Paracervical Injection for Headache in the Emergency Department

NCT ID: NCT04109885

Last Updated: 2024-08-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

19 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-15

Study Completion Date

2024-01-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Headache is one of the most common presenting complaints in the emergency department.1 By the time patients with benign headaches present for treatment in the ED, they often have exhausted non-invasive treatments, and physicians are left with few therapeutic options. The investigators therefore propose to study the use of paracervical injection as a novel approach to managing headache in the emergency department. This procedure has great potential, if efficacious, to provide a safe, rapidly effective, non-sedating treatment for headache that does not involve intravenous line placement and systemic medication administration. To date, there are no published trials that evaluate this technique in this setting. The investigators intend to compare the efficacy of paracervical injection to standard first-line therapy (intravenous prochlorperazine and diphenhydramine) for the treatment of benign headache of any etiology in the emergency department.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Headache is one of the most common presenting complaints in the emergency department.1 By the time patients with benign headaches present for treatment in the ED, they often have exhausted non-invasive treatments, and physicians are left with few therapeutic options.

Amongst the array of medications used by physicians to manage benign headache, dopamine antagonists have demonstrated the best efficacy in trials. A number of studies have demonstrated the efficacy of dopamine antagonists in treating migraine, tension, cluster-type, and other benign headaches2,3 Dopamine antagonists have shown superiority over opioids4, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs5, triptans6, and anti-epileptics7. Prochlorperazine is probably the most studied and most commonly clinically utilized in this regard in the ED setting.

Despite the preponderance of evidence supporting the use of dopamine antagonists as first-line therapeutic agents in the ED management of benign headache, more than half of the 1.2 million patients treated in U.S. emergency departments for acute migraine are treated with opioids despite the known risks and recommendations to the contrary.12 In addition, there is tremendous variation in the medications chosen by ED physicians for managing benign headache.13 Most of these regimens involve administration of systemic medications that have considerable side effect profiles. Moreover, many of these headache cocktails require prolonged durations of treatment with sedative side effects. This results in prolonged ED lengths of stay that occupy valuable bed space in increasingly busy and crowded emergency departments.

A less well-known approach to managing benign headache is bilateral, paracervical, intramuscular injection of a long-acting anesthetic. The mechanism of action is not entirely understood, however it is postulated to involve neuronal pathways in the trigeminocervical complex thought to play a central role in headache physiology. This is similar in concept to the mechanism proposed for the occipital nerve blocks performed by neurologists.

Paracervical injection was first described by Mellick et al.8 This method has the advantage of ease of administration, favorable safety profile, lack of need for intravenous access, lack of sedative side effects, and swiftness of therapeutic response. In Mellick's case series, he treated 417 patients who presented with all manner of benign headaches with a 65% rate of complete relief of pain and a 20% rate of partial relief. Many patients had rapid relief of headache within 5 minutes and the remainder in less than 30 minutes. This study was limited by possible selection bias, given it is unclear why the specific patients enrolled were chosen for this treatment. The study was also limited by its observational nature and lack of a control group.

In recent years this procedure has gained popularity amongst emergency physicians, and it has been widely discussed in emergency medicine blogs and podcasts. Numerous online videos demonstrate the ease with which the procedure is performed by physicians and tolerated by patients. Many physicians have called for clinical trials to assess its efficacy.

The investigators therefore propose to study the use of paracervical injection as a novel approach to managing headache in the emergency department. This procedure has great potential, if efficacious, to provide a safe, rapidly effective, non-sedating treatment for headache that does not involve intravenous line placement and systemic medication administration. To date, there are no published trials that evaluate this technique in this setting. The investigators intend to compare the efficacy of paracervical injection to standard first-line therapy (intravenous prochlorperazine and diphenhydramine) for the treatment of benign headache of any etiology in the emergency department.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Headache Disorders, Primary Pain Management Emergency Department

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Paracervical injection

1.5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine will be will be injected bilaterally in the paraspinal musculature of the cervical spine.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Paracervical injection

Intervention Type DRUG

1.5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine will be will be injected bilaterally in the paraspinal musculature of the cervical spine.

Standard treatment

Intravenous administration of prochlorperazine and diphenhydramine.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

prochlorperazine and diphenhydramine.(Standard Treatment)

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous administration of prochlorperazine and diphenhydramine.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Paracervical injection

1.5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine will be will be injected bilaterally in the paraspinal musculature of the cervical spine.

Intervention Type DRUG

prochlorperazine and diphenhydramine.(Standard Treatment)

Intravenous administration of prochlorperazine and diphenhydramine.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 to 64 years
* Suspected diagnosis of benign or primary headache

Exclusion Criteria

* Treating attending physician is suspicious of a serious secondary cause of headache
* History of brain disease, concussion, stroke, intracranial mass or tumor, hemorrhage, increased intracranial pressure, head trauma in last 2 weeks, status post intracranial surgery
* History of neck disease, cervical spine or disc abnormality, history of vertebral or carotid artery dissection, torticollis, status post cervical spine surgery or hardware in place
* Hypersensitivity or allergy to bupivacaine (amide anesthetics) or prochlorperazine (dopamine receptor antagonists)
* Overlying signs of infection at site of injection (erythema, purulence, open skin)
* History of extrapyramidal symptoms, dystonia, parkinsonism, tardive dyskinesia or neuroleptic malignant syndrome
* Pregnancy
* History of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder
* Narcotic seeking patients as determined by the treating attending physician with optional assistance from medical record and online database review
* Weight more than 150 kg or less than 40 kg
* Received pain medication in the ED or less than 6 hours prior to enrollment
* Temperature greater than 38 degrees Celcius
* Previous enrollment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

64 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Christian Fromm, MD

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Christian Fromm, MD

Director of Clinical Trials

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Christian Fromm, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Einstein Healthcare Network

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Albert Einstein Medical Center

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2019-173

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Occipital Blocks for Acute Migraine
NCT03526874 COMPLETED PHASE3