Prediction on Time to Death in Potential Controlled Donation After Circulatory Death (cDCD) Donors (DCD III Study)

NCT ID: NCT04123275

Last Updated: 2019-10-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

400 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-07-07

Study Completion Date

2018-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A considerable number of potential cDCD donors do not convert into actual organ donors because circulatory arrest does not occur within the predefined timeframe of warm ischemia after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. The main objective of this study is to determine parameters predicting time to death in potential cDCD patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) is a major source of organs for transplantation. Even though there is a well-established cDCD program in the Netherlands, there is still a considerable number of potential donors not being converted into actual organ donors. A potential cDCD donor poses considerable challenges in terms of a) identification of those dying within the predefined timeframe of warm ischemia, after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment to circulatory arrest, b) managing them appropriately within the framework and resources of the intensive care unit, c) dealing with family expectations especially when failure to donation occurs, and d) efficient utilization of the organ procurement teams.

Factors associated with early circulatory collapse after treatment withdrawal include a younger age, non-triggered modes of artificial ventilation, high FiO2, the use of inotropes, and a low arterial pH. Another important factor which could influence the donor potential is end-of-life treatment. The practice of withdrawal of life support treatment (WLST) is highly variable between ICU's and countries. This influences the dying process and can thus have a large influence on the onset of cardio respiratory arrest. There is also wide variation in the use and dosage of additional sedation and analgesia during WLST and controversy exists regarding hastening or slowing down death.

Several attempts have been made to develop models to predict the time between treatment withdrawal and circulatory arrest, as this is crucial to a) proceed with organ donation, and b) the quality of the harvested organs. The selected patients however, where not always restricted to potential candidates for cDCD organ donation as patients with cancer and severe infection were also included.

Objective: Objectives of this study are: a) To determine parameters predicting time to death in potential cDCD patients b) To validate and update previous predicting models on time to death after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. c) To assess variation in withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in the Netherlands and its influence on post mortal organ donor potential and actual post mortal organ donors.

Design and setting: Multicenter, observational, prospective cohort study of all potential cDCD patients of 3 university and 3 teaching hospitals in the Netherlands with diverse focus of attention

Methods: All potential cDCD patients participating in the cDCD protocol as defined by the Dutch Transplant Foundation admitted at the Intensive Care unit, will be included.

Participants: Mechanically ventilated ICU patients aged between 18 to 75 years. Brain dead patients will be excluded.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tissue and Organ Procurement

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

No intervention wil be done. Patient characteristics and the standard care before and after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in all potential cDCD donors, will be studied. .

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* mechanically ventilated patients
* aged between 18 and 75 years old, where further treatment is futile.
* patients should meet the criteria of potential cDCD donors as defined by the Dutch Transplant Foundation

Exclusion Criteria

* non-intubated patients
* younger than 18 years old
* brain dead patients
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Radboud University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Jeroen Bosch Hospital

's-Hertogenbosch, , Netherlands

Site Status

University Medical Center Groningen

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Radboud University Medical Center

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Erasmus Medical Center

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

ETZ

Tilburg, , Netherlands

Site Status

Isala clinics

Zwolle, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kotsopoulos A, Vos P, Witjes M, Volbeda M, Franke H, Epker J, Sonneveld H, Simons K, Bronkhorst E, Mullers R, Jansen N, van der Hoeven H, Abdo WF. Prospective Multicenter Observational Cohort Study on Time to Death in Potential Controlled Donation After Circulatory Death Donors-Development and External Validation of Prediction Models: The DCD III Study. Transplantation. 2022 Sep 1;106(9):1844-1851. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004106. Epub 2022 Mar 8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35266926 (View on PubMed)

Kotsopoulos AMM, Vos P, Jansen NE, Bronkhorst EM, van der Hoeven JG, Abdo WF. Prediction Model for Timing of Death in Potential Donors After Circulatory Death (DCD III): Protocol for a Multicenter Prospective Observational Cohort Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jun 23;9(6):e16733. doi: 10.2196/16733.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32459638 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

nw 2014-36

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

DCN for ECD Livers
NCT06804746 COMPLETED
Delayed Infusion of DCreg in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
NCT04208919 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2
DCreg in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
NCT03164265 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Predicting Mortality in Kidney Transplant Recipients
NCT06531967 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Donor Dopamine and Initial Graft Function
NCT00115115 COMPLETED PHASE4