Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Evaluation of RPH-104 Administered at Different Doses to Patients With Acute Gout Attack (NCT NCT04067492)
NCT ID: NCT04067492
Last Updated: 2022-07-25
Results Overview
Change in pain intensity in the assessed joint 72 hours after the initiation of treatment with the test drug measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in comparison to baseline. VAS is a hard copy 100 mm scale with the indications: "Absence of pain" on the left side of the scale (0 mm point) and "The most severe pain ever experienced" on the right side of the scale (100 mm point)) The better outcome would be "Absence of pain", the worse outcome would be "The most severe pain ever experienced".
TERMINATED
PHASE2
47 participants
Baseline and Day 4 (72 hours after the initiation of treatment with the test drug)
2022-07-25
Participant Flow
Enrollment was conducted at 11 clinical sites in Russian Federation. 54 subjects were screened and 47 subjects were enrolled (randomized) and treated, 44 subjects completed the study. The Safety Population and Efficacy Population included data from all 47 randomized patients to assess safety, treatment efficacy and pharmacodynamics.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
RPH - 4 mg
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 80 mg
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
15
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
5
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
15
|
5
|
6
|
5
|
5
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
RPH - 4 mg
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 80 mg
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
closure of city borders because of COVID-19 quarantine
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
COVID-19 epidemiological situation
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Evaluation of RPH-104 Administered at Different Doses to Patients With Acute Gout Attack
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
Total
n=47 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
52.3 years
n=5 Participants
|
51.7 years
n=7 Participants
|
42.8 years
n=5 Participants
|
56.5 years
n=4 Participants
|
53.6 years
n=21 Participants
|
52.2 years
n=10 Participants
|
51.5 years
n=115 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Caucasian/White
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · other
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=115 Participants
|
|
Disease duration
|
8.13 years
n=5 Participants
|
7.65 years
n=7 Participants
|
8.04 years
n=5 Participants
|
9.16 years
n=4 Participants
|
13.55 years
n=21 Participants
|
6.41 years
n=10 Participants
|
8.82 years
n=115 Participants
|
|
Exact number of affected joints
|
5.3 number (of joints)
n=5 Participants
|
3.0 number (of joints)
n=7 Participants
|
5.7 number (of joints)
n=5 Participants
|
2.7 number (of joints)
n=4 Participants
|
6.2 number (of joints)
n=21 Participants
|
3.0 number (of joints)
n=10 Participants
|
4.32 number (of joints)
n=115 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 4 (72 hours after the initiation of treatment with the test drug)Population: The baseline observation carried forward method (BOCF) was used to impute missing data for the main efficacy analysis. Missing patient data were replaced with baseline values from the time of patient discontinuation or use of the rescue medication.
Change in pain intensity in the assessed joint 72 hours after the initiation of treatment with the test drug measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in comparison to baseline. VAS is a hard copy 100 mm scale with the indications: "Absence of pain" on the left side of the scale (0 mm point) and "The most severe pain ever experienced" on the right side of the scale (100 mm point)) The better outcome would be "Absence of pain", the worse outcome would be "The most severe pain ever experienced".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint 72 Hours After the Initiation of Treatment in Comparison to Baseline
|
-33.39 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -55.53 to -11.24
|
-30.55 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -54.46 to -6.64
|
-36.51 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -55.11 to -17.9
|
-7.88 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -22.26 to 6.5
|
-38.56 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -60.39 to -16.72
|
-19.80 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -41.83 to 2.22
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 15, 30, 45 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 after the initiation of treatmentPopulation: The baseline observation carried forward method (BOCF) was used to impute missing data for the main efficacy analysis. Missing patient data were replaced with baseline values from the time of patient discontinuation or use of the rescue medication.
