The Detection of EGFR Mutations in Liquid Based Cytology Samples
NCT ID: NCT04086680
Last Updated: 2020-06-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
13 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-05-07
2020-02-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study will be based in the cytology department at Royal Cornwall Hospital as part of a service improvement. It will use residual material from existing samples sent to the laboratory as part of the routine service. It will use existing material from patients diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma by cytology using the current, validated procedure which uses formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) samples over a 10 month period. EGFR mutation results obtained using the validated procedure (formalin fixed paraffin embedded) will be compared to those produced using liquid based cytology samples.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
KEBI-Cyto Study - Use of the Biocartis Idylla
NCT04236102
Idylla EGFR Lung Trial
NCT04962191
EGFR_IUO 3.20 Clinical Study Protocol
NCT05959473
e- Ab Sensor-based Real-time Detection of Mutant EGFR in Clinical Specimens From Patients of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT01359436
Study to Evaluate Concordance of Detecting EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) Mutation by Circulating Tumour Free DNA Versus Tissues Biopsy in NSCLC (Non-small Cell Lung Cancer).
NCT03562819
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Samples for EGFR mutation analysis are collected from patients by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and bronchial brushings and washings. EBUS-TBNA provides a minimally invasive method for tissue sampling from radiologically suspicious lymph nodes in the chest using a fine-gauge needle. Samples obtained are collected and sent to the laboratory for processing. At present, laboratories rely on the use of formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) samples for EGFR testing, therefore clots are produced in the laboratory using the collected tissue fragments. The clotted sample must then be fixed in formalin before being processed in the histology laboratory to produce slides for microscopic examination by the consultant pathologist. Once adenocarcinoma is diagnosed, FFPE samples are then sent for EGFR mutation analysis. The current laboratory process takes approximately 5 days.
Liquid based cytology (LBC) specimens obtained through the same sampling procedures are also prepared in the laboratory and fixed using a methanol based solution (PreservCyt). Previous research has been carried out to determine whether LBC samples can be used instead of FFPE samples for the detection of EGFR mutations with favourable results. Examples of this include research by Zhao et al (2017), Satouchi et al (2017), De Luca et al (2017) and Malapelle et al (2016). A switch to the use of LBC samples for EGFR testing would remove multiple processing steps in the sample pathway to mutation testing. Immunocytochemistry will be required in the majority of cases for confirmation of adenocarcinoma. This faster pathway would be beneficial in cases of already confirmed adenocarcinoma for second line EGFR treatment testing (T790M) and in cases where the residual cytology sample, that would normally be discarded, can be utilised for testing, optimising the potential of the sampling.
This study will investigate whether LBC specimens are a feasible alternative to FFPE samples for detection of EGFR mutations using the Biocartis Idylla platform.
If liquid based cytology samples are found to be a feasible alternative this could result in:
* Quicker turnaround time of results in cases of unequivocal adenocarcinoma. This would provide earlier access to TKIs allowing for optimal patient management.
* Easier sample preparation within the laboratory
* Would allow for efficient use of all material acquired from the sampling procedures. For example additional testing could be performed on the FFPE tissue in place of EGFR testing which could aid in diagnosis. Increase in efficient use of material could also prevent repeats of the EBUS procedure on patients.
* Methanol has been found to be a superior fixative than formalin. Use of liquid based cytology samples may allow for better results from molecular testing.
* Would provide support to the idea that molecular testing for other cancers may be able to be carried out on liquid based cytology samples for example BRAF mutation testing for melanoma. Also provides support of the use of other liquid samples for molecular testing such as blood samples which could be tested for circulating tumour cells (less invasive sampling).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Biocartis NV
INDUSTRY
Royal Cornwall Hospitals Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cytopathology Laboratory Royal Cornwall Hospital
Truro, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2019.RCHT.24
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.