Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Evaluation of RPH-104 Administered at Different Doses to Patients With Acute Gout Attack (NCT NCT04067492)

NCT ID: NCT04067492

Last Updated: 2022-07-25

Results Overview

Change in pain intensity in the assessed joint 72 hours after the initiation of treatment with the test drug measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in comparison to baseline. VAS is a hard copy 100 mm scale with the indications: "Absence of pain" on the left side of the scale (0 mm point) and "The most severe pain ever experienced" on the right side of the scale (100 mm point)) The better outcome would be "Absence of pain", the worse outcome would be "The most severe pain ever experienced".

Recruitment status

TERMINATED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

47 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline and Day 4 (72 hours after the initiation of treatment with the test drug)

Results posted on

2022-07-25

Participant Flow

Enrollment was conducted at 11 clinical sites in Russian Federation. 54 subjects were screened and 47 subjects were enrolled (randomized) and treated, 44 subjects completed the study. The Safety Population and Efficacy Population included data from all 47 randomized patients to assess safety, treatment efficacy and pharmacodynamics.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
RPH - 4 mg
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 80 mg
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
Overall Study
STARTED
15
6
6
6
5
9
Overall Study
COMPLETED
15
5
6
5
5
8
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
1
0
1
0
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
RPH - 4 mg
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 80 mg
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
0
0
0
0
0
1
Overall Study
closure of city borders because of COVID-19 quarantine
0
1
0
0
0
0
Overall Study
COVID-19 epidemiological situation
0
0
0
1
0
0

Baseline Characteristics

Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Evaluation of RPH-104 Administered at Different Doses to Patients With Acute Gout Attack

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
Total
n=47 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
52.3 years
n=5 Participants
51.7 years
n=7 Participants
42.8 years
n=5 Participants
56.5 years
n=4 Participants
53.6 years
n=21 Participants
52.2 years
n=10 Participants
51.5 years
n=115 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
2 Participants
n=10 Participants
3 Participants
n=115 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
5 Participants
n=21 Participants
7 Participants
n=10 Participants
44 Participants
n=115 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Caucasian/White
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
5 Participants
n=21 Participants
9 Participants
n=10 Participants
47 Participants
n=115 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · other
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
0 Participants
n=115 Participants
Disease duration
8.13 years
n=5 Participants
7.65 years
n=7 Participants
8.04 years
n=5 Participants
9.16 years
n=4 Participants
13.55 years
n=21 Participants
6.41 years
n=10 Participants
8.82 years
n=115 Participants
Exact number of affected joints
5.3 number (of joints)
n=5 Participants
3.0 number (of joints)
n=7 Participants
5.7 number (of joints)
n=5 Participants
2.7 number (of joints)
n=4 Participants
6.2 number (of joints)
n=21 Participants
3.0 number (of joints)
n=10 Participants
4.32 number (of joints)
n=115 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Day 4 (72 hours after the initiation of treatment with the test drug)

Population: The baseline observation carried forward method (BOCF) was used to impute missing data for the main efficacy analysis. Missing patient data were replaced with baseline values from the time of patient discontinuation or use of the rescue medication.

Change in pain intensity in the assessed joint 72 hours after the initiation of treatment with the test drug measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in comparison to baseline. VAS is a hard copy 100 mm scale with the indications: "Absence of pain" on the left side of the scale (0 mm point) and "The most severe pain ever experienced" on the right side of the scale (100 mm point)) The better outcome would be "Absence of pain", the worse outcome would be "The most severe pain ever experienced".

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint 72 Hours After the Initiation of Treatment in Comparison to Baseline
-33.39 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -55.53 to -11.24
-30.55 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -54.46 to -6.64
-36.51 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -55.11 to -17.9
-7.88 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -22.26 to 6.5
-38.56 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -60.39 to -16.72
-19.80 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -41.83 to 2.22

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 15, 30, 45 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 after the initiation of treatment

Population: The baseline observation carried forward method (BOCF) was used to impute missing data for the main efficacy analysis. Missing patient data were replaced with baseline values from the time of patient discontinuation or use of the rescue medication.

Change in pain intensity in the assessed joint in 15, 30, 45 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and compared to baseline. VAS is a hard copy 100 mm scale with the indications: "Absence of pain" on the left side of the scale (0 mm point) and "The most severe pain ever experienced" on the right side of the scale (100 mm point)) The better outcome would be "Absence of pain", the worse outcome would be "The most severe pain ever experienced".

