Trial Outcomes & Findings for Working to Implement and Sustain Digital Outcome Measures (NCT NCT04096274)
NCT ID: NCT04096274
Last Updated: 2024-02-20
Results Overview
Fidelity to the OQ-A will be measured by using electronic meta-data from the OQ-A system combined with caregiver reported information on the number of sessions the youth attended. For each youth, a fidelity index will be generated that represents the product of two quantities: (a) the youth's completion rate (i.e., number of measures administered relative to the number of sessions attended within the 6-month observation period), and (b) the youth's viewing rate (i.e., the number of feedback reports viewed by the clinician relative to the number of measures administered). Note that this product is equivalent to the ratio of viewed feedback reports to total sessions; it represents an events/trials proportion. MBC fidelity index scores summarize the level of MBC fidelity experienced by each youth (range=0-1). Higher scores indicate the youth experienced greater fidelity to MBC.
COMPLETED
NA
686 participants
0-6 months after youth's baseline/ entry into treatment
2024-02-20
Participant Flow
Data were only collected from caregivers of youth who received services at participating clinics. Caregivers reported on youth's mental health service experiences and outcomes. Consequently, started and completed numbers shown below only reflect caregivers of eligible youth who participated in services (i.e., number of caregivers enrolled). Youths were not enrolled.
Unit of analysis: Clinics
Participant milestones
| Measure |
LOCI (Intervention)
In clinics assigned to the LOCI condition, executives and first-level leaders will receive leadership training and coaching to support implementation of the OQ-A system. In addition, leaders and clinicians in this condition will receive training and technical assistance to implement the OQ-A measurement-based care system.
Leadership for Organization Change and Implementation (LOCI) is a multicomponent implementation strategy that engages organizational executives and first-level leaders (i.e., those who administratively supervise clinicians) to build an organizational climate to support the implementation of a focal evidence-based practice (EBP) with fidelity. In this study, the focal EBP is the OQ-A system. LOCI includes two overarching components: (1) monthly organizational strategy meetings between executives and LOCI consultants/trainers to develop and embed policies, procedures, and practices that support implementation of a focal EBP, and (2) training and coaching for first-level leaders, to develop their skills in leading implementation. The aim of these components is to develop an organizational implementation climate in which clinicians' perceive that use of the OQ-A with high fidelity is expected, supported, and rewarded.
Training and Technical Assistance: All leaders and clinicians in participating clinics will receive standardized OQ-A training and technical assistance provided by the OQ-A purveyor organization.
|
Training and Technical Assistance Only (Control)
In clinics assigned to the control group, leaders and clinicians will receive training and technical assistance to implement the OQ-A measurement-based care system. In addition, to support enrollment in this condition, leaders in this condition will be offered access to general web-based leadership seminars.
Training and Technical Assistance Only: All leaders and clinicians in participating clinics will receive standardized OQ-A training and technical assistance provided by the OQ-A purveyor organization. This includes an initial, 6-hr, in-person OQ-A training; two, live, virtual, 1-hr booster trainings, offered 3 and 5 months after the initial training; and, year-round technical assistance from the OQ-A purveyor organization. Technical assistance includes virtual training sessions, online library of training videos, and customer care representative for technical support.
In addition, to encourage participation in the study, a set of four 1-hr, web-based general leadership seminars will be offered to leaders in the control condition. These will cover topics ranging from effective leadership, to giving effective feedback.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Phase I
STARTED
|
117 11
|
117 10
|
|
Phase I
COMPLETED
|
112 10
|
112 8
|
|
Phase I
NOT COMPLETED
|
5 1
|
5 2
|
|
Phase II
STARTED
|
269 11
|
183 8
|
|
Phase II
COMPLETED
|
258 10
|
172 8
|
|
Phase II
NOT COMPLETED
|
11 1
|
11 0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
LOCI (Intervention)
In clinics assigned to the LOCI condition, executives and first-level leaders will receive leadership training and coaching to support implementation of the OQ-A system. In addition, leaders and clinicians in this condition will receive training and technical assistance to implement the OQ-A measurement-based care system.
