after first administration of study intervention (or worsened since then).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=85 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
n=45 Participants
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
|
85.9 Percentage of participants
|
80.0 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From screening up to 102 weeksPopulation: Safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant who was administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study. TEAE was defined as the AEs occurring after first administration of study intervention (or worsened since then). SAEs included any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in disability/incapacity or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the off spring of a study participant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=85 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
n=45 Participants
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
|
3.5 Percentage of participants
|
8.9 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 48Population: mITT included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least one dose of study intervention excluding those participants impacted by the pandemic. Here, 'N' (number of subjects analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participants with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance at Week 48 was reported. Seroclearance at Week 48 of the treatment defined as a confirmed loss of HBsAg at Week 48. Loss is defined as a baseline HBsAg with a repeat reactive, confirmed or positive result and a post-baseline assessment with a negative result.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=76 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
n=41 Participants
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroclearance at Week 48
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 48Population: mITT included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least one dose of study intervention excluding those participants impacted by the pandemic. Here, 'N' (number of subjects analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participants with HBV DNA \<LLOQ (20 international units per milliliters \[IU/mL\]) at Week 48 was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=75 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
n=41 Participants
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Less Than (<) Lower Limit of Quantification (LLOQ) at Week 48
|
97.3 Percentage of participants
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 96Population: mITT included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least one dose of study intervention excluding those participants impacted by the pandemic.
Percentage of participants with HBsAg seroclearance at Week 96 (48 weeks after stopping all study interventions at Week 48 without restarting NA treatment) was reported. Seroclearance at Week 96 of the treatment defined as a confirmed loss of HBsAg at Week 96. Loss is defined as a baseline HBsAg with a repeat reactive, confirmed or positive result and a post-baseline assessment with a negative result. Missing values were imputed by last observation carried forward (LOCF).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=84 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
n=44 Participants
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroclearance at Week 96 (48 Weeks After Stopping All Study Interventions at Week 48 Without Restarting NA Treatment)
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 96Population: mITT included all participants, who were randomized in the study and received at least one dose of study intervention excluding those participants impacted by the pandemic. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) included participants with blood marker data.
Percentage of participants with (sustained) reduction, suppression, and/or seroclearance considering single and multiple markers (such as hepatitis B surface antigen \[HBsAg\] and HBV DNA) (HBsAg \>= lower limit of quantification \[LLOQ\] and HBV DNA\<2000 IU/mL; HBsAg \>= LLOQ and LLOQ \<= HBV DNA \< 2000 IU/mL) off-treatment was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=71 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
n=28 Participants
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With (Sustained) Reduction, Suppression, and/or Seroclearance
HBsAg>=LLOQ and HBVDNA<2000 IU/mL
|
23.9 Percentage of participants
|
3.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With (Sustained) Reduction, Suppression, and/or Seroclearance
HBsAg>=LLOQ and LLOQ<=HBV DNA <2000 IU/mL
|
64.8 Percentage of participants
|
64.3 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 96Population: mITT included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least one dose of study intervention excluding those participants impacted by the pandemic. Here, 'N' (number of subjects analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participants with HBsAg seroconversion were reported. HBsAg seroconversion was defined as HBsAg seroclearance together with appearance of anti-hepatitis B surface (HBs) or anti-hepatitis e (HBe) antibodies, respectively.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=81 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
n=39 Participants
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Week 96
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 48, 72, and 96Population: mITT included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least one dose of study intervention excluding those participants impacted by the pandemic. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' (number evaluable) signifies number of participants analyzed at each specified timepoints.
