The Effect of Magnetic Therapy on Pain Relief in Postoperation Patients
NCT ID: NCT04112745
Last Updated: 2019-10-02
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
UNKNOWN
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
220 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2019-10-01
Study Completion Date
2020-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Using Complementary therapies with conventional treatments to relieve pain can reduce the patient's medical expenses and increase the patient's psychological feeling of self-control of the body. Static magnetic therapy is one of the non-invasive complementary therapies. The aim of this study was to explore the effect of static magnetic therapy on pain relief in hospitalized patients.
In this study, a quasi-experimental design with double-blind randomization method was proposed. 220 inpatients in a teaching hospital in central Taiwan were selected as the research subjects, and divided into experimental group and control group of 110. SPSS software package was used for descriptive and inferential statistical analysis in this study. For descriptive statistical analysis, frequency distribution, percentage, mean, and standard deviation were utilized. Inferential statistical analysis was applied with Chi-square test, Pearson's correlation, t-test, ANOVA, and Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE). The P value of significance level was set less than 0.05.
In this study, a quasi-experimental design with double-blind randomization method was proposed. 220 inpatients in a teaching hospital in central Taiwan were selected as the research subjects, and divided into experimental group and control group of 110. SPSS software package was used for descriptive and inferential statistical analysis in this study. For descriptive statistical analysis, frequency distribution, percentage, mean, and standard deviation were utilized. Inferential statistical analysis was applied with Chi-square test, Pearson's correlation, t-test, ANOVA, and Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE). The P value of significance level was set less than 0.05.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of Magnetic Therapy on Pain Intensity
NCT00104533
Postoperative Pain
COMPLETED
PHASE3
Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Stimulation on DOMS
NCT05554874
Electromagnetic Fields
COMPLETED
NA
Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of a Tele-Rehabilitation Program in the Treatment of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain
NCT04274439
Chronic Pain
UNKNOWN
NA
The Efficacy of Myofascial Chain Release Techniques in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.
NCT05327569
Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome
UNKNOWN
NA
Massage Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT01973010
Low Back Pain
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Research Motivation and Research Issues:
The National Institutes of Health proposed six important strategies for pain management: studying the characteristics and needs of pain populations, prevention and care, identifying barriers and exclusions for pain care, providing individual pain care, professional education and training, and public awareness and communication. 80-100% of surgical patients experienced acute pain after surgery, and about 61-92% of postoperative patients experienced moderate or severe pain, and less than half of patients undergoing surgery showed that postoperative pain were alleviated. In the emergency treatment of musculoskeletal trauma patients, 40.9% of patients received medication. After pain treatment, only 12.5% of patients felt pain relief, and 23% of patients still felt moderate to severe pain when they left the emergency department. When pain is not properly relieved, it will have a negative impact on the patient, including quality of life and recovery of physical function, risk of complications, and even ineffective communication between doctors and patients. Proper pain assessment and care by caregivers can affect the effectiveness of pain relief in patients. Complementary therapy, in combination with conventional medicine, is one of the effective ways to relieve pain by reducing drug and medical costs and increasing the patient's self-care and autonomy. Complementary therapies can be divided into three broad categories: the first is natural products that are ingested through inhalation, external use or oral intake, including herbs, vitamins, minerals and probiotics. The second category is physical and mental interventional therapy, including art therapy, cognitive therapy, prayer, chanting, meditation, and energy complementary therapy, such as magnetic energy therapy. The third category is other categories such as local traditional therapy, Ayurvedic medicine, traditional Chinese medicine, homeopathy and natural remedies.
Magnetic therapy is a form of energy complementary therapy, which is the use of magnetic energy to produce energy for the relief or healing of diseases, usually divided into static magnetic therapy and dynamic electromagnetic therapy. In the implementation of magnetic therapy, there is no invasive treatment of pain and discomfort, no damage, so it is easy to be accepted by the public. The U.S. and Canada spend more than $500 million on static magnetic therapy to relieve pain, and global consumer spending exceeds $5 billion. The magnetic field has the effect of two distinct magnetic poles. The positive magnetic pole effect has the functions of oxidation, activation, excitation and pressure increase, and the negative magnetic pole effect has the functions of reduction, alkalization, relaxation, sedation and pressure resistance. Most of the research literature didn't show magnetic poles.