Leadership for Organization Change and Implementation (LOCI) is a multicomponent implementation strategy that engages organizational executives and first-level leaders (i.e., those who administratively supervise clinicians) to build an organizational climate to support the implementation of a focal evidence-based practice (EBP) with fidelity. In this study, the focal EBP is the OQ-A system. LOCI includes two overarching components: (1) monthly organizational strategy meetings between executives and LOCI consultants/trainers to develop and embed policies, procedures, and practices that support implementation of a focal EBP, and (2) training and coaching for first-level leaders, to develop their skills in leading implementation. The aim of these components is to develop an organizational implementation climate in which clinicians' perceive that use of the OQ-A with high fidelity is expected, supported, and rewarded.
Training and Technical Assistance: All leaders and clinicians in participating clinics will receive standardized OQ-A training and technical assistance provided by the OQ-A purveyor organization.
|
Training and Technical Assistance Only (Control)
In clinics assigned to the control group, leaders and clinicians will receive training and technical assistance to implement the OQ-A measurement-based care system. In addition, to support enrollment in this condition, leaders in this condition will be offered access to general web-based leadership seminars.
Training and Technical Assistance Only: All leaders and clinicians in participating clinics will receive standardized OQ-A training and technical assistance provided by the OQ-A purveyor organization. This includes an initial, 6-hr, in-person OQ-A training; two, live, virtual, 1-hr booster trainings, offered 3 and 5 months after the initial training; and, year-round technical assistance from the OQ-A purveyor organization. Technical assistance includes virtual training sessions, online library of training videos, and customer care representative for technical support.
In addition, to encourage participation in the study, a set of four 1-hr, web-based general leadership seminars will be offered to leaders in the control condition. These will cover topics ranging from effective leadership, to giving effective feedback.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Phase I
Lost to Follow-up
|
5
|
5
|
|
Phase II
Lost to Follow-up
|
11
|
11
|
Baseline Characteristics
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
LOCI (Intervention)
n=386 Participants
The Leadership for Organization Change and Implementation (LOCI) strategy is a multicomponent implementation strategy that engages organizational executives and first-level leaders (i.e., those who administratively supervise clinicians) to build an organizational climate to support the implementation of a focal evidence-based practice (EBP) with fidelity. In this study, the focal EBP is the OQ-A system. LOCI includes two overarching components: (1) monthly organizational strategy meetings between executives and LOCI consultants/trainers to develop and embed policies, procedures, and practices that support implementation of a focal EBP, and (2) training and coaching for first-level leaders, to develop their skills in leading implementation. The aim of these components is to develop an organizational implementation climate in which clinicians' perceive that use of the OQ-A with high fidelity is expected, supported, and rewarded.
|
Training and Technical Assistance Only (Control)
n=300 Participants
All leaders and clinicians in participating clinics will receive standardized OQ-A training and technical assistance provided by the OQ-A purveyor organization. This includes an initial, 6-hr, in-person OQ-A training; two, live, virtual, 1-hr booster trainings, offered 3 and 5 months after the initial training; and, year-round technical assistance from the OQ-A purveyor organization. Technical assistance includes virtual training sessions, online library of training videos, and customer care representative for technical support.
In addition, to encourage participation in the study, a set of four 1-hr, web-based general leadership seminars will be offered to leaders in the control condition. These will cover topics ranging from effective leadership, to giving effective feedback.