Change from baseline in HBsAg values was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=81 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
n=41 Participants
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in HBsAg Values at Weeks 48, 72, and 96
Week 48
|
-1.89 log10 IU/mL
Standard Deviation 0.522
|
-0.06 log10 IU/mL
Standard Deviation 0.082
|
|
Change From Baseline in HBsAg Values at Weeks 48, 72, and 96
Week 72
|
-1.76 log10 IU/mL
Standard Deviation 0.658
|
-0.25 log10 IU/mL
Standard Deviation 0.563
|
|
Change From Baseline in HBsAg Values at Weeks 48, 72, and 96
Week 96
|
-1.46 log10 IU/mL
Standard Deviation 0.661
|
-0.49 log10 IU/mL
Standard Deviation 0.783
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Weeks 48, 72, and 96Population: mITT included as all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least one dose of study intervention excluding those participants impacted by the pandemic. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies that no participants were available for change from baseline HBV DNA analysis because all participants were virologically suppressed, thereby planned data collection and analysis was not performed and thus, no data was reported for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in HBV DNA values was reported. Participants were considered as virologically suppressed if they were on stable HBV treatment (receiving NA treatment \[ETV, TDF, or TAF)\] for at least 24 months prior to screening and were on the same dose of NA treatment regimen for at least 3 months at the time of screening, and had serum HBV DNA less than (\<)60 IU/mL on 2 sequential measurements at least 6 months and had documented alanine aminotransferase values \<2.0\* upper limit of normal on 2 sequential measurements at least 6 months apart.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 96Population: mITT included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least one dose of study intervention excluding those participants impacted by the pandemic. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Time to achieve first HBsAg seroclearance was defined as the number of days between the date of first study treatment intake and the date of the first occurrence of HBsAg seroclearance.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=83 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
n=44 Participants
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Achieve First HBsAg Seroclearance
|
NA Days
Here, NA indicates that median and full range for the first occurrence of HBsAg seroclearance after first intake of study treatment was not estimable because of less number of events.
|
NA Days
Here, NA indicates that median and full range for the first occurrence of HBsAg seroclearance after first intake of study treatment was not estimable because of less number of events.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 96Population: mITT included as all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least one dose of study intervention excluding those participants impacted by the pandemic. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure
Percentage of participants with reduction of \>1 log10 in HBsAg Levels IU/mL from baseline was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=81 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
n=40 Participants
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Reduction of More Than (>) 1 log10 IU/mL in HBsAg Levels From Baseline
|
81.5 Percentage of participants
|
12.5 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 48, 72, and 96Population: mITT included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least one dose of study intervention excluding those participants impacted by the pandemic. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participants with HBsAg Levels \<100 IU/mL at Weeks 48, 72, and 96 was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=81 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
n=41 Participants
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Levels Less Than (<) 100 IU/mL at Weeks 48, 72, and 96
Week 48
|
71.1 Percentage of participants
|
2.4 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Levels Less Than (<) 100 IU/mL at Weeks 48, 72, and 96
Week 72
|
67.1 Percentage of participants
|
10.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Levels Less Than (<) 100 IU/mL at Weeks 48, 72, and 96
Week 96
|
46.9 Percentage of participants
|
15.0 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 96Population: mITT included as all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least one dose of study intervention excluding those participants impacted by the pandemic. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) included participants with blood marker data.
Percentage of Participants with HBV DNA levels \<LLOQ (20 IU/mL) was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=71 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
n=28 Participants
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With HBV DNA Levels Less Than (<) LLOQ From Baseline up to Week 96 (End of Study)
|
23.9 Percentage of participants
|
3.6 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 96Population: mITT included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least one dose of study intervention excluding those participants impacted by the pandemic. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participants with flares (virologic, biochemical and clinical flares) was reported. Biochemical flare was defined as confirmed alanine transaminase flare and/or aspartate aminotransferase flare \>=3\*upper limit of normal and \>=3\*nadir. The start of a confirmed virologic flare was defined as the first date of two consecutive visits with HBV DNA \>200 IU/mL. The end date of the same confirmed virologic flare was defined as the first date when HBV DNA value returns to less than or equal to (\<=)200 IU/mL or the date of NA treatment restart, whichever comes first. Clinical flare was defined as participants with both virologic and biochemical flare.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=77 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
n=41 Participants
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Flares
Virologic Flare (HBV DNA >20000 - =<100000 IU/mL)
|
8.0 Percentage of participants
|
10.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Flares
Virologic Flare (HBV DNA >100000 IU/mL)
|
2.7 Percentage of participants
|
27.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Flares
Alanine Transaminase Flare
|
3.9 Percentage of participants
|
19.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Flares
Aspartate Aminotransferase Flare
|
1.3 Percentage of participants
|
14.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Flares
Clinical Flare: HBV DNA > 200 - =<2000IU/mL
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Flares
Clinical Flare: HBV DNA > 2000 - =<20000IU/mL
|
1.3 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Flares
Clinical Flare: HBV DNA > 20000 - =<100000IU/mL
|
1.3 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Flares
Clinical Flare: HBV DNA > 100000 IU/mL
|
1.3 Percentage of participants
|
27.5 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Flares
Virologic Flare (HBV DNA > 200 - =<2000 IU/mL)
|
38.7 Percentage of participants
|
25.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Flares
Virologic Flare (HBV DNA>2000 - =< 20000 IU/mL)
|
24.0 Percentage of participants
|
30.0 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 48Population: mITT included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least one dose of study intervention excluding those participants impacted by the pandemic.
