Lumbopelvic Biomechanical Variables and TMJ Kinematics Changes in Pregnant Women: A Case-Control Study
NCT ID: NCT04077775
Last Updated: 2024-09-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-10-04
2022-05-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Various rationales for the relationship between the spine or pelvis and TMJ have been found. These theories include fascial, myological interrelationships, referred pain patterns and facilitating tonic neck reflexes involving inter segmental spinal pathways. A contributing mechanism could be the relationship between how TMJ occlusion, head position and body posture relate to the body's natural neurological visual/vestibular righting mechanism (Blum, 2004).
There is a Correlation between the facial axis together with the lordotic angle and the pelvic inclination, the inner gonial angle and the mandibular plane with the lordotic angle and the pelvic inclination, as well as the facial depth with the pelvic inclination showed a significant correlation (Carsten et al., 2007).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Biomechanical Changes in Women With Post-partum Pelvic Girdle Pain: An Observational Case-control Study
NCT04077801
Biomechanical and Viscoelastic Properties of Thoracolumbar Fascia in Pregnancy Pelvic Girdle Pain
NCT05403424
Biomechanical and Viscoelastic Properties of Plantar Fascia in Pregnant Women
NCT04620993
Assessment of Temporomandibular Joint Function Across Different Trimesters of Pregnancy
NCT06946147
Impact of Kinesiotaping Application on Pelvic Girdle Pain in Pregnant Women
NCT07292701
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Study group (group A):
Study group (group ) Diagnostic Test: Study group (group A)24 women who have cyclic CPP
I) Pelvic tilt angle:
The physiotherapist stood beside the women and found the position of the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) accurately while the woman was in standing position. Hence the therapist placed one end arm of PALM inclinometer on ASIS, and the other end arm was placed on PSIS. The pelvic sagittal inclination angle was the angle between the horizontal line and a line passing through the ASIS and PSIS that determined by the bubble level in the PALM inclinometer
assesment
assesment
Study group(group B):
included 20 women who have non-cyclic CPP and the other 16 women of the participants were normal I)
Pelvic tilt angle:
The physiotherapist stood beside the women and found the position of the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) accurately. In contrast, the woman was in a standing position. Hence the therapist placed one end arm of PALM inclinometer on ASIS, and the other end arm was placed on PSIS. The pelvic sagittal inclination angle was the angle between the horizontal line and a line passing through the ASIS and PSIS that determined by the bubble level in the PALM inclinometer
Diagnostic Test: Study group (group A)
No interventions assigned to this group
Control group (group C):
16 women of the participants were normal and considered the control group
I) Pelvic tilt angle:
The physiotherapist stood beside the women and found the position of the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) accurately while the woman was in standing position. Hence the therapist placed one end arm of PALM inclinometer on ASIS, and the other end arm was placed on PSIS. The pelvic sagittal inclination angle was the angle between the horizontal line and a line passing through the ASIS and PSIS that determined by the bubble level in the PALM inclinometer
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
assesment
assesment
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
20 Years
40 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
rovan mohamed saad elbesh
Doctor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rovan Elbesh
Giza, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P.T.REC/012/001888
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.