Trial Outcomes & Findings for Investigating Psychosocial Predictors & Employment Outcomes of Enhanced IPS Intervention (NCT NCT04083404)

NCT ID: NCT04083404

Last Updated: 2020-01-09

Results Overview

successful attainment of open employment or educational opportunity / unsuccessful

• Recruitment status: COMPLETED
• Target enrollment: 202 participants
• Primary outcome timeframe: 1day
• Results posted on: 2020-01-09

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Measure	Enhanced Individual Placement and Support (IPS) Programme An enhanced individual placement and support (IPS) intervention based on the Model of Human Occupation
Overall Study STARTED	202
Overall Study COMPLETED	202
Overall Study NOT COMPLETED	0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Investigating Psychosocial Predictors & Employment Outcomes of Enhanced IPS Intervention

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Measure	Enhanced IPS Programme n=202 Participants An enhanced individual placement and support (IPS) intervention based on the Model of Human Occupation
Age, Continuous	37.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male Female	78 Participants n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male Male	124 Participants n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized Ethnicity · White	185 Participants n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized Ethnicity · Other ethnic group	17 Participants n=5 Participants
Marital Status Married / de facto relationship	33 Participants n=5 Participants
Marital Status Single	163 Participants n=5 Participants
Marital Status missing data	6 Participants n=5 Participants
Social Situation living with others	97 Participants n=5 Participants
Social Situation living alone	101 Participants n=5 Participants
Social Situation missing data	4 Participants n=5 Participants
Scottish Indices of Multiple Deprivation most deprived quintile 1	38 Participants n=5 Participants
Scottish Indices of Multiple Deprivation quintile 2	35 Participants n=5 Participants
Scottish Indices of Multiple Deprivation quintile 3	33 Participants n=5 Participants
Scottish Indices of Multiple Deprivation quintile 4	32 Participants n=5 Participants
Scottish Indices of Multiple Deprivation least deprived quintile 5	64 Participants n=5 Participants
Educational Attainment Did Not Attain School Quals	18 Participants n=5 Participants
Educational Attainment Exams from School	61 Participants n=5 Participants
Educational Attainment Further Education	121 Participants n=5 Participants
Educational Attainment missing data	2 Participants n=5 Participants
Previous Employment Previous employment	182 Participants n=5 Participants
Previous Employment No previous employment	20 Participants n=5 Participants
ICD10 ICD10 F2	105 Participants n=5 Participants
ICD10 ICD10 F3	67 Participants n=5 Participants
ICD10 ICD10 other	30 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Assesses Abilities and Limitations Strongly supports	35 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Assesses Abilities and Limitations Supports	102 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Assesses Abilities and Limitations Interferes	59 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Assesses Abilities and Limitations Strongly interferes	5 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Assesses Abilities and Limitations Missing data	1 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Expectation of job success Strongly supports	17 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Expectation of job success Supports	92 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Expectation of job success Interferes	88 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Expectation of job success Strongly interferes	5 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Expectation of job success Missing data	0 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Takes Responsibility Strongly supports	30 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Takes Responsibility Supports	81 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Takes Responsibility Interferes	82 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Takes Responsibility Strongly interferes	9 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Takes Responsibility Missing data	0 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Commitment to work Strongly supports	69 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Commitment to work Supports	106 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Commitment to work Interferes	27 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Commitment to work Strongly interferes	0 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Commitment to work Missing data	0 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Work-related goals Strongly supports	29 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Work-related goals Supports	89 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Work-related goals Interferes	74 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Work-related goals Strongly interferes	9 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Work-related goals Missing data	1 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Enjoys work Strongly supports	36 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Enjoys work Supports	114 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Enjoys work Interferes	42 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Enjoys work Strongly interferes	5 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Enjoys work Missing data	5 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Pursues interests Strongly supports	32 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Pursues interests Supports	77 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Pursues interests Interferes	81 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Pursues interests Strongly interferes	10 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Pursues interests Missing data	2 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Appraises work expectations Strongly supports	50 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Appraises work expectations Supports	108 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Appraises work expectations Interferes	34 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Appraises work expectations Strongly interferes	6 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Appraises work expectations Missing data	4 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Influence of other roles Strongly supports	50 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Influence of other roles Supports	96 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Influence of other roles Interferes	54 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Influence of other roles Strongly interferes	2 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Influence of other roles Missing data	0 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Work Habits Strongly supports	33 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Work Habits Supports	96 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Work Habits Interferes	52 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Work Habits Strongly interferes	16 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Work Habits Missing data	5 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Daily Routine Strongly supports	13 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Daily Routine Supports	62 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Daily Routine Interferes	106 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Daily Routine Strongly interferes	20 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Daily Routine Missing data	1 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Adapts routines to minimize difficulties Strongly supports	13 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Adapts routines to minimize difficulties Supports	87 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Adapts routines to minimize difficulties Interferes	85 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Adapts routines to minimize difficulties Strongly interferes	16 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Adapts routines to minimize difficulties Missing data	1 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of physical work setting Strongly supports	27 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of physical work setting Supports	107 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of physical work setting Interferes	46 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of physical work setting Strongly interferes	2 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of physical work setting Missing data	20 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of family and peers Strongly supports	50 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of family and peers Supports	92 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of family and peers Interferes	33 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of family and peers Strongly interferes	11 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of family and peers Missing data	16 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of boss and/or company Strongly supports	26 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of boss and/or company Supports	52 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of boss and/or company Interferes	57 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of boss and/or company Strongly interferes	9 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of boss and/or company Missing data	58 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of co-workers Strongly supports	26 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of co-workers Supports	63 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of co-workers Interferes	40 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of co-workers Strongly interferes	8 Participants n=5 Participants
Worker Role Interview Item Perception of co-workers Missing data	65 Participants n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 1day

successful attainment of open employment or educational opportunity / unsuccessful

Outcome measures

Measure	Enhanced IPS Programme n=202 Participants An enhanced individual placement and support (IPS) intervention based on the Model of Human Occupation
Attainment of Employment or Education Attained employment or education	128 Participants
Attainment of Employment or Education Did not attain employment or education	74 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 1day-69months

Time to outcome for those successfully attaining employment or education

Outcome measures

Measure	Enhanced IPS Programme n=128 Participants An enhanced individual placement and support (IPS) intervention based on the Model of Human Occupation
Time to Attainment of Employment or Education	8.435 months Interval 5.055 to 16.742

Adverse Events

Enhanced IPS Programme

Serious events: 0 serious events

Other events: 0 other events

Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr Susan Prior

Queen Margaret University

Phone: 44 (0)131 474 0000

Email: sprior@qmu.ac.uk

Results disclosure agreements

• Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
• Publication restrictions are in place