Efficacy of Metamizole Versus Ibuprofen and a Short Educational Intervention Versus Standard Care in Acute Low Back Pain
NCT ID: NCT04111315
Last Updated: 2024-02-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE4
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-12-15
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ibuprofen With or Without Acetaminophen for Low Back Pain
NCT03554018
Efficacy and Safety of S (+) - Ibuprofen in the Treatment of Mechanical Low Back Pain
NCT04772781
A Comparison of NSAIDs for Acute, Non-radicular Low Back Pain.
NCT03861611
Magnesium Oral Supplementation for Acute Non-specific Low Back Pain
NCT04626063
Ibuprofen With or Without Dexamethasone for Acute Radicular Low Back Pain.
NCT05721027
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are considered to be effective for LBP and recommended by guidelines. However, adverse events including kidney injury and gastrointestinal bleeding, limit the use of NSAIDs in many patients. Metamizole is an effective non-opioid analgesic and antipyretic with a favorable gastrointestinal and renal safety profile and therefore, a valuable treatment option in many LBP patients with contraindications for NSAIDs. Metamizole has been increasingly used in many countries such as Germany, France, Spain, and Switzerland. Despite its increased use, the role of metamizole for the treatment of LBP is unclear and has so far not been systematically studied. This surprising lack of efficacy data may be due to an ongoing controversy over the risk of metamizole-associated agranulocytosis, a serious hematological adverse event. Even though the overall risk of agranulocytosis is increased compared to other drugs, it only occurs in a small proportion of susceptible patients and the overall safety profile of metamizole is still favorable compared to other analgesics such as NSAIDs or opioids, which carry their own specific risks.
Many patients have reservations against regular intake of pain medication and limit physical activity to keep pain manageable without medication, which is against the guidelines' recommendation. However, education to encourage activity may help to improve pain control and function as well. In a busy primary care practice extended educational sessions that have been shown to be effective are not feasible. A short educational intervention that provides evidence-based information on the nature of LBP and promotes physical activity may also improve outcome.
Objectives This study aims to assess (A) whether metamizole is non-inferior to ibuprofen in a new episode of acute or subacute LBP and (B) whether a short educational intervention including evidence-based patient information is superior to usual care alone.
Methods The EMISI trial is a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial (RCT) using a factorial design recruiting patients consulting general practitioners (GP) practices and the outpatient Division of the Department of General Internal Medicine at the University Hospital Bern, Switzerland. Patients are randomized into one of four groups (1:1:1:1): metamizole + educational intervention vs. metamizole + standard care vs. ibuprofen + educational intervention vs. ibuprofen + standard care. Patients assigned to the educational information will receive an information leaflet and a phone call by a member of the research team to discuss evidence based information on LBP. All patients will receive usual care provided by their GPs that includes additional pain medications and non-pharmacological measures at the GPs discretion.
The primary outcome (A) Comparison of ibuprofen vs. metamizole: change from baseline pain on the numeric rating scale (NRS) to day 14 (non-inferiority).
B) Comparison of the short intervention vs. usual care: change from baseline Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) sum-score to 42 days follow-up (superiority).
Statistical analysis Analysis will include an intention-to-treat (ITT) and a per-protocol (PP) analysis for the comparison of the primary between metamizole and ibuprofen outcome (NRS change from baseline to follow-up at 14 days). Both analyses need to meet non-inferiority in order to claim success. The comparison of the primary outcome between the intervention and the usual care group (COMI change from baseline to day 42) will be performed according to intention-to-treat principle. Based on the sample size calculation for both interventions, 120 patients will be included into the study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
metamizole + educational intervention
(A) Metamizole (Novalgin® Oblong tablets 0,5 g) orally three times daily 2 capsules for 4 days followed by an as needed regimen (days 4 - 42). The treatment duration will depend on the duration of pain. Patients are considered to be recovered when their pain is below 2 (NRS 0-10) on 2 consecutive days after they stopped the pain medication (end of treatment).
(B) Educational short intervention: patients receive two leaflets with information non-specific LBP and exercises to alleviate LBP. Further, patients receive a 10-minute standardized telephone intervention during the first 4 treatment days.
Metamizole Sodium
Novalgin® Oblong tablets 0,5 g 2-2-2
Patient education
Leaflet and phone call
metamizole + standard care
(A) Metamizole (Novalgin® Oblong tablets 0,5 g) orally three times daily 2 capsules for 4 days followed by an as needed regimen (days 4 - 42). The treatment duration will depend on the duration of pain. Patients are considered to be recovered when their pain is below 2 (NRS 0-10) on 2 consecutive days after they stopped the pain medication (end of treatment).
(B) Standard care will be prescribed by the GP.
Metamizole Sodium
Novalgin® Oblong tablets 0,5 g 2-2-2
ibuprofen + educational intervention
(A) Ibuprofen (Ibufen-L® tablets 500 mg) orally three times daily 2 capsules for 4 days followed by an as needed regimen (days 4 - 42). The treatment duration will depend on the duration of pain. Patients are considered to be recovered when their pain is below 2 (NRS 0-10) on 2 consecutive days after they stopped the pain medication (end of treatment).
(B) Educational short intervention: patients receive two leaflets with information non-specific LBP and exercises to alleviate LBP. Further, patients receive a 10-minute standardized telephone intervention during the first 4 treatment days.
Ibuprofen 600 mg
Ibufen-L® tablets 500 mg 2-2-2
Patient education
Leaflet and phone call
ibuprofen + standard care
(A) Ibuprofen (Ibufen-L® tablets 500 mg) orally three times daily 2 capsules for 4 days followed by an as needed regimen (days 4 - 42). The treatment duration will depend on the duration of pain. Patients are considered to be recovered when their pain is below 2 (NRS 0-10) on 2 consecutive days after they stopped the pain medication (end of treatment).
(B) Standard care will be prescribed by the GP.
Ibuprofen 600 mg
Ibufen-L® tablets 500 mg 2-2-2
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Metamizole Sodium
Novalgin® Oblong tablets 0,5 g 2-2-2
Ibuprofen 600 mg
Ibufen-L® tablets 500 mg 2-2-2
Patient education
Leaflet and phone call
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 18 years or older
* Seeking care for new onset of non-specific or specific LBP (pain duration of less than 12 weeks LBP prior to the baseline visit)
* The GP plans to prescribe a non-opioid pain medication for pain control
Exclusion Criteria
* Active malignancy and / or history of a (previous) hematologic disorder (anemia (hemoglobin \< 10.0 g/L), neutropenia or agranulocytosis, thrombocytopenia),
* Known contraindications against the study medications: heart failure (NYHA III-IV), liver failure (liver cirrhosis, ascites), renal insufficiency (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 60 ml/min/1,73 m2) or previous acute kidney injury (AKI stage 2 according to the KDIGO definition), previous gastrointestinal ulcer, inflammatory bowel disease.
* Immune deficiency or under immunosuppressant treatment
* Current use of opioids
* Known intolerance to the study medication (i.e. previous acute allergic reaction to the study medication)
* Patients unable or unwilling to follow instructions or do not speak and are unable to read / understand German
* Patients unable to provide informed consent themselves
* Known or suspected non-compliance, drug or alcohol abuse
* Inability to follow study procedures, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc.
* Participation in another study within the 30 days preceding the randomization and during the present study or previous enrolment into the current study
* Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons
* Pregnancy: In women in the child bearing age a negative pregnancy test (urine or blood test as available in the primary care practice) before inclusion is required. Women who are not willing to use safe contraception (condom or birth control pill) during the course of the trial, intention to become pregnant during the trial, pregnancy, or breast feeding
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Maria M. Wertli, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Bern
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Bern
Bern, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wertli MM, Flury JS, Streit S, Limacher A, Schuler V, Ferrante AN, Rimensberger C, Haschke M. Efficacy of metamizole versus ibuprofen and a short educational intervention versus standard care in acute and subacute low back pain: a study protocol of a randomised, multicentre, factorial trial (EMISI trial). BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 13;11(10):e048531. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048531.
Jermini-Gianinazzi I, Blum M, Trachsel M, Trippolini MA, Tochtermann N, Rimensberger C, Liechti FD, Wertli MM. Management of acute non-specific low back pain in the emergency department: do emergency physicians follow the guidelines? Results of a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 4;13(8):e071893. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071893.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2018-01986
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.