Therefore, this study focuses on the effect of magnetic complementary therapy on pain relief, in order to explore the magnetic therapy method and effect of pain relief.
Research design:
In this study, we adopted a double-blind randomized research design to investigate the effectiveness of magnetic complementary therapy in relieving pain in hospitalized patients. The outcomes of experimental group and the control group were repeatedly measured. Both groups received routine care and pain relief treatment, but the interventions were different: the participants of experimental group was adhered with magnets, and the control group with placebo.
Participants are randomly assigned to the experimental group and the control group, and the magnets or placebos are placed into the zipper bag and marked with serial numbers 1 to 100. When the cases are conducted in the study, the researchers take out the serial number zipper bag and paste it to the serial number. After the data collection, the researchers will identify the experimental and the control group according to the random table and the study case number.
The intervention materials are pre-packaged. Because the intervention materials (magnet and placebo) look exactly the same, none of the study subjects, the researchers who perform the sticking intervention material, and the physiological indicators monitoring were aware of the study case as an experimental group or a control group.
Interventions are implemented by the personnel including 1. Material assemblers: After a list of random numbers will be calculated by the randomizer, four pieces of magnets or placebos are arranged in each bag according to the random number table. 2. Magnet/placebo adhesion and evaluator: intervention adhesion and assessment of physiological indicators and rhythm variation measurements.
Research steps:
1. Screening for eligible cases.
2. Random assignment to the experimental group and the control group.
3. Pretest data collection: Pretest data collection is performed the day before surgery.
4. Day of surgery: According to the medical records, the researchers fill in the disease characteristics, including the name of the operation, the surgical site, the indwelling of the tube, and the total length of the wound. According to the case number, the magnet or the placebo, is pasted to the corresponding position of the healthy side limb.
5. On the first and second days after surgery, posttest data collection will be performed, including pain sensations: concise pain scale and anxiety scale; physiological indicators assessment and heart rhythm variation assessment.
6. On the 3rd day after surgery, the intervention material will be removed and posttest data will be collected. The researchers use the random table and the case number to identify the experimental and the control group.
Data analysis methods:
The collected quantitative data are encoded and analyzed by SPSS 24.0 statistical software package. According to the research variable attributes, the distributions of the independent variables and the dependent variables are verified by descriptive statistics, including the frequency distribution, percentage, average, and standard deviation. Inferential statistical analysis are applied with Chi-square test, Pearson's correlation, t-test, ANOVA, and Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE). The P value of significance level was set less than 0.05.
The National Institutes of Health proposed six important strategies for pain management: studying the characteristics and needs of pain populations, prevention and care, identifying barriers and exclusions for pain care, providing individual pain care, professional education and training, and public awareness and communication. 80-100% of surgical patients experienced acute pain after surgery, and about 61-92% of postoperative patients experienced moderate or severe pain, and less than half of patients undergoing surgery showed that postoperative pain were alleviated. In the emergency treatment of musculoskeletal trauma patients, 40.9% of patients received medication. After pain treatment, only 12.5% of patients felt pain relief, and 23% of patients still felt moderate to severe pain when they left the emergency department. When pain is not properly relieved, it will have a negative impact on the patient, including quality of life and recovery of physical function, risk of complications, and even ineffective communication between doctors and patients. Proper pain assessment and care by caregivers can affect the effectiveness of pain relief in patients. Complementary therapy, in combination with conventional medicine, is one of the effective ways to relieve pain by reducing drug and medical costs and increasing the patient's self-care and autonomy. Complementary therapies can be divided into three broad categories: the first is natural products that are ingested through inhalation, external use or oral intake, including herbs, vitamins, minerals and probiotics. The second category is physical and mental interventional therapy, including art therapy, cognitive therapy, prayer, chanting, meditation, and energy complementary therapy, such as magnetic energy therapy. The third category is other categories such as local traditional therapy, Ayurvedic medicine, traditional Chinese medicine, homeopathy and natural remedies.