Percentage of participants with virologic breakthrough defined as confirmed on-treatment HBV DNA increase by more than (\>) 1 log10 IU/mL from nadir level or confirmed on treatment level \>200 IU/mL in participants who had HBV DNA level below \<LLOQ of the HBV DNA assay was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=84 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
n=44 Participants
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Breakthrough
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
0.0 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 96Population: mITT included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least one dose of study intervention excluding those participants impacted by the pandemic. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participants requiring NA re-treatment (either ETV, TDF, or TAF) during follow-up was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=77 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
n=41 Participants
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Requiring NA Re-Treatment During Follow-up
|
9.1 Percentage of participants
|
26.8 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Week 96Population: mITT included all participants who were randomized in the study and received at least one dose of study intervention excluding those participants impacted by the pandemic. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Correlation coefficient between on-treatment HBsAg change from baseline with on-treatment HBV blood markers and baseline characteristics was reported at different timepoints (against age, baseline NA treatment duration, HBsAg value at baseline, HBsAg values at Weeks 24 and 48).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=79 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
n=39 Participants
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Correlation Coefficient Between On-treatment HBsAg Change From Baseline With On-treatment HBV Blood Markers and Baseline Characteristics
Age
|
0.2860 correlation coefficient
|
0.1746 correlation coefficient
|
|
Correlation Coefficient Between On-treatment HBsAg Change From Baseline With On-treatment HBV Blood Markers and Baseline Characteristics
Baseline NA treatment duration
|
0.2381 correlation coefficient
|
0.4324 correlation coefficient
|
|
Correlation Coefficient Between On-treatment HBsAg Change From Baseline With On-treatment HBV Blood Markers and Baseline Characteristics
HBsAg value at baseline
|
-0.9970 correlation coefficient
|
-0.5923 correlation coefficient
|
|
Correlation Coefficient Between On-treatment HBsAg Change From Baseline With On-treatment HBV Blood Markers and Baseline Characteristics
HBsAg at Week 24
|
0.9983 correlation coefficient
|
0.7120 correlation coefficient
|
|
Correlation Coefficient Between On-treatment HBsAg Change From Baseline With On-treatment HBV Blood Markers and Baseline Characteristics
HBsAg at Week 48
|
0.9982 correlation coefficient
|
0.8065 correlation coefficient
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of any of the study interventions and had at least 1 valid blood sample drawn for PK analysis. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. NA (nucleos\[t\]ide analog) was tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF).
C(predose) was defined as the observed plasma concentration of JNJ-73763976 (a molecule of JNJ-73763989) at predose of JNJ-73763989. PK sample collection was done based on the availability of the participants at Weeks 4, 8, 12, or 16 and thus collected data were averaged and reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=18 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Observed Plasma Concentration at Predose (C[Predose]) of JNJ-73763976 (Molecule of JNJ-73763989)
|
NA nanogram/milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation NA
Here, NA indicated that data was below quantification limit (\<2.1 ng/mL).
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16: at Predose, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 hours postdosePopulation: PK analysis set included participants who had received at least 1 dose of any of the study interventions and had at least 1 valid blood sample drawn for PK analysis. NA was TDF. Here, 'N' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure.
Cmax was defined as the maximum observed concentration of JNJ-73763976 (molecule of JNJ-73763989). PK sample collection was done based on the availability of the participants at Weeks 4, 8, 12, or 16 and thus collected data were averaged and reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=18 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Observed Analyte Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-73763976 (Molecule of JNJ-73763989)
|
1111 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 716 • Interval 716.0 to
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16: at Predose, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 hours postdosePopulation: PK analysis set included participants who had received at least 1 dose of any of the study interventions and had at least 1 valid blood sample drawn for PK analysis. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. NA was TDF.
tmax was defined as the time to reach the maximum observed plasma concentration of JNJ-73763976 (molecule of JNJ-73763989). PK sample collection was done based on the availability of the participants at Weeks 4, 8, 12, or 16 and thus collected data were averaged and reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=18 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Reach the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of JNJ-73763976 (Molecule of JNJ-73763989)
|
6.00 Hour
Full Range 1.00 • Interval 1.0 to 10.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hours postdose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: PK analysis set included participants who had received at least 1 dose of any of the study interventions and had at least 1 valid blood sample drawn for PK analysis. Here, 'N' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure. NA was TDF.
