Trial Outcomes & Findings for PCI Treatment/Gemcitabine & Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy Alone in Patients With Inoperable Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer (NCT NCT04099888)
NCT ID: NCT04099888
Last Updated: 2023-09-11
Results Overview
From date of randomisation to date of objective disease progression or death, whichever comes first (in months)
TERMINATED
PHASE2
41 participants
Up to 18 months
2023-09-11
Participant Flow
Of the 41 enrolled participants, all met inclusion criteria and were randomized and included in the intent-to-great (ITT) analysis set.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
PCI Treatment in Conjunction With Standard of Care (SoC)
Arm A: Fimaporfin-induced photochemical internalisation (PCI) of gemcitabine complemented by gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Fimaporfin and Gemcitabine: PCI treatment consists of IV administration of Amphinex solution for injection (investigational product) at 0.22 mg/kg dose of fimaporfin, followed 4 days later by a standard dose of gemcitabine infusion (1000 mg/m²) and intraluminal laser light application. Up to 2 PCI treatments will be given.
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
Standard of Care (SoC)
Arm B: Gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
21
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
21
|
20
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
PCI Treatment in Conjunction With Standard of Care (SoC)
Arm A: Fimaporfin-induced photochemical internalisation (PCI) of gemcitabine complemented by gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Fimaporfin and Gemcitabine: PCI treatment consists of IV administration of Amphinex solution for injection (investigational product) at 0.22 mg/kg dose of fimaporfin, followed 4 days later by a standard dose of gemcitabine infusion (1000 mg/m²) and intraluminal laser light application. Up to 2 PCI treatments will be given.
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
Standard of Care (SoC)
Arm B: Gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Study terminated by sponsor
|
9
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
5
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
5
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
PCI Treatment/Gemcitabine & Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy Alone in Patients With Inoperable Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
PCI Treatment in Conjunction With Standard of Care (SoC)
n=21 Participants
Arm A: Fimaporfin-induced photochemical internalisation (PCI) of gemcitabine complemented by gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy. Length of cycle is 3 weeks with PCI treatment at Day 1.
Fimaporfin and Gemcitabine: PCI treatment consists of IV administration of Amphinex solution for injection (investigational product) at 0.22 mg/kg dose of fimaporfin, followed 4 days later by a standard dose of gemcitabine infusion (1000 mg/m²) and intraluminal laser light application. Up to 2 PCI treatments will be given.
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
Standard of Care (SoC)
n=20 Participants
Arm B: Gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy. Length of cycle is 3 weeks.
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
Total
n=41 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
68.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.30 • n=5 Participants
|
64.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.43 • n=7 Participants
|
66.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.61 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
<50 years of age
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
50 to <65 years of age
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>=65 years of age
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 18 monthsPopulation: Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis set (all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and had a RECIST assessment at baseline).
From date of randomisation to date of objective disease progression or death, whichever comes first (in months)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PCI Treatment in Conjunction With Standard of Care (SoC)
n=19 Participants
Arm A: Fimaporfin-induced photochemical internalisation (PCI) of gemcitabine complemented by gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Fimaporfin and Gemcitabine: PCI treatment consists of IV administration of Amphinex solution for injection (investigational product) at 0.22 mg/kg dose of fimaporfin, followed 4 days later by a standard dose of gemcitabine infusion (1000 mg/m²) and intraluminal laser light application. Up to 2 PCI treatments will be given.
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
Standard of Care (SoC)
n=15 Participants
Arm B: Gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
|
7.29 Months
Interval 6.0 to 12.0
|
8.08 Months
Interval 6.0 to 12.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 24 monthsPopulation: Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis set (all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and had a RECIST assessment at baseline).
From date of randomisation to date of death from any cause (in months)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PCI Treatment in Conjunction With Standard of Care (SoC)
n=19 Participants
Arm A: Fimaporfin-induced photochemical internalisation (PCI) of gemcitabine complemented by gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Fimaporfin and Gemcitabine: PCI treatment consists of IV administration of Amphinex solution for injection (investigational product) at 0.22 mg/kg dose of fimaporfin, followed 4 days later by a standard dose of gemcitabine infusion (1000 mg/m²) and intraluminal laser light application. Up to 2 PCI treatments will be given.
