The Use of PRP and BMC in Patients With Internal Disc Disruption Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial in Patients With Internal Disc Disruption
NCT ID: NCT04102761
Last Updated: 2021-08-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
45 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-03-27
2020-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Bone Marrow Concentrate (BMC) Injection in Intervertebral Discs
NCT04559295
Bone Marrow Concentrate Intradiscal Injection for Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain
NCT03340818
Injection of Autologous Bone Marrow Aspirate in Patients With Degenerative Disc Disease.
NCT05146583
Platelet-rich Plasma for Low Back Pain
NCT03197415
Efficacy of Intradiscal Injection of BM-MSC in Subjects With Chronic Low Back Pain (LBP) Due to Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) Unresponsive
NCT03737461
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
If the investigators can demonstrate statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in study's primary and secondary outcome measures, this study will have identified a natural, effective and sustainable treatment for discogenic back pain that currently accounts for the highest level of disability in US. This will help guide physicians in the choice of care between surgical and conservative treatment options when treating patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Trigger Point Needling
The first group will receive a deep trigger point injection of saline into deep tissue.
Intradiscal PRP & BMC Injections
The intervention to be studied is the intradiscal delivery of autologous Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) or bone marrow concentrate (BMC) into the nucleus pulposus of the disrupted disc(s).
Platelet Rich Plasma Injection
The Platelet Rich Plasma group will receive an injection of approximately 1-2 mL of Platelet Rich Plasma into the painful disc/discs.
Intradiscal PRP & BMC Injections
The intervention to be studied is the intradiscal delivery of autologous Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) or bone marrow concentrate (BMC) into the nucleus pulposus of the disrupted disc(s).
Bone Marrow Aspirate Injection
The third group will receive an injection of approximately 1-2 mL of Bone Marrow Concentrate into the painful disc/discs.
Intradiscal PRP & BMC Injections
The intervention to be studied is the intradiscal delivery of autologous Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) or bone marrow concentrate (BMC) into the nucleus pulposus of the disrupted disc(s).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intradiscal PRP & BMC Injections
The intervention to be studied is the intradiscal delivery of autologous Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) or bone marrow concentrate (BMC) into the nucleus pulposus of the disrupted disc(s).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age greater than 18 and less than 70 years
* Maintained intervertebral disc heights of at least 50%
* Pain not generated from facet joints, sacro-iliac joints or any pathology other than discogenic origin.
* Pain is not responsive to conservative treatment measures (oral medications, epidural steroid injections, physical therapy)
* Pain persists for an extended period of time (i.e., at least 3 months)
* High intensity zone (HIZ) in annular fissure detected on T2 or STIR MRI, degenerated discs or contained disc protrusions.
* No evidence of contraindications to undergo procedure such as pregnancy, active infection, bleeding disorder, or metastatic cancer
* English speaking
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient refusal
* Presence of a known bleeding disorder
* Pregnancy
* Systemic or local infection
* Presence of an unstable medical or psychiatric condition
* Prior intradiscal procedure (ie. IDET, Nucleoplasty)
* Inaccessibility to discs such as fusion
* Non-English speaking
* Prior fusion surgery
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Andrews Research & Education Foundation
OTHER
Annu Navani
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Annu Navani
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Annu Navani, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Comprehensive Spine & Sports Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Alex Hames
Campbell, California, United States
The Orthohealing Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Texas Spine and Joint Hospital
Tyler, Texas, United States
Nexus Pain Care
Provo, Utah, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mehra M, Hill K, Nicholl D, Schadrack J. The burden of chronic low back pain with and without a neuropathic component: a healthcare resource use and cost analysis. J Med Econ. 2012;15(2):245-52. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.642090. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
Zhang YG, Guo TM, Guo X, Wu SX. Clinical diagnosis for discogenic low back pain. Int J Biol Sci. 2009 Oct 13;5(7):647-58. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.5.647.
Omlor GW, Nerlich AG, Tirlapur UK, Urban JP, Guehring T. Loss of notochordal cell phenotype in 3D-cell cultures: implications for disc physiology and disc repair. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Dec;134(12):1673-81. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2097-2. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
Konttinen YT, Kemppinen P, Li TF, Waris E, Pihlajamaki H, Sorsa T, Takagi M, Santavirta S, Schultz GS, Humphreys-Beher MG. Transforming and epidermal growth factors in degenerated intervertebral discs. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999 Nov;81(6):1058-63. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.81b6.9321.