C(24h) was defined as the observed plasma concentration of JNJ-73763976 (a molecule of JNJ-73763989) at 24 h postdose of JNJ-73763989. PK sample collection was done based on the availability of the participants at Weeks 4, 8, 12, or 16 and thus collected data were averaged and reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=18 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Observed Plasma Concentration at 24 Hour Postdose (C[24h]) of JNJ-73763976 (Molecule of JNJ-73763989)
|
275 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 161 • Interval 161.0 to
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 to 24 hours postdose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: PK analysis set included participants who had received at least 1 dose of any of the study interventions and had at least 1 valid blood sample drawn for PK analysis. Here, 'N' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure. NA was TDF.
AUC(0-24h) was defined as the area under the concentration of JNJ-73763976 (a molecule of JNJ-73763989) versus time curve from time 0 to 24 hours of JNJ-73763989. PK sample collection was done based on the availability of the participants at Weeks 4, 8, 12, or 16 and thus collected data were averaged and reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=17 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Analyte Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours (AUC[0-24h]) of JNJ-73763976 (Molecule of JNJ-73763989)
|
17833 nanogram*hour/milliliter (ng*h/mL)
Standard Deviation 9670 • Interval 9670.0 to
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16: at Predose, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 hours postdosePopulation: PK analysis set included participants who had received at least 1 dose of any of the study interventions and had at least 1 valid blood sample drawn for PK analysis. Here, 'N' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure. NA was TDF.
Cmax(Dose Normalized) was defined as the maximum observed concentration of JNJ-73763976 (a molecule of JNJ-73763989) dose normalized to 1 mg. PK sample collection was done based on the availability of the participants at Weeks 4, 8, 12, or 16 and thus collected data were averaged and reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=18 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Observed Analyte Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-73763976 (Molecule of JNJ-73763989) Dose Normalized to 1 mg (Cmax[Dose Normalized])
|
8.34 ng/mL/mg
Standard Deviation 5.37 • Interval 5.37 to
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 to 24 hours post-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: PK analysis set included participants who had received at least 1 dose of any of the study interventions and had at least 1 valid blood sample drawn for PK analysis. Here, 'N' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure. NA was TDF.
AUC(\[0-24h\], Dose Normalized) was defined as the area under the concentration of JNJ-73763976 (molecule of JNJ-73763989) versus time curve from time 0 to 24 hours of JNJ-73763989 dose normalized to 1 mg. PK sample collection was done based on the availability of the participants at Weeks 4, 8, 12, or 16 and thus collected data were averaged and reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=17 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Analyte Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours of JNJ-73763976 (Molecule of JNJ-73763989) Dose Normalized to 1 mg (AUC[0-24h], Dose Normalized)
|
134 ng*h/mL/mg
Standard Deviation 72.5 • Interval 72.5 to
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: PK analysis set was defined as participants who had received at least 1 dose of any of the study interventions and had at least 1 valid blood sample drawn for PK analysis. Here, 'N' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed at each specified outcome measure. NA was TDF.
C(predose) was defined as the observed plasma concentration of JNJ-73763924 (a molecule of JNJ-73763989) at predose of JNJ-73763989. PK sample collection was done based on the availability of the participants at Weeks 4, 8, 12, or 16 and thus collected data were averaged and reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=18 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Observed Plasma Concentration at Predose (C[Predose]) of JNJ-73763924 (Molecule of JNJ-73763989)
|
NA ng/mL
Standard Deviation NA
Here, NA indicates that mean and standard deviation could not be estimated as data was below quantification limit (\<2.1 ng/mL).
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16: at Predose, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 hours postdosePopulation: PK analysis set included participants who had received at least 1 dose of any of the study interventions and had at least 1 valid blood sample drawn for PK analysis. Here, 'N' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure. NA was TDF.