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
Standard of Care (SoC)
n=15 Participants
Arm B: Gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival (OS)
|
12 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 18 monthsPopulation: Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis set (all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and had a RECIST assessment at baseline).
Best response recorded from start of treatment until disease progression/recurrence (according to RECIST 1.1)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PCI Treatment in Conjunction With Standard of Care (SoC)
n=19 Participants
Arm A: Fimaporfin-induced photochemical internalisation (PCI) of gemcitabine complemented by gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Fimaporfin and Gemcitabine: PCI treatment consists of IV administration of Amphinex solution for injection (investigational product) at 0.22 mg/kg dose of fimaporfin, followed 4 days later by a standard dose of gemcitabine infusion (1000 mg/m²) and intraluminal laser light application. Up to 2 PCI treatments will be given.
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
Standard of Care (SoC)
n=15 Participants
Arm B: Gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Best Overall Response (BOR)
Complete response
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Best Overall Response (BOR)
Partial response
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Best Overall Response (BOR)
Stable disease
|
12 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Best Overall Response (BOR)
Progressive disease
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 18 monthsPopulation: Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis set (all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and had a RECIST assessment at baseline).
Proportion of patients with measurable disease at baseline who have at least one visit response with a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) noted (according to RECIST 1.1)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PCI Treatment in Conjunction With Standard of Care (SoC)
n=19 Participants
Arm A: Fimaporfin-induced photochemical internalisation (PCI) of gemcitabine complemented by gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Fimaporfin and Gemcitabine: PCI treatment consists of IV administration of Amphinex solution for injection (investigational product) at 0.22 mg/kg dose of fimaporfin, followed 4 days later by a standard dose of gemcitabine infusion (1000 mg/m²) and intraluminal laser light application. Up to 2 PCI treatments will be given.
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
Standard of Care (SoC)
n=15 Participants
Arm B: Gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 24 monthsFrom first documented tumour response until first documented disease progression, or death in the absence of disease progression (in months)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PCI Treatment in Conjunction With Standard of Care (SoC)
n=3 Participants
Arm A: Fimaporfin-induced photochemical internalisation (PCI) of gemcitabine complemented by gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Fimaporfin and Gemcitabine: PCI treatment consists of IV administration of Amphinex solution for injection (investigational product) at 0.22 mg/kg dose of fimaporfin, followed 4 days later by a standard dose of gemcitabine infusion (1000 mg/m²) and intraluminal laser light application. Up to 2 PCI treatments will be given.
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
Standard of Care (SoC)
n=3 Participants
Arm B: Gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Response (DoR)
Patient A
|
169 Days
|
NA Days
Patient enrolled in Arm A: PCI treatment in conjunction with Standard of Care (SoC)
|
|
Duration of Response (DoR)
Patient B
|
260 Days
|
NA Days
Patient enrolled in Arm A: PCI treatment in conjunction with Standard of Care (SoC)
|
|
Duration of Response (DoR)
Patient C
|
264 Days
|
NA Days
Patient enrolled in Arm A: PCI treatment in conjunction with Standard of Care (SoC)
|
|
Duration of Response (DoR)
Patient D
|
NA Days
Patient enrolled in Arm B: Standard of Care (SoC)
|
85 Days
|
|
Duration of Response (DoR)
Patient E
|
NA Days
Patient enrolled in Arm B: Standard of Care (SoC)
|
1 Days
|
|
Duration of Response (DoR)
Patient F
|
NA Days
Patient enrolled in Arm B: Standard of Care (SoC)
|
1 Days
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months and 12 monthsPopulation: Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis set (all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and had a RECIST assessment at baseline).