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 1/ 2 hours
-13.86 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -32.15 to 4.44
-19.59 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -39.62 to 0.44
-20.56 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -35.52 to -5.6
-22.07 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -33.65 to -10.48
-25.14 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -43.42 to -6.86
-24.63 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -42.92 to -6.34
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 1/15 minutes
-1.52 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -8.39 to 5.34
-5.75 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -13.23 to 1.74
-3.78 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -9.44 to 1.88
-2.00 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -6.38 to 2.38
-6.97 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -13.81 to -0.14
-5.91 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -12.76 to 0.94
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 1/ 1.5 hours
-14.69 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -31.26 to 1.88
-17.79 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -35.92 to 0.35
-13.67 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -27.22 to -0.12
-22.47 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -32.96 to -11.97
-15.14 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -31.7 to 1.42
-21.26 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -37.82 to -4.7
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 4
-34.52 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -56.19 to -12.85
-30.75 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -54.47 to -7.02
-38.12 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -55.83 to -20.4
-6.67 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -20.38 to 7.05
-38.77 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -60.43 to -17.11
-18.91 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -40.58 to 2.76
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 6
-22.86 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -44.38 to -1.33
-29.15 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -52.71 to -5.58
-42.45 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -60.04 to -24.86
-4.80 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -18.42 to 8.82
-34.44 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -55.95 to -12.93
-12.43 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -33.95 to 9.09
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 15
-12.69 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -34.93 to 9.55
-28.95 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -53.3 to -4.6
-38.34 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -56.51 to -20.16
-4.13 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -18.21 to 9.94
-41.77 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -64.0 to -19.55
-12.41 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -34.64 to 9.82
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 1/ 4 hours
-14.36 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -34.52 to 5.81
-20.35 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -42.43 to 1.73
-22.67 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -39.15 to -6.19
-21.87 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -34.63 to -9.1
-27.27 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -47.43 to -7.12
-21.44 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -41.61 to -1.28
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 1/ 8 hours
-16.52 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -36.82 to 3.77
-25.35 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -47.57 to -3.13
-25.67 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -42.26 to -9.08
-14.20 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -27.05 to -1.35
-29.61 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -49.89 to -9.32
-18.93 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -39.22 to 1.36
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 1/30 minutes
-5.19 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -15.92 to 5.54
-10.57 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -22.3 to 1.16
-5.45 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -14.24 to 3.35
-10.00 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -16.81 to -3.19
-14.16 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -24.87 to -3.45
-6.43 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -17.15 to 4.29
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 1/45 minutes
-9.36 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -22.78 to 4.07
-11.77 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -26.45 to 2.92
-8.56 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -19.55 to 2.43
-16.20 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -24.71 to -7.69
-16.14 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -29.55 to -2.73
-7.91 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -21.33 to 5.51
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 1/ 1 hour
-12.52 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -29.03 to 3.99
-15.99 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -34.06 to 2.09
-12.67 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -26.17 to 0.83
-19.67 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -30.12 to -9.21
-15.81 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -32.3 to 0.69
-11.76 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -28.27 to 4.74
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 2
-25.52 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -45.53 to -5.52
-30.35 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -52.25 to -8.44
-30.34 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -46.69 to -13.98
-10.60 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -23.27 to 2.07
-37.77 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -57.77 to -17.78
-20.94 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -40.95 to -0.94
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 3
-34.69 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -55.03 to -14.35
-30.15 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -52.41 to -7.88
-38.67 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -55.29 to -22.05
-3.33 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -16.21 to 9.54
-35.77 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -56.1 to -15.45
-27.94 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -48.28 to -7.61
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 5
-35.86 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -57.79 to -13.92
-31.35 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -55.36 to -7.33
-42.78 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -60.71 to -24.86
-4.73 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -18.62 to 9.15
-31.27 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -53.2 to -9.35
-13.64 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -35.57 to 8.28
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 10
-23.52 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -46.52 to -0.53
-29.15 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -54.33 to -3.96
-37.78 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -56.57 to -18.99
-6.73 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -21.29 to 7.82
-37.27 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -60.26 to -14.29
-12.43 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -35.42 to 10.57
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 18
-12.69 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -34.99 to 9.61
-29.75 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -54.17 to -5.33
-28.45 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -46.67 to -10.22
-4.07 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -18.18 to 10.05
-42.61 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -64.9 to -20.31
-12.74 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -35.04 to 9.55
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 22
-12.69 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -35.17 to 9.79
-28.35 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -52.96 to -3.73
-30.34 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -48.71 to -11.97
-3.20 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -17.43 to 11.03
-44.61 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -67.08 to -22.14
-13.58 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -36.05 to 8.9
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 29
-12.69 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -35.28 to 9.9
-17.95 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -42.68 to 6.79
-23.89 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -42.35 to -5.43
-4.07 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -18.36 to 10.23
-44.94 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -67.52 to -22.36
-13.58 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -36.16 to 9.01
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 45
-12.69 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -34.93 to 9.55
-19.75 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -44.09 to 4.6
-23.34 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -41.51 to -5.16
-2.60 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -16.67 to 11.48
-46.94 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -69.17 to -24.71
-13.58 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -35.81 to 8.66

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 15, 30, 45 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 after the initiation of treatment with the test drug

Population: The table shows the frequencies and proportions (%) of the number of valid observations. Values after the use of rescue medication and after withdrawal were imputed as failure.

Proportion of patients who assessed the response to therapy with the test drug as "Excellent" or "Good" in 15, 30, 45 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug. The patient's response to therapy was assessed in the form of frequency tables by assessment point and therapy group. The rates of the response were specified in the evaluation form as: "Excellent", "Good", "Fair", "Weak", "Poor" (where "excellent" represents the best possible response to treatment and "poor" indicates the worst treatment response).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 1/ 1 hour
2 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 2
1 Participants
2 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
2 Participants
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 45
1 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 1/15 minutes
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 1/30 minutes
1 Participants
0 Participants
2 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 1/45 minutes
2 Participants
0 Participants
2 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 1/ 1.5 hours
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 1/ 2 hours
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 1/ 4 hours
1 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
2 Participants
0 Participants
2 Participants
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 1/ 8 hours
1 Participants
2 Participants
4 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 3
1 Participants
2 Participants
5 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 4
3 Participants
2 Participants
6 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 5
3 Participants
2 Participants
6 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 6
2 Participants
2 Participants
6 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 10
2 Participants
2 Participants
6 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 15
1 Participants
2 Participants
6 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 18
1 Participants
2 Participants
4 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 22
1 Participants
2 Participants
5 Participants
0 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 29
1 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 24, 48, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug

Population: It should be noted that estimates following the use of the rescue medication or a prohibited analgesic were not included in the descriptive statistics, therefore, the number of patients with analyzable data in treatment groups decreased over time.

Change in the rate of swelling of the assessed joint evaluated in 24, 48, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug compared to baseline. The rates of swelling were specified in the evaluation form as: "absence" = no swelling, "mild" = palpable swelling, "moderate" = visible swelling, "severe" = bulging outside the joint (where "severe" represented the worst possible degree of swelling and "absence" was the best outcome).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 10 · moderate
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
22 · severe
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
29 · mild
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
29 · moderate
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
22 · absence
1 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
45 · mild
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Baseline · absence
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Baseline · mild
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Baseline · moderate
4 Participants
1 Participants
5 Participants
9 Participants
3 Participants
2 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Baseline · severe
2 Participants
4 Participants
3 Participants
5 Participants
3 Participants
4 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 2/ 24 hours · absence
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 2/ 24 hours · mild
1 Participants
1 Participants
5 Participants
2 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 2/ 24 hours · moderate
3 Participants
2 Participants
3 Participants
8 Participants
3 Participants
2 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 2/ 24 hours · severe
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
3 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 3/ 48 hours · absence
3 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 3/ 48 hours · mild
0 Participants
0 Participants
5 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 3/ 48 hours · moderate
1 Participants
2 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 3/ 48 hours · severe
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
3 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 4/ 72 hours · absence
3 Participants
1 Participants
4 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 4/ 72 hours · mild
0 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 4/ 72 hours · moderate
0 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 4/ 72 hours · severe
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
2 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 5 · absence
3 Participants
1 Participants
4 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 5 · mild
0 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 5 · moderate
0 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 5 · severe
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 6 · absence
2 Participants
1 Participants
4 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 6 · mild
0 Participants
2 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 6 · moderate
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 6 · severe
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 10 · absence
2 Participants
2 Participants
4 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 10 · mild
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 10 · severe
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 15 · absence
1 Participants
2 Participants
6 Participants
1 Participants
4 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 15 · mild
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 15 · moderate
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 15 · severe
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 18 · absence
1 Participants
2 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 18 · mild
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 18 · moderate
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 18 · severe
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
22 · mild
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
22 · moderate
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
29 · absence
1 Participants
0 Participants
4 Participants
1 Participants
4 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
29 · severe
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
45 · absence
1 Participants
0 Participants
4 Participants
0 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
45 · moderate
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
45 · severe
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 24, 48, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug

Population: It should be noted that estimates following the use of the rescue medication or a prohibited analgesic were not included in the descriptive statistics, therefore, the number of patients with analyzable data in treatment groups decreased over time.

Change in the rate of tenderness of the assessed joint evaluated in 24, 48, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug compared to baseline. Tenderness degrees: "absent" = no tenderness, "mild" = tenderness when touched, "moderate" = pain and flinching, "severe" = pain, flinching and withdrawal of the limb (where "severe" represents the worst possible degree of tenderness and "absent" is the best outcome).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Baseline · severe
2 Participants
3 Participants
3 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 2/ 24 hours · moderate
3 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
6 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 3/ 48 hours · absence
1 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 3/ 48 hours · mild
2 Participants
2 Participants
6 Participants
1 Participants
5 Participants
2 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 4/ 72 hours · absence
2 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 4/ 72 hours · mild
1 Participants
2 Participants
4 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 4/ 72 hours · severe
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 5 · mild
0 Participants
1 Participants
4 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 5 · moderate
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 10 · mild
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
22 · moderate
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
29 · absence
1 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
29 · mild
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
29 · severe
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
45 · mild
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
45 · moderate
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
45 · severe
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 18 · moderate
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 18 · severe
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
22 · absence
1 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
22 · mild
0 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
22 · severe
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
29 · moderate
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
45 · absence
1 Participants
0 Participants
4 Participants
0 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Baseline · absence
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Baseline · mild
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Baseline · moderate
4 Participants
2 Participants
6 Participants
12 Participants
4 Participants
3 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 2/ 24 hours · absence
1 Participants
2 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 2/ 24 hours · mild
1 Participants
1 Participants
6 Participants
4 Participants
5 Participants
3 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 2/ 24 hours · severe
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
2 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 3/ 48 hours · moderate
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 3/ 48 hours · severe
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
2 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 4/ 72 hours · moderate
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 5 · absence
3 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 5 · severe
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 6 · absence
2 Participants
1 Participants
4 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 6 · mild
0 Participants
2 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 6 · moderate
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 6 · severe
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 10 · absence
2 Participants
2 Participants
4 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 10 · moderate
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 10 · severe
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 15 · absence
1 Participants
2 Participants
5 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 15 · mild
0 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 15 · moderate
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 15 · severe
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 18 · absence
1 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 18 · mild
0 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 24, 48, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug

Population: It should be noted that estimates following the use of the rescue medication or a prohibited analgesic were not included in the descriptive statistics, therefore, the number of patients with analyzable data in treatment groups decreased over time.

Change in the rate of erythema of the assessed joint evaluated in 24, 48, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug compared to baseline.The rates of "erythema" were specified as "absence", "presence", "impossible to evaluate".

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 3/ 48 hours · evaluation impossible
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 10 · absence
2 Participants
3 Participants
4 Participants
2 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 18 · absence
1 Participants
3 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 18 · presence
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 18 · evaluation impossible
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
22 · absence
1 Participants
2 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
4 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
22 · evaluation impossible
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
29 · absence
1 Participants
1 Participants
4 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
29 · presence
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
22 · presence
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
29 · evaluation impossible
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
45 · absence
1 Participants
1 Participants
4 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
45 · presence
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
45 · evaluation impossible
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Baseline · absence
0 Participants
0 Participants
2 Participants
3 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Baseline · presence
5 Participants
5 Participants
7 Participants
12 Participants
6 Participants
6 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Baseline · evaluation impossible
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 2/ 24 hours · absence
1 Participants
2 Participants
2 Participants
5 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 2/ 24 hours · presence
4 Participants
2 Participants
6 Participants
7 Participants
3 Participants
4 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 2/ 24 hours · evaluation impossible
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 3/ 48 hours · absence
3 Participants
1 Participants
5 Participants
2 Participants
4 Participants
2 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 3/ 48 hours · presence
1 Participants
2 Participants
2 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 4/ 72 hours · absence
3 Participants
2 Participants
7 Participants
2 Participants
4 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 4/ 72 hours · presence
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 4/ 72 hours · evaluation impossible
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 5 · absence
3 Participants
3 Participants
7 Participants
2 Participants
4 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 5 · presence
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 5 · evaluation impossible
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 6 · absence
2 Participants
3 Participants
7 Participants
2 Participants
4 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 6 · presence
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 6 · evaluation impossible
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 10 · presence
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 10 · evaluation impossible
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 15 · absence
1 Participants
3 Participants
6 Participants
1 Participants
4 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 15 · presence
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 15 · evaluation impossible
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and in 24, 48, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug

Population: It should be noted that estimates following the use of the rescue medication or a prohibited analgesic were not included in the descriptive statistics, therefore, the number of patients with analyzable data in treatment groups decreased over time.