Magnetic therapy is a form of energy complementary therapy, which is the use of magnetic energy to produce energy for the relief or healing of diseases, usually divided into static magnetic therapy and dynamic electromagnetic therapy. In the implementation of magnetic therapy, there is no invasive treatment of pain and discomfort, no damage, so it is easy to be accepted by the public. The U.S. and Canada spend more than $500 million on static magnetic therapy to relieve pain, and global consumer spending exceeds $5 billion. The magnetic field has the effect of two distinct magnetic poles. The positive magnetic pole effect has the functions of oxidation, activation, excitation and pressure increase, and the negative magnetic pole effect has the functions of reduction, alkalization, relaxation, sedation and pressure resistance. Most of the research literature didn't show magnetic poles.
Therefore, this study focuses on the effect of magnetic complementary therapy on pain relief, in order to explore the magnetic therapy method and effect of pain relief.
Research design:
In this study, we adopted a double-blind randomized research design to investigate the effectiveness of magnetic complementary therapy in relieving pain in hospitalized patients. The outcomes of experimental group and the control group were repeatedly measured. Both groups received routine care and pain relief treatment, but the interventions were different: the participants of experimental group was adhered with magnets, and the control group with placebo.
Participants are randomly assigned to the experimental group and the control group, and the magnets or placebos are placed into the zipper bag and marked with serial numbers 1 to 100. When the cases are conducted in the study, the researchers take out the serial number zipper bag and paste it to the serial number. After the data collection, the researchers will identify the experimental and the control group according to the random table and the study case number.
The intervention materials are pre-packaged. Because the intervention materials (magnet and placebo) look exactly the same, none of the study subjects, the researchers who perform the sticking intervention material, and the physiological indicators monitoring were aware of the study case as an experimental group or a control group.
Interventions are implemented by the personnel including 1. Material assemblers: After a list of random numbers will be calculated by the randomizer, four pieces of magnets or placebos are arranged in each bag according to the random number table. 2. Magnet/placebo adhesion and evaluator: intervention adhesion and assessment of physiological indicators and rhythm variation measurements.
Research steps:
1. Screening for eligible cases.
2. Random assignment to the experimental group and the control group.
3. Pretest data collection: Pretest data collection is performed the day before surgery.
4. Day of surgery: According to the medical records, the researchers fill in the disease characteristics, including the name of the operation, the surgical site, the indwelling of the tube, and the total length of the wound. According to the case number, the magnet or the placebo, is pasted to the corresponding position of the healthy side limb.
5. On the first and second days after surgery, posttest data collection will be performed, including pain sensations: concise pain scale and anxiety scale; physiological indicators assessment and heart rhythm variation assessment.
6. On the 3rd day after surgery, the intervention material will be removed and posttest data will be collected. The researchers use the random table and the case number to identify the experimental and the control group.
Data analysis methods:
The collected quantitative data are encoded and analyzed by SPSS 24.0 statistical software package. According to the research variable attributes, the distributions of the independent variables and the dependent variables are verified by descriptive statistics, including the frequency distribution, percentage, average, and standard deviation. Inferential statistical analysis are applied with Chi-square test, Pearson's correlation, t-test, ANOVA, and Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE). The P value of significance level was set less than 0.05.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Surgical Patients
Hospitalized Patients
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
RANDOMIZED
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Primary Study Purpose
TREATMENT
Blinding Strategy
DOUBLE
Participants
Caregivers
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental group
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
Static magnet
Intervention Type
OTHER
Static magnet with 2,000 Gauss
Control group
Group Type
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR
Placebo
Intervention Type
OTHER
Polyvinyl chloride resin material black jewelry
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Static magnet
Static magnet with 2,000 Gauss
Intervention Type
OTHER
Placebo
Polyvinyl chloride resin material black jewelry
Intervention Type
OTHER
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Prepare for surgery for adults.
2. The communicator is clear in Mandarin and Taiwanese.
3. Those who are willing to participate in this study and sign a consent form.
4. The patient has no history of arrhythmia or severe cardiopulmonary disease.
5. No allergies to adhesive fixtures.
2. The communicator is clear in Mandarin and Taiwanese.
3. Those who are willing to participate in this study and sign a consent form.
4. The patient has no history of arrhythmia or severe cardiopulmonary disease.
5. No allergies to adhesive fixtures.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Patients with cancer or chronic pain that lasts for more than 6 months.
2. Those with effects on the accuracy of autonomic nervous system measurements: such as autonomic neuropathy.
3. Patients with excessive anxiety and nervousness who are unable to cooperate with the study.
4. A person who abuses painkillers or narcotic drugs.
5. Patients use electromagnetic medical supplies such as heart rhythms.
2. Those with effects on the accuracy of autonomic nervous system measurements: such as autonomic neuropathy.
3. Patients with excessive anxiety and nervousness who are unable to cooperate with the study.
4. A person who abuses painkillers or narcotic drugs.
5. Patients use electromagnetic medical supplies such as heart rhythms.
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
China Medical University Hospital
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Responsibility Role
SPONSOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Shwn-Huey Shieh, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
China Medical University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
China Medical University
Taichung, , Taiwan
Site Status
RECRUITING
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Taiwan
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Akin-Akinyosoye K, Frowd N, Marshall L, Stocks J, Fernandes GS, Valdes A, McWilliams DF, Zhang W, Doherty M, Ferguson E, Walsh DA. Traits associated with central pain augmentation in the Knee Pain In the Community (KPIC) cohort. Pain. 2018 Jun;159(6):1035-1044. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001183.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Albuquerque WW, Costa RM, Fernandes Tde S, Porto AL. Evidences of the static magnetic field influence on cellular systems. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2016 May;121(1):16-28. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):534-540. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000068822.10113.9E.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Barnes PM, Bloom B, Nahin RL. Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children: United States, 2007. Natl Health Stat Report. 2008 Dec 10;(12):1-23.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Brown CS, Ling FW, Wan JY, Pilla AA. Efficacy of static magnetic field therapy in chronic pelvic pain: a double-blind pilot study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Dec;187(6):1581-7. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.128026.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cepeda MS, Carr DB, Sarquis T, Miranda N, Garcia RJ, Zarate C. Static magnetic therapy does not decrease pain or opioid requirements: a randomized double-blind trial. Anesth Analg. 2007 Feb;104(2):290-4. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000230613.25754.08.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Chou R, Gordon DB, de Leon-Casasola OA, Rosenberg JM, Bickler S, Brennan T, Carter T, Cassidy CL, Chittenden EH, Degenhardt E, Griffith S, Manworren R, McCarberg B, Montgomery R, Murphy J, Perkal MF, Suresh S, Sluka K, Strassels S, Thirlby R, Viscusi E, Walco GA, Warner L, Weisman SJ, Wu CL. Management of Postoperative Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American Pain Society, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' Committee on Regional Anesthesia, Executive Committee, and Administrative Council. J Pain. 2016 Feb;17(2):131-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.12.008.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cowen SL, Phelps CE, Navratilova E, McKinzie DL, Okun A, Husain O, Gleason SD, Witkin JM, Porreca F. Chronic pain impairs cognitive flexibility and engages novel learning strategies in rats. Pain. 2018 Jul;159(7):1403-1412. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001226.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
de Heer EW, Ten Have M, van Marwijk HWJ, Dekker J, de Graaf R, Beekman ATF, van der Feltz-Cornelis CM. Pain as a risk factor for common mental disorders. Results from the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2: a longitudinal, population-based study. Pain. 2018 Apr;159(4):712-718. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001133.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Eccles NK. A critical review of randomized controlled trials of static magnets for pain relief. J Altern Complement Med. 2005 Jun;11(3):495-509. doi: 10.1089/acm.2005.11.495.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Eghbali MEKR, Abazari P. Patients' viewpoints concerning post-surgical pain management. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 11(2), 2010
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gan TJ, Habib AS, Miller TE, White W, Apfelbaum JL. Incidence, patient satisfaction, and perceptions of post-surgical pain: results from a US national survey. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Jan;30(1):149-60. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.860019. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Haghighi MJ, Shahdadi H, Moghadam MP, Balouchi A. The Impact of Evidence-Based Practices on Postoperative Pain in Patients undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery in Amiralmomenin Hospital in Zabol During 2014-2015. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jul;10(7):IC01-IC04. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/20961.8119. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hashimoto Y, Kawasumi M, Saito M. Effect of static magnetic field on cell migration. Electrical Engineering in Japan, 160(2), 46-52, 2007
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hussain A, Erdek M. Interventional pain management for failed back surgery syndrome. Pain Pract. 2014 Jan;14(1):64-78. doi: 10.1111/papr.12035. Epub 2013 Feb 3.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Jaberi FM, Keshtgar S, Tavakkoli A, Pishva E, Geramizadeh B, Tanideh N, Jaberi MM. A moderate-intensity static magnetic field enhances repair of cartilage damage in rabbits. Arch Med Res. 2011 May;42(4):268-73. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2011.06.004.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kotani H, Kawaguchi H, Shimoaka T, Iwasaka M, Ueno S, Ozawa H, Nakamura K, Hoshi K. Strong static magnetic field stimulates bone formation to a definite orientation in vitro and in vivo. J Bone Miner Res. 2002 Oct;17(10):1814-21. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.10.1814.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lyle DB, Fuchs TA, Casamento JP, Davis CC, Swicord ML. Intracellular calcium signaling by Jurkat T-lymphocytes exposed to a 60 Hz magnetic field. Bioelectromagnetics. 1997;18(6):439-45. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1521-186x(1997)18:63.0.co;2-3.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Meulders A, Boddez Y, Blanco F, Van Den Houte M, Vlaeyen JWS. Reduced selective learning in patients with fibromyalgia vs healthy controls. Pain. 2018 Jul;159(7):1268-1276. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001207.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Mogilner AY. Quality and cost-effectiveness of interventional pain procedures: minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MILD) as a paradigm? Pain Med. 2013 May;14(5):613-4. doi: 10.1111/pme.12140. Epub 2013 May 10. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Munn Z, Moola S, Riitano D, Lisy K. The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2014 Aug 13;3(3):123-8. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.71. eCollection 2014 Aug.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Nettina SM, Msn A-B, Nettina SM. Lippincott manual of nursing practice: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2013
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Pierik JG, IJzerman MJ, Gaakeer MI, Berben SA, van Eenennaam FL, van Vugt AB, Doggen CJ. Pain management in the emergency chain: the use and effectiveness of pain management in patients with acute musculoskeletal pain. Pain Med. 2015 May;16(5):970-84. doi: 10.1111/pme.12668. Epub 2014 Dec 28.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ross SM. Combined DC and ELF magnetic fields can alter cell proliferation. Bioelectromagnetics. 1990;11(1):27-36. doi: 10.1002/bem.2250110105.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Sakurai T, Terashima S, Miyakoshi J. Enhanced secretion of prostaglandin E2 from osteoblasts by exposure to a strong static magnetic field. Bioelectromagnetics. 2008 May;29(4):277-83. doi: 10.1002/bem.20392.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Salomonowitz G, Friedrich M, Guntert BJ. [Medical relevance of magnetic fields in pain therapy]. Schmerz. 2011 Apr;25(2):157-60, 162-5. doi: 10.1007/s00482-010-1005-0. German.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Sieber FE, Barnett SR. Preventing postoperative complications in the elderly. Anesthesiol Clin. 2011 Mar;29(1):83-97. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2010.11.011. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Simon LS. Relieving pain in America: A blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research. Journal of pain & palliative care pharmacotherapy, 26(2), 197-198, 2012
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Stochkendahl MJ, Sorensen J, Vach W, Christensen HW, Hoilund-Carlsen PF, Hartvigsen J. Cost-effectiveness of chiropractic care versus self-management in patients with musculoskeletal chest pain. Open Heart. 2016 May 4;3(1):e000334. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000334. eCollection 2016.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Waxman SG, Cummins TR, Dib-Hajj SD, Black JA. Voltage-gated sodium channels and the molecular pathogenesis of pain: a review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000 Sep-Oct;37(5):517-28.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Weintraub MI, Wolfe GI, Barohn RA, Cole SP, Parry GJ, Hayat G, Cohen JA, Page JC, Bromberg MB, Schwartz SL; Magnetic Research Group. Static magnetic field therapy for symptomatic diabetic neuropathy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 May;84(5):736-46. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00106-0.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CMUH108-REC2-092
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
A Clinical Study on the Efficacy of Cognitive Distraction Focus Relaxation Therapy Based on MR
NCT06290011
RECRUITING
Comparing the Effect of Physical Therapy With Oral Appliance on Temporomandibular Disorder Related Myofascial Pain
NCT01725867
COMPLETED
NA
Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field on Autonomic Function in Patients With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain
NCT01944917
UNKNOWN
High-induction Magnetic Field Therapy in Patients With Shoulder Pain
NCT06116981
COMPLETED
NA
Double-Blind Placebo Study on Magnetic Field Therapy in Chronic Lumbar Pain
NCT00407615
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
Effectiveness of Photobiomodulation and Manual Therapy Alone or Combined in TMD Patients
NCT03454581
COMPLETED
PHASE2
Nocipoint Therapy Versus Standard Physical Therapy Using Electrical Stimulation in Treating Pain From TMJ Disorder
NCT01676129
UNKNOWN
NA
Efficacy of Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation Compare to Dry Needling in Myofascial Pain Syndrome
NCT05320601
COMPLETED
NA
Efficacy Study of Acupuncture to Treat the Upper Abdominal Pain of Cancer Patients
NCT01913574
COMPLETED
NA
Myofascial Pain and Central Sensitization
NCT04929171
COMPLETED
Magnets in the Treatment of Sciatica
NCT00044109
COMPLETED
PHASE2
Study on Magnetic Field Therapy to Improve Quality of Sleep and Reduction of Chronic Spine Pain
NCT00445133
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
Effects of Thai Massage on EMG
NCT02067325
COMPLETED
NA
Effects of Home-based Surface Electrical Stimulation for Patients with Cervical Myofascial Pain Syndrome
NCT05972837
RECRUITING
NA
The Effect of Percussion Massage Therapy on the Recovery of DOMS in Physically Active Young Men Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness = DOMS
NCT06612502
COMPLETED
NA
Diamagnetic Therapy in Pain and Inflammation
NCT06844552
RECRUITING
Effects of Traditional Thai Massage on Pain and Pain Related Parameters in Patients With Upper Back Pain
NCT02067312
COMPLETED
NA
Effectiveness of Self-myofascial Release Combined With Biofeedback and Electrical Stimulation for the Management of MFPP
NCT04746352
COMPLETED
NA
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and/or Neurofunctional Electrical Acupuncture in Myofascial Chronic Pain Patients
NCT02381171
UNKNOWN
NA
Effectiveness Verification of a Smartphone-based System for Assessment and Health Care on Myofascial Pain Syndrome
NCT06379269
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Effectiveness of Acupuncture for Cyclical Mastalgia （CM）
NCT05408377
RECRUITING
NA
High Intensity Focused Electromagnetic Therapy on Pain and Quality of Life in Patients With Lumbar Disc Prolapse
NCT07278596
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
The Impact of Myofascial Therapy on Connective Tissue
NCT06950541
COMPLETED
NA
Intelligent Moxibustion Robot in the Treatment of Low Back Pain
NCT05704127
UNKNOWN
NA