Efficacy of Re-challenge With Immune-Checkpoints Inhibitors in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients: a Retrospective Observational Study

NCT ID: NCT04069663

Last Updated: 2020-03-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

144 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-22

Study Completion Date

2019-10-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a multicentre, retrospective, national observational study aiming to describe clinical outcomes of advanced NSCLC patients that performed an ICP re-challenge during their history of disease. The objective of this study is to evaluate the ICP re-challenge efficacy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICP), including nivolumab, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab, are currently approved by EMA (European Medicines Agency) and ANSM (National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products) for the treatment of advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) in first or second line with different strategies according to the expression of PD-L1. Moreover, durvalumab recently entered the treatment strategy for locally advanced disease in PD-L1 expressing (\>1%) patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with advanced NSCLC is approximately 3 to 4 months with this kind of drugs and chemotherapy is currently the reference treatment after progression. However, the scientific community is now evaluating the re-challenge strategy. Notably, in patients with metastatic melanoma, different trials have shown the efficacy and the good safety of re-challenge with ipilimumab or a combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab after an initial period of disease control with ipilimumab.

To date, no studies have reported the clinical benefit of ICP re-challenge in patients with advanced NSCLC. The effectiveness and tolerance of the re-challenge strategy with the same or another ICP remains therefore a major issue.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

No interventional study

Retrospective data analysis

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of NSCLC
* Advanced disease (stage III-IV) according to the TNM 7th /8th edition classification at the beginning of first ICP
* Patients must have received at least two lines of ICP during their history of disease
* Patients with EGFR mutation and/or ALK translocation must have received all specific target agents regularly reimbursed (during the reporting period) prior to the first PCI

Exclusion Criteria

• Opposition form signed by the living patient or opposition clearly indicated in the deceased patient's medical records
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bristol-Myers Squibb

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Grenoble

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Elisa Gobinni, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University Hospital, Grenoble

Matteo Giaj Levra, pHD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Grenoble

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hosipital, Grenoble

La Tronche, Isère, France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

38RC19.005

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.