Change in the rate of movement restrictions in the assessed joint evaluated in 24, 48, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug compared to baseline. For the assessment, the categorical scale consistent with the Form for evaluation (Investigator's Assessment) of the restriction of movements was used. The rates of movement restrictions (amplitude of movements) were specified in the evaluation form as "1 - Normal range", "2 - Slightly limited range", " 3 - Moderately limited range" ,"4 - Severely limited range" and "5 - Joint movement is impossible " (where higher score means worse outcome).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Baseline · 3
3 Participants
2 Participants
6 Participants
5 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 22 · 1
1 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
0 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Baseline · 5
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 2/ 24 hours · 1
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 2/ 24 hours · 2
2 Participants
2 Participants
4 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 2/ 24 hours · 3
2 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
7 Participants
3 Participants
3 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 2/ 24 hours · 4
1 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 3/ 48 hours · 4
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 3/ 48 hours · 5
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 4/ 72 hours · 1
2 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 4/ 72 hours · 5
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 5 · 1
3 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 5 · 2
0 Participants
1 Participants
4 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 5 · 3
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 5 · 4
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 29 · 2
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 6 · 3
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 6 · 4
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 6 · 5
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 10 · 1
2 Participants
2 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 10 · 4
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 15 · 1
1 Participants
2 Participants
5 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 15 · 2
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 15 · 3
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 15 · 5
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 18 · 2
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 18 · 3
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 18 · 5
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 22 · 2
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 22 · 3
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 22 · 4
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 29 · 3
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 3/ 48 hours · 3
1 Participants
0 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Baseline · 1
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Baseline · 2
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 4/ 72 hours · 2
1 Participants
1 Participants
5 Participants
0 Participants
3 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 4/ 72 hours · 3
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 4/ 72 hours · 4
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 5 · 5
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 6 · 1
2 Participants
1 Participants
5 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 6 · 2
0 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Baseline · 4
2 Participants
2 Participants
3 Participants
9 Participants
4 Participants
5 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 10 · 2
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 10 · 3
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 10 · 5
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 15 · 4
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 18 · 1
1 Participants
2 Participants
2 Participants
0 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 2/ 24 hours · 5
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 3/ 48 hours · 1
1 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 3/ 48 hours · 2
2 Participants
1 Participants
4 Participants
1 Participants
5 Participants
2 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 29 · 4
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 29 · 5
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 18 · 4
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 22 · 5
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 29 · 1
1 Participants
0 Participants
4 Participants
0 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 45 · 5
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 45 · 1
1 Participants
0 Participants
4 Participants
0 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 45 · 2
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 45 · 3
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 45 · 4
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and one of the pain intensity measurements in accordance with the schedule: 15, 30, 45 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 after the initiation of treatment

Time to achieve the 50% decrease in pain intensity in the assessed joint relative to the baseline VAS level. VAS is a hard copy 100 mm scale with the indications: "Absence of pain" on the left side of the scale (0 mm point) and "The most severe pain ever experienced" on the right side of the scale (100 mm point)). The better outcome would be "Absence of pain", the worse outcome would be "The most severe pain ever experienced".

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Time to Achieve the 50% Decrease in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint Relative to the Baseline
NA hours
Interval 0.8 to
No median estimate was obtained due to the small group sizes and the small number of events assessed.
8.0 hours
Interval 4.0 to
No CI estimate was obtained due to the small group sizes and the small number of events assessed.
47.3 hours
Interval 0.8 to
No CI estimate was obtained due to the small group sizes and the small number of events assessed.
NA hours
Interval 0.8 to
No median estimate was obtained due to the small group sizes and the small number of events assessed.
6.0 hours
Interval 0.3 to
No CI estimate was obtained due to the small group sizes and the small number of events assessed.
NA hours
Interval 1.5 to
No median estimate was obtained due to the small group sizes and the small number of events assessed.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: from the date/time of IP administration (first dose) to the date/time of the first use of the rescue medication, up to day 60

Population: Patient 01003 was excluded from the analysis of the endpoint due to the use of prohibited therapy (methylprednisolone 125 mg, IV, daily from the 2nd day of therapy until the end of the study).

Time to use of the rescue medication was calculated as the time in hours from the date/time of administration (first dose) of the investigational product to the date/time of the first use of the rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=14 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Time to Use of the Rescue Medication
84.6 hours
Interval 22.7 to
No CI estimate was obtained due to the small group sizes and the small number of events assessed.
NA hours
Interval 3.0 to
No median estimate was obtained due to the small group sizes and the small number of events assessed.
NA hours
Interval 4.4 to
No median estimate was obtained due to the small group sizes and the small number of events assessed.
23.7 hours
Interval 21.3 to 24.5
NA hours
Interval 3.1 to
No median estimate was obtained due to the small group sizes and the small number of events assessed.
71.8 hours
Interval 24.4 to
No CI estimate was obtained due to the small group sizes and the small number of events assessed.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 72 hours after the initiation of treatment with the test drug

Population: Patient 01003 was excluded from the analysis of the endpoint due to the use of prohibited therapy (methylprednisolone 125 mg, IV, daily from the 2nd day of therapy until the end of the study).

The proportion of patients who received the rescue medication within 72 hours of starting the investigational product therapy

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=14 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Proportion of Patients Who Received a Rescue Therapy Agent
3 Participants
2 Participants
2 Participants
12 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: up to day 60

Population: Patient 01003 was excluded from the analysis of the endpoint due to the use of prohibited therapy (methylprednisolone 125 mg, IV, daily from the 2nd day of therapy until the end of the study).

The proportion of patients who received the rescue medication over the entire treatment period

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=14 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Proportion of Patients Who Received a Rescue Therapy Agent
4 Participants
2 Participants
3 Participants
13 Participants
1 Participants
4 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 15, 29 and 45 days following the initiation of treatment with the test drug

Population: It should be noted that estimates following the use of the rescue medication or a prohibited analgesic were not included in the descriptive statistics.

Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) parameters in 15, 29 and 45 days following the initiation of treatment with the test drug as compared to baseline. (The result for each of the 8 categories ("Dressing and Grooming", "Arising", "Eating", "Walking", "Hygiene", "Reach", "Grip", "Activities") of the HAQ questionnaire was calculated as the maximum score of responses (on an ordinal scale from 0 (best) to 3 (worst): without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3)) to questions included in this category. If the patient required outside help or any of the specified aids or devices to perform actions related to a certain category, then this category was assigned "2" points, if the point was not equal to "3", i.e. points "0" and "1" increased to "2". The sum of points for the evaluated categories was calculated and divided by the number of categories, which gives a disability index in the range of 0 to 3.)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Disability Index
Baseline value
1.1 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.649
1.6 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.615
1.32 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.577
1.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.802
1.23 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.578
1.75 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.806
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Disability Index
Change Day 15
-0.63 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-1.06 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.619
-0.56 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.342
-0.75 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-0.63 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.685
-0.88 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Disability Index
Change Day 29
-0.63 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.53
-0.38 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.144
-0.13 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-1.09 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.672
-1.25 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Disability Index
Change Day 45
-0.63 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-0.56 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.619
-0.44 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.298
-0.38 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-1.42 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.382
-1.38 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 15, 29 and 45 days following the initiation of treatment with the test drug

Population: It should be noted that estimates following the use of the rescue medication or a prohibited analgesic were not included in the descriptive statistics.

Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) parameters in 15, 29 and 45 days following the initiation of treatment with the test drug as compared to baseline. The result was calculated as the maximum score of responses (on an ordinal scale from 0 to 3) to questions included in this category. Patients were asked about their ability to complete these tasks in the past week using the following categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst). If the patient required outside help or any of the specified aids or devices to perform actions related to a certain category, then this category was assigned "2" points, if the point was not equal to "3", i.e. points "0" and "1" increased to "2".

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Arising
Baseline value
0.7 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.82
1.4 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.55
1.2 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.97
0.9 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.74
1.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.52
1.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.05
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Arising
Change Day 15
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.00
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.55
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.82
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Arising
Change Day 29
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.71
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.82
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-1.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.50
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Arising
Change Day 45
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.71
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.0
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-1.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.58
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 15, 29 and 45 days following the initiation of treatment with the test drug

Population: It should be noted that estimates following the use of the rescue medication or a prohibited analgesic were not included in the descriptive statistics.

Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) parameters in 15, 29 and 45 days following the initiation of treatment with the test drug as compared to baseline. The result was calculated as the maximum score of responses (on an ordinal scale from 0 to 3) to questions included in this category. Patients were asked about their ability to complete these tasks in the past week using the following categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst). If the patient required outside help or any of the specified aids or devices to perform actions related to a certain category, then this category was assigned "2" points, if the point was not equal to "3", i.e. points "0" and "1" increased to "2".

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Eating
Baseline value
0.8 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.17
1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.00
0.7 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.00
1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.20
0.7 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.82
1.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.37
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Eating
Change Day 15
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.00
-0.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.52
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.0
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Eating
Change Day 29
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.71
-0.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.50
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.82
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Eating
Change Day 45
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.71
-0.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.5
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-1.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.58
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 15, 29 and 45 days following the initiation of treatment with the test drug

Population: It should be noted that estimates following the use of the rescue medication or a prohibited analgesic were not included in the descriptive statistics.

Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) parameters in 15, 29 and 45 days following the initiation of treatment with the test drug as compared to baseline. The result was calculated as the maximum score of responses (on an ordinal scale from 0 to 3) to questions included in this category. Patients were asked about their ability to complete these tasks in the past week using the following categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst). If the patient required outside help or any of the specified aids or devices to perform actions related to a certain category, then this category was assigned "2" points, if the point was not equal to "3", i.e. points "0" and "1" increased to "2".

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Walking
Baseline value
1.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.82
1.6 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.14
1.8 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.67
1.4 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.74
1.8 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.75
1.8 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.17
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Walking
Change Day 15
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-1.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.71
-0.7 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.82
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-1.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.96
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Walking
Change Day 29
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.71
-0.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.50
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-1.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.96
-2.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Walking
Change Day 45
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.71
-0.8 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.96
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-1.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.15
-2.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 15, 29 and 45 days following the initiation of treatment with the test drug

Population: It should be noted that estimates following the use of the rescue medication or a prohibited analgesic were not included in the descriptive statistics.

Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) parameters in 15, 29 and 45 days following the initiation of treatment with the test drug as compared to baseline. The result was calculated as the maximum score of responses (on an ordinal scale from 0 to 3) to questions included in this category. Patients were asked about their ability to complete these tasks in the past week using the following categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst). If the patient required outside help or any of the specified aids or devices to perform actions related to a certain category, then this category was assigned "2" points, if the point was not equal to "3", i.e. points "0" and "1" increased to "2".

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Hygiene
Change Day 15
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-2.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.71
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.55
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-0.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.26
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Hygiene
Change Day 29
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.71
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.58
1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-1.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.96
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Hygiene
Change Day 45
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.71
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.82
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-1.7 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.58
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Hygiene
Baseline value
1.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.05
2.2 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.45
1.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.50
1.2 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.21
1.2 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.98
1.7 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.03

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 15, 29 and 45 days following the initiation of treatment with the test drug

Population: It should be noted that estimates following the use of the rescue medication or a prohibited analgesic were not included in the descriptive statistics.

Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) parameters in 15, 29 and 45 days following the initiation of treatment with the test drug as compared to baseline. The result was calculated as the maximum score of responses (on an ordinal scale from 0 to 3) to questions included in this category. Patients were asked about their ability to complete these tasks in the past week using the following categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst). If the patient required outside help or any of the specified aids or devices to perform actions related to a certain category, then this category was assigned "2" points, if the point was not equal to "3", i.e. points "0" and "1" increased to "2".

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Grip
Baseline value
1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.10
1.2 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.10
0.4 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.73
1.4 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.99
1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.63
1.2 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.17
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Grip
Change Day 15
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.00
-0.2 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.41
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.58
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Grip
Change Day 29
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.71
-0.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.5
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.82
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Grip
Change Day 45
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.41
0.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.26
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
-1.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.58
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and in 2,8,24,48,72 hours,on Days 5,6,10,15,18,22,29,45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug and on the follow-up visit (in case of premature withdrawal of patient)

Including area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (AUC0-tau)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=3 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Pharmacokinetics (PK) - Area Under the Plasma concentration-of RPH-104 Under the Subcutaneous Administration
1620000 h*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.5
3230000 h*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 38.2
38000 h*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 124
762000 h*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 152
845000 h*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 45

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and in 2,8,24,48,72 hours,on Days 5,6,10,15,18,22,29,45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug and on the follow-up visit (in case of premature withdrawal of patient)

