Trial Outcomes & Findings for eHealth Diet and Physical Activity Program for the Improvement of Health in Rural Latino Cancer Survivors (NCT NCT04081298)

Results Overview

Number of participants that completed the follow-up (3 month) data collection. This feasibility study has primary outcomes that are descriptive in nature and do not include statistical analyses. The outcome measure data table provide the feasibility results for the project.

Recruitment status

TERMINATED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

20 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

At 3-months

Results posted on

2023-07-03

Participant Flow

The study was paused April 2020 due to the pandemic. Because we had not reached the number needed to begin our first intervention cohort and pandemic protocols halted our in-person study design, the project was paused. We revised the study design and began recruitment again with a new online version of the protocol, recruitment protocols, and participant eligibility on 9/16/2021. The revised protocol concluded on 2/25/2022.

As this was a single arm study, participants were not assigned to any arm or group.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure	eHealth Diet and Physical Activity Education and Communication This is a single arm feasibility study to assess a culturally tailored eHealth diet and physical activity education and communication program for rural Latino adults with a history of hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and/or obesity in the Lower Yakima Valley in Washington State.
Overall Study STARTED	20
Overall Study COMPLETED	19
Overall Study NOT COMPLETED	1

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

eHealth Diet and Physical Activity Program for the Improvement of Health in Rural Latino Cancer Survivors

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure	Single Arm n=20 Participants This is a single arm feasibility study to assess a culturally tailored eHealth diet and physical activity program for rural Latino adults with a history of hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and/or obesity in the Lower Yakima Valley.
Age, Continuous	49.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male Female	19 Participants n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male Male	1 Participants n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino	20 Participants n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino	0 Participants n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported	0 Participants n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race · Other	7 Participants n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race · White	12 Participants n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race · Black or African American	1 Participants n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment United States	20 Participants n=5 Participants
Place of Birth U.S born	12 Participants n=5 Participants
Place of Birth Foreign born	8 Participants n=5 Participants
Years of education	12.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8 • n=5 Participants
Body Mass Index	33.6 kg/m-squared STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2 • n=5 Participants
Married or Living With Partner Married or Living with Partner	10 Participants n=5 Participants
Married or Living With Partner Living Alone	10 Participants n=5 Participants
Number of Household Members	3.9 Household Members STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1 • n=5 Participants
Use of Electronic Benefit Transfer/Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program	3 Participants n=5 Participants
Employment Status Employed (FT or PT)	11 Participants n=5 Participants
Employment Status Unemployed	9 Participants n=5 Participants
Languages Spoken at Home Only Spanish	6 Participants n=5 Participants
Languages Spoken at Home More Spanish than English	2 Participants n=5 Participants
Languages Spoken at Home Both Spanish and English Equally	4 Participants n=5 Participants
Languages Spoken at Home More English than Spanish	8 Participants n=5 Participants
Clinical Diagnosis Diabetes	8 Participants n=5 Participants
Clinical Diagnosis Hypertension	6 Participants n=5 Participants
Clinical Diagnosis Cholesterol	3 Participants n=5 Participants
Clinical Diagnosis Liver Disease	2 Participants n=5 Participants
Clinical Diagnosis Gastrointestinal Problems	3 Participants n=5 Participants
Clinical Diagnosis Cancer	2 Participants n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At 3-months

Number of participants that completed the follow-up (3 month) data collection. This feasibility study has primary outcomes that are descriptive in nature and do not include statistical analyses. The outcome measure data table provide the feasibility results for the project.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Health Services: Single Arm Feasibility Online Diet and Physical Activity and eHealth Communication n=19 Participants Patients attend 6 online nutrition and PA education classes, cooking sessions, and participate in physical activities over 120 minutes each. Patients also receive text messages, electronic newsletters and have access to an interactive nutrition website. Health Education: Attend nutrition and PA classes, and cooking sessions Physical Activity: Participate in physical activities Health Promotion and Education: Text Messages: Receive motivational text messages Health Promotion and Education: Web Site: Given access to nutrition website Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
Feasibility: Retention	19 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At 3 months

