Optimize PRO Study

NCT ID: NCT04091048

Last Updated: 2025-11-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1127 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-09-16

Study Completion Date

2024-11-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to collect clinical evidence on valve performance and procedural outcomes associated with an "optimized" TAVR care pathway and post-TAVR conduction disturbance pathway while using the Evolut™ PRO and Evolut™ PRO+ devices.

The purpose of the addendum is to collect post-market clinical evidence on valve performance and procedural outcomes associated with the Evolut FX Device.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a post market, multi-center (sites in US/CAN/EMEA/ANZ), prospective, non-randomized study.

The addendum is a post market, multi-center (sites in US only), prospective, non-randomized study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Primary Cohort

Evolut™ PRO and Evolut™ PRO+ System (Evolut™ FX System for the addendum)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Aortic valve replacement

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Evolut™ PRO and Evolut™ PRO+ System (Evolut™ FX System for the addendum)

Aortic valve replacement

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Acceptable candidate for treatment with the Evolut™ PRO or Evolut™ PRO+ system (FX system for the addendum where applicable) in accordance with the Instructions for Use and local regulations;
* Subject is symptomatic from his/her aortic valve stenosis, as demonstrated by New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class II or greater;
* Subject and the treating physician agree that the subject will return for all required post procedure follow-up visits;
* Anatomically suitable for transfemoral TAVR with the Medtronic TAVR system;
* Subject meets the legal minimum age to provide Informed Consent based on local regulatory requirements.

Exclusion Criteria

* Contraindicated for treatment with the Evolut™ PRO or Evolut™ PRO+ or FX system (where applicable) in accordance with the Instructions for Use
* Anatomically not suitable for the Evolut™ PRO or Evolut™ PRO+ or FX system (where applicable);
* Previous aortic valve replacement
* Reduced ventricular function with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<35% as measured by resting echocardiogram;
* Frailty assessments identify:

* Subject is \<80 years of age and three or more of the following apply; OR subject is \> 80 years of age and two or more of the following apply

* Wheelchair bound
* Resides in an institutional care facility (e.g. nursing home, skilled care center)
* Body Mass Index \<20kg/m2
* Grip strength \<16kg
* Katz Index score ≤4
* Albumin \<3.5 g/dL
* Bicuspid valve verified;
* Aortic root angulation (angle between plane of aortic valve annulus and horizontal plane/vertebrae) \> 70°.
* Implanted with pacemaker or ICD;
* Prohibitive left ventricular outflow tract calcification;
* Estimated life expectancy of less than 12 months due to associated non- cardiac co-morbid conditions;
* Other medical, social, or psychological conditions that in the opinion of the Investigator precludes the subject from appropriate consent, adherence to the protocol required follow-up exams;
* Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device trial (excluding registries);
* Need for emergency surgery for any reason.
* Subject is less than legal age of consent, legally incompetent, or otherwise vulnerable\*.

* Notes: Vulnerable subjects include individuals whose willingness to volunteer in a clinical investigation could be unduly influenced by the expectation, whether justified or not, of benefits associated with participation or of retaliatory response from senior members of a hierarchy in case of refusal to participate. EXAMPLE Individuals with lack of or loss of autonomy due to immaturity or through mental disability, persons in nursing homes, children, impoverished persons, subjects in emergency situations, ethnic minority groups, homeless persons, nomads, refugees, and those incapable of giving informed consent. Other vulnerable subjects include, for example, members of a group with a hierarchical structure such as university students, subordinate hospital and laboratory personnel, employees of the sponsor, members of the armed forces, and persons kept in detention.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic Cardiovascular

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Steven Yakubov, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

OhioHealth

Kendra Grubb, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Emory University

Josep Rodés-Cabau, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Laval University

Suneet Mittal, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Valley Health System

Tamim Nazif, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Columbia - New York Presbyterian

Hemal Gada, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

UPMC Pinnacle

Douglas Fraser, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Manchester Royal Infirmary

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

California Pacific Medical Center - Sutter Health

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Hartford Hospital

Hartford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Yale New Haven Hospital

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

St. Vincent's Hospital / Cardiology Associates of Fairfield County, P.C.

Norwalk, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Morton Plant Hospital

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Emory University Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Rush University Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

St. John's Hospital/Prarie Education and Research Cooperative

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Medstar Union Memorial Hospital

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Ascension St. John Hospital

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Spectrum Health

Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Abbott Northwestern Hospital (Minneapolis Heart)

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Providence St. Patrick Hospital

Missoula, Montana, United States

Site Status

University of Nebraska Medical Center

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Jersey Shore University Medical Center

Neptune City, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

The Valley Hospital

Ridgewood, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Buffalo General Medical Center

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

The Mount Sinai Hospital

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

New York Presbyterian - Columbia University Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Vassar Brother's Medical Center

Poughkeepsie, New York, United States

Site Status

St. Francis Hospital

Roslyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Stony Brook University Hospital

Stony Brook, New York, United States

Site Status

Ohio Health Research Institute

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Kettering Medical Center

Kettering, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Lehigh Valley Hospital - Cedar Crest

Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

UPMC Pinnacle Harrisburg

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Allegheny General Hospital

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

UPMC Presbyterian

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

York Hospital

York, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Houston Methodist Hospital

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

The Heart Hospital - Baylor Plano

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dixie Regional Medical Center Intermountain

St. George, Utah, United States

Site Status

Sentara Norfolk General Hospital

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Charleston Medical Center

Charleston, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Aurora Saint Luke's Medical Center

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Saint Vincents Hospital Sydney

Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

The Prince Charles Hospital

Chermside West, , Australia

Site Status

Monash Hospital

Clayton, , Australia

Site Status

Austin Hospital

Heidelberg, , Australia

Site Status

Fiona Stanley Hospital

Murdoch, , Australia

Site Status

John Hunter Hospital

Newcastle, , Australia

Site Status

Saint Vincents Hospital Sydney

Sydney, , Australia

Site Status

ZNA Middelheim

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

St Jan Hospital

Bruges, , Belgium

Site Status

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Laval University Institute of Cardiology and Respirology of Quebec

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Hôpitaux Universitaires - Hôpital Henri Mondor

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Haut-Lévêque - CHU de Bordeaux

Pessac, , France

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Ulm

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Mater Private Hospital

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Galway University Hospitals - University Hospital Galway (UHG)

Galway, , Ireland

Site Status

Shaare Zedek Medical Center

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Fondazione Poliambulanza

Brescia, , Italy

Site Status

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Central de Asturas

Oviedo, , Spain

Site Status

Akademiska Sjukhuset

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Royal Victoria Hospital - Belfast Health and Social Care Trust

Belfast, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester Royal Infirmary

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Belgium Canada France Germany Ireland Israel Italy Spain Sweden United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Grubb KJ, Gada H, Mittal S, Nazif T, Rodes-Cabau J, Fraser DGW, Lin L, Rovin JD, Khalil R, Sultan I, Gardner B, Lorenz D, Chetcuti SJ, Patel NC, Harvey JE, Mahoney P, Schwartz B, Jafar Z, Wang J, Potluri S, Vora AN, Sanchez C, Corrigan A, Li S, Yakubov SJ. Clinical Impact of Standardized TAVR Technique and Care Pathway: Insights From the Optimize PRO Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Mar 13;16(5):558-570. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.01.016.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36922042 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol: Version 3.0

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol: Version 4.0

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol: Version 5.0

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol: Version 6.0

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol: FX Addendum Version 1.0

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol: FX Addendum Version 2.0

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol: FX Addendum Version 3.0

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MDT18051EVR008

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id