Communicating With Patients on Cancer Resistance to Treatment: the Development of a Communication Tool. (HECTOR)
NCT ID: NCT04118062
Last Updated: 2025-09-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
128 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-02-02
2024-05-26
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Seeking Informed Consent to Phase I Cancer Clinical Trials: Identifying Oncologists'Communication Styles
NCT00582192
Informational Meetings for Planning and Coordinating Treatment
NCT04330833
An Interactive Empowerment Tool for Breast Cancer Patients
NCT02312700
Identification of Psychosocial Factors Associated With Diagnostic Delay in Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma
NCT04124796
Impact of the Therapeutic Alliance on Reduction of Disparities in Latino End-of-Life Cancer Care
NCT04342611
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
Step 1: Questionnaires and semi-structured individual interviews will : (a) to identify patients' needs and (b) to build the initial contents of the tool, items and issues. Four patients' populations will be recruited in this step : metastatic uveal melanoma, triple negative breast cancer, luminal B breast cancer, and pediatric cancer. This step will be conducted in parallel with these populations.
Step 2 : Focus groups : to evaluate the acceptability and applicability of the tool in this clinical context with expert patients, researchers and clinicians.
Step 3 : The DELPHI consensus method : to validate the contents of the booklet for patients with expert patients, researchers and clinicians.
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Metastatic Uveal Melanoma
Questionnaires and semi-structured individual interviews with patients with Metastatic Uveal Melanoma
Questionnaires
Questionnaires
Semi-structured individual interviews
Semi-structured individual interviews
Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Questionnaires and semi-structured individual interviews with patients with Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Questionnaires
Questionnaires
Semi-structured individual interviews
Semi-structured individual interviews
Luminal B Breast Cancer
Questionnaires and semi-structured individual interviews with patients with Luminal B Breast Cancer
Questionnaires
Questionnaires
Semi-structured individual interviews
Semi-structured individual interviews
Pediatric Cancer
Questionnaires and semi-structured individual interviews with parents of children with cancer.
Questionnaires
Questionnaires
Semi-structured individual interviews
Semi-structured individual interviews
Expert Patients
Focus groups (or group interviews) and DELPHI consensus method with expert patients
Focus Group
Focus Group
DELPHI Consensus Method
DELPHI Consensus Method
Researchers and Clinicians
Focus groups (or group interviews) and DELPHI consensus method with Researchers and Clinicians
Focus Group
Focus Group
DELPHI Consensus Method
DELPHI Consensus Method
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Questionnaires
Questionnaires
Semi-structured individual interviews
Semi-structured individual interviews
Focus Group
Focus Group
DELPHI Consensus Method
DELPHI Consensus Method
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. To be 18 years of age or older ;
2. To have metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) or triple negative or luminal B breast cancer ;
3. To have received the information that the disease is resistant to treatment ;
4. To have read the information and signed the informed consent.
* Parents of a sick child:
1. To be a parent (parental authority holder) of a child with cancer ;
2. To have received the information that the child disease is resistant to treatment ;
3. To have read the information and signed the informed consent.
* Expert patients:
1. To be 18 years of age or older ;
2. To have had cancer (regardless the cancer site) ;
3. To participated to an expert patient training (fine knowledge of the illness, experience with the disease) ;
4. To have read the information and signed the informed consent.
* Professionals:
1. To be an oncologist (medical oncologist, surgeon, radiotherapist, supportive care specialist) and/or to be a researcher in oncology (doctor, biologist, geneticist ...) ;
2. To have patients with a triple-negative or luminal B breast cancer or metastatic uveal melanoma which is resistant to anti-tumor treatments and/or to take part to a research on resistance to cancer treatment;
3. To have read the information and signed the informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
1. To have difficulties in understanding the French language.
2. Have or have had cancer (criteria only for parents);
3. Pregnant woman, likely to be pregnant or breastfeeding (criteria only for patients).
4. Persons deprived of their liberty or under guardianship;
5. Impossibility of study requirements respect for geographical, social or psychological reasons.
* Expert patients:
1. To have difficulties in understanding the French language ;
2. Currently being undergoing anti-tumor treatment.
* Professionals:
1. To have difficulties in understanding the French language ;
2. Not to be confronted in professional practice with resistance to anti-tumor treatments.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Institut Curie
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sylvie DOLBEAULT, PHD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Institut Curie
Anne BREDART, PHD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Institut Curie
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institut Curie
Paris, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rault A, Dolbeault S, Terrasson J, Bouleuc C, Cottu P, Piperno-Neumann S, Rodrigues M, Vaflard P, Bredart A. Facilitating patient-oncologist communication in advanced treatment-resistant cancer: development and feasibility testing of a question prompt list. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Aug 28;10(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01543-y.
Bredart A, Rault A, Terrasson J, Seigneur E, De Koning L, Hess E, Savignoni A, Cottu P, Pierga JY, Piperno-Neumann S, Rodrigues M, Bouleuc C, Dolbeault S. Helping Patients Communicate With Oncologists When Cancer Treatment Resistance Occurs to Develop, Test, and Implement a Patient Communication Aid: Sequential Collaborative Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jan 12;11(1):e26414. doi: 10.2196/26414.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IC 2018-09
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.