Including Area under the active substance concentration-time curve from zero (before drug administration) to infinity (AUC0-∞)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=3 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=14 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Pharmacokinetics (PK) - Area Under the Active Substance Concentration- of RPH-104 Under the Subcutaneous Administration
1720000 h*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 37.1
3380000 h*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 38.1
47900 h*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 97.9
816000 h*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 155
901000 h*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 44.3

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and in 2,8,24,48,72 hours,on Days 5,6,10,15,18,22,29,45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug and on the follow-up visit (in case of premature withdrawal of patient)

Including Maximum concentration of the active substance (Cmax)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=4 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Pharmacokinetics (PK) - Maximum Concentration of the Active Substance -of RPH-104 Under the Subcutaneous Administration
4860 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 18
9760 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 38.2
142 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 110
2220 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 155
2380 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 47.7

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and in 2,8,24,48,72 hours,on Days 5,6,10,15,18,22,29,45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug and on the follow-up visit (in case of premature withdrawal of patient)

Including elimination constant (Kel)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=3 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=14 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Pharmacokinetics (PK) of RPH-104 Under the Subcutaneous Administration
0.00317 1/h
Standard Deviation 0.000575
0.00294 1/h
Standard Deviation 0.000311
0.00298 1/h
Standard Deviation 0.000573
0.00314 1/h
Standard Deviation 0.000622
0.00304 1/h
Standard Deviation 0.000241

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and in 2,8,24,48,72 hours,on Days 5,6,10,15,18,22,29,45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug and on the follow-up visit (in case of premature withdrawal of patient)

Including Time to reach maximum concentration of the active substance (tmax)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=4 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Pharmacokinetics (PK) -Time to Reach Maximum Concentration of the Active Substance - of RPH-104 Under the Subcutaneous Administration
82.7 hours
Interval 24.0 to 122.0
94.4 hours
Interval 72.0 to 96.1
93.7 hours
Interval 8.0 to 120.0
47.5 hours
Interval 21.3 to 72.1
84.8 hours
Interval 47.1 to 120.0

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and in 2,8,24,48,72 hours,on Days 5,6,10,15,18,22,29,45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug and on the follow-up visit (in case of premature withdrawal of patient)

Including terminal half-life (T 1/2)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=3 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=14 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Pharmacokinetics (PK) - Terminal Half-life -of RPH-104 Under the Subcutaneous Administration
231 hours
Interval 168.0 to 264.0
241 hours
Interval 212.0 to 261.0
248 hours
Interval 153.0 to 285.0
235 hours
Interval 170.0 to 274.0
223 hours
Interval 205.0 to 256.0

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and in 24, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 after the initiation of treatment with the test drug

Population: Number of valid observations is presented.

Change in the serum rate of high-sensitive CRP (hs-CRP) in 24, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug compared to baseline

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Change in the Serum Rate of High-sensitive CRP (Hs-CRP) in Specified Timeframes
Day 4/ 72 hours
11.846 mg/L
Standard Deviation 6.1780
8.678 mg/L
Standard Deviation 10.5037
9.279 mg/L
Standard Deviation 8.1642
33.894 mg/L
Standard Deviation 35.0873
3.408 mg/L
Standard Deviation 0.8120
12.900 mg/L
Standard Deviation 9.3579
Change in the Serum Rate of High-sensitive CRP (Hs-CRP) in Specified Timeframes
Baseline value
37.908 mg/L
Standard Deviation 25.5594
35.396 mg/L
Standard Deviation 32.4800
15.769 mg/L
Standard Deviation 18.0878
36.673 mg/L
Standard Deviation 31.3545
8.295 mg/L
Standard Deviation 6.6212
10.105 mg/L
Standard Deviation 14.2834
Change in the Serum Rate of High-sensitive CRP (Hs-CRP) in Specified Timeframes
Day 2/ 24 hours
28.864 mg/L
Standard Deviation 16.1194
12.000 mg/L
Standard Deviation 11.5518
22.716 mg/L
Standard Deviation 26.9958
35.468 mg/L
Standard Deviation 32.2025
20.338 mg/L
Standard Deviation 33.3728
24.483 mg/L
Standard Deviation 16.3543
Change in the Serum Rate of High-sensitive CRP (Hs-CRP) in Specified Timeframes
Day 5
8.696 mg/L
Standard Deviation 3.6468
6.178 mg/L
Standard Deviation 6.4262
8.877 mg/L
Standard Deviation 6.3308
32.279 mg/L
Standard Deviation 32.6858
3.090 mg/L
Standard Deviation 0.9076
7.142 mg/L
Standard Deviation 5.7071
Change in the Serum Rate of High-sensitive CRP (Hs-CRP) in Specified Timeframes
Day 6
4.604 mg/L
Standard Deviation 1.3871
3.190 mg/L
Standard Deviation 3.0165
8.417 mg/L
Standard Deviation 7.0440
29.065 mg/L
Standard Deviation 28.1288
2.710 mg/L
Standard Deviation 1.6140
3.650 mg/L
Standard Deviation 2.8445
Change in the Serum Rate of High-sensitive CRP (Hs-CRP) in Specified Timeframes
Day 15
5.115 mg/L
Standard Deviation 3.5382
4.042 mg/L
Standard Deviation 6.1199
6.579 mg/L
Standard Deviation 4.4134
21.017 mg/L
Standard Deviation 28.4384
2.642 mg/L
Standard Deviation 1.4322
3.304 mg/L
Standard Deviation 5.8018
Change in the Serum Rate of High-sensitive CRP (Hs-CRP) in Specified Timeframes
Day 29
5.014 mg/L
Standard Deviation 2.8480
10.998 mg/L
Standard Deviation 17.3463
7.595 mg/L
Standard Deviation 7.9870
16.811 mg/L
Standard Deviation 26.3922
7.532 mg/L
Standard Deviation 13.0615
2.750 mg/L
Standard Deviation 2.9068
Change in the Serum Rate of High-sensitive CRP (Hs-CRP) in Specified Timeframes
Day 45
3.093 mg/L
Standard Deviation 0.5652
14.500 mg/L
Standard Deviation 19.2882
11.734 mg/L
Standard Deviation 11.4627
24.958 mg/L
Standard Deviation 29.4450
3.570 mg/L
Standard Deviation 2.1907
2.445 mg/L
Standard Deviation 1.8315

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and in 24, 72 hours and on Day 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug

Population: Number of valid observations is presented.