Wang SZ, Chang Q, Lu J, Wang C. Growth factors and platelet-rich plasma: promising biological strategies for early intervertebral disc degeneration. Int Orthop. 2015 May;39(5):927-34. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2664-8. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
Tolonen J, Gronblad M, Vanharanta H, Virri J, Guyer RD, Rytomaa T, Karaharju EO. Growth factor expression in degenerated intervertebral disc tissue. An immunohistochemical analysis of transforming growth factor beta, fibroblast growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor. Eur Spine J. 2006 May;15(5):588-96. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0930-6. Epub 2005 Jun 25.
Fujita N, Imai J, Suzuki T, Yamada M, Ninomiya K, Miyamoto K, Iwasaki R, Morioka H, Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Watanabe S, Suda T, Toyama Y, Miyamoto T. Vascular endothelial growth factor-A is a survival factor for nucleus pulposus cells in the intervertebral disc. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008 Jul 25;372(2):367-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.05.044. Epub 2008 May 19.
Civinini R, Macera A, Nistri L, Redl B, Innocenti M. The use of autologous blood-derived growth factors in bone regeneration. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2011 Jan;8(1):25-31.
Anitua E, Andia I, Ardanza B, Nurden P, Nurden AT. Autologous platelets as a source of proteins for healing and tissue regeneration. Thromb Haemost. 2004 Jan;91(1):4-15. doi: 10.1160/TH03-07-0440.
Hoogendoorn RJ, Lu ZF, Kroeze RJ, Bank RA, Wuisman PI, Helder MN. Adipose stem cells for intervertebral disc regeneration: current status and concepts for the future. J Cell Mol Med. 2008 Dec;12(6A):2205-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00291.x. Epub 2008 Feb 24.
Masuda K, Oegema TR Jr, An HS. Growth factors and treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Dec 1;29(23):2757-69. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000146048.14946.af.
Pirvu TN, Schroeder JE, Peroglio M, Verrier S, Kaplan L, Richards RG, Alini M, Grad S. Platelet-rich plasma induces annulus fibrosus cell proliferation and matrix production. Eur Spine J. 2014 Apr;23(4):745-53. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3198-x. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
Tuakli-Wosornu YA, Terry A, Boachie-Adjei K, Harrison JR, Gribbin CK, LaSalle EE, Nguyen JT, Solomon JL, Lutz GE. Lumbar Intradiskal Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Injections: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study. PM R. 2016 Jan;8(1):1-10; quiz 10. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.08.010. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
Pettine KA, Murphy MB, Suzuki RK, Sand TT. Percutaneous injection of autologous bone marrow concentrate cells significantly reduces lumbar discogenic pain through 12 months. Stem Cells. 2015 Jan;33(1):146-56. doi: 10.1002/stem.1845.
Pauza KJ, Howell S, Dreyfuss P, Peloza JH, Dawson K, Bogduk N. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of intradiscal electrothermal therapy for the treatment of discogenic low back pain. Spine J. 2004 Jan-Feb;4(1):27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.07.001.
Boswell MV, Trescot AM, Datta S, Schultz DM, Hansen HC, Abdi S, Sehgal N, Shah RV, Singh V, Benyamin RM, Patel VB, Buenaventura RM, Colson JD, Cordner HJ, Epter RS, Jasper JF, Dunbar EE, Atluri SL, Bowman RC, Deer TR, Swicegood JR, Staats PS, Smith HS, Burton AW, Kloth DS, Giordano J, Manchikanti L; American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians. Interventional techniques: evidence-based practice guidelines in the management of chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician. 2007 Jan;10(1):7-111.
Slosar PJ, Reynolds JB, Schofferman J, Goldthwaite N, White AH, Keaney D. Patient satisfaction after circumferential lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Mar 15;25(6):722-6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200003150-00012.
Hedlund R, Johansson C, Hagg O, Fritzell P, Tullberg T; Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. The long-term outcome of lumbar fusion in the Swedish lumbar spine study. Spine J. 2016 May;16(5):579-87. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.08.065. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
Lee JJ, Lee MK, Kim JE, Kim HZ, Park SH, Tae JH, Choi SS. Pain relief scale is more highly correlated with numerical rating scale than with visual analogue scale in chronic pain patients. Pain Physician. 2015 Mar-Apr;18(2):E195-200.
Frost H, Lamb SE, Stewart-Brown S. Responsiveness of a patient specific outcome measure compared with the Oswestry Disability Index v2.1 and Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire for patients with subacute and chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Oct 15;33(22):2450-7; discussion 2458. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818916fd.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
N003R113
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.