Proportion of patients with BOR of CR, PR or stable disease (SD) (according to RECIST 1.1) at or after the first follow-up scan, partial response or complete response
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PCI Treatment in Conjunction With Standard of Care (SoC)
n=19 Participants
Arm A: Fimaporfin-induced photochemical internalisation (PCI) of gemcitabine complemented by gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Fimaporfin and Gemcitabine: PCI treatment consists of IV administration of Amphinex solution for injection (investigational product) at 0.22 mg/kg dose of fimaporfin, followed 4 days later by a standard dose of gemcitabine infusion (1000 mg/m²) and intraluminal laser light application. Up to 2 PCI treatments will be given.
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
Standard of Care (SoC)
n=15 Participants
Arm B: Gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Overall Disease Control Rate
|
15 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Overall Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Disease Control Rate at 6 Months
|
11 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 18 monthsPopulation: Only patients with measurable disease at baseline are included in this summary.
Best overall percentage change in tumour size from baseline
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PCI Treatment in Conjunction With Standard of Care (SoC)
n=17 Participants
Arm A: Fimaporfin-induced photochemical internalisation (PCI) of gemcitabine complemented by gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Fimaporfin and Gemcitabine: PCI treatment consists of IV administration of Amphinex solution for injection (investigational product) at 0.22 mg/kg dose of fimaporfin, followed 4 days later by a standard dose of gemcitabine infusion (1000 mg/m²) and intraluminal laser light application. Up to 2 PCI treatments will be given.
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
Standard of Care (SoC)
n=11 Participants
Arm B: Gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Tumor Size
|
-12.06 Percentage Change in Tumor Size
Standard Deviation 28.008
|
-14.73 Percentage Change in Tumor Size
Standard Deviation 16.377
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 12 monthsFrequency and severity of loco-regional tumour related events and biliary complications
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PCI Treatment in Conjunction With Standard of Care (SoC)
n=18 Participants
Arm A: Fimaporfin-induced photochemical internalisation (PCI) of gemcitabine complemented by gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Fimaporfin and Gemcitabine: PCI treatment consists of IV administration of Amphinex solution for injection (investigational product) at 0.22 mg/kg dose of fimaporfin, followed 4 days later by a standard dose of gemcitabine infusion (1000 mg/m²) and intraluminal laser light application. Up to 2 PCI treatments will be given.
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
Standard of Care (SoC)
n=16 Participants
Arm B: Gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Loco-regional Tumour-related Events and Biliary Complications
|
12 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 12 monthsNumber and proportion of patients with AEs/SAEs
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PCI Treatment in Conjunction With Standard of Care (SoC)
n=18 Participants
Arm A: Fimaporfin-induced photochemical internalisation (PCI) of gemcitabine complemented by gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Fimaporfin and Gemcitabine: PCI treatment consists of IV administration of Amphinex solution for injection (investigational product) at 0.22 mg/kg dose of fimaporfin, followed 4 days later by a standard dose of gemcitabine infusion (1000 mg/m²) and intraluminal laser light application. Up to 2 PCI treatments will be given.
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
Standard of Care (SoC)
n=16 Participants
Arm B: Gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Adverse Events (AEs)/Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
|
12 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Time Frame AUC calculated from time zero to C5-D8 (3 months from the first PCI treatment)Population: AUC was calculated for each single patient and not for the population since the study was terminated and the amount of data was limited. No mean and standard deviation was calculated for the population
A non-compartmental analysis (NCA) was applied on the data. AUC from time zero to the last measured concentration (AUC 0-t) was initially estimated by the linear trapezoidal method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PCI Treatment in Conjunction With Standard of Care (SoC)
n=13 Participants
Arm A: Fimaporfin-induced photochemical internalisation (PCI) of gemcitabine complemented by gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Fimaporfin and Gemcitabine: PCI treatment consists of IV administration of Amphinex solution for injection (investigational product) at 0.22 mg/kg dose of fimaporfin, followed 4 days later by a standard dose of gemcitabine infusion (1000 mg/m²) and intraluminal laser light application. Up to 2 PCI treatments will be given.
