Trial Outcomes & Findings for Everyday Memory Intervention (NCT NCT04088136)
NCT ID: NCT04088136
Last Updated: 2024-05-01
Results Overview
Across the data collection period, participants audio recorded descriptions of their memory failures on a smartphone app. The audio recordings were transcribed and then cleaned and qualitatively coded so that the number of memory failures each participant reported during the data collection period could be counted. The data was qualitatively coded to ensure an accurate count of the number of memory failures per participant without counting duplicate events or accidental reports. Average daily number of reported memory failures from EMA \& daily diaries is reported.
COMPLETED
NA
68 participants
minimum 8 day period after training on app prior to posttest
2024-05-01
Participant Flow
The study was converted to a completely on-line study due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Enrollment began in March of 2021.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Everyday Metacognitive Memory
Training in techniques for managing memory demands in everyday life
Everyday Metacognitive Memory Intervention: Provides training in use of techniques and procedures to enhance proactive self-regulatory control over everyday memory demands, including strategies for learning information, planning for meeting everyday goals, and monitoring of efficacy of goal pursuit.
|
Memory Strategy Control
Trains the use of memory strategies for learning new associations and concepts
Memory Strategy Control Intervention: Trains use of standard mnemonic techniques such as imagery and sentence generation for learning new associations and organizational and distinctiveness-based strategies for learning sets of items (e.g., word lists).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
35
|
33
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
30
|
32
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
5
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Everyday Metacognitive Memory
Training in techniques for managing memory demands in everyday life
Everyday Metacognitive Memory Intervention: Provides training in use of techniques and procedures to enhance proactive self-regulatory control over everyday memory demands, including strategies for learning information, planning for meeting everyday goals, and monitoring of efficacy of goal pursuit.
|
Memory Strategy Control
Trains the use of memory strategies for learning new associations and concepts
Memory Strategy Control Intervention: Trains use of standard mnemonic techniques such as imagery and sentence generation for learning new associations and organizational and distinctiveness-based strategies for learning sets of items (e.g., word lists).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
5
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
1 non-response
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Everyday Metacognitive Memory
n=35 Participants
Training in techniques for managing memory demands in everyday life
Everyday Metacognitive Memory Intervention: Provides training in use of techniques and procedures to enhance proactive self-regulatory control over everyday memory demands, including strategies for learning information, planning for meeting everyday goals, and monitoring of efficacy of goal pursuit.
|
Memory Strategy Control
n=33 Participants
Trains the use of memory strategies for learning new associations and concepts
Memory Strategy Control Intervention: Trains use of standard mnemonic techniques such as imagery and sentence generation for learning new associations and organizational and distinctiveness-based strategies for learning sets of items (e.g., word lists).
|
Total
n=68 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
76.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8 • n=35 Participants • 1 non-response
|
75.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6 • n=32 Participants • 1 non-response
|
75.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7 • n=67 Participants • 1 non-response
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
21 Participants
n=34 Participants • 1 nonresponse
|
19 Participants
n=33 Participants • 1 nonresponse
|
40 Participants
n=67 Participants • 1 nonresponse
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
13 Participants
n=34 Participants • 1 nonresponse
|
14 Participants
n=33 Participants • 1 nonresponse
|
27 Participants
n=67 Participants • 1 nonresponse
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
3 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=33 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=68 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
31 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=33 Participants
|
64 Participants
n=68 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=33 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=68 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=33 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=68 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=33 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=68 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
2 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=33 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=68 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
4 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=33 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=68 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
26 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=33 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=68 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
2 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=33 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=68 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=33 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=68 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
35 participants
n=35 Participants
|
33 participants
n=33 Participants
|
68 participants
n=68 Participants
|
|
AB5C Personality Scales
AB5C Gregariousness
|
3.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7 • n=34 Participants • one participant did not complete the AB5C inventory
|
2.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6 • n=33 Participants • one participant did not complete the AB5C inventory
|
3.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7 • n=67 Participants • one participant did not complete the AB5C inventory
|
|
AB5C Personality Scales
AB5C Stability
|
3.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6 • n=34 Participants • one participant did not complete the AB5C inventory
|
3.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7 • n=33 Participants • one participant did not complete the AB5C inventory
|
3.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6 • n=67 Participants • one participant did not complete the AB5C inventory
|
|
AB5C Personality Scales
AB5C Understanding
|
4.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4 • n=34 Participants • one participant did not complete the AB5C inventory
|