Change in the rate of serum amyloid protein A in 24, 72 hours and on Day 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug as compared to baseline

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Change in the Rate of Serum Amyloid Protein A in the Specified Timeframes
Day 2/ 24 hours
15581.486 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 13271.7115
3659.778 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 3244.2099
7294.631 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 5163.5001
17424.060 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 17167.2073
11078.300 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 19281.3822
20104.555 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 15608.3760
Change in the Rate of Serum Amyloid Protein A in the Specified Timeframes
Day 5
8228.272 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 7624.1329
5952.460 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 10455.6856
8252.633 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 8121.6203
17360.201 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 15874.5237
1195.975 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 393.6981
5680.190 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 5708.9022
Change in the Rate of Serum Amyloid Protein A in the Specified Timeframes
Day 15
4582.338 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 5995.5993
2732.598 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1325.3698
6031.146 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 10261.9489
9272.782 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 11297.9676
1525.612 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 502.8845
8899.982 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 17399.0042
Change in the Rate of Serum Amyloid Protein A in the Specified Timeframes
Baseline value
16168.130 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 12937.7377
16291.605 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 17949.6741
5033.151 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 3384.3761
13493.687 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 14565.0449
2516.606 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1367.7981
16764.020 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 14525.1072
Change in the Rate of Serum Amyloid Protein A in the Specified Timeframes
Day 4/ 72 hours
14419.760 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 11828.2546
10596.423 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 16813.3253
7362.322 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 9834.7459
17588.735 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 16623.4301
1171.203 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 400.3851
12162.612 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 12060.2753
Change in the Rate of Serum Amyloid Protein A in the Specified Timeframes
Day 6
5799.608 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 5562.9980
6117.777 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 8569.9756
6165.779 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 5356.4841
18553.955 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 15454.2373
1847.923 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1646.0125
4781.173 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 6120.5728
Change in the Rate of Serum Amyloid Protein A in the Specified Timeframes
Day 29
3626.702 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 2740.1283
3618.843 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 3147.2319
3779.410 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 2727.9500
8918.439 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 12001.1492
4255.756 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 6845.1947
1645.107 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1044.8811
Change in the Rate of Serum Amyloid Protein A in the Specified Timeframes
Day 45
1567.040 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1421.4541
9885.230 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 15228.9607
7289.553 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 7189.8429
13858.845 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 16512.5575
2086.198 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 2799.5039
1269.680 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 695.3511

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and in 24, 72 hours and on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug

Population: Number of valid observations is presented. (IL-1a values \<1.10 were replaced with 1.09 for graphical representation and statistical analysis.)

Change in the serum rates of IL-1α in 24, 72 hours and on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug as compared to baseline

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1α
Day 2/ 24 hours
1.782 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.5474
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.097 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0163
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1α
Baseline value
1.752 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.5390
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1α
Day 4/ 72 hours
1.688 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.3372
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1α
Day 5
1.790 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.5652
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1α
Day 6
1.612 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.1672
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1α
Day 15
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.132 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.1525
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1α
Day 29
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.097 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0258
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1α
Day 45
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and in 24, 72 hours and on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug

Population: Number of valid observations is presented. (IL-1β \<0.30 values were replaced with 0.29, IL-1β \> 500.00 values were replaced with 500.01 for graphical presentation and statistical analysis.)

Change in the serum rates of IL-1β in 24, 72 hours and on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug as compared to baseline

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1β
Day 2/ 24 hours
1.100 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.8112
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
33.885 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 128.9519
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1β
Day 15
1.965 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 3.3500
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
38.730 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 138.5974
1.222 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 2.0840
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1β
Day 29
1.746 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 3.2557
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
33.811 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 128.9724
1.320 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 2.3032
0.417 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.3103
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1β
Baseline value
2.558 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 3.5248
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
39.035 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 138.5078
1.080 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.9351
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1β
Day 4/ 72 hours
2.112 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 4.0741
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
33.759 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 128.9859
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1β
Day 5
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
33.753 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 128.9873
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1β
Day 6
2.362 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 4.6331
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
33.998 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 128.9231
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1β
Day 45
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and in 24, 72 hours and on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug

Population: Number of valid observations is presented. (IL-1RA values \<30.00 were replaced with 29.99 for graphical representation and statistical analysis.)

Change in the serum rates of IL-1RA in 24, 72 hours and on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug as compared to baseline

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Interleukin -1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1RA)
Day 6
180.492 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 112.2664
29.990 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2426.761 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1452.6687
1407.230 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 927.8243
214.610 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 125.9518
203.688 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 133.0562
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Interleukin -1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1RA)
Day 15
645.085 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 300.6542
257.492 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 166.0738
2249.794 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1459.3243
1620.332 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 935.4363
374.900 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 96.9459
474.542 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 214.5880
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Interleukin -1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1RA)
Baseline value
2240.155 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 937.1988
2619.456 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 2706.3397
2090.721 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1240.5717
2400.500 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1495.1100
1448.978 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 527.8658
1671.010 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1225.2673
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Interleukin -1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1RA)
Day 2/ 24 hours
29.990 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
29.990 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2483.891 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1786.0361
1700.180 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1448.4981
229.842 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 291.9887
153.098 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 145.3780
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Interleukin -1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1RA)
Day 4/ 72 hours
157.654 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 227.2334
29.990 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2297.651 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1361.7429
1295.743 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 916.8659
156.216 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 110.6281
140.108 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 123.8956
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Interleukin -1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1RA)
Day 5
87.214 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 79.7269
29.990 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2417.991 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1416.8428
1364.993 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1106.8245
187.223 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 109.9846
154.463 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 124.6690
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Interleukin -1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1RA)
Day 29
686.992 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 305.9470
471.178 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 267.8262
1870.815 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1032.8765
1928.417 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1048.0875
563.892 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 142.6097
583.062 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 269.1237
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Interleukin -1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1RA)
Day 45
711.997 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 285.9941
518.063 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 201.1455
1969.547 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1352.6193
1806.647 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 858.8185
915.010 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 177.2813
808.212 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 354.6509

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and in 24, 72 hours and on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug

Population: Number of valid observations is presented. (IL-6 values \<0.92 were replaced with 0.913, IL-6 values \>200.00 were replaced with 200.01 for graphical representation and statistical analysis.)