Cmax was defined as the maximum concentration of JNJ-73763924 (molecule of JNJ-73763989). PK sample collection was done based on the availability of the participants at Weeks 4, 8, 12, or 16 and thus collected data were averaged and reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=18 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Observed Analyte Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-73763924 (Molecule of JNJ-73763989)
|
222 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 142 • Interval 142.0 to
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16: at Predose, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 hours postdosePopulation: PK analysis set included participants who had received at least 1 dose of any of the study interventions and had at least 1 valid blood sample drawn for PK analysis. Here, 'N' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure. NA was TDF.
tmax was defined as the time to reach the maximum observed plasma concentration of JNJ-73763924 (molecule of JNJ-73763989). PK sample collection was done based on the availability of the participants at Weeks 4, 8, 12, or 16 and thus collected data were averaged and reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=18 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Reach the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of JNJ-73763924 (Molecule of JNJ-73763989)
|
5.07 Hour
Full Range 1.00 • Interval 1.0 to 8.03
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hours postdose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: PK analysis set included participants who had received at least 1 dose of any of the study interventions and had at least 1 valid blood sample drawn for PK analysis. Here, 'N' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure. NA was TDF.
C(24h) was defined as the observed plasma concentration of JNJ-73763924 (molecule of JNJ-73763989) at 24 h postdose of JNJ-73763989. PK sample collection was done based on the availability of the participants at Weeks 4, 8, 12, or 16 and thus collected data were averaged and reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=17 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Observed Plasma Concentration at 24 Hour Postdose (C[24h]) of JNJ-73763924 (Molecule of JNJ-73763989)
|
35.0 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 25.5 • Interval 25.5 to
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 to 24 hours postdose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: PK analysis set included participants who had received at least 1 dose of any of the study interventions and had at least 1 valid blood sample drawn for PK analysis. Here, 'N' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure. NA was TDF.
AUC(0-24h) was defined as the area under the concentration of JNJ-73763924 (molecule of JNJ-73763989) versus time curve from time 0 to 24 hour of JNJ-73763989. PK sample collection was done based on the availability of the participants at Weeks 4, 8, 12, or 16 and thus collected data were averaged and reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=17 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Analyte Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hour (AUC[0-24h]) of JNJ-73763924 (Molecule of JNJ-73763989)
|
3386 ng*h/mL
Standard Deviation 1930 • Interval 1930.0 to
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16: at Predose, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 hours postdosePopulation: PK analysis set included participants who had received at least 1 dose of any of the study interventions and had at least 1 valid blood sample drawn for PK analysis. Here, 'N' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure. NA was TDF.
Cmax(Dose Normalized) was defined as the maximum observed analyte concentration of JNJ-73763924 (molecule of JNJ-73763989) dose normalized to 1 mg. PK sample collection was done based on the availability of the participants at Weeks 4, 8, 12, or 16 and thus collected data were averaged and reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=18 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Observed Analyte Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-73763924 (Molecule of JNJ-73763989) Dose Normalized to 1 mg (Cmax[Dose Normalized])
|
3.33 nanogram/milliliter/milligram (ng/mL/mg)
Standard Deviation 2.14 • Interval 2.14 to
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 0 to 24 hours postdose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: PK analysis set included participants who had received at least 1 dose of any of the study interventions and had at least 1 valid blood sample drawn for PK analysis. Here, 'N' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure. NA was TDF.
AUC(\[0-24h\], Dose Normalized) was defined as the area under the analyte concentration JNJ-73763924 (a molecule of JNJ-73763989) versus time curve from time 0 to 24 hours of JNJ-73763989 dose normalized to 1 mg. PK sample collection was done based on the availability of the participants at Weeks 4, 8, 12, or 16 and thus collected data were averaged and reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=17 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Analyte Concentration Versus Time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours of JNJ-73763924 (Molecule of JNJ-73763989) Dose Normalized to 1 mg (AUC[0-24h], Dose Normalized)
|
50.8 ng*h/mL/mg
Standard Deviation 28.9 • Interval 28.9 to
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: PK analysis set was defined as participants who had received at least 1 dose of any of the study interventions and had at least 1 valid blood sample drawn for PK analysis. Here, 'N' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed at each specified outcome measure. NA was TDF.