Number of participants who responded to 1 or more text messages. This feasibility study has primary outcomes that are descriptive in nature and do not include statistical analyses. The outcome measure data table provide the feasibility results for the project.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Health Services: Single Arm Feasibility Online Diet and Physical Activity and eHealth Communication n=20 Participants Patients attend 6 online nutrition and PA education classes, cooking sessions, and participate in physical activities over 120 minutes each. Patients also receive text messages, electronic newsletters and have access to an interactive nutrition website. Health Education: Attend nutrition and PA classes, and cooking sessions Physical Activity: Participate in physical activities Health Promotion and Education: Text Messages: Receive motivational text messages Health Promotion and Education: Web Site: Given access to nutrition website Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
Feasibility: Adherence for Text Messages	10 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At 3 months

Number of times participant received all 6 grocery deliveries. This feasibility study has primary outcomes that are descriptive in nature and do not include statistical analyses. The outcome measure data table provide the feasibility results for the project.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Health Services: Single Arm Feasibility Online Diet and Physical Activity and eHealth Communication n=20 Participants Patients attend 6 online nutrition and PA education classes, cooking sessions, and participate in physical activities over 120 minutes each. Patients also receive text messages, electronic newsletters and have access to an interactive nutrition website. Health Education: Attend nutrition and PA classes, and cooking sessions Physical Activity: Participate in physical activities Health Promotion and Education: Text Messages: Receive motivational text messages Health Promotion and Education: Web Site: Given access to nutrition website Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
Feasibility: Adherence of Grocery Deliveries	19 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At 3 months

For the purpose of this feasibility study, participants who completed at least 3 of the 6 online sessions were assessed. Participants attend 6 online nutrition and PA education classes, cooking sessions, and participate in physical activities over 120 minutes each. Patients also receive text messages, electronic newsletters and have access to an interactive nutrition website Health Education: Attend nutrition and PA classes, and cooking sessions Physical Activity: Participate in physical activities This feasibility study has primary outcomes that are descriptive in nature and do not include statistical analyses. The outcome measure data table provide the feasibility results for the project.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Health Services: Single Arm Feasibility Online Diet and Physical Activity and eHealth Communication n=19 Participants Patients attend 6 online nutrition and PA education classes, cooking sessions, and participate in physical activities over 120 minutes each. Patients also receive text messages, electronic newsletters and have access to an interactive nutrition website. Health Education: Attend nutrition and PA classes, and cooking sessions Physical Activity: Participate in physical activities Health Promotion and Education: Text Messages: Receive motivational text messages Health Promotion and Education: Web Site: Given access to nutrition website Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
Feasibility: Adherence for Online Sessions	13 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At 3 months

Acceptability of the cooking sessions was assessed during the exit interview. The exit interview asked participants to respond to a series of 15-questions assessing the helpfulness of each intervention component (e.g., online session, FITBit, e-communications, etc). Response options include a 6-item Likert scale (1=not at all helpful to 5=very helpful). A space for written-qualitative responses was also provided to allow the participant to provide information about the context and recommendations related to the intervention components/delivery. This feasibility study has primary outcomes that are descriptive in nature and do not include statistical analyses. The outcome measure data table provide the feasibility results for the project.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Health Services: Single Arm Feasibility Online Diet and Physical Activity and eHealth Communication n=19 Participants Patients attend 6 online nutrition and PA education classes, cooking sessions, and participate in physical activities over 120 minutes each. Patients also receive text messages, electronic newsletters and have access to an interactive nutrition website. Health Education: Attend nutrition and PA classes, and cooking sessions Physical Activity: Participate in physical activities Health Promotion and Education: Text Messages: Receive motivational text messages Health Promotion and Education: Web Site: Given access to nutrition website Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
Feasibility: Acceptability of Cooking Sessions Cooking sessions were somewhat or very helpful	18 Participants
Feasibility: Acceptability of Cooking Sessions Cooking sessions were somewhat or not very helpful or not at all helpful	1 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At 3 months

Acceptability of recipes was assessed during the exit interview. The exit interview asked participants to respond to a series of 15-questions assessing the helpfulness of each intervention component (e.g., online session, FITBit, e-communications, etc). Response options include a 6-item Likert scale (1=not at all helpful to 5=very helpful). A space for written-qualitative responses was also provided to allow the participant to provide information about the context and recommendations related to the intervention components/delivery. This feasibility study has primary outcomes that are descriptive in nature and do not include statistical analyses. The outcome measure data table provide the feasibility results for the project.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Health Services: Single Arm Feasibility Online Diet and Physical Activity and eHealth Communication n=19 Participants Patients attend 6 online nutrition and PA education classes, cooking sessions, and participate in physical activities over 120 minutes each. Patients also receive text messages, electronic newsletters and have access to an interactive nutrition website. Health Education: Attend nutrition and PA classes, and cooking sessions Physical Activity: Participate in physical activities Health Promotion and Education: Text Messages: Receive motivational text messages Health Promotion and Education: Web Site: Given access to nutrition website Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
Feasibility: Acceptability of Recipes Recipes were somewhat or very helpful	19 Participants
Feasibility: Acceptability of Recipes Recipes were somewhat or not at all helpful	0 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At 3 months

Acceptability of the nutrition and physical activity sessions was assessed during the exit interview. The exit interview asked participants to respond to a series of 15-questions assessing the helpfulness of each intervention component (e.g., online session, FITBit, e-communications, etc). Response options include a 6-item Likert scale (1=not at all helpful to 5=very helpful). A space for written-qualitative responses was also provided to allow the participant to provide information about the context and recommendations related to the intervention components/delivery. This feasibility study has primary outcomes that are descriptive in nature and do not include statistical analyses. The outcome measure data table provide the feasibility results for the project.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Health Services: Single Arm Feasibility Online Diet and Physical Activity and eHealth Communication n=19 Participants Patients attend 6 online nutrition and PA education classes, cooking sessions, and participate in physical activities over 120 minutes each. Patients also receive text messages, electronic newsletters and have access to an interactive nutrition website. Health Education: Attend nutrition and PA classes, and cooking sessions Physical Activity: Participate in physical activities Health Promotion and Education: Text Messages: Receive motivational text messages Health Promotion and Education: Web Site: Given access to nutrition website Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
Feasibility: Acceptability Nutrition and Physical Activity Sessions Nutrition and physical activity sessions were somewhat or very helpful	19 Participants
Feasibility: Acceptability Nutrition and Physical Activity Sessions Nutrition and physical activity sessions were not very helpful or not at all helpful	0 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At 3 months

Acceptability of the nutrition text messages was assessed during the exit interview. The exit interview asked participants to respond to a series of 15-questions assessing the helpfulness of each intervention component (e.g., online session, FITBit, e-communications, etc). Response options include a 6-item Likert scale (1=not at all helpful to 5=very helpful). A space for written-qualitative responses was also provided to allow the participant to provide information about the context and recommendations related to the intervention components/delivery. This feasibility study has primary outcomes that are descriptive in nature and do not include statistical analyses. The outcome measure data table provide the feasibility results for the project.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Health Services: Single Arm Feasibility Online Diet and Physical Activity and eHealth Communication n=19 Participants Patients attend 6 online nutrition and PA education classes, cooking sessions, and participate in physical activities over 120 minutes each. Patients also receive text messages, electronic newsletters and have access to an interactive nutrition website. Health Education: Attend nutrition and PA classes, and cooking sessions Physical Activity: Participate in physical activities Health Promotion and Education: Text Messages: Receive motivational text messages Health Promotion and Education: Web Site: Given access to nutrition website Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
Feasibility: Acceptability of Nutrition Text Messages nutrition text messages were somewhat or very helpful	18 Participants
Feasibility: Acceptability of Nutrition Text Messages nutrition text messages were not very helpful or not at all helpful	1 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At 3 months

Acceptability of physical activity text messages was assessed during the exit interview. The exit interview asked participants to respond to a series of 15-questions assessing the helpfulness of each intervention component (e.g., online session, FITBit, e-communications, etc). Response options include a 6-item Likert scale (1=not at all helpful to 5=very helpful). A space for written-qualitative responses was also provided to allow the participant to provide information about the context and recommendations related to the intervention components/delivery. This feasibility study has primary outcomes that are descriptive in nature and do not include statistical analyses. The outcome measure data table provide the feasibility results for the project.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Health Services: Single Arm Feasibility Online Diet and Physical Activity and eHealth Communication n=19 Participants Patients attend 6 online nutrition and PA education classes, cooking sessions, and participate in physical activities over 120 minutes each. Patients also receive text messages, electronic newsletters and have access to an interactive nutrition website. Health Education: Attend nutrition and PA classes, and cooking sessions Physical Activity: Participate in physical activities Health Promotion and Education: Text Messages: Receive motivational text messages Health Promotion and Education: Web Site: Given access to nutrition website Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
Feasibility: Acceptability of Physical Activity Text Messages physical activity text messages were somewhat or very helpful	18 Participants
Feasibility: Acceptability of Physical Activity Text Messages physical activity text messages were not very helpful or not at all helpful	1 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At 3 months

Acceptability of the website was assessed during the exit interview. The exit interview asked participants to respond to a series of 15-questions assessing the helpfulness of each intervention component (e.g., online session, FITBit, e-communications, etc). Response options include a 6-item Likert scale (1=not at all helpful to 5=very helpful). A space for written-qualitative responses was also provided to allow the participant to provide information about the context and recommendations related to the intervention components/delivery.This feasibility study has primary outcomes that are descriptive in nature and do not include statistical analyses. The outcome measure data table provide the feasibility results for the project.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Health Services: Single Arm Feasibility Online Diet and Physical Activity and eHealth Communication n=19 Participants Patients attend 6 online nutrition and PA education classes, cooking sessions, and participate in physical activities over 120 minutes each. Patients also receive text messages, electronic newsletters and have access to an interactive nutrition website. Health Education: Attend nutrition and PA classes, and cooking sessions Physical Activity: Participate in physical activities Health Promotion and Education: Text Messages: Receive motivational text messages Health Promotion and Education: Web Site: Given access to nutrition website Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
Feasibility: Acceptability of Website Website was somewhat or very helpful	12 Participants
Feasibility: Acceptability of Website Website was not very helpful or not at all helpful	7 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At 3 months

Acceptability of the FITBit was assessed during the exit interview. The exit interview asked participants to respond to a series of 15-questions assessing the helpfulness of each intervention component (e.g., online session, FITBit, e-communications, etc). Response options include a 6-item Likert scale (1=not at all helpful to 5=very helpful). A space for written-qualitative responses was also provided to allow the participant to provide information about the context and recommendations related to the intervention components/delivery.This feasibility study has primary outcomes that are descriptive in nature and do not include statistical analyses. The outcome measure data table provide the feasibility results for the project.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Health Services: Single Arm Feasibility Online Diet and Physical Activity and eHealth Communication n=19 Participants Patients attend 6 online nutrition and PA education classes, cooking sessions, and participate in physical activities over 120 minutes each. Patients also receive text messages, electronic newsletters and have access to an interactive nutrition website. Health Education: Attend nutrition and PA classes, and cooking sessions Physical Activity: Participate in physical activities Health Promotion and Education: Text Messages: Receive motivational text messages Health Promotion and Education: Web Site: Given access to nutrition website Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
Feasibility: Acceptability of FITBit Fitbits were not very helpful or not at all helpful	3 Participants
Feasibility: Acceptability of FITBit Fitbits were somewhat or very helpful	16 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At 3 months

Acceptability of monthly check-in calls was assessed during the exit interview. The exit interview asked participants to respond to a series of 15-questions assessing the helpfulness of each intervention component (e.g., online session, FITBit, e-communications, etc). Response options include a 6-item Likert scale (1=not at all helpful to 5=very helpful). A space for written-qualitative responses was also provided to allow the participant to provide information about the context and recommendations related to the intervention components/delivery. This feasibility study has primary outcomes that are descriptive in nature and do not include statistical analyses. The outcome measure data table provide the feasibility results for the project.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Health Services: Single Arm Feasibility Online Diet and Physical Activity and eHealth Communication n=19 Participants Patients attend 6 online nutrition and PA education classes, cooking sessions, and participate in physical activities over 120 minutes each. Patients also receive text messages, electronic newsletters and have access to an interactive nutrition website. Health Education: Attend nutrition and PA classes, and cooking sessions Physical Activity: Participate in physical activities Health Promotion and Education: Text Messages: Receive motivational text messages Health Promotion and Education: Web Site: Given access to nutrition website Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
Feasibility: Acceptability of Monthly check-in Calls Monthly checking in calls were somewhat or very helpful	18 Participants
Feasibility: Acceptability of Monthly check-in Calls Monthly checking in calls were not very helpful or not at all helpful	1 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At 3 months

Acceptability of contact with study staff was assessed during the exit interview. The exit interview asked participants to respond to a series of 15-questions assessing the helpfulness of each intervention component (e.g., online session, FITBit, e-communications, etc). Response options include a 6-item Likert scale (1=not at all helpful to 5=very helpful). A space for written-qualitative responses was also provided to allow the participant to provide information about the context and recommendations related to the intervention components/delivery. This feasibility study has primary outcomes that are descriptive in nature and do not include statistical analyses. The outcome measure data table provide the feasibility results for the project.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Health Services: Single Arm Feasibility Online Diet and Physical Activity and eHealth Communication n=19 Participants Patients attend 6 online nutrition and PA education classes, cooking sessions, and participate in physical activities over 120 minutes each. Patients also receive text messages, electronic newsletters and have access to an interactive nutrition website. Health Education: Attend nutrition and PA classes, and cooking sessions Physical Activity: Participate in physical activities Health Promotion and Education: Text Messages: Receive motivational text messages Health Promotion and Education: Web Site: Given access to nutrition website Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
Feasibility: Acceptability of Contact With Study Staff Contact with study staff was somewhat or very helpful	18 Participants
Feasibility: Acceptability of Contact With Study Staff Contact with study staff was not very helpful or not at all helpful	1 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

Nutrition preferences were measured using 17-questions adapted from a battery developed and validated by the study team. The battery is titled "The Preferences and Self-Efficacy of Diet and Physical Activity Behaviors Questionnaires for Latinas" (preparing manuscript for submission). Participants were asked to rate their like or dislike for 11 specific fruits or vegetables (e.g., green cabbage, kale, turkey or veggie burgers, foods made with oil instead of butter or lard). For each fruit or vegetable listed they were asked to rate on a 5 point likert scale with 1=strongly dislike to 5=strongly like or respond with "never tried it"=0. Scores are averaged across the 17 items. Higher scores are considered a better outcome.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Health Services: Single Arm Feasibility Online Diet and Physical Activity and eHealth Communication n=19 Participants Patients attend 6 online nutrition and PA education classes, cooking sessions, and participate in physical activities over 120 minutes each. Patients also receive text messages, electronic newsletters and have access to an interactive nutrition website. Health Education: Attend nutrition and PA classes, and cooking sessions Physical Activity: Participate in physical activities Health Promotion and Education: Text Messages: Receive motivational text messages Health Promotion and Education: Web Site: Given access to nutrition website Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
Nutrition Preferences: Fruit and Vegetables Baseline	3.80 score on a scale Standard Deviation 0.89
Nutrition Preferences: Fruit and Vegetables 3 month follow-up	4.04 score on a scale Standard Deviation 0.41

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

Nutrition Self-efficacy was measured using 11-questions from a battery developed and validated by the study team. The battery is titled "The Preferences and Self-Efficacy of Diet and Physical Activity Behaviors Questionnaires for Latinas" (preparing manuscript for submission). Participants were asked to rate thow confident they are in their ability to engage in healthy dietary behaviors for one month. For each behavior listed they were asked to rate on a 5 point likert scale with 1=not at all confident to 5=extremely confident. Scores are averaged across the 11 items. Higher scores are considered a better outcome.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Health Services: Single Arm Feasibility Online Diet and Physical Activity and eHealth Communication n=19 Participants Patients attend 6 online nutrition and PA education classes, cooking sessions, and participate in physical activities over 120 minutes each. Patients also receive text messages, electronic newsletters and have access to an interactive nutrition website. Health Education: Attend nutrition and PA classes, and cooking sessions Physical Activity: Participate in physical activities Health Promotion and Education: Text Messages: Receive motivational text messages Health Promotion and Education: Web Site: Given access to nutrition website Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
Nutrition Self-Efficacy Baseline	3.20 score on a scale Standard Deviation 0.76
Nutrition Self-Efficacy 3 month follow-up	3.34 score on a scale Standard Deviation 0.69

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Change in correct nutrition knowledge response from baseline to 3 month follow-up

Population: McNemar's test for binary measures.

Nutrition knowledge was a single question. The value reflects a change in the percent of women who correctly answered the targeted number of daily serving intake of fruits and vegetables at baseline compared to 3-month follow-up. The correct answer was 5-9 servings per day.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Health Services: Single Arm Feasibility Online Diet and Physical Activity and eHealth Communication n=19 Participants Patients attend 6 online nutrition and PA education classes, cooking sessions, and participate in physical activities over 120 minutes each. Patients also receive text messages, electronic newsletters and have access to an interactive nutrition website. Health Education: Attend nutrition and PA classes, and cooking sessions Physical Activity: Participate in physical activities Health Promotion and Education: Text Messages: Receive motivational text messages Health Promotion and Education: Web Site: Given access to nutrition website Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
Nutrition Knowledge	21 change in % of correct responses

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

Physical Activity preferences were measured using 8-questions from a battery developed and validated by the study team. The battery is titled "The Preferences and Self-Efficacy of Diet and Physical Activity Behaviors Questionnaires for Latinas" (preparing manuscript for submission). Participants were asked to rate their like or dislike for 8 specific types of physical activity (e.g., doing housework with vigorous effort, dancing in a group setting, playing with children with vigorous effort). For each activity listed they were asked to rate on a 5 point likert scale with 1=strongly dislike to 5=strongly like or respond with "never tried it"=0. Scores are averaged across the 8 items. Higher scores are considered a better outcome.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Health Services: Single Arm Feasibility Online Diet and Physical Activity and eHealth Communication n=19 Participants Patients attend 6 online nutrition and PA education classes, cooking sessions, and participate in physical activities over 120 minutes each. Patients also receive text messages, electronic newsletters and have access to an interactive nutrition website. Health Education: Attend nutrition and PA classes, and cooking sessions Physical Activity: Participate in physical activities Health Promotion and Education: Text Messages: Receive motivational text messages Health Promotion and Education: Web Site: Given access to nutrition website Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
Physical Activity Preferences Baseline	3.47 score on a scale Standard Deviation 0.70
Physical Activity Preferences 3 month follow-up	3.66 score on a scale Standard Deviation 0.55