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
Standard of Care (SoC)
Arm B: Gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
101-01 1st dose
|
1017672 (ng/ml)*hrs
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
101-01 2nd dose
|
1399905 (ng/ml)*hrs
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
101-02
|
385730 (ng/ml)*hrs
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
101-03 1st dose
|
576835 (ng/ml)*hrs
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
101-03 2nd dose
|
600546 (ng/ml)*hrs
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
106-01 1st dose (No samples taken before 90 hrs, therefore AUC values is likely underestimated)
|
677373 (ng/ml)*hrs
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
106-01 2nd dose
|
874614 (ng/ml)*hrs
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
111-02 1st dose
|
492274 (ng/ml)*hrs
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
111-02 2nd dose
|
NA (ng/ml)*hrs
One data point was measured post injection and AUC could not be calculated.
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
181-06 1st dose
|
566460 (ng/ml)*hrs
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
181-06 2nd dose
|
NA (ng/ml)*hrs
Three data points was measured post injection. Two samples were measured in the distribution phase (30 min, 4 hours) , and only one sample was measured in the elimination phase (96 hours), AUC could therefore not be calculated.
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
183-03 1st dose
|
751771 (ng/ml)*hrs
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
183-03 2nd dose
|
475001 (ng/ml)*hrs
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
183-03 3rd dose
|
646845 (ng/ml)*hrs
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
187-02 1st dose
|
709053 (ng/ml)*hrs
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
187-02 2nd dose
|
383882 (ng/ml)*hrs
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
192-01
|
805049 (ng/ml)*hrs
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
303-01 1st dose
|
434347 (ng/ml)*hrs
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
303-01 2nd dose
|
NA (ng/ml)*hrs
The interval between the two first measured samples post injection was too long to calculate AUC. No samples were measured between 30 min and approximately 7 weeks.
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
303-02 1st dose
|
681663 (ng/ml)*hrs
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
303-02 2nd dose
|
730864 (ng/ml)*hrs
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
401-01
|
521326 (ng/ml)*hrs
|
—
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Curve (AUC) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
501-01
|
549955 (ng/ml)*hrs
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Timepoints for pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling: Day -4 (before, 30m and 4hrs after Amphinex), C1-D1, C1-D8, C2-D8, C3-D8, C4-D8, C4-D18 (before, 30m and 4hrs after Amphinex), C5-D1, and C5-D8Population: Maximum observed concentration (Cmax) was performed for patients in arm A.
A non-compartmental analysis (NCA) was applied on the data.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PCI Treatment in Conjunction With Standard of Care (SoC)
n=13 Participants
Arm A: Fimaporfin-induced photochemical internalisation (PCI) of gemcitabine complemented by gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Fimaporfin and Gemcitabine: PCI treatment consists of IV administration of Amphinex solution for injection (investigational product) at 0.22 mg/kg dose of fimaporfin, followed 4 days later by a standard dose of gemcitabine infusion (1000 mg/m²) and intraluminal laser light application. Up to 2 PCI treatments will be given.