|
Total
n=686 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Prefer not to disclose
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaskan Native
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Pacific Islander or Hawaiian Native
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Prefer to self-describe
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Prefer not to disclose
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
More than one race (Multiracial)
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown or not reported
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
0 Participants
Data not collected from caregivers for this baseline measure
|
|
Phase I: Youth Short-form Assessment for Children (SAC) Total Problem Score
|
37.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6 • n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
34.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 • n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
35.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2 • n=234 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
|
Phase I: Youth received prior mental health treatment
|
66 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
58 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
124 Participants
n=234 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
|
Phase I: Family Income
Less than $25,750
|
27 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
20 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
47 Participants
n=234 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
|
Phase I: Family Income
$25,751 to $35,535
|
19 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
18 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
37 Participants
n=234 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
|
Phase I: Family Income
$35,536 to $51,500
|
19 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
20 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
39 Participants
n=234 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
|
Phase I: Family Income
More than $51,500
|
50 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
59 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
109 Participants
n=234 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
|
Phase I: Family Income
Unknown or not reported
|
2 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
0 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
2 Participants
n=234 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
|
Phase I: Parent Highest Education Level
High school graduate/GED or less
|
25 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
23 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
48 Participants
n=234 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
|
Phase I: Parent Highest Education Level
Associate's degree or some college
|
48 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
42 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
90 Participants
n=234 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
|
Phase I: Parent Highest Education Level
Bachelor's degree
|
26 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
28 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
54 Participants
n=234 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
|
Phase I: Parent Highest Education Level
Graduate degree
|
18 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
24 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
42 Participants
n=234 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
|
Phase I: Parent Highest Education Level
Unknown or not reported
|
0 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
0 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
0 Participants
n=234 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
|
Phase I: Youth age
|
11.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7 • n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
12.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.0 • n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
11.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8 • n=234 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
|
Phase I: Youth sex
Male
|
54 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
54 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
108 Participants
n=234 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
|
Phase I: Youth sex
Female
|
62 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
63 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
125 Participants
n=234 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
|
Phase I: Youth sex
Prefer not to disclose
|
1 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
0 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
1 Participants
n=234 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
|
Phase I: Youth Race
American Indian or Alaskan Native
|
1 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
2 Participants
n=117 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
3 Participants
n=234 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
|
Phase I: Youth Race
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=386 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
1 Participants
n=300 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
2 Participants
n=686 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
|
Phase I: Youth Race
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=386 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
2 Participants
n=300 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
3 Participants
n=686 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
|
Phase I: Youth Race
Multiracial
|
10 Participants
n=386 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
6 Participants
n=300 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
16 Participants
n=686 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
|
Phase I: Youth Race
Pacific Islander or Hawaiian Native
|
0 Participants
n=386 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
0 Participants
n=300 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
0 Participants
n=686 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
|
Phase I: Youth Race
Prefer to self-describe
|
3 Participants
n=386 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
2 Participants
n=300 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
5 Participants
n=686 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
|
Phase I: Youth Race
White
|
98 Participants
n=386 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
103 Participants
n=300 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
201 Participants
n=686 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
|
Phase I: Youth Race
Prefer not to disclose
|
3 Participants
n=386 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
1 Participants
n=300 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
4 Participants
n=686 Participants • Data for Phase I only
|
|
Phase I: Youth Hispanic/ Latinx Ethnicity
|
21 Participants
n=117 Participants • Date for Phase I only
|
14 Participants
n=117 Participants • Date for Phase I only
|
35 Participants
n=234 Participants • Date for Phase I only
|
|
Phase II: Youth Short-form Assessment for Children (SAC) Total Problem Score
|
35.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3 • n=269 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
34.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6 • n=183 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
34.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4 • n=452 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
|
Phase II: Youth received prior mental health treatment
|
153 Participants
n=269 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
110 Participants
n=183 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
263 Participants
n=452 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
|
Phase II: Family income
Less than $25,750
|
57 Participants
n=269 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
34 Participants
n=183 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
91 Participants
n=452 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