C(predose) was defined as the observed plasma concentration at predose of JNJ-56136379. PK sample collection was done based on the availability of the participants at Weeks 4, 8, 12, or 16 and thus collected data were averaged and reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=12 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Observed Plasma Concentration at Predose (C[Predose]) of JNJ-56136379
|
10812 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 2430 • Interval 2430.0 to
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16: at Predose, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 hours postdosePopulation: PK analysis set included participants who had received at least 1 dose of any of the study interventions and had at least 1 valid blood sample drawn for PK analysis. Here, 'N' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure. NA was TDF.
Cmax was defined as the maximum observed concentration of JNJ-56136379. PK sample collection was done based on the availability of the participants at Weeks 4, 8, 12, or 16 and thus collected data were averaged and reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=12 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Observed Analyte Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-56136379
|
14754 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 4318 • Interval 4318.0 to
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16: at Predose, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 hours postdosePopulation: PK analysis set included participants who had received at least 1 dose of any of the study interventions and had at least 1 valid blood sample drawn for PK analysis. Here, 'N' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure. NA was TDF.
tmax was defined as the time to reach the maximum observed plasma concentration of JNJ-56136379. PK sample collection was done based on the availability of the participants at Weeks 4, 8, 12, or 16 and thus collected data were averaged and reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=12 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Reach the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of JNJ-56136379
|
4.00 Hour
Full Range 0.0 • Interval 0.0 to 24.17
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16: at Predose, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 hours postdosePopulation: PK analysis set included participants who had received at least 1 dose of any of the study interventions and had at least 1 valid blood sample drawn for PK analysis. Here, 'N' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure. NA was TDF.
Ctau was defined as the observed or predicted concentration at the end of a dosing interval of JNJ-56136379. PK sample collection was done based on the availability of the participants at Weeks 4, 8, 12, or 16 and thus collected data were averaged and reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=11 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Observed or Predicted Concentration at the End of a Dosing Interval (Ctau) of JNJ-56136379
|
12763 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 4959 • Interval 4959.0 to
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16: at Predose, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 hours postdosePopulation: PK analysis set included participants who have received at least 1 dose of any of the study interventions and have at least 1 valid blood sample drawn for PK analysis. Here, 'N' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure. NA was TDF.
AUCtau was defined as the area under the analyte concentration versus time curve during a dosing interval at steady state of JNJ-56136379. PK sample collection was done based on the availability of the participants at Weeks 4, 8, 12, or 16 and thus collected data were averaged and reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=12 Participants
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Analyte Concentration Versus Time Curve During a Dosing Interval at Steady State (AUCtau) of JNJ-56136379
|
282458 ng*h/mL
Standard Deviation 79118 • Interval 79118.0 to
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=85 participants at risk
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
n=45 participants at risk
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
1.2%
1/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Subacute Hepatic Failure
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Covid-19
|
1.2%
1/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cytomegalovirus Infection Reactivation
|
1.2%
1/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Hepatitis B Reactivation
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radius Fracture
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral Disc Disorder
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Cholangiocarcinoma
|
1.2%
1/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Hepatic Cancer
|
1.2%
1/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Arm 1: JNJ-73763989 (200 Milligrams [mg])+JNJ-56136379 (250 mg)+NA
n=85 participants at risk
Participants received JNJ-73763989 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once every 4 weeks (q4w), along with JNJ-56136379 250 mg tablet once daily (qd) and NA treatment orally (either entecavir \[ETV\], tenofovir disoproxil fumarate \[TDF\] or tenofovir alafenamide \[TAF\]) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
Arm 2: Nucleos(t)Ide Analog (NA)
n=45 participants at risk
Participants received matching placebo for JNJ-73763989 by SC injection q4w, along with matching placebo for JNJ-56136379 qd and NA treatment orally (either ETV, TDF or TAF) qd up to 48 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Visual Impairment
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Discomfort
|
3.5%
3/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain
|
2.4%
2/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.7%
3/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain Upper
|
4.7%
4/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
3.5%
3/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dental Caries
|
2.4%
2/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
3.5%
3/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
13.3%
6/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Duodenogastric Reflux
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
4.7%
4/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
4.7%
4/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Iron Deficiency Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina Pectoris
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
|
1.2%
1/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus Arrhythmia
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus Tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
3.5%
3/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Eye disorders
Ocular Hyperaemia
|
2.4%
2/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric Polyps
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric Ulcer
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal Reflux Disease
|
2.4%
2/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
|
2.4%
2/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal Hernia
|
1.2%
1/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Large Intestine Polyp
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lip Ulceration
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
8.2%
7/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.7%
3/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Proctalgia
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal Haemorrhage
|
1.2%
1/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
7.1%
6/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
14.1%
12/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
8.9%
4/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Chest Discomfort
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Chest Pain
|
1.2%
1/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
2.4%
2/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
12.9%
11/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
5/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Feeling Abnormal
