Trial Outcomes & Findings for TAS-102 and Irinotecan in 2L+ Gastric and Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma (NCT NCT04074343)
NCT ID: NCT04074343
Last Updated: 2024-02-02
Results Overview
This is defined as the percentage of subjects who are free of progression 6 months after study treatment start. Progression is defined as death, radiographic progression or clinical deterioration attributed to disease progression as judged by an investigator. Radiographic progression is defined using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions and an absolute increase of an least 5 mm and/or appearance of new lesions.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
20 participants
6 Months
2024-02-02
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
TAS-102 and Irinotecan
Patients receive TAS-102 25 mg/m2 PO twice daily on days 1-5 and and Irinotecan 180mg/m2 IV on day 1 every 14 days.
TAS-102: Given PO
Irinotecan: Given IV
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
TAS-102 and Irinotecan in 2L+ Gastric and Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
TAS-102 and Irinotecan
n=20 Participants
Patients receive TAS-102 25 mg/m2 PO twice daily on days 1-5 and and Irinotecan 180mg/m2 IV on day 1 every 14 days.
TAS-102: Given PO
Irinotecan: Given IV
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
61 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
20 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 MonthsThis is defined as the percentage of subjects who are free of progression 6 months after study treatment start. Progression is defined as death, radiographic progression or clinical deterioration attributed to disease progression as judged by an investigator. Radiographic progression is defined using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions and an absolute increase of an least 5 mm and/or appearance of new lesions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TAS-102 and Irinotecan
n=20 Participants
Patients receive TAS-102 25 mg/m2 PO twice daily on days 1-5 and and Irinotecan 180mg/m2 IV on day 1 every 14 days.
TAS-102: Given PO
Irinotecan: Given IV
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival at 6 Months
|
40 percent of participants
Interval 19.3 to 60.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 WeeksTo evaluate the tolerability of administering TAS-102 in combination with Irinotecan in patients with advanced recurrent or unresectable gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma for the first 2 cycles of study treatment. Toxicity and adverse events are based on the CTCAE (NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) Version 5.0.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TAS-102 and Irinotecan
n=20 Participants
Patients receive TAS-102 25 mg/m2 PO twice daily on days 1-5 and and Irinotecan 180mg/m2 IV on day 1 every 14 days.
TAS-102: Given PO
Irinotecan: Given IV
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Grade 3-5 Adverse Events
|
8 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of registration until first date of disease progression, toxicity, delay of treatment, or withdrawal of treatment, whichever came first, an average of 1 year.To assess the objective response rate to the combination of TAS-102 and Irinotecan. Objective response rate (ORR) is defined as confirmed complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1): Complete Response (CR) is defined as the disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR) is defined as a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions. ORR = CR + PR
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TAS-102 and Irinotecan
n=17 Participants
Patients receive TAS-102 25 mg/m2 PO twice daily on days 1-5 and and Irinotecan 180mg/m2 IV on day 1 every 14 days.
TAS-102: Given PO
Irinotecan: Given IV
|
|---|---|
|
Objective Response Rate as Assessed by RECIST v1.1 Criteria of Patients Who Received TAS-102 and Irinotecan
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of registration for up to 18 months after last patient is enrolled or until death from any cause, whichever came first.To evaluate overall survival in patients with advanced recurrent or unresectable and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma treated with this combination of TAS-102 and Irinotecan.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
TAS-102 and Irinotecan
n=20 Participants
Patients receive TAS-102 25 mg/m2 PO twice daily on days 1-5 and and Irinotecan 180mg/m2 IV on day 1 every 14 days.
TAS-102: Given PO
Irinotecan: Given IV
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Survival of Patients of Patients Who Received TAS-102 and Irinotecan
|
12.2 Months
Interval 5.9 to 18.6
|
Adverse Events
TAS-102 and Irinotecan
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
TAS-102 and Irinotecan
n=20 participants at risk
Patients receive TAS-102 25 mg/m2 PO twice daily on days 1-5 and and Irinotecan 180mg/m2 IV on day 1 every 14 days.
TAS-102: Given PO
Irinotecan: Given IV
|
|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile Neutropenia
|
5.0%
1/20 • From date of registration until treatment completion, disease progression or other reasons for removal from protocol treatments, whichever came first, an average of 1 year.
Toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events, version 5.0. Safety was assessed through adverse event monitoring, physical examinations, vital signs and clinical laboratory tests before each dosing.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
5.0%
1/20 • From date of registration until treatment completion, disease progression or other reasons for removal from protocol treatments, whichever came first, an average of 1 year.
Toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events, version 5.0. Safety was assessed through adverse event monitoring, physical examinations, vital signs and clinical laboratory tests before each dosing.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
TAS-102 and Irinotecan
n=20 participants at risk
Patients receive TAS-102 25 mg/m2 PO twice daily on days 1-5 and and Irinotecan 180mg/m2 IV on day 1 every 14 days.