4.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5 • n=33 Participants • one participant did not complete the AB5C inventory
|
4.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4 • n=67 Participants • one participant did not complete the AB5C inventory
|
|
AB5C Personality Scales
AB5C Introspection
|
3.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7 • n=34 Participants • one participant did not complete the AB5C inventory
|
4.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5 • n=33 Participants • one participant did not complete the AB5C inventory
|
3.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6 • n=67 Participants • one participant did not complete the AB5C inventory
|
|
AB5C Personality Scales
AB5C Conscientiousness
|
3.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5 • n=34 Participants • one participant did not complete the AB5C inventory
|
4.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4 • n=33 Participants • one participant did not complete the AB5C inventory
|
4.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5 • n=67 Participants • one participant did not complete the AB5C inventory
|
|
Victoria Activity Scale
|
4.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6 • n=34 Participants • one nonresponse
|
4.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6 • n=33 Participants • one nonresponse
|
4.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6 • n=67 Participants • one nonresponse
|
|
Pattern Comparison Test
|
16.1 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3 • n=34 Participants • missing data due to program failure during remote administration
|
14.8 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6 • n=30 Participants • missing data due to program failure during remote administration
|
15.5 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9 • n=64 Participants • missing data due to program failure during remote administration
|
|
Shipley Vocabulary Test
|
34.3 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4 • n=34 Participants • missing data due to program failure during remote administration
|
35.7 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.1 • n=32 Participants • missing data due to program failure during remote administration
|
35.0 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3 • n=66 Participants • missing data due to program failure during remote administration
|
|
ETS Letter Sets Test
|
8.9 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5 • n=34 Participants • missing data due to program failure during remote administration
|
9.1 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3 • n=32 Participants • missing data due to program failure during remote administration
|
9.0 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9 • n=66 Participants • missing data due to program failure during remote administration
|
|
Mobile Device Proficiency Questionnaire (MDPQ-16)
|
31.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2 • n=33 Participants • missing questionnaires
|
31.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4 • n=33 Participants • missing questionnaires
|
31.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8 • n=66 Participants • missing questionnaires
|
|
Technology Experience Profile
|
23.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1 • n=34 Participants • missing questionnaire
|
23.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4 • n=33 Participants • missing questionnaire
|
23.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3 • n=67 Participants • missing questionnaire
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: minimum 8 day period after training on app prior to posttestAcross the data collection period, participants audio recorded descriptions of their memory failures on a smartphone app. The audio recordings were transcribed and then cleaned and qualitatively coded so that the number of memory failures each participant reported during the data collection period could be counted. The data was qualitatively coded to ensure an accurate count of the number of memory failures per participant without counting duplicate events or accidental reports. Average daily number of reported memory failures from EMA \& daily diaries is reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Everyday Metacognitive Memory
n=30 Participants
Training in techniques for managing memory demands in everyday life
Everyday Metacognitive Memory Intervention: Provides training in use of techniques and procedures to enhance proactive self-regulatory control over everyday memory demands, including strategies for learning information, planning for meeting everyday goals, and monitoring of efficacy of goal pursuit.
|
Memory Strategy Control
n=32 Participants
Trains the use of memory strategies for learning new associations and concepts
Memory Strategy Control Intervention: Trains use of standard mnemonic techniques such as imagery and sentence generation for learning new associations and organizational and distinctiveness-based strategies for learning sets of items (e.g., word lists).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Everyday Memory Failures
|
0.55 average daily number memory failures/day
Standard Error 0.57
|
0.62 average daily number memory failures/day
Standard Error 0.71
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Two weeks prior to posttestNumber of successfully completed lab contacts (maximum of 4)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Everyday Metacognitive Memory
n=30 Participants
Training in techniques for managing memory demands in everyday life
Everyday Metacognitive Memory Intervention: Provides training in use of techniques and procedures to enhance proactive self-regulatory control over everyday memory demands, including strategies for learning information, planning for meeting everyday goals, and monitoring of efficacy of goal pursuit.
|
Memory Strategy Control
n=32 Participants
Trains the use of memory strategies for learning new associations and concepts
Memory Strategy Control Intervention: Trains use of standard mnemonic techniques such as imagery and sentence generation for learning new associations and organizational and distinctiveness-based strategies for learning sets of items (e.g., word lists).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Prospective Memory Lab Contacts
|
2.8 number of contacts
Standard Error 0.2
|
3.0 number of contacts
Standard Error 0.2
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Two weeks prior to posttestPopulation: data only available for persons who successfully completed at least one laboratory contact
median absolute time deviation (in minutes) from scheduled lab contact for completed contacts
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Everyday Metacognitive Memory
n=29 Participants
Training in techniques for managing memory demands in everyday life
Everyday Metacognitive Memory Intervention: Provides training in use of techniques and procedures to enhance proactive self-regulatory control over everyday memory demands, including strategies for learning information, planning for meeting everyday goals, and monitoring of efficacy of goal pursuit.
