Trial Outcomes & Findings for Dopamine Receptor Contributions to Prediction Error and Reversal Learning in Anorexia Nervosa (NCT NCT04128683)

NCT ID: NCT04128683

Last Updated: 2025-04-11

Results Overview

This task measures responsiveness to unexpected stimulus in the dopamine related brain circuitry. Study participants in both the healthy control group and anorexia nervosa group completed 3 fMRI scans. Prior to each scan subjects were administered one of three study medications (amisulpride, bromocriptine, or placebo). During the fMRI scan, subjects completed a taste reward prediction error task where they viewed visual stimuli and then received one of three conditions: sweet taste, neutral taste, or no solution. 20 percent of stimulus receipt was unexpected, that is there is a mismatch between expectation and outcome. Using a region of interest (ROI)-based approach, brain activation percent signal change values were extracted from the brain images for each subject and compared across groups and medication scans. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to calculate the mean brain activation for each group and each medication scan.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

EARLY_PHASE1

Target enrollment

31 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

The outcome measure was assessed during the taste MRI task on each of the 3 intervention scan days over the course of 9 to 12 days

Results posted on

2025-04-11

Participant Flow

31 individuals were recruited and enrolled in the study between 10/20/2020 and 6/22/2023 from the San Diego community and the UC San Diego Health Eating Disorders Center for Treatment and Research. Subjects completed several screening processes to determine eligibility and after eligibility was confirmed, were randomly assigned to the study arms. Of those not randomized, 18 individuals were excluded (10 screen failures, 1 voluntary withdrawal by subject, and 7 withdrawals by PI).

Of the 31 subjects enrolled, 13 subjects were randomized, 7 participants in the healthy control group and 6 participants in the anorexia nervosa group. Each subject was assigned randomly to one of the 6 study arms. These study arms had different orders of the medication intervention administered at each scan. All subjects received each of the 3 study interventions (amysulpride, bromocriptine, placebo), however, the order of medication intervention at each scan varied based on the randomization.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Healthy Controls
Subjects at normal weight without psychiatric or eating disorder history
Anorexia Nervosa
Subjects diagnosed with restricting-type anorexia nervosa according to DSM-V criteria
1st Intervention (1 Day)
STARTED
7
6
1st Intervention (1 Day)
1st Intervention = Amysulpride
3
2
1st Intervention (1 Day)
1st Intervention = Bromocriptine
1
2
1st Intervention (1 Day)
1st Intervention = Placebo
3
2
1st Intervention (1 Day)
COMPLETED
7
6
1st Intervention (1 Day)
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
Washout Period (2-3 Days)
STARTED
7
6
Washout Period (2-3 Days)
COMPLETED
7
6
Washout Period (2-3 Days)
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
2nd Intervention (1 Day)
STARTED
7
6
2nd Intervention (1 Day)
2nd Intervention = Amysulpride.
2
2
2nd Intervention (1 Day)
2nd Intervention = Bromocriptine
3
2
2nd Intervention (1 Day)
2nd Intervention = Placebo
2
2
2nd Intervention (1 Day)
COMPLETED
7
6
2nd Intervention (1 Day)
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
3rd Intervention (1 Day)
STARTED
7
6
3rd Intervention (1 Day)
3rd Intervention = Amysulpride
2
2
3rd Intervention (1 Day)
3rd Intervention = Bromocriptine
3
2
3rd Intervention (1 Day)
3rd Intervention = Placebo
2
2
3rd Intervention (1 Day)
COMPLETED
7
6
3rd Intervention (1 Day)
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Dopamine Receptor Contributions to Prediction Error and Reversal Learning in Anorexia Nervosa

