Accessory Pathway Antegrade Effective Refractory Period Among WPW Patients: the Risk in Relation to the Location

NCT ID: NCT04106622

Last Updated: 2020-01-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

35 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-03-01

Study Completion Date

2023-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To correlate the antegrade effective refractory period of the accessory pathway with its anatomical location in the heart.

To investigate whether the accessory pathway location can predict the high risk nature of the accessory pathway

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Wolf-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome is a clinical entity characterized by the presence of ≥1 accessory pathways between the atria and the ventricles pre-disposing patients to arrhythmias. Anterograde conduction through the accessory pathway leads to preexcitation of the ventricles and a delta wave in the ECG. The prevalence of preexcitation in the general population has been estimated to be 1 to 3 in 1000 individuals. Although most asymptomatic patients with pre-excitation have a good prognosis, there is also a lifetime risk of malignant arrhythmias and SCD, estimated to be 0.1 % per patient year.

* More worrisome is the fact that this event can be the first manifestation of the disease in up to 53 % of patients.
* Atrial fibrillation (AF) can be a life-threatening arrhythmia in the WPW syndrome if the AV AP has a short anterograde refractory period (RP), allowing too many atrial impulses to be conducted to the ventricle.
* This will result in very high ventricular rates with possible deterioration into ventricular fibrillation (VF) and sudden death.
* Parameters proved to indicate high risk AP include AP effective refractory period \<240 ms, shortest preexcited RR interval \<250 ms
* Certain Locations were thought to be associated with higher risk of the accessory pathway like Septal localization which was significantly more frequent in patients with VF when compared with individuals with no VF but the overall number of patients is limited . .

These debatable relations between AP location and its risk stratification was not extensively studied in larger scale studies….

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Wolff Parkinson White patients

The investigators will decide the location of the AP by:

\- Invasively: if the patient is subjected to (EPS)

• There are different locations of AP To assess whether the AP is of high risk or not, for all patients the Antegrade refractory period of the APAERP of the AP will be determined by one of the following ways: ( AERP) is measured during EPS as the shortest cycle length with one-to-one conduction over the AP by incremental atrial stimulation after which the QRS becomes narrow or no conduction occurs due to block of the impulse in the AP. The shortest pre-excited R-R interval (SPERRI) during spontaneous or induced AF.

The AERP and the risk category of the AP according to its value, will be recorded in relation to the site of the AP determined in every case and compared between different accessory Locations to see whether some of these positions are more liable to be of higher risk or there is no differerence between different positions.

electrophysiological study

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

To assess whether the AP is of high risk or not, for all patients the AERP of the AP will be determined by one of the following ways:

The cycle length at which abrupt and complete loss of pre-excitation occurs during exercise test. If this didn't happen, the patient will be subjected to invasive electrophysiologic study..

The Antegrade refractory period of the AP is measured during EPS as the shortest cycle length with one-to-one conduction over the AP by incremental atrial stimulation after which the QRS becomes narrow or no conduction occurs due to block of the impulse in the AP.

The shortest pre-excited R-R interval during spontaneous or induced AF.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

electrophysiological study

To assess whether the AP is of high risk or not, for all patients the AERP of the AP will be determined by one of the following ways:

The cycle length at which abrupt and complete loss of pre-excitation occurs during exercise test. If this didn't happen, the patient will be subjected to invasive electrophysiologic study..

The Antegrade refractory period of the AP is measured during EPS as the shortest cycle length with one-to-one conduction over the AP by incremental atrial stimulation after which the QRS becomes narrow or no conduction occurs due to block of the impulse in the AP.

The shortest pre-excited R-R interval during spontaneous or induced AF.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

all patients with WPW admitted to Assuit university hospital and subjected to invasive EPS

Exclusion Criteria

1. heart failure
2. cardiomyopathy
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohamed Khairy Ibrahim

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

M K Ibrahim, Msc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assiut University

S S Atta, Professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Assiut University

S M Taha, Lecturer

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Assiut University

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

M K Ibrahim, Msc

Role: CONTACT

1152453334 ext. +20

Study Documents

Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.

Document Type: Pubmed

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

WPW syndrome

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ventricular Tachycardia Mechanisms
NCT05478213 RECRUITING NA
Clinical Cohort Study - TRUST
NCT05521451 RECRUITING