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
Standard of Care (SoC)
Arm B: Gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
101-01 1st dose
|
2462 ng/ml
|
—
|
|
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
101-01 2nd dose
|
2377 ng/ml
|
—
|
|
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
101-02
|
2631 ng/ml
|
—
|
|
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
101-03 1st dose
|
2495 ng/ml
|
—
|
|
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
101-03 2nd dose
|
3172 ng/ml
|
—
|
|
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
106-01 1st dose (No samples taken before 90 hrs, Cmax value likely underestimated)
|
800 ng/ml
|
—
|
|
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
106-01 2nd dose
|
2923 ng/ml
|
—
|
|
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
111-02 1st dose
|
2221 ng/ml
|
—
|
|
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
111-02 2nd dose
|
3255 ng/ml
|
—
|
|
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
181-06 1st dose (No sample at 30 minutes, Cmax is likely underestimated)
|
1427 ng/ml
|
—
|
|
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
181-06 2nd dose
|
2321 ng/ml
|
—
|
|
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
183-03 1st dose
|
2624 ng/ml
|
—
|
|
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
183-03 2nd dose
|
2187 ng/ml
|
—
|
|
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
183-03 3rd dose
|
2571 ng/ml
|
—
|
|
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
187-02 1st dose
|
2750 ng/ml
|
—
|
|
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
187-02 2nd dose
|
1937 ng/ml
|
—
|
|
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
192-01
|
2017 ng/ml
|
—
|
|
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
303-01 1st dose
|
2606 ng/ml
|
—
|
|
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
303-01 2nd dose
|
1848 ng/ml
|
—
|
|
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
303-02 1st dose
|
2868 ng/ml
|
—
|
|
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
303-02 2nd dose
|
3124 ng/ml
|
—
|
|
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
401-01
|
2912 ng/ml
|
—
|
|
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
501-01
|
2300 ng/ml
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Timepoints for PK sampling: Day -4 (before, 30 min and 4 hours after Amphinex), C1-D1, C1-D8, C2-D8, C3-D8, C4-D8, C4-D18 (before, 30 min and 4 hours after Amphinex) , C5-D1, and C5-D8Population: A standard non-compartmental PK analysis (NCA) of bioanalytical data from 13 patients dosed with fimaporfin was performed for the RELEASE study.
A non-compartmental analysis (NCA) was applied on the data as described by Gabrielsson \& Weiner (Methods in molecular biology, 929:161-180, 2012).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PCI Treatment in Conjunction With Standard of Care (SoC)
n=13 Participants
Arm A: Fimaporfin-induced photochemical internalisation (PCI) of gemcitabine complemented by gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Fimaporfin and Gemcitabine: PCI treatment consists of IV administration of Amphinex solution for injection (investigational product) at 0.22 mg/kg dose of fimaporfin, followed 4 days later by a standard dose of gemcitabine infusion (1000 mg/m²) and intraluminal laser light application. Up to 2 PCI treatments will be given.
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
Standard of Care (SoC)
Arm B: Gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Cmax (Tmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
401-01
|
0.50 hours
|
—
|
|
Time to Cmax (Tmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
501-01
|
0.50 hours
|
—
|
|
Time to Cmax (Tmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
101-01 1st dose
|
0.50 hours
|
—
|
|
Time to Cmax (Tmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
101-01 2nd dose
|
0.50 hours
|
—
|
|
Time to Cmax (Tmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
101-02
|
0.50 hours
|
—
|
|
Time to Cmax (Tmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
101-03 1st dose
|
0.50 hours
|
—
|
|
Time to Cmax (Tmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
101-03 2nd dose
|
0.50 hours
|
—
|
|
Time to Cmax (Tmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
106-01 1st dose (No samples taken before 90 hrs, erroneous data)
|
90 hours
|
—
|
|
Time to Cmax (Tmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
106-01 2nd dose
|
0.50 hours
|
—
|
|
Time to Cmax (Tmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
111-02 1st dose
|
0.50 hours
|
—
|
|
Time to Cmax (Tmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
111-02 2nd dose
|
0.50 hours
|
—
|
|
Time to Cmax (Tmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
181-06 1st dose (No sample at 30 minutes)
|
4 hours
|
—
|
|
Time to Cmax (Tmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
181-06 2nd dose
|
0.50 hours
|
—
|
|
Time to Cmax (Tmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
183-03 1st dose
|
0.50 hours
|
—
|
|
Time to Cmax (Tmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
183-03 2nd dose
|
0.50 hours
|
—
|
|
Time to Cmax (Tmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
183-03 3rd dose
|
0.50 hours
|
—
|
|
Time to Cmax (Tmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
187-02 1st dose
|
0.50 hours
|
—
|
|
Time to Cmax (Tmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
187-02 2nd dose
|
0.50 hours
|
—
|
|
Time to Cmax (Tmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
192-01
|
0.50 hours
|
—
|
|
Time to Cmax (Tmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
303-01 1st dose
|
0.50 hours
|
—
|
|
Time to Cmax (Tmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
303-01 2nd dose
|
0.50 hours
|
—
|
|
Time to Cmax (Tmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
303-02 1st dose
|
0.50 hours
|
—
|
|
Time to Cmax (Tmax) Was Performed for Patients in Arm A.