|
Memory Strategy Control
n=31 Participants
Trains the use of memory strategies for learning new associations and concepts
Memory Strategy Control Intervention: Trains use of standard mnemonic techniques such as imagery and sentence generation for learning new associations and organizational and distinctiveness-based strategies for learning sets of items (e.g., word lists).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Prospective Memory Lab Contact Efficiency
|
4.4 minutes
Standard Error 1.7
|
4.2 minutes
Standard Error 1.1
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: posttest onlyComputerized task to simulate use of an ATM machine. Measure: number of errors
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Everyday Metacognitive Memory
n=25 Participants
Training in techniques for managing memory demands in everyday life
Everyday Metacognitive Memory Intervention: Provides training in use of techniques and procedures to enhance proactive self-regulatory control over everyday memory demands, including strategies for learning information, planning for meeting everyday goals, and monitoring of efficacy of goal pursuit.
|
Memory Strategy Control
n=28 Participants
Trains the use of memory strategies for learning new associations and concepts
Memory Strategy Control Intervention: Trains use of standard mnemonic techniques such as imagery and sentence generation for learning new associations and organizational and distinctiveness-based strategies for learning sets of items (e.g., word lists).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Everyday Cognition Simulation Task: ATM Task (Number of Errors)
|
9.08 number of errors
Standard Error 0.79
|
10.14 number of errors
Standard Error 1.59
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: posttest onlyPopulation: Missing data caused by program run-time errors aborting program without recording results for several participants (6 Everyday Metacognitive Memory; 5 Memory Strategy Control)
Computerized task to simulate use of an automated telephone program to refill prescriptions. Measure: Number of errors
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Everyday Metacognitive Memory
n=24 Participants
Training in techniques for managing memory demands in everyday life
Everyday Metacognitive Memory Intervention: Provides training in use of techniques and procedures to enhance proactive self-regulatory control over everyday memory demands, including strategies for learning information, planning for meeting everyday goals, and monitoring of efficacy of goal pursuit.
|
Memory Strategy Control
n=27 Participants
Trains the use of memory strategies for learning new associations and concepts
Memory Strategy Control Intervention: Trains use of standard mnemonic techniques such as imagery and sentence generation for learning new associations and organizational and distinctiveness-based strategies for learning sets of items (e.g., word lists).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Czaja Everyday Cognition Simulation Task: Prescription Refill Task (Number of Errors)
|
9.29 number of errors
Standard Error 1.74
|
8.44 number of errors
Standard Error 1.55
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: pretest and posttest (approximately 1 month lag)Population: One missing case due to program failure when administering the test
Computerized task to present 30 concrete nouns, 6 from 5 taxonomic categories (Hultsch, Hertzog, Dixon, \& Small, 1998) Measure is proportion of 30 words recalled
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Everyday Metacognitive Memory
n=29 Participants
Training in techniques for managing memory demands in everyday life
Everyday Metacognitive Memory Intervention: Provides training in use of techniques and procedures to enhance proactive self-regulatory control over everyday memory demands, including strategies for learning information, planning for meeting everyday goals, and monitoring of efficacy of goal pursuit.
|
Memory Strategy Control
n=32 Participants
Trains the use of memory strategies for learning new associations and concepts
Memory Strategy Control Intervention: Trains use of standard mnemonic techniques such as imagery and sentence generation for learning new associations and organizational and distinctiveness-based strategies for learning sets of items (e.g., word lists).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Free Recall Test
Pretest
|
0.27 proportion of words recalled
Standard Error 0.05
|
0.31 proportion of words recalled
Standard Error 0.05
|
|
Free Recall Test
Posttest
|
0.37 proportion of words recalled
Standard Error 0.05
|
0.44 proportion of words recalled
Standard Error 0.05
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: pretest and posttest (approximately 1 month lag)Computerized task to present 40 concrete-concrete associatively unrelated noun pairs (Hertzog, Sinclair, \& Dunlosky, 2010) Outcome is proportion of 40 words correctly recalled.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Everyday Metacognitive Memory
n=30 Participants
Training in techniques for managing memory demands in everyday life
Everyday Metacognitive Memory Intervention: Provides training in use of techniques and procedures to enhance proactive self-regulatory control over everyday memory demands, including strategies for learning information, planning for meeting everyday goals, and monitoring of efficacy of goal pursuit.
