Correcting Myopia Among Secondary School Children to Increase Academic High School Attendance Rates in Rural Communities

NCT ID: NCT04077086

Last Updated: 2024-12-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10000 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-11-28

Study Completion Date

2027-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Chinese children are some of the most short-sighted in the world, but only one in five children in poor areas who needs glasses has them. Our team has already shown in other trials that giving children free glasses leads to better grades and that free glasses have a bigger impact on grades than factors like parents' education level and the amount of money a family has. The effect on grades from glasses is greater than from other health services in school, like giving vitamins. Only about one in three children in rural China goes on to a regular, non-vocational high school. The investigators would like to show the Chinese government strong evidence of what glasses can do to help children continue their education, in order to help convince the government to carry out national programs to provide free glasses for children who need them.

Study Plan: The investigators will choose 111 middle schools at random in Liaoning, northern China, and all children in Year 1 at each school will go at random into one of two groups: either a group getting free glasses, with support from teachers to push them to wear the glasses ("Intervention") or a group getting just glasses prescriptions ("Control.") The main study outcome will be the proportion of children going on to academic (as opposed to vocational) high school, and the study is powered to detect a 10% difference in this figure between groups.The study will also assess whether children wear their glasses at school and how often they use blackboards (which disadvantage short-sighted children) vs textbooks to learn from. These other outcomes will help us to better understand the causal pathway between vision and high school attendance. We will also study the total cost of providing glasses and the teacher support to wear them per additional student attending academic high school, as well as student mental health outcomes. We will also collect data on the progression of nearsightedness. The hypothesis of this study is that providing glasses will increase academic high school attendance.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Research question: Will providing free glasses to myopic rural Chinese students, with a teacher incentive to promote use, increase academic high school attendance?

Design: Cluster-randomised controlled trial

Rationale: Rural Chinese children have high myopia prevalence, but poor access to glasses. Our previous trials show giving free glasses significantly improves academic performance, with greater effect size than parental education or family income, equaling or exceeding other classroom-based medical interventions. Non-vocational (academic) high school attendance is only 30% in rural western China. Strong evidence of educational benefit from glasses is needed to spur adoption of national distribution programs.

Methods: Children in Year 1 at 111 randomly-selected middle schools in Liaoning, Northern China, will be randomized by school to receive free glasses and a trial-proven teacher-based incentive to promote wear (Intervention) or prescriptions only (Control). The main outcome 3 years later will be high school attendance (powered to detect 10% difference between study groups); secondary outcomes of compliance and use of near versus distance classroom learning aids will elucidate biological plausibility of a causal pathway between myopia correction and learning. Local knowledge and attitudes about myopia and spectacle use and intervention cost-effectiveness will be studied.

Statistical methods to be employed in the analysis and justification for the choice of sample size:

Adjusted- and unadjusted-comparison of the difference between study groups

Principal analyses for the main trial will include:

* Of attendance at academic high school after Year 3 of middle school (as opposed to following a vocational pathway or leaving school).
* of observed spectacle wear at un-announced examinations at school and for self-efficacy scores.
* of mental health outcomes after Year 1 year of intervention

Sample size: Assuming 120 students per school undergoing vision screening, 50% of children failing vision screening, 30% of these needing glasses, α=0.05, intra-class correlation=0.10, explained variation by covariates=0.40, difference between the groups in the main study outcome=10%, high-school attendance rate in the Control group=50%, a sample size of 111 middle-schools (55 or 56 in each group) will provide power=80%.

Loss to follow-up in our previous school-based trials in China, SWLW I and II, was approximately 4% over the course of one school year, and so our calculations here assume a loss to follow-up of 10% over 2-3 years. However, we have not adjusted for non-compliance because we will use a strict intention-to-treat analytic approach where children in schools allocated to the Intervention group will be analysed as such irrespective of compliance and because our intention is to test the policy of making free glasses available to those students who need them, rather than the effect of those students actually wearing the glasses. Further, our expected effect size is based conservatively on previous trials with compliance rates of approximately 40%, which we feel can be improved on in the current trial with teacher incentives as above.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Refractive Errors

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Refractive error Myopia Academic high school attendance Education attainment Spectacle wear compliance Mental health well-being Progression of shortsightedness

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Children in Year 1 at 111 randomly-selected middle-schools in Liaoning, northern China, will be randomized by school to receive free glasses and a teacher-based incentive to promote wear, or prescriptions only.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
Study personnel assessing trial outcomes will be masked as to children's study group assignment, which will be simplified by the fact that there will be participants with and without glasses at both Intervention and Control schools. It is not ethical in this setting to provide Control participants with placebo treatment (glasses with zero power lenses), but students, parents and teachers will not be informed of either the overall design of the study or the explicit treatment intervention assignment. Only one school will be selected in each township, minimizing the possibility of cross arm communication and contamination.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention

Children at Intervention schools will receive free spectacles of a design they select, based on the child's measured refractive power and dispensed at school by the study optometrist. Additionally, teachers (but not children) in eligible classes will be informed that if 80% spectacle compliance as measured across three separate unannounced inspections was achieved, they will be given an incentive of an conditional cash transfer. The cash transfer will be deposited into the teacher's bank accounts directly.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Spectacles

Intervention Type DEVICE

Intervention group children in middle school Year 1 will receive spectacles in December 2024. Assuming that the relevant effects of treatment (glasses wear) on the main study outcome are complete once examinations determining high school attendance are finished at the end of Middle School Year 3, Intervention participants will have undergone 32 months (December 2024 - July 2027) of treatment by the endpoint of the trial.

Control

Children at Control schools will receive a glasses prescription and letter to the parents informing them of the refractive status of their child, with free glasses provided only at the end of the trial. No teacher incentive will be offered. Service offered to the Control group exceeds standard care, in that no school-based programs of vision screening and refraction currently exist in the study area, or in most of rural China.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Spectacles

Intervention group children in middle school Year 1 will receive spectacles in December 2024. Assuming that the relevant effects of treatment (glasses wear) on the main study outcome are complete once examinations determining high school attendance are finished at the end of Middle School Year 3, Intervention participants will have undergone 32 months (December 2024 - July 2027) of treatment by the endpoint of the trial.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Glasses

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Year 1 classes (likely age 12-13 years) at the recruited schools
* Have uncorrected (without glasses) visual acuity of ≤6/12 in both eyes;
* Refractive error meets cut-offs shown to be associated with significantly greater improvement in visual acuity when corrected (myopia ≤-0.75 diopters (D, or astigmatism (non-spherical refractive error) ≥1.00 D);
* Visual acuity can be improved to \>= 6/7.5 in at least one eye with glasses.

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of visually-significant ocular condition besides refractive error
Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Stanford University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

New England College of Optometry

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Clearly

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ningxia Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

He Eye Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

He University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Queen's University, Belfast

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nathan Congdon

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nathan Congdon, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Queen's University, Belfast

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

He Eye Specialist Hospital

Shenyang, Liaoning, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Ningxia University

Yinchuan, Xixia, China

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Centre for Public Health

Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Nathan Congdon, MD, MPH

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 07748751393

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Li Meng

Role: primary

Huiping Zhang, PhD

Role: primary

Nathan Congdon, MD, MPH

Role: primary

Smit Gade

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MR/S023208/1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id