|
2.4%
2/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Illness
|
2.4%
2/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Influenza Like Illness
|
3.5%
3/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Injection Site Haematoma
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Injection Site Pain
|
4.7%
4/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Injection Site Rash
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Non-Cardiac Chest Pain
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
2.4%
2/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Peripheral Swelling
|
1.2%
1/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
9.4%
8/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.7%
3/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Suprapubic Pain
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Vaccination Site Pain
|
3.5%
3/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic Steatosis
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Seasonal Allergy
|
3.5%
3/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
2.4%
2/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Covid-19
|
20.0%
17/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
8.9%
4/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes Zoster
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infected Dermal Cyst
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower Respiratory Tract Infection
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
11.8%
10/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
5/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
2.4%
2/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory Tract Infection
|
2.4%
2/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
|
3.5%
3/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
2.4%
2/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth Abscess
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth Infection
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
8.9%
4/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
4.7%
4/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary Tract Infection
|
3.5%
3/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral Infection
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod Sting
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
1.2%
1/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post-Traumatic Pain
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Soft Tissue Injury
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Thermal Burn
|
1.2%
1/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine Aminotransferase Increased
|
7.1%
6/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
24.4%
11/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Amylase Increased
|
1.2%
1/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased
|
3.5%
3/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
8.9%
4/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood Bilirubin Increased
|
3.5%
3/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood Iron Decreased
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood Phosphorus Decreased
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood Pressure Diastolic Increased
|
2.4%
2/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Creatinine Renal Clearance Decreased
|
2.4%
2/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Crystal Urine Present
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Glomerular Filtration Rate Abnormal
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Glomerular Filtration Rate Decreased
|
21.2%
18/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
8.9%
4/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Hepatitis B Dna Increased
|
2.4%
2/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.7%
3/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Lipase Increased
|
2.4%
2/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Sars-Cov-2 Test Positive
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased Appetite
|
1.2%
1/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dyslipidaemia
|
2.4%
2/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercholesterolaemia
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Iron Deficiency
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
10.6%
9/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
20.0%
9/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back Pain
|
11.8%
10/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
5/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bursitis
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint Swelling
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle Spasms
|
1.2%
1/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.7%
3/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular Weakness
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal Chest Pain
|
4.7%
4/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal Stiffness
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
7.1%
6/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.7%
3/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck Pain
|
3.5%
3/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.7%
3/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in Extremity
|
10.6%
9/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tendonitis
|
1.2%
1/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tenosynovitis
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
2.4%
2/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
22.4%
19/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
22.2%
10/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
1.2%
1/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
1.2%
1/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Radiculopathy
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
|
1.2%
1/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
1.2%
1/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
8.9%
4/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Sleep Disorder
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Chromaturia
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nocturia
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Pollakiuria
|
2.4%
2/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Polyuria
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal Impairment
|
3.5%
3/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Semenuria
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urine Odour Abnormal
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Breast Mass
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Dysmenorrhoea
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Erectile Dysfunction
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Testicular Pain
|
1.2%
1/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal Haemorrhage
|
1.2%
1/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Catarrh
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
5.9%
5/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
3.5%
3/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Haemoptysis
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal Pain
|
2.4%
2/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinitis Allergic
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sneezing
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
2.4%
2/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
0.00%
0/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
3.5%
3/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
2.4%
2/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Haematoma
|
2.4%
2/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
12.9%
11/85 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.7%
3/45 • Up to Week 102 (including 6 weeks of screening)
The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee If an investigator wishes to publish information from the study, a copy of the manuscript must be provided to the sponsor for review at least 60 days before submission for publication or presentation. If requested by the sponsor in writing, the investigator will withhold such publication for up to an additional 60 days.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER