Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
700 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-10-01
2039-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Predicting Prostate Biopsy Results With Biomarkers and mpMRI.
NCT03730324
Early Detection of Prostate Cancer
NCT04556916
Biomarkers in Patients Undergoing Transrectal Ultrasound Prostate Biopsy
NCT00373035
Danish Prostate Cancer Consortium Study-1
NCT05767307
Combination of Serum Measurements of Molecular Biomarkers and Serum Protein Profiling Can be Used to Predict Which Patients Undergoing Prostatic Biopsy Will be Diagnosed With Cancer
NCT00773773
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
AIM With this study we want of compare "Liquid Biopsy", defined by our blood and urine panel against prostate biopsy in a large-scale randomized manner including men referred for a biopsy due to the suspicion of prostate cancer over the age of 70 (elderly).
OBJECTIVE The primary objectives of this study are to test the ability of the "liquid biopsy" to
1. Detect as many patients with aggressive prostate cancer as the standard method (PSA).
2. Reduce the number of prostate biopsy sets taken and thereby reduce the number of patients detected with indolent prostate cancer.
The secondary objectives are to evaluate
1. The economic effect of implementation of the test with regard to reduced biopsies taken, iatrogenic infectious disease and reduced control of indolent prostate cancer.
2. The association of the liquid biopsy to tumor grade and tumor volume in biopsied men.
3. The Quality of life.
4. Progression and survival: overall survival, prostate cancer specific survival, PSA recurrence, time to metastases, time to castration resistance
5. Safety
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Liquid Biopsy
Experimental arm where the "liquid biopsy" decides whether to perform an prostate biopsy or not
Liquid Biopsy
Measuring biomarkers in blood and urine samples
Standard Biopsy
Standard arm, where every patient receives a standard prostate biopsy
Standard biopsy
Histological examination of tissue biopsies
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Liquid Biopsy
Measuring biomarkers in blood and urine samples
Standard biopsy
Histological examination of tissue biopsies
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Indication for digital rectal examination and trans-rectal ultrasound with biopsy
* Age: 70 years or above
* PSA: 20 or above
* Able to provide informed written consent (competent adults only)
Exclusion Criteria
* Receiving treatment influencing PSA levels
* Medical conditions that may interfere with the study such as previously cancer-related therapy
* Life expectancy of less than 10 years
* MRI of the prostate within the last 2 years
* Digital rectal examination of the prostate within 24 hours or ejaculation within 24 hours
70 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Odense University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mads Hvid Poulsen
MD, PhD, Associate professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lars Lund, MD, DMSci
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Odense University Hospital
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DaProCa4
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.