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Healthy Controls
n=7 Participants
Subjects at normal weight without psychiatric or eating disorder history
Anorexia Nervosa
n=6 Participants
Subjects diagnosed with restricting-type anorexia nervosa according to DSM-V criteria
Total
n=13 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
24.09 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.02 • n=5 Participants
21.43 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.25 • n=7 Participants
22.86 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.47 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
Body Mass Index
22.41 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.69 • n=5 Participants
18.63 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.94 • n=7 Participants
20.67 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.38 • n=5 Participants
Eating Disorder Inventory 3 - Drive for Thinness Subscale
0.57 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.79 • n=5 Participants
19.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.41 • n=7 Participants
9.30 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.24 • n=5 Participants
Eating Disorder Inventory 3 - Body Dissatisfaction Subscale
5.00 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.78 • n=5 Participants
30.33 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.76 • n=7 Participants
16.69 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.76 • n=5 Participants
Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire Global Score
0.33 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.41 • n=5 Participants
3.62 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.88 • n=7 Participants
1.85 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.80 • n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: The outcome measure was assessed during the taste MRI task on each of the 3 intervention scan days over the course of 9 to 12 days

Population: brain imaging data was pre-processed and brain response was analyzed across groups (healthy control group versus anorexia nervosa group) and within group for each medication. One participant in the anorexia nervosa group had to be excluded from the analysis results due to excessive movement throughout the MRI scan.

This task measures responsiveness to unexpected stimulus in the dopamine related brain circuitry. Study participants in both the healthy control group and anorexia nervosa group completed 3 fMRI scans. Prior to each scan subjects were administered one of three study medications (amisulpride, bromocriptine, or placebo). During the fMRI scan, subjects completed a taste reward prediction error task where they viewed visual stimuli and then received one of three conditions: sweet taste, neutral taste, or no solution. 20 percent of stimulus receipt was unexpected, that is there is a mismatch between expectation and outcome. Using a region of interest (ROI)-based approach, brain activation percent signal change values were extracted from the brain images for each subject and compared across groups and medication scans. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to calculate the mean brain activation for each group and each medication scan.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Controls Placebo Scan
n=7 Participants
Subjects at normal weight without psychiatric or eating disorder history. Placebo medication was administered 3 hours prior to the start of the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) Taste Reward Task.
Anorexia Nervosa Placebo Scan
n=5 Participants
Subjects diagnosed with restricting-type anorexia nervosa according to DSM-V criteria. Placebo medication was administered 3 hours prior to the start of the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) Taste Reward Task.
Healthy Controls Amisulpride Medication Scan
n=7 Participants
Subjects at normal weight without psychiatric or eating disorder history. Amisulpride medication was administered 3 hours prior to the start of the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) Taste Reward Task.
Anorexia Nervosa Amisulpride Medication Scan
n=5 Participants
Subjects diagnosed with restricting-type anorexia nervosa according to DSM-V criteria. Amisulpride medication was administered 3 hours prior to the start of the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) Taste Reward Task.
Healthy Controls Bromocriptine Medication Scan
n=7 Participants
Subjects at normal weight without psychiatric or eating disorder history. Bromocriptine medication was administered 3 hours prior to the start of the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) Taste Reward Task.
Anorexia Nervosa Bromocriptine Medication Scan
n=5 Participants
Subjects diagnosed with restricting-type anorexia nervosa according to DSM-V criteria. Bromocriptine medication was administered 3 hours prior to the start of the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) Taste Reward Task.
Measurement of Brain Activation (Measured in Percent Signal Change) During a Prediction Error Taste Reward Task Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI).
Left Ventral Insula Brain Activation
5.847 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 1.349
5.083 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 1.596
0.991 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.938
-1.047 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 1.109
1.116 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 1.225
-0.148 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 1.450
Measurement of Brain Activation (Measured in Percent Signal Change) During a Prediction Error Taste Reward Task Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI).
Right Ventral Insula Brain Activation
4.095 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.669
4.860 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.791
0.883 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.716
-0.137 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.847
4.117 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.987
2.650 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 1.167
Measurement of Brain Activation (Measured in Percent Signal Change) During a Prediction Error Taste Reward Task Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI).
Left Ventral Striatum Brain Activation
2.081 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.582
1.767 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.689
1.475 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 1.153
-0.599 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 1.365
1.122 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.951
1.328 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 1.126
Measurement of Brain Activation (Measured in Percent Signal Change) During a Prediction Error Taste Reward Task Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI).
Right Ventral Striatum Brain Activation
1.583 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.660
2.367 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.781
1.728 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 1.020
-0.799 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 1.207
1.642 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.304
1.732 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.359
Measurement of Brain Activation (Measured in Percent Signal Change) During a Prediction Error Taste Reward Task Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI).
Left Inferior Orbital Frontal Cortex Brain Activation
-0.199 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.789
0.544 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.934
0.988 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.686
-1.222 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.811
0.646 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 1.038
1.171 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 1.229
Measurement of Brain Activation (Measured in Percent Signal Change) During a Prediction Error Taste Reward Task Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI).
Right Inferior Orbital Frontal Cortex Brain Activation
4.333 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.427
4.138 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.505
0.396 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.803
-0.699 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.950
5.512 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 1.244
4.774 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 1.472