Change in the serum rates of IL-6 in 24, 72 hours and on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug as compared to baseline

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-6
Day 5
1.396 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.5031
4.905 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 7.5114
1.823 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.6473
23.999 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 37.5678
2.695 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 2.2949
2.378 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.9432
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-6
Day 29
1.482 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.5334
17.903 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 31.1335
5.304 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 7.4387
18.643 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 50.4658
2.758 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.7315
3.278 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 4.2245
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-6
Day 45
1.537 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.3911
3.753 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.6094
2.607 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.9663
6.466 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 9.1261
4.608 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 5.8999
3.370 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 4.5051
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-6
Baseline value
5.623 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 6.8564
13.666 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 11.9695
6.058 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 6.9686
26.035 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 39.1257
5.005 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 4.6022
34.307 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 54.3264
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-6
Day 2/ 24 hours
6.284 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 11.1153
9.065 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 12.5843
2.361 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.2039
27.030 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 42.9908
2.084 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.8930
37.788 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 72.3187
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-6
Day 4/ 72 hours
3.142 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 3.7290
4.698 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 7.3223
1.702 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.1067
14.943 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 29.9008
2.236 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.8533
2.145 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.9961
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-6
Day 6
1.272 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.3636
6.220 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 9.8491
2.157 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 2.1250
8.391 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 13.3742
3.565 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 3.5282
2.965 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 3.4991
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-6
Day 15
1.793 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.5907
12.858 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 25.3149
2.036 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.2089
10.595 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 14.4444
2.870 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.5838
2.434 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.7929

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and in 24, 72 hours and on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug

Population: Number of valid observations is presented. (IL-8 values \<2.00 were replaced with 1.99 for graphical representation and statistical analysis.)

Change in the serum rates of IL-8 in 24, 72 hours and on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug as compared to baseline

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-8
Day 5
10.518 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 6.8098
11.190 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 4.4376
15.188 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 12.3696
13.521 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 7.8988
4.313 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 2.6941
8.032 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 4.9402
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-8
Day 6
7.594 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 5.9449
10.745 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 6.3010
19.881 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 21.0673
16.969 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 16.9723
8.015 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 4.6897
7.937 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 5.3199
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-8
Day 15
16.395 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 19.5556
3.060 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 2.3926
34.770 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 66.4033
9.765 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 9.3536
20.884 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 31.6507
11.520 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 7.4313
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-8
Day 45
7.223 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 3.0891
7.927 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 5.3051
11.763 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 11.1239
12.664 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 7.2467
5.468 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 4.1120
5.807 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 5.8272
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-8
Baseline value
18.305 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 21.8921
12.318 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 12.5702
10.863 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 7.1505
12.384 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 5.8297
21.964 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 24.8759
9.277 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 4.5347
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-8
Day 2/ 24 hours
12.304 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 9.9136
2.668 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.3550
17.141 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 13.6494
8.228 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 7.1217
9.304 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 9.7609
9.030 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 5.5014
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-8
Day 4/ 72 hours
5.952 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 4.4991
8.148 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 5.6025
15.980 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 11.7350
15.601 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 19.4714
8.708 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 5.8951
9.020 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 6.2030
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-8
Day 29
8.596 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 9.2114
9.243 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 5.1441
8.554 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 7.6207
19.766 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 20.8879
25.622 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 36.4743
8.003 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 6.1368

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and in 24, 72 hours and on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug

Population: Number of valid observations is presented. (TNF-α values \<2.30 were replaced with 2.29 for graphical representation and statistical analysis.)

Change in the serum rates of TNF-α in 24, 72 hours and on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug as compared to baseline

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF-α)
Day 2/ 24 hours
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF-α)
Day 29
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF-α)
Baseline value
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF-α)
Day 4/ 72 hours
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF-α)
Day 5
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF-α)
Day 6
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF-α)
Day 15
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF-α)
Day 45
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000

Adverse Events

RPH - 4 mg

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 11 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

RPH - 20 mg

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

RPH - 40 mg

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

RPH - 80 mg

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

RPH - 160 mg

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 4 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Voltaren® (Diclofenac)

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 2 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 participants at risk
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 participants at risk
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 participants at risk
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 participants at risk
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 participants at risk
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 participants at risk
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
Hepatobiliary disorders
drug-induced liver injury
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Investigations
Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex test positive
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
pulmonary fibrosis
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 participants at risk
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 participants at risk
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 participants at risk
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 participants at risk
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 participants at risk
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites. 1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 participants at risk
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukocytosis
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Cardiac disorders
Sinus bradycardia
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Cardiac disorders
Sinus tachycardia
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diverticulum intestinal
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric disorder
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal scarring
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis chronic
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
General disorders
Administration site haemorrhage
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
General disorders
Asthenia
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
General disorders
Injection site erythema
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
General disorders
Injection site pruritus
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
General disorders
Pain
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis chronic
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Infections and infestations
Genitourinary chlamydia infection
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Infections and infestations
Mycoplasma infection
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Infections and infestations
Ureaplasma infection
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Investigations
Bilirubin conjugated increased
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Investigations
Blood cholesterol increased
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Investigations
Blood triglycerides increased
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Investigations
Blood urea increased
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Investigations
Blood uric acid increased
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Investigations
C-reactive protein increased
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Investigations
Creatinine renal clearance decreased
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Investigations
Hepatic enzyme increased
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Investigations
Lymphocyte count increased
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Investigations
Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex test positive
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Investigations
Neutrophil percentage decreased
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthritis
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Gouty arthritis
33.3%
5/15 • Number of events 5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Investigations
Joint swelling
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Psychiatric disorders
Daydreaming
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Renal and urinary disorders
Micturition disorder
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Renal and urinary disorders
Proteinuria
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Balanoposthitis
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis allergic
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.

Additional Information

D.V. Bukhanova, Medical Adviser

R-Pharm

Phone: 0074959567

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Any study related information could be made public available only after Sponsors written permission.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER