Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
476 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-11-01
2020-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The Pathways Project faculty will work with up to 15 change teams at dialysis centers to create a system to identify seriously ill patients with kidney disease; conduct conversations with them so that their values, preferences, and goals for current and future medical treatment are known and respected; assess and address patients' physical, psychological and spiritual needs; and coordinate care throughout the healthcare system so patients receive only the care they want in settings in which they wish to be.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of Home-Embedded Palliative Care for Hemodialysis- (and Peritoneal-) Dependent End-Stage Renal Disease
NCT06144281
Bringing Care to Patients: Patient-Centered Medical Home for Kidney Disease
NCT02270515
Study of Home-Embedded Palliative Care for Hemodialysis-Dependent End-Stage Renal Disease
NCT05471622
Shared Decision Making and Renal Supportive Care
NCT02405312
An Exercise Facilitator to Activate Simple Training Programs in the Dialysis Center
NCT04282616
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To achieve an overall improvement in aligning treatment with patient values and preferences, satisfaction with care, quality of life, and symptom and pain management, Pathways Project Collaborative teams will embark on an 18-month Collaborative beginning spring 2019. Beginning in May 2019, there will be a 4-month observation period to obtain baseline measurements of current supportive care practices at the participating sites. Through the application of the Pathways Project change package, project teams will enhance the delivery of supportive care processes for patients with kidney disease, specifically through the testing and implementation of shared decision-making and advance care planning; systematically identifying seriously ill patients; and providing palliative dialysis to seriously ill patients with advanced Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) whose goals are not compatible with standard dialysis schedules.
Aim 2: Revise Pathways change package and resources in preparation for dissemination.
In summer 2020, the Pathways Project Advisory Committee, including patient subject matter experts, will revise and strengthen the change package, resources and tools based on the knowledge gained through the Collaborative. The revisions will incorporate the dialysis center/ESCO teams' experience during the collaborative along with the preliminary evaluation results.
Aim 3: Develop strategy for dissemination In fall 2020, the Pathways Project Advisory Committee will develop a strategy to disseminate the revised change package and results of the Collaborative. The dissemination strategy will include outreach to three audiences based on the outcomes of the Pathways Project: 1) the professional and scientific community through presentations at national meetings and articles in peer-reviewed journals; 2) the large dialysis organizations and those who oversee quality of dialysis care including the Forum of ESKD Networks, the individual networks, and the American Health Quality Association; and 3) policy makers including members of Congress and CMS to advocate for changes to improve patient-centered care for patients with kidney disease.
To achieve these aims we will employ three primary tactics:
1. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) Breakthrough Collaborative Model - The Collaborative Model is the primary intervention for this project. It has been used to foster successful change adoption in numerous settings with a variety of health problems.
2. The ESCO Model - ESCO stands for ESKD Seamless Care Organizations. ESCO's are a pilot program conducted by CMS to test value-based payment models for dialysis care. The ESCO program brings together economic incentives and organizational innovation factors to create a fertile field for uptake of innovations in patient- and family-centered care in the kidney care continuum. At least four of the participating dialysis centers are part of ESCO demonstration. Three centers (at American Renal Associates) are part of a similar private initiative to provide an integrated care model for ESKD patients.
3. The Pathways Change Package - Provides an evidence-based set of changes and tools collated from the research literature and experiences and efforts of exemplars and organizations that have already successfully adopted supportive care best practices and shown positive outcomes. Justification for the study: Dialysis patients have significant unmet palliative care needs and arguably are the chronic disease patient population who receive the worst end-of-life care because of high intensity care (intensive care unit admission with frequent cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation and feeding tube use compared to patients with cancer and other chronic diseases) at the end of life with very low referral to hospice. They have a high symptom burden, multiple co-morbid illnesses, and a shortened life expectancy.
Hypothesis: A collaborative quality improvement approach with training of independent dialysis centers and CKD practices in supportive care best practices will lead to improvements in patient and staff-reported outcomes in patient care.
Research Question: Will a collaborative quality improvement approach to spreading supportive care best practices at dialysis centers and affiliated CKD clinics measurably increase the provision of supportive care best practices leading to more effective goal-concordant care?
Relevant background information:
The absence in the United States of a comprehensive medical management without dialysis pathway which is available and selected by about 15% of advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients in other countries is a major deficit in U.S. kidney care. In other ways as well, the current care of patients with advanced CKD in the U.S. is not patient-centered, nor does it utilize supportive care \[i\] approaches to optimize patients' quality of life. The Pathways Project is seeking to address these deficits through the implementation of a Collaborative.
In a 2013 survey of dialysis center staff, only 4.5% of 487 respondents believed they were presently providing high-quality supportive care including at the end-of-life. When asked what one change could most improve supportive care in their dialysis center, the top choice was "guidelines to help with decision making in seriously ill patients." The second most frequently selected choice was the availability of supportive care consultation to patients. With the exception of a few innovative practices, specialty supportive care consultations are not generally available to patients on dialysis. In those places where supportive care consultation is an option for seriously ill patients on dialysis, nephrologists and their teams typically have not been trained in eliciting shared decision-making, communication, and symptom management skills that would help them deliver primary supportive care.
Shared decision-making is a necessary component to informed consent for patients with advanced CKD. The American Society of Nephrology (ASN) has recommended shared decision-making prior to the initiation of dialysis. Despite ASN's recommendation, shared decision-making-the process in which patients and their family collaborate with healthcare providers to develop a care plan and make decisions about treatments based on patient preferences and values as well as the clinical risks and advantages-is poorly integrated into the care of patients with kidney disease. Most nephrologists express lack of comfort in discussing end-of-life issues. Consequently, most patients with CKD and those on dialysis have little awareness of their prognosis.
Patients older than 75 years are the fastest growing segment of the dialysis population, but these patients, especially if they are frail or have co-morbidities, may not experience a survival benefit from dialysis treatment.The current default is to start elderly patients with advanced kidney disease and multiple co-morbid conditions on dialysis irrespective of their prognosis or likelihood of benefit. The symptom burden for patients with advanced CKD is comparable to that for patients on dialysis, and symptoms are under-recognized and under-treated because of lack of nephrology clinician expertise in supportive care.
The symptom burden of patients on dialysis rivals that of those with cancer, and their five-year survival rate is worse. This tremendous suffering leads to staggering rates of voluntary dialysis withdrawal as high as 35% in the oldest groups, yet hospice and supportive care are underutilized. As a result, patients on dialysis are subjected to more aggressive treatment at the end-of-life than patients with other serious illnesses. Most patients die in the hospital and often after intensive procedures including mechanical ventilation, feeding tube placement, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Families of deceased dialysis patients rate the quality of their loved ones' end-of-life care worse than families of those with cancer and other chronic conditions.
There is an urgent need to improve the care of patients with advanced and end stage kidney disease (ESKD). The current situation offers the opportunity to intervene with multiple evidence-based supportive care best practices to transform the care of these seriously ill patients by improving the delivery of supportive care throughout the continuum of kidney disease and making available to seriously ill patients who wish to withdraw from dialysis, delay dialysis, or avoid dialysis, a pathway that offers medical management without dialysis.
\[i\] In surveys of patients and physicians, they prefer the term supportive care over palliative care. The term palliative care will be used to refer to the specialist title of physicians with board certification in hospice and palliative medicine along with specialist palliative care teams and to the practice of "palliative dialysis" which has a particular definition in the literature. Primary supportive care includes basic communication and symptom management skills provided by other than specialty-trained clinicians.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Dialysis Centers - Seriously Ill patients - pre-implementation cohort
Dialysis center patients who screened positive as seriously ill in month 1 of the collaborative activities (the preimplementation period).