TAS-102: Given PO
Irinotecan: Given IV
|
|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hypokalemia
|
10.0%
2/20 • From date of registration until treatment completion, disease progression or other reasons for removal from protocol treatments, whichever came first, an average of 1 year.
Toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events, version 5.0. Safety was assessed through adverse event monitoring, physical examinations, vital signs and clinical laboratory tests before each dosing.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
White blood cell decreased
|
10.0%
2/20 • From date of registration until treatment completion, disease progression or other reasons for removal from protocol treatments, whichever came first, an average of 1 year.
Toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events, version 5.0. Safety was assessed through adverse event monitoring, physical examinations, vital signs and clinical laboratory tests before each dosing.
|
|
General disorders
Nausea
|
70.0%
14/20 • From date of registration until treatment completion, disease progression or other reasons for removal from protocol treatments, whichever came first, an average of 1 year.
Toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events, version 5.0. Safety was assessed through adverse event monitoring, physical examinations, vital signs and clinical laboratory tests before each dosing.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
50.0%
10/20 • From date of registration until treatment completion, disease progression or other reasons for removal from protocol treatments, whichever came first, an average of 1 year.
Toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events, version 5.0. Safety was assessed through adverse event monitoring, physical examinations, vital signs and clinical laboratory tests before each dosing.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
50.0%
10/20 • From date of registration until treatment completion, disease progression or other reasons for removal from protocol treatments, whichever came first, an average of 1 year.
Toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events, version 5.0. Safety was assessed through adverse event monitoring, physical examinations, vital signs and clinical laboratory tests before each dosing.
|
|
General disorders
Abdominal Pain
|
35.0%
7/20 • From date of registration until treatment completion, disease progression or other reasons for removal from protocol treatments, whichever came first, an average of 1 year.
Toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events, version 5.0. Safety was assessed through adverse event monitoring, physical examinations, vital signs and clinical laboratory tests before each dosing.
|
|
General disorders
Vomiting
|
30.0%
6/20 • From date of registration until treatment completion, disease progression or other reasons for removal from protocol treatments, whichever came first, an average of 1 year.
Toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events, version 5.0. Safety was assessed through adverse event monitoring, physical examinations, vital signs and clinical laboratory tests before each dosing.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Anorexia
|
30.0%
6/20 • From date of registration until treatment completion, disease progression or other reasons for removal from protocol treatments, whichever came first, an average of 1 year.
Toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events, version 5.0. Safety was assessed through adverse event monitoring, physical examinations, vital signs and clinical laboratory tests before each dosing.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Alopecia
|
20.0%
4/20 • From date of registration until treatment completion, disease progression or other reasons for removal from protocol treatments, whichever came first, an average of 1 year.
Toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events, version 5.0. Safety was assessed through adverse event monitoring, physical examinations, vital signs and clinical laboratory tests before each dosing.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
15.0%
3/20 • From date of registration until treatment completion, disease progression or other reasons for removal from protocol treatments, whichever came first, an average of 1 year.
Toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events, version 5.0. Safety was assessed through adverse event monitoring, physical examinations, vital signs and clinical laboratory tests before each dosing.
|
|
General disorders
Headache
|
15.0%
3/20 • From date of registration until treatment completion, disease progression or other reasons for removal from protocol treatments, whichever came first, an average of 1 year.
Toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events, version 5.0. Safety was assessed through adverse event monitoring, physical examinations, vital signs and clinical laboratory tests before each dosing.
|
|
General disorders
Mucositis oral
|
10.0%
2/20 • From date of registration until treatment completion, disease progression or other reasons for removal from protocol treatments, whichever came first, an average of 1 year.
Toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events, version 5.0. Safety was assessed through adverse event monitoring, physical examinations, vital signs and clinical laboratory tests before each dosing.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotention
|
10.0%
2/20 • From date of registration until treatment completion, disease progression or other reasons for removal from protocol treatments, whichever came first, an average of 1 year.
Toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events, version 5.0. Safety was assessed through adverse event monitoring, physical examinations, vital signs and clinical laboratory tests before each dosing.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutrophil count decreased
|
30.0%
6/20 • From date of registration until treatment completion, disease progression or other reasons for removal from protocol treatments, whichever came first, an average of 1 year.
Toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events, version 5.0. Safety was assessed through adverse event monitoring, physical examinations, vital signs and clinical laboratory tests before each dosing.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
|
25.0%
5/20 • From date of registration until treatment completion, disease progression or other reasons for removal from protocol treatments, whichever came first, an average of 1 year.
Toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events, version 5.0. Safety was assessed through adverse event monitoring, physical examinations, vital signs and clinical laboratory tests before each dosing.
|
Additional Information
Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine
Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place