303-02 2nd dose
|
0.50 hours
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 18 monthsPopulation: The RELEASE study did not collect QoL data.
QoL assessment. Patients select one of four answers to 22 questions ranging from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Lower total scores indicate a more favorable QoL perception than a higher score.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
PCI Treatment in Conjunction With Standard of Care (SoC)
Standard of Care (SoC)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
PCI Treatment in Conjunction With Standard of Care (SoC)
n=18 participants at risk
Arm A: Fimaporfin-induced photochemical internalisation (PCI) of gemcitabine complemented by gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Fimaporfin and Gemcitabine: PCI treatment consists of IV administration of Amphinex solution for injection (investigational product) at 0.22 mg/kg dose of fimaporfin, followed 4 days later by a standard dose of gemcitabine infusion (1000 mg/m²) and intraluminal laser light application. Up to 2 PCI treatments will be given.
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
Standard of Care (SoC)
n=16 participants at risk
Arm B: Gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Duodenal ulcer
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis acute
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Transaminases increased
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholangitis
|
33.3%
6/18 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
18.8%
3/16 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholangitis acute
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
12.5%
2/16 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Biliary obstruction
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Biliary tract infection
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cholangitis infective
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Product Issues
Stent malfunction
|
11.1%
2/18 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Product Issues
Device occlusion
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Aortic stenosis
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Aortic thrombosis
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Tumour necrosis
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Toxic encephalopathy
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia aspiration
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary oedema
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
PCI Treatment in Conjunction With Standard of Care (SoC)
n=18 participants at risk
Arm A: Fimaporfin-induced photochemical internalisation (PCI) of gemcitabine complemented by gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Fimaporfin and Gemcitabine: PCI treatment consists of IV administration of Amphinex solution for injection (investigational product) at 0.22 mg/kg dose of fimaporfin, followed 4 days later by a standard dose of gemcitabine infusion (1000 mg/m²) and intraluminal laser light application. Up to 2 PCI treatments will be given.
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
Standard of Care (SoC)
n=16 participants at risk
Arm B: Gemcitabine/cisplatin chemotherapy
Gemcitabine/Cisplatin chemotherapy: Up to 8 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin combination chemotherapy will be administered.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal disorders
|
55.6%
10/18 • Number of events 30 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
75.0%
12/16 • Number of events 35 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
General disorders
General disorders and administration site conditions
|
50.0%
9/18 • Number of events 13 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
50.0%
8/16 • Number of events 13 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Investigations
Investigations
|
33.3%
6/18 • Number of events 45 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 10 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
18.8%
3/16 • Number of events 12 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatobiliary disorders
|
22.2%
4/18 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
18.8%
3/16 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
|
44.4%
8/18 • Number of events 16 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
18.8%
3/16 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
|
16.7%
3/18 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
37.5%
6/16 • Number of events 7 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infections and infestations
|
27.8%
5/18 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Nervous system disorders
|
33.3%
6/18 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
|
22.2%
4/18 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
25.0%
4/16 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Product Issues
Product issues
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal and urinary disorders
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
18.8%
3/16 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Vascular disorders
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye disorders
|
11.1%
2/18 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Psychiatric disorders
|
11.1%
2/18 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
12.5%
2/16 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac disorders
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
0.00%
0/16 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear and labyrinth disorders
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were monitored/assessed during chemotherapy, an average of 128.3 days (range 28 to 203 days). All-Cause Mortality was monitored/assessed up to 24 months.
A total of 41 participants were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set, with 34 participants being included in the safety analysis set (18 in Arm A and 16 in Arm B) and 34 participants being included in the mITT analysis set (19 in Arm A and 15 in Arm B). The difference in the number of participants in each arm between the safety analysis set and the mITT is due to 1 participant who was randomized to Arm A but received Arm B treatment.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place