Validation of a Shared Decision-Making Tool for Multiple Sclerosis
NCT ID: NCT04122989
Last Updated: 2022-05-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
501 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-11-12
2021-12-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Use of Technology to Improve MS Clinical Trials and Patient Care
NCT02454907
Study to Evaluate the Usability and Value of Integrated Digital Solutions in Medical Care of Participants With Multiple Sclerosis
NCT05949580
Traditional Versus Early Aggressive Therapy for Multiple Sclerosis Trial
NCT03500328
Emotion Regulation Skills Training for Individuals With MS and Their Support Partners
NCT03934489
Impact of Disease Modifying Therapies (DMTs) and Associated Support Services in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (RMS) Patients
NCT01601119
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This validation study will evaluate the effect of using MS-SUPPORT on starting or switching DMTs, patient-provider communication, DMT adherence, Quality of Life (QoL), decision quality (the concordance of the treatment chosen, which includes no treatment, with the patient's values), quality of care, and decisional conflict. Participants will include adult patients with relapsing forms of MS and their MS healthcare providers (HCP). Patients will be randomized into one of two groups: MS-SUPPORT (intervention) or Usual Care (control).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MS-SUPPORT
Group receives access to an online shared decision making tool (an interactive decision aid) for multiple sclerosis.
MS-SUPPORT
MS-SUPPORT is a shared decision making tool designed to be used by patients and providers.
Control
Usual care
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MS-SUPPORT
MS-SUPPORT is a shared decision making tool designed to be used by patients and providers.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Live within the United States and receive MS care in the USA
* 18 years or older
* Having a diagnosis of a relapsing form of MS, including Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS), active secondary progressive MS, and Clinically Isolated Syndrome (CIS)
* Having access to the internet
* Having a valid email address
* Have a healthcare provider who is managing their MS
* Having an upcoming appointment with an MS healthcare provider to manage their MS within the next 12 weeks
* English-speaking
* Any HCP who manages a participating patient's MS
Exclusion Criteria
For HCPs:
• Unable or unwilling to give informed consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
EMD Serono
INDUSTRY
Multiple Sclerosis Association of America
UNKNOWN
Shared Decision Making Resources
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nananda Col, MD, MPH, MPP
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Shared Decision Making Resources
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Shared Decision Making Resources
Georgetown, Maine, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Edwards A, Elwyn G, Hood K, Robling M, Atwell C, Holmes-Rovner M, Kinnersley P, Houston H, Russell I. The development of COMRADE--a patient-based outcome measure to evaluate the effectiveness of risk communication and treatment decision making in consultations. Patient Educ Couns. 2003 Jul;50(3):311-22. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00055-7.
Moriarty DG, Zack MM, Kobau R. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Healthy Days Measures - population tracking of perceived physical and mental health over time. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Sep 2;1:37. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-37.
Sepucha KR, Borkhoff CM, Lally J, Levin CA, Matlock DD, Ng CJ, Ropka ME, Stacey D, Joseph-Williams N, Wills CE, Thomson R. Establishing the effectiveness of patient decision aids: key constructs and measurement instruments. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S12. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, Volk R, Edwards A, Coulter A, Thomson R, Barratt A, Barry M, Bernstein S, Butow P, Clarke A, Entwistle V, Feldman-Stewart D, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Moumjid N, Mulley A, Ruland C, Sepucha K, Sykes A, Whelan T; International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ. 2006 Aug 26;333(7565):417. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38926.629329.AE. Epub 2006 Aug 14.
Pieterse AH, de Vries M, Kunneman M, Stiggelbout AM, Feldman-Stewart D. Theory-informed design of values clarification methods: a cognitive psychological perspective on patient health-related decision making. Soc Sci Med. 2013 Jan;77:156-63. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.11.020. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
Reynolds MW, Stephen R, Seaman C, Rajagopalan K. Persistence and adherence to disease modifying drugs among patients with multiple sclerosis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Mar;26(3):663-74. doi: 10.1185/03007990903554257.
Col NF, Solomon AJ, Springmann V, Garbin CP, Ionete C, Pbert L, Alvarez E, Tierman B, Hopson A, Kutz C, Berrios Morales I, Griffin C, Phillips G, Ngo LH. Whose Preferences Matter? A Patient-Centered Approach for Eliciting Treatment Goals. Med Decis Making. 2018 Jan;38(1):44-55. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17724434. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
Col NF, Solomon AJ, Springmann V, Ionete C, Alvarez E, Tierman B, Kutz C, Morales IB, Griffin C, Ngo LH, Jones DE, Phillips G, Hopson A, Pbert L. Evaluation of a Novel Preference Assessment Tool for Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Int J MS Care. 2018 Nov-Dec;20(6):260-267. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2017-021.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MS700568_0052
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.