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 3 months

Physical Activity Self-Efficacy: Self-efficacy was measured using 5-questions from a battery developed and validated by the study team. The battery is titled "The Preferences and Self-Efficacy of Diet and Physical Activity Behaviors Questionnaires for Latinas" (preparing manuscript for submission). Participants were asked to rate how confident they are in their ability to engage in healthy physical activity behaviors given certain conditions (e.g., when you can't notice any improvements in your fitness, when you have many other demands on your time, when you feel a little stiff or sore) for one month. For each behavior listed they were asked to rate on a 5 point likert scale with 1=not at all confident to 5=extremely confident. Scores are averaged across the 5 items. Higher scores are considered a better outcome.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Health Services: Single Arm Feasibility Online Diet and Physical Activity and eHealth Communication n=19 Participants Patients attend 6 online nutrition and PA education classes, cooking sessions, and participate in physical activities over 120 minutes each. Patients also receive text messages, electronic newsletters and have access to an interactive nutrition website. Health Education: Attend nutrition and PA classes, and cooking sessions Physical Activity: Participate in physical activities Health Promotion and Education: Text Messages: Receive motivational text messages Health Promotion and Education: Web Site: Given access to nutrition website Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
Physical Activity Self-Efficacy Baseline	3.12 score on a scale Standard Deviation 0.69
Physical Activity Self-Efficacy 3 month follow-up	3.18 score on a scale Standard Deviation 0.64

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 3 month follow-up

Self-reported physical activity reflects change in time spent sitting (minutes/day). NOTE: The outcomes are reported as a change score (value at 3 months minus value at baseline)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Health Services: Single Arm Feasibility Online Diet and Physical Activity and eHealth Communication n=19 Participants Patients attend 6 online nutrition and PA education classes, cooking sessions, and participate in physical activities over 120 minutes each. Patients also receive text messages, electronic newsletters and have access to an interactive nutrition website. Health Education: Attend nutrition and PA classes, and cooking sessions Physical Activity: Participate in physical activities Health Promotion and Education: Text Messages: Receive motivational text messages Health Promotion and Education: Web Site: Given access to nutrition website Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
Self-Reported Physical Activity: Time Sitting	-3.6 change in mean (minutes/day) Standard Deviation 128.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 3 month-follow-up

Self-reported physical activity: walking (MET-minutes/week). NOTE: METs=metabolic equivalent of task. Walking in this case is defined as a light activity equivalent to \< 3 METs. The outcomes are reported as a change score (value at 3 months minus value at baseline).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Health Services: Single Arm Feasibility Online Diet and Physical Activity and eHealth Communication n=19 Participants Patients attend 6 online nutrition and PA education classes, cooking sessions, and participate in physical activities over 120 minutes each. Patients also receive text messages, electronic newsletters and have access to an interactive nutrition website. Health Education: Attend nutrition and PA classes, and cooking sessions Physical Activity: Participate in physical activities Health Promotion and Education: Text Messages: Receive motivational text messages Health Promotion and Education: Web Site: Given access to nutrition website Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
Self-Reported Physical Activity: Walking	490 change in mean (MET-minutes/week) Standard Deviation 907

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 3-month follow-up

Self-reported physical activity includes moderate to vigorous physical activity (MET-minutes/week). NOTE: METs=metabolic equivalent of task. Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity is considered activities estimated at 3 or more METs. The outcomes are reported as a change score (value at 3 months minus value at baseline)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure	Health Services: Single Arm Feasibility Online Diet and Physical Activity and eHealth Communication n=19 Participants Patients attend 6 online nutrition and PA education classes, cooking sessions, and participate in physical activities over 120 minutes each. Patients also receive text messages, electronic newsletters and have access to an interactive nutrition website. Health Education: Attend nutrition and PA classes, and cooking sessions Physical Activity: Participate in physical activities Health Promotion and Education: Text Messages: Receive motivational text messages Health Promotion and Education: Web Site: Given access to nutrition website Quality-of-Life Assessment: Ancillary studies Questionnaire Administration: Ancillary studies
Self-Reported Physical Activity: Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity	-1024 change in mean (MET-minutes/week) Standard Deviation 4709

Adverse Events

eHealth Diet and Physical Activity Program

Serious events: 0 serious events

Other events: 0 other events

Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Heather Greenlee

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Phone: 206-667-4502

Email: [email protected]

Results disclosure agreements

Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
Publication restrictions are in place