|
Memory Strategy Control
n=32 Participants
Trains the use of memory strategies for learning new associations and concepts
Memory Strategy Control Intervention: Trains use of standard mnemonic techniques such as imagery and sentence generation for learning new associations and organizational and distinctiveness-based strategies for learning sets of items (e.g., word lists).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Associative Recall Test
Pretest
|
0.52 proportion of words recalled
Standard Error 0.04
|
0.53 proportion of words recalled
Standard Error 0.04
|
|
Associative Recall Test
Posttest
|
0.55 proportion of words recalled
Standard Error 0.04
|
0.66 proportion of words recalled
Standard Error 0.04
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: posttest onlygist recall of narrative story (total number of propositions (ideas) from story recalled)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Everyday Metacognitive Memory
n=30 Participants
Training in techniques for managing memory demands in everyday life
Everyday Metacognitive Memory Intervention: Provides training in use of techniques and procedures to enhance proactive self-regulatory control over everyday memory demands, including strategies for learning information, planning for meeting everyday goals, and monitoring of efficacy of goal pursuit.
|
Memory Strategy Control
n=31 Participants
Trains the use of memory strategies for learning new associations and concepts
Memory Strategy Control Intervention: Trains use of standard mnemonic techniques such as imagery and sentence generation for learning new associations and organizational and distinctiveness-based strategies for learning sets of items (e.g., word lists).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Story Recall
|
30.8 number of ideas recalled
Standard Error 1.6
|
29.7 number of ideas recalled
Standard Error 1.9
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: posttest onlyComputerized task to simulate use of an ATM machine. Measure: time to complete task (in seconds)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Everyday Metacognitive Memory
n=25 Participants
Training in techniques for managing memory demands in everyday life
Everyday Metacognitive Memory Intervention: Provides training in use of techniques and procedures to enhance proactive self-regulatory control over everyday memory demands, including strategies for learning information, planning for meeting everyday goals, and monitoring of efficacy of goal pursuit.
|
Memory Strategy Control
n=28 Participants
Trains the use of memory strategies for learning new associations and concepts
Memory Strategy Control Intervention: Trains use of standard mnemonic techniques such as imagery and sentence generation for learning new associations and organizational and distinctiveness-based strategies for learning sets of items (e.g., word lists).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Everyday Cognition Simulation Task: ATM Task (Time in Seconds)
|
852.10 seconds
Standard Error 61.74
|
902.10 seconds
Standard Error 80.53
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: posttest onlyPopulation: Missing data caused by program run-time errors aborting program without recording results for several participants (6 Everyday Metacognitive Memory; 5 Memory Strategy Control)
Computerized task to simulate use of an automated telephone program to refill prescriptions. Measure: time to complete task (in seconds)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Everyday Metacognitive Memory
n=24 Participants
Training in techniques for managing memory demands in everyday life
Everyday Metacognitive Memory Intervention: Provides training in use of techniques and procedures to enhance proactive self-regulatory control over everyday memory demands, including strategies for learning information, planning for meeting everyday goals, and monitoring of efficacy of goal pursuit.
|
Memory Strategy Control
n=27 Participants
Trains the use of memory strategies for learning new associations and concepts
Memory Strategy Control Intervention: Trains use of standard mnemonic techniques such as imagery and sentence generation for learning new associations and organizational and distinctiveness-based strategies for learning sets of items (e.g., word lists).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Czaja Everyday Cognition Simulation Task: Prescription Refill Task (Time in Seconds)
|
590.50 seconds
Standard Error 31.68
|
579.90 seconds
Standard Error 30.15
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: pretest and posttest (approximately 1 month lag)Summative Likert scale measuring frequency of reported memory problems for specific types of problems Measure is average item Likert rating on a 1-7 scale. Higher score indicates fewer memory problems
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Everyday Metacognitive Memory
n=30 Participants
Training in techniques for managing memory demands in everyday life
Everyday Metacognitive Memory Intervention: Provides training in use of techniques and procedures to enhance proactive self-regulatory control over everyday memory demands, including strategies for learning information, planning for meeting everyday goals, and monitoring of efficacy of goal pursuit.
|
Memory Strategy Control
n=32 Participants
Trains the use of memory strategies for learning new associations and concepts
Memory Strategy Control Intervention: Trains use of standard mnemonic techniques such as imagery and sentence generation for learning new associations and organizational and distinctiveness-based strategies for learning sets of items (e.g., word lists).
|
|---|---|---|
|
MFQ Memory Complaint (Frequency of Forgetting Scale)
Pretest
|
4.9 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
|
5.1 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
|
|
MFQ Memory Complaint (Frequency of Forgetting Scale)
Posttest
|
5.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
|
5.0 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: pretest and posttest (approximately 1 month lag)The Personal Beliefs about Memory Instruments (PBMI) Specific Memory Self-Efficacy measurement is a summative visual analog rating scale measuring self-rated memory aggregated over multiple specific types of memory. Outcomes scaled in average proportion of distance from left (0) to maximum of 1.00 (higher scores indicate greater memory self-efficacy).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Everyday Metacognitive Memory
n=30 Participants
Training in techniques for managing memory demands in everyday life
Everyday Metacognitive Memory Intervention: Provides training in use of techniques and procedures to enhance proactive self-regulatory control over everyday memory demands, including strategies for learning information, planning for meeting everyday goals, and monitoring of efficacy of goal pursuit.
|
Memory Strategy Control
n=32 Participants
Trains the use of memory strategies for learning new associations and concepts
Memory Strategy Control Intervention: Trains use of standard mnemonic techniques such as imagery and sentence generation for learning new associations and organizational and distinctiveness-based strategies for learning sets of items (e.g., word lists).
|
|---|---|---|
|
PBMI Specific Memory Self-Efficacy
Pretest
|
0.65 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.02
|
0.71 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.02
|
|
PBMI Specific Memory Self-Efficacy
Posttest
|
0.72 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.02
|
0.73 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.02
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: pretest and posttest (approximately 1 month lag)Summative visual analog rating scale measuring self-rated control over everyday. Outcome is scaled as average proportion of maximum endorsement (ranging from 0 to 1.0, with higher scores indicate greater perceived control)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Everyday Metacognitive Memory
n=30 Participants
Training in techniques for managing memory demands in everyday life
Everyday Metacognitive Memory Intervention: Provides training in use of techniques and procedures to enhance proactive self-regulatory control over everyday memory demands, including strategies for learning information, planning for meeting everyday goals, and monitoring of efficacy of goal pursuit.
|
Memory Strategy Control
n=32 Participants
Trains the use of memory strategies for learning new associations and concepts
Memory Strategy Control Intervention: Trains use of standard mnemonic techniques such as imagery and sentence generation for learning new associations and organizational and distinctiveness-based strategies for learning sets of items (e.g., word lists).
|
|---|---|---|
|
PBMI Memory Control
Pretest
|
0.79 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
0.80 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
|
|
PBMI Memory Control
Posttest
|
0.90 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.02
|
0.89 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.02
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: pretest and posttest (approximately 1 month lag)Summative Likert scale obtaining self-rated frequency of use of internal mnemonic strategies in everyday life. Average Likert rating on 1-5 scale (higher scores indicate greater use of strategies)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Everyday Metacognitive Memory
n=30 Participants
Training in techniques for managing memory demands in everyday life
Everyday Metacognitive Memory Intervention: Provides training in use of techniques and procedures to enhance proactive self-regulatory control over everyday memory demands, including strategies for learning information, planning for meeting everyday goals, and monitoring of efficacy of goal pursuit.
|
Memory Strategy Control
n=32 Participants
Trains the use of memory strategies for learning new associations and concepts
Memory Strategy Control Intervention: Trains use of standard mnemonic techniques such as imagery and sentence generation for learning new associations and organizational and distinctiveness-based strategies for learning sets of items (e.g., word lists).
|
|---|---|---|
|
MCQ Internal Scale
Pretest
|
1.92 average units on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
|
2.01 average units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
|
MCQ Internal Scale
Posttest
|
2.31 average units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
2.26 average units on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: pretest and posttest (approximately 1 month lag)Summative Likert scale obtaining self-rated frequency of use of external memory aids. Outcome is scaled as average Likert rating on 1-5 scale. Higher score indicates greater use of external aids.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Everyday Metacognitive Memory
n=30 Participants
Training in techniques for managing memory demands in everyday life
Everyday Metacognitive Memory Intervention: Provides training in use of techniques and procedures to enhance proactive self-regulatory control over everyday memory demands, including strategies for learning information, planning for meeting everyday goals, and monitoring of efficacy of goal pursuit.
|
Memory Strategy Control
n=32 Participants
Trains the use of memory strategies for learning new associations and concepts
Memory Strategy Control Intervention: Trains use of standard mnemonic techniques such as imagery and sentence generation for learning new associations and organizational and distinctiveness-based strategies for learning sets of items (e.g., word lists).
|
|---|---|---|
|
MCQ External
Pretest
|
3.34 average units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
3.28 average units on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
|
|
MCQ External
Posttest
|
3.38 average units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
3.30 average units on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
|
Adverse Events
Everyday Metacognitive Memory
Memory Strategy Control
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Christopher Hertzog
Georgia Institute of Technology
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place