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: The outcome measure was assessed during the taste MRI task on each of the 3 intervention scan days over the course of 9 to 12 days

Population: brain imaging data was pre-processed and brain response was analyzed across groups (healthy control group versus anorexia nervosa group) and within group for each medication

Study participants in both the healthy control group and anorexia nervosa group completed 3 fMRI scans. Prior to each scan subjects were administered one of three study medications (amisulpride, bromocriptine, or placebo). During the fMRI scan, subjects completed a taste reward prediction error task where they viewed visual stimuli and then received one of three conditions: sweet taste, neutral taste, or no solution. Using a region of interest (ROI)-based approach, brain activation percent signal change values were extracted from the brain images for each subject and compared across groups and medication scans. Here only stimulus expectation data were analyzed. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to calculate the mean brain activation for each group and each medication scan.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Healthy Controls Placebo Scan
n=7 Participants
Subjects at normal weight without psychiatric or eating disorder history. Placebo medication was administered 3 hours prior to the start of the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) Taste Reward Task.
Anorexia Nervosa Placebo Scan
n=5 Participants
Subjects diagnosed with restricting-type anorexia nervosa according to DSM-V criteria. Placebo medication was administered 3 hours prior to the start of the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) Taste Reward Task.
Healthy Controls Amisulpride Medication Scan
n=7 Participants
Subjects at normal weight without psychiatric or eating disorder history. Amisulpride medication was administered 3 hours prior to the start of the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) Taste Reward Task.
Anorexia Nervosa Amisulpride Medication Scan
n=5 Participants
Subjects diagnosed with restricting-type anorexia nervosa according to DSM-V criteria. Amisulpride medication was administered 3 hours prior to the start of the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) Taste Reward Task.
Healthy Controls Bromocriptine Medication Scan
n=7 Participants
Subjects at normal weight without psychiatric or eating disorder history. Bromocriptine medication was administered 3 hours prior to the start of the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) Taste Reward Task.
Anorexia Nervosa Bromocriptine Medication Scan
n=5 Participants
Subjects diagnosed with restricting-type anorexia nervosa according to DSM-V criteria. Bromocriptine medication was administered 3 hours prior to the start of the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) Taste Reward Task.
Measurement of Brain Activation (Measured in Percent Signal Change) During Taste Stimulus Expectation Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI).
Left Ventral Insula Brain Activation
4.799 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.681
3.282 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.806
4.821 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 1.481
5.569 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 1.752
5.265 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.803
4.691 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.950
Measurement of Brain Activation (Measured in Percent Signal Change) During Taste Stimulus Expectation Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI).
Right Ventral Insula Brain Activation
3.884 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.526
3.015 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.622
4.436 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 2.406
5.866 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 2.847
3.464 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.725
3.383 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.858
Measurement of Brain Activation (Measured in Percent Signal Change) During Taste Stimulus Expectation Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI).
Left Ventral Striatum Brain Activation
1.558 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.347
1.790 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.411
3.450 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 1.174
2.860 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 1.390
1.206 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.390
1.738 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.461
Measurement of Brain Activation (Measured in Percent Signal Change) During Taste Stimulus Expectation Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI).
Right Ventral Striatum Brain Activation
1.717 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.381
1.501 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.451
4.700 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 1.459
3.208 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 1.727
2.163 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.758
1.609 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.897
Measurement of Brain Activation (Measured in Percent Signal Change) During Taste Stimulus Expectation Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI).
Left Inferior Orbital Frontal Cortex Brain Activation
3.649 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.480
2.259 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.569
3.838 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 2.061
6.392 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 2.439
3.562 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.996
4.722 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 1.178
Measurement of Brain Activation (Measured in Percent Signal Change) During Taste Stimulus Expectation Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI).
Right Inferior Orbital Frontal Cortex Brain Activation
4.193 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.782
3.352 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 0.926
4.745 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 1.758
5.712 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 2.080
5.362 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 1.130
4.226 Percent Signal Change
Standard Error 1.337

Adverse Events

Healthy Control Group Placebo Scan

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Anorexia Nervosa Group Placebo Scan

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Healthy Control Group Amisulpride Scan

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Anorexia Nervosa Group Amisulpride Scan

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Healthy Control Group Bromocriptine Scan

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 2 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Anorexia Nervosa Group Bromocriptine Scan

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Healthy Control Group Placebo Scan
n=7 participants at risk
Healthy Control subjects were administered placebo 3 hours prior to the start of the MRI. Subjects performed prediction error and reversal tasks during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
Anorexia Nervosa Group Placebo Scan
n=6 participants at risk
Anorexia Nervosa subjects were administered placebo pill 3 hours prior to the start of the MRI. Subjects performed prediction error and reversal tasks during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
Healthy Control Group Amisulpride Scan
n=7 participants at risk
Healthy Control subjects were administered the dopamine D2 antagonist medication amisulpride 3 hours prior to the start of the MRI. Subjects performed prediction error and reversal tasks during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
Anorexia Nervosa Group Amisulpride Scan
n=6 participants at risk
Anorexia Nervosa subjects were administered the dopamine D2 antagonist medication amisulpride 3 hours prior to the start of the MRI. Subjects performed prediction error and reversal tasks during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
Healthy Control Group Bromocriptine Scan
n=7 participants at risk
Healthy Control subjects were administered the dopamine D2 receptor agonist medication bromocriptine 3 hours prior to the start of the MRI. Subjects performed prediction error and reversal tasks during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
Anorexia Nervosa Group Bromocriptine Scan
n=6 participants at risk
Anorexia Nervosa subjects were administered the dopamine D2 receptor agonist medication bromocriptine 3 hours prior to the start of the MRI. Subjects performed prediction error and reversal tasks during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
General disorders
Fatigue
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed from the administration of the medication on scan 1 (1st intervention) through the end of scan 3 (3rd intervention). The time period was 9 to 12 days depending on length of each washout period.
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed from the administration of the medication on scan 1 (1st intervention) through the end of scan 3 (3rd intervention). The time period was 9 to 12 days depending on length of each washout period.
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed from the administration of the medication on scan 1 (1st intervention) through the end of scan 3 (3rd intervention). The time period was 9 to 12 days depending on length of each washout period.
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed from the administration of the medication on scan 1 (1st intervention) through the end of scan 3 (3rd intervention). The time period was 9 to 12 days depending on length of each washout period.
28.6%
2/7 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed from the administration of the medication on scan 1 (1st intervention) through the end of scan 3 (3rd intervention). The time period was 9 to 12 days depending on length of each washout period.
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed from the administration of the medication on scan 1 (1st intervention) through the end of scan 3 (3rd intervention). The time period was 9 to 12 days depending on length of each washout period.
General disorders
Dizziness
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed from the administration of the medication on scan 1 (1st intervention) through the end of scan 3 (3rd intervention). The time period was 9 to 12 days depending on length of each washout period.
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed from the administration of the medication on scan 1 (1st intervention) through the end of scan 3 (3rd intervention). The time period was 9 to 12 days depending on length of each washout period.
0.00%
0/7 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed from the administration of the medication on scan 1 (1st intervention) through the end of scan 3 (3rd intervention). The time period was 9 to 12 days depending on length of each washout period.
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed from the administration of the medication on scan 1 (1st intervention) through the end of scan 3 (3rd intervention). The time period was 9 to 12 days depending on length of each washout period.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed from the administration of the medication on scan 1 (1st intervention) through the end of scan 3 (3rd intervention). The time period was 9 to 12 days depending on length of each washout period.
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse events were monitored/assessed from the administration of the medication on scan 1 (1st intervention) through the end of scan 3 (3rd intervention). The time period was 9 to 12 days depending on length of each washout period.

Additional Information

Dr. Guido Frank

University of California San Diego

Phone: 858-246-2053

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place