No interventions assigned to this group
Dialysis Centers - Seriously Ill patients - post-intervention cohort
Dialysis Center patients who screened positive as seriously ill in month 15 of the intervention (the post-implementation period).
IHI Breakthrough Collaborative Model
Staff teams at participating dialysis centers take part in a quality improvement/collaborative learning model that was initially planned to include three in-person learning sessions, and three activity sessions during which staff teams at each site use quality improvement processes to implement kidney supportive care best practices from the change package. Technical assistance, education, and quality improvement coaching are provided to the site staff teams throughout the project. Patients at the sites then receive care that has been improved via this staff education and quality improvement activities.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
IHI Breakthrough Collaborative Model
Staff teams at participating dialysis centers take part in a quality improvement/collaborative learning model that was initially planned to include three in-person learning sessions, and three activity sessions during which staff teams at each site use quality improvement processes to implement kidney supportive care best practices from the change package. Technical assistance, education, and quality improvement coaching are provided to the site staff teams throughout the project. Patients at the sites then receive care that has been improved via this staff education and quality improvement activities.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Patients at least 18 years old who are currently being treated by participating dialysis center.
2. Dialysis patients identified as "seriously ill" by screening with "surprise question"- a validated tool that identifies patients with elevated mortality risk. The treating nephrologist or nurse practitioner or dialysis nurse answers whether they would be surprised if the patient died in the next 6 months.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients who speak language other than English or Spanish.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
West Virginia University Research Corporation
UNKNOWN
Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
OTHER
Coalition for Supportive Care of Kidney Patients
UNKNOWN
Stanford University
OTHER
George Washington University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dale Lupu
PI
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dale E Lupu, PhD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The George Washington University
Alvin Moss, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
West Virginia University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kidney Center of Arvada
Arvada, Colorado, United States
Thornton Kidney Center
Thornton, Colorado, United States
Kidney Center of Westminster
Westminster, Colorado, United States
George Washington University
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Washington DC VA Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Atlantic Dialysis Astoria
Astoria, New York, United States
Rogosin Institute Auburndale
Flushing, New York, United States
Atlantic Dialysis Newton
Long Island City, New York, United States
Rogosin Institute Manhattan East
New York, New York, United States
Atlantic Dialysis Ridgewood
Ridge, New York, United States
Rogosin Institute Woodside
Woodside, New York, United States
Dallas Nephrology Associates
Dallas, Texas, United States
Desoto Regional Dialysis Center
DeSoto, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lupu DE, Aldous A, Harbert G, Kurella Tamura M, Holdsworth LM, Nicklas A, Vinson B, Moss AH. Pathways Project: Development of a Multimodal Innovation To Improve Kidney Supportive Care in Dialysis Centers. Kidney360. 2020 Nov 23;2(1):114-128. doi: 10.34067/KID.0005892020. eCollection 2021 Jan 28.
Kurella Tamura M, Holdsworth L, Stedman M, Aldous A, Asch SM, Han J, Harbert G, Lorenz KA, Malcolm E, Nicklas A, Moss AH, Lupu DE. Implementation and Effectiveness of a Learning Collaborative to Improve Palliative Care for Seriously Ill Hemodialysis Patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022 Oct;17(10):1495-1505. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00090122. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
Holdsworth LM, Stedman M, Gustafsson ES, Han J, Asch SM, Harbert G, Lorenz KA, Lupu DE, Malcolm E, Moss AH, Nicklas A, Kurella Tamura M. "Diving in the deep-end and swimming": a mixed methods study using normalization process theory to evaluate a learning collaborative approach for the implementation of palliative care practices in hemodialysis centers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 11;23(1):1384. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10360-7.
Moss AH, Harbert G, Aldous A, Anderson E, Nicklas A, Lupu DE. Pathways Project Pragmatic Lessons Learned: Integrating Supportive Care Best Practices into Real-World Kidney Care. Kidney360. 2023 Dec 1;4(12):1738-1751. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000277. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Pathways Project Website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
180679
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.