Trial Outcomes & Findings for Mepolizumab in Episodic Angioedema With Eosinophilia (NCT NCT04128371)
NCT ID: NCT04128371
Last Updated: 2024-04-16
Results Overview
We measure the number and severity of clinical symptoms associated with episodic angioedema with eosinophilia (EAE) using the maximum of the patient reported daily angioedema activity score, a validated patient reported outcome measure. The daily score was used to measure changes in swelling within a cycle. Participants answered 5 questions each day that were scored from 0-3 for each item. The daily score consisted of a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 15, the sum of the 5 question answers. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome. The change of the daily angioedema activity score is measured as the average percent reduction in the maximum score over the 3 cycles (about 3 months) after treatment compared to the cycle (about 1 month) pre-treatment. The estimated percent change and its confidence interval was calculated from a quasi-Poisson model. The model estimates a multiplicative treatment effect on the baseline AAS, and that effect is translated into a percent change.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
5 participants
1 month prior to treatment and 3 months after treatment
2024-04-16
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Active Treatment
Participants with episodic angioedema with eosinophilia (EAE) received mepolizumab 700 mg intravenously monthly for three doses.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Active Treatment
Participants with episodic angioedema with eosinophilia (EAE) received mepolizumab 700 mg intravenously monthly for three doses.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Mepolizumab in Episodic Angioedema With Eosinophilia
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Active Treatment
n=5 Participants
Participants with episodic angioedema with eosinophilia (EAE) received mepolizumab 700 mg intravenously monthly for three doses.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month prior to treatment and 3 months after treatmentPopulation: The analyses included all participants during the cycle (about the 1 month) prior to treatment with up to 3 cycles (about 3 months) after treatment began. One patient withdrew after only 2 cycles post treatment and we used their values up until time of withdrawal.
We measure the number and severity of clinical symptoms associated with episodic angioedema with eosinophilia (EAE) using the maximum of the patient reported daily angioedema activity score, a validated patient reported outcome measure. The daily score was used to measure changes in swelling within a cycle. Participants answered 5 questions each day that were scored from 0-3 for each item. The daily score consisted of a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 15, the sum of the 5 question answers. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome. The change of the daily angioedema activity score is measured as the average percent reduction in the maximum score over the 3 cycles (about 3 months) after treatment compared to the cycle (about 1 month) pre-treatment. The estimated percent change and its confidence interval was calculated from a quasi-Poisson model. The model estimates a multiplicative treatment effect on the baseline AAS, and that effect is translated into a percent change.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active Treatment
n=5 Participants
Participants with episodic angioedema with eosinophilia (EAE) received mepolizumab 700 mg intravenously monthly for three doses.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent Change in Maximum Daily Angioedema Activity Score (AAS)
|
16.5 Percent change
Interval -64.6 to 57.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month prior to treatment and 1 month after treatmentPopulation: Analysis included all participants
Percent change in peak AEC is measured on each individual as the percentage change in peak AEC in the cycle following the first mepolizumab infusion compared to the peak AEC in the cycle prior to mepolizumab treatment. Those values are summarized by taking the mean of a transformation of each percent change in peak AEC, and back-transforming the results. Specifically, if x is the percent change in peak AEC, then the transformation is log(1-x/100). The estimated percent change and its confidence interval was calculated using the mean of the transformed values and using the associated one-sample t-test confidence interval on that mean, then translating those estimates and confidence intervals back to the percent change scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active Treatment
n=5 Participants
Participants with episodic angioedema with eosinophilia (EAE) received mepolizumab 700 mg intravenously monthly for three doses.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent Change in Peak Absolute Eosinophil Count (AEC)
|
82.2 Percent change
Interval -108.5 to 98.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month prior to treatment and 3 months after treatmentPopulation: 4 of the 5 participants were assessed at visit 8. One participant withdrew prior to visit 8, and we used their values at visit 7.
Percent change in peak AEC is measured on each individual as the percentage change in peak AEC by visit 8 (3 months) compared to the peak AEC in the cycle prior to mepolizumab treatment. Those values are summarized by taking the mean of a transformation of each percent change in peak AEC, and back-transforming the results. Specifically, if x is the percent change in peak AEC, then the transformation is log(1-x/100). The estimated percent change and its confidence interval was calculated using the mean of the transformed values and using the associated one-sample t-test confidence interval on that mean, then translating those estimates and confidence intervals back to the percent change scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active Treatment
n=5 Participants
Participants with episodic angioedema with eosinophilia (EAE) received mepolizumab 700 mg intravenously monthly for three doses.
|
|---|---|
|
Percent Change in Peak Absolute Eosinophil Count (AEC)
|
96.2 Percent change
Interval 71.4 to 99.5
|
Adverse Events
Active Treatment
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Active Treatment
n=5 participants at risk
Participants with episodic angioedema with eosinophilia (EAE) received mepolizumab 700 mg intravenously monthly for three doses.
|
|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
20.0%
1/5 • Up to 12 months
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
20.0%
1/5 • Up to 12 months
|
|
Investigations
Coronavirus test positive
|
40.0%
2/5 • Up to 12 months
|
|
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
|
20.0%
1/5 • Up to 12 months
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
20.0%
1/5 • Up to 12 months
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
20.0%
1/5 • Up to 12 months
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pharyngitis
|
20.0%
1/5 • Up to 12 months
|
Additional Information
Dr. Paneez Khoury
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place