|
Phase II: Family income
$25,751 to $35,535
|
45 Participants
n=269 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
25 Participants
n=183 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
70 Participants
n=452 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
|
Phase II: Family income
$35,536 to $51,500
|
55 Participants
n=269 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
29 Participants
n=183 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
84 Participants
n=452 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
|
Phase II: Family income
More than $51,500
|
107 Participants
n=269 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
91 Participants
n=183 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
198 Participants
n=452 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
|
Phase II: Family income
Unknown
|
5 Participants
n=269 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
4 Participants
n=183 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
9 Participants
n=452 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
|
Phase II: Parent Highest Education Level
High school graduate/ GED or less
|
37 Participants
n=269 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
29 Participants
n=183 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
66 Participants
n=452 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
|
Phase II: Parent Highest Education Level
Associate's degree or some college
|
129 Participants
n=269 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
76 Participants
n=183 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
205 Participants
n=452 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
|
Phase II: Parent Highest Education Level
Bachelor's degree
|
64 Participants
n=269 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
53 Participants
n=183 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
117 Participants
n=452 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
|
Phase II: Parent Highest Education Level
Graduate degree
|
34 Participants
n=269 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
25 Participants
n=183 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
59 Participants
n=452 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
|
Phase II: Parent Highest Education Level
Unknown
|
5 Participants
n=269 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
0 Participants
n=183 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
5 Participants
n=452 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
|
Phase II: Youth age
|
10.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6 • n=269 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
11.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8 • n=183 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
10.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7 • n=452 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
|
Phase II: Youth sex
Male
|
118 Participants
n=269 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
67 Participants
n=183 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
185 Participants
n=452 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
|
Phase II: Youth sex
Female
|
149 Participants
n=269 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
114 Participants
n=183 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
263 Participants
n=452 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
|
Phase II: Youth sex
Prefer not to disclose
|
2 Participants
n=269 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
2 Participants
n=183 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
4 Participants
n=452 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
|
Phase II: Youth race
American Indian or Alaskan Native
|
5 Participants
n=269 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
0 Participants
n=183 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
5 Participants
n=452 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
|
Phase II: Youth race
Asian
|
3 Participants
n=269 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
2 Participants
n=183 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
5 Participants
n=452 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
|
Phase II: Youth race
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=269 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
3 Participants
n=183 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
5 Participants
n=452 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
|
Phase II: Youth race
Pacific Islander or Hawaiian Native
|
1 Participants
n=269 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
0 Participants
n=183 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
1 Participants
n=452 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
|
Phase II: Youth race
Prefer not to disclose
|
3 Participants
n=269 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
0 Participants
n=183 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
3 Participants
n=452 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
|
Phase II: Youth race
Prefer to self-describe
|
12 Participants
n=269 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
5 Participants
n=183 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
17 Participants
n=452 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
|
Phase II: Youth race
Multiracial
|
20 Participants
n=269 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
13 Participants
n=183 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
33 Participants
n=452 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
|
Phase II: Youth race
White
|
223 Participants
n=269 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
160 Participants
n=183 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
383 Participants
n=452 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
|
Phase II: Youth Hispanic/ Latinx Ethnicity
|
40 Participants
n=269 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
21 Participants
n=183 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
61 Participants
n=452 Participants • Data for Phase II only
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-6 months after youth's baseline/ entry into treatmentPopulation: Youths from the Phase I Cohort were included in this analysis.
Fidelity to the OQ-A will be measured by using electronic meta-data from the OQ-A system combined with caregiver reported information on the number of sessions the youth attended. For each youth, a fidelity index will be generated that represents the product of two quantities: (a) the youth's completion rate (i.e., number of measures administered relative to the number of sessions attended within the 6-month observation period), and (b) the youth's viewing rate (i.e., the number of feedback reports viewed by the clinician relative to the number of measures administered). Note that this product is equivalent to the ratio of viewed feedback reports to total sessions; it represents an events/trials proportion. MBC fidelity index scores summarize the level of MBC fidelity experienced by each youth (range=0-1). Higher scores indicate the youth experienced greater fidelity to MBC.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LOCI (Intervention)
n=117 Participants
The Leadership for Organization Change and Implementation (LOCI) strategy is a multicomponent implementation strategy that engages organizational executives and first-level leaders (i.e., those who administratively supervise clinicians) to build an organizational climate to support the implementation of a focal evidence-based practice (EBP) with fidelity. In this study, the focal EBP is the OQ-A system. LOCI includes two overarching components: (1) monthly organizational strategy meetings between executives and LOCI consultants/trainers to develop and embed policies, procedures, and practices that support implementation of a focal EBP, and (2) training and coaching for first-level leaders, to develop their skills in leading implementation. The aim of these components is to develop an organizational implementation climate in which clinicians' perceive that use of the OQ-A with high fidelity is expected, supported, and rewarded.
|
Training and Technical Assistance Only (Control)
n=117 Participants
All leaders and clinicians in participating clinics will receive standardized OQ-A training and technical assistance provided by the OQ-A purveyor organization. This includes an initial, 6-hr, in-person OQ-A training; two, live, virtual, 1-hr booster trainings, offered 3 and 5 months after the initial training; and, year-round technical assistance from the OQ-A purveyor organization. Technical assistance includes virtual training sessions, online library of training videos, and customer care representative for technical support.
In addition, to encourage participation in the study, a set of four 1-hr, web-based general leadership seminars will be offered to leaders in the control condition. These will cover topics ranging from effective leadership, to giving effective feedback.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Fidelity to the OQ-A System Experienced by the Youth (0-100%)
|
23.1 percentage fidelity achieved
Standard Error 9.0
|
3.4 percentage fidelity achieved
Standard Error 2.5
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-6 months after youth's baseline/ entry into treatmentPopulation: Analysis includes youths from Phase I cohort.
The SAC Total Problem Score is a 48-item measure of youth internalizing (e.g., anxious, depressed) and externalizing (e.g., aggressive, noncompliant, overactive) behaviors (range=0-96) completed by caregivers of youth. Total Problem Score was assessed at baseline (youth's entry into treatment) and monthly for 6 months, change from baseline to month 6 is reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LOCI (Intervention)
n=117 Participants
The Leadership for Organization Change and Implementation (LOCI) strategy is a multicomponent implementation strategy that engages organizational executives and first-level leaders (i.e., those who administratively supervise clinicians) to build an organizational climate to support the implementation of a focal evidence-based practice (EBP) with fidelity. In this study, the focal EBP is the OQ-A system. LOCI includes two overarching components: (1) monthly organizational strategy meetings between executives and LOCI consultants/trainers to develop and embed policies, procedures, and practices that support implementation of a focal EBP, and (2) training and coaching for first-level leaders, to develop their skills in leading implementation. The aim of these components is to develop an organizational implementation climate in which clinicians' perceive that use of the OQ-A with high fidelity is expected, supported, and rewarded.
|
Training and Technical Assistance Only (Control)
n=117 Participants
All leaders and clinicians in participating clinics will receive standardized OQ-A training and technical assistance provided by the OQ-A purveyor organization. This includes an initial, 6-hr, in-person OQ-A training; two, live, virtual, 1-hr booster trainings, offered 3 and 5 months after the initial training; and, year-round technical assistance from the OQ-A purveyor organization. Technical assistance includes virtual training sessions, online library of training videos, and customer care representative for technical support.
In addition, to encourage participation in the study, a set of four 1-hr, web-based general leadership seminars will be offered to leaders in the control condition. These will cover topics ranging from effective leadership, to giving effective feedback.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to 6-months in Youth Total Problems Score on the Short Form Assessment for Children (SAC) - Phase I Cohort
|
-8.17 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.19
|
-4.04 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.15
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-6 months after youth's baseline/ entry into treatmentPopulation: Analyses based on an intent-to-treat approach. Note that one clinic was identified as an extreme outlier and consequently was excluded from analyses.
Fidelity to the OQ-A will be measured by using electronic meta-data from the OQ-A system combined with caregiver reported information on the number of sessions the youth attended. For each youth, a fidelity index will be generated that represents the product of two quantities: (a) the youth's completion rate (i.e., number of measures administered relative to the number of sessions attended within the 6-month observation period), and (b) the youth's viewing rate (i.e., the number of feedback reports viewed by the clinician relative to the number of measures administered). Note that this product is equivalent to the ratio of viewed feedback reports to total sessions; it represents an events/trials proportion. MBC fidelity index scores summarize the level of MBC fidelity experienced by each youth (range=0-1). Higher scores indicate the youth experienced greater fidelity to MBC.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LOCI (Intervention)
n=269 Participants
The Leadership for Organization Change and Implementation (LOCI) strategy is a multicomponent implementation strategy that engages organizational executives and first-level leaders (i.e., those who administratively supervise clinicians) to build an organizational climate to support the implementation of a focal evidence-based practice (EBP) with fidelity. In this study, the focal EBP is the OQ-A system. LOCI includes two overarching components: (1) monthly organizational strategy meetings between executives and LOCI consultants/trainers to develop and embed policies, procedures, and practices that support implementation of a focal EBP, and (2) training and coaching for first-level leaders, to develop their skills in leading implementation. The aim of these components is to develop an organizational implementation climate in which clinicians' perceive that use of the OQ-A with high fidelity is expected, supported, and rewarded.
|
Training and Technical Assistance Only (Control)
n=146 Participants
All leaders and clinicians in participating clinics will receive standardized OQ-A training and technical assistance provided by the OQ-A purveyor organization. This includes an initial, 6-hr, in-person OQ-A training; two, live, virtual, 1-hr booster trainings, offered 3 and 5 months after the initial training; and, year-round technical assistance from the OQ-A purveyor organization. Technical assistance includes virtual training sessions, online library of training videos, and customer care representative for technical support.
In addition, to encourage participation in the study, a set of four 1-hr, web-based general leadership seminars will be offered to leaders in the control condition. These will cover topics ranging from effective leadership, to giving effective feedback.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Fidelity to the OQ-A System Experienced by the Youth (0-100%)
|
5.65 percentage fidelity achieved
Standard Error 4.79
|
0.97 percentage fidelity achieved
Standard Error 1.27
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 0-6 months after youth's baseline/ entry into treatmentPopulation: One clinic was excluded from analyses because it was an extreme outlier.
The SAC Total Problem Score is a 48-item measure of youth internalizing (e.g., anxious, depressed) and externalizing (e.g., aggressive, noncompliant, overactive) behaviors (range=0-96) completed by caregivers of youth. Total Problem Score was assessed at baseline (youth's entry into treatment) and monthly for 6 months, change from baseline to month 6 is reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
LOCI (Intervention)
n=269 Participants
The Leadership for Organization Change and Implementation (LOCI) strategy is a multicomponent implementation strategy that engages organizational executives and first-level leaders (i.e., those who administratively supervise clinicians) to build an organizational climate to support the implementation of a focal evidence-based practice (EBP) with fidelity. In this study, the focal EBP is the OQ-A system. LOCI includes two overarching components: (1) monthly organizational strategy meetings between executives and LOCI consultants/trainers to develop and embed policies, procedures, and practices that support implementation of a focal EBP, and (2) training and coaching for first-level leaders, to develop their skills in leading implementation. The aim of these components is to develop an organizational implementation climate in which clinicians' perceive that use of the OQ-A with high fidelity is expected, supported, and rewarded.
|
Training and Technical Assistance Only (Control)
n=146 Participants
All leaders and clinicians in participating clinics will receive standardized OQ-A training and technical assistance provided by the OQ-A purveyor organization. This includes an initial, 6-hr, in-person OQ-A training; two, live, virtual, 1-hr booster trainings, offered 3 and 5 months after the initial training; and, year-round technical assistance from the OQ-A purveyor organization. Technical assistance includes virtual training sessions, online library of training videos, and customer care representative for technical support.
In addition, to encourage participation in the study, a set of four 1-hr, web-based general leadership seminars will be offered to leaders in the control condition. These will cover topics ranging from effective leadership, to giving effective feedback.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to 6-months in Youth Total Problems Score on the Short-form Assessment for Children (SAC) - Phase II Cohort
|
-4.82 units on a scale
Standard Error .70
|
-5.19 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.02
|
Adverse Events
LOCI (Intervention)
Training and Technical Assistance Only (Control)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place