Change in pain intensity in the assessed joint in 15, 30, 45 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and compared to baseline. VAS is a hard copy 100 mm scale with the indications: "Absence of pain" on the left side of the scale (0 mm point) and "The most severe pain ever experienced" on the right side of the scale (100 mm point)) The better outcome would be "Absence of pain", the worse outcome would be "The most severe pain ever experienced".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 1/ 2 hours
|
-13.86 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -32.15 to 4.44
|
-19.59 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -39.62 to 0.44
|
-20.56 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -35.52 to -5.6
|
-22.07 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -33.65 to -10.48
|
-25.14 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -43.42 to -6.86
|
-24.63 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -42.92 to -6.34
|
|
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 1/15 minutes
|
-1.52 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -8.39 to 5.34
|
-5.75 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -13.23 to 1.74
|
-3.78 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -9.44 to 1.88
|
-2.00 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -6.38 to 2.38
|
-6.97 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -13.81 to -0.14
|
-5.91 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -12.76 to 0.94
|
|
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 1/ 1.5 hours
|
-14.69 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -31.26 to 1.88
|
-17.79 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -35.92 to 0.35
|
-13.67 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -27.22 to -0.12
|
-22.47 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -32.96 to -11.97
|
-15.14 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -31.7 to 1.42
|
-21.26 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -37.82 to -4.7
|
|
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 4
|
-34.52 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -56.19 to -12.85
|
-30.75 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -54.47 to -7.02
|
-38.12 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -55.83 to -20.4
|
-6.67 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -20.38 to 7.05
|
-38.77 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -60.43 to -17.11
|
-18.91 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -40.58 to 2.76
|
|
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 6
|
-22.86 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -44.38 to -1.33
|
-29.15 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -52.71 to -5.58
|
-42.45 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -60.04 to -24.86
|
-4.80 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -18.42 to 8.82
|
-34.44 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -55.95 to -12.93
|
-12.43 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -33.95 to 9.09
|
|
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 15
|
-12.69 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -34.93 to 9.55
|
-28.95 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -53.3 to -4.6
|
-38.34 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -56.51 to -20.16
|
-4.13 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -18.21 to 9.94
|
-41.77 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -64.0 to -19.55
|
-12.41 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -34.64 to 9.82
|
|
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 1/ 4 hours
|
-14.36 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -34.52 to 5.81
|
-20.35 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -42.43 to 1.73
|
-22.67 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -39.15 to -6.19
|
-21.87 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -34.63 to -9.1
|
-27.27 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -47.43 to -7.12
|
-21.44 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -41.61 to -1.28
|
|
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 1/ 8 hours
|
-16.52 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -36.82 to 3.77
|
-25.35 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -47.57 to -3.13
|
-25.67 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -42.26 to -9.08
|
-14.20 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -27.05 to -1.35
|
-29.61 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -49.89 to -9.32
|
-18.93 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -39.22 to 1.36
|
|
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 1/30 minutes
|
-5.19 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -15.92 to 5.54
|
-10.57 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -22.3 to 1.16
|
-5.45 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -14.24 to 3.35
|
-10.00 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -16.81 to -3.19
|
-14.16 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -24.87 to -3.45
|
-6.43 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -17.15 to 4.29
|
|
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 1/45 minutes
|
-9.36 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -22.78 to 4.07
|
-11.77 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -26.45 to 2.92
|
-8.56 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -19.55 to 2.43
|
-16.20 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -24.71 to -7.69
|
-16.14 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -29.55 to -2.73
|
-7.91 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -21.33 to 5.51
|
|
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 1/ 1 hour
|
-12.52 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -29.03 to 3.99
|
-15.99 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -34.06 to 2.09
|
-12.67 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -26.17 to 0.83
|
-19.67 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -30.12 to -9.21
|
-15.81 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -32.3 to 0.69
|
-11.76 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -28.27 to 4.74
|
|
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 2
|
-25.52 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -45.53 to -5.52
|
-30.35 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -52.25 to -8.44
|
-30.34 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -46.69 to -13.98
|
-10.60 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -23.27 to 2.07
|
-37.77 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -57.77 to -17.78
|
-20.94 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -40.95 to -0.94
|
|
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 3
|
-34.69 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -55.03 to -14.35
|
-30.15 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -52.41 to -7.88
|
-38.67 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -55.29 to -22.05
|
-3.33 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -16.21 to 9.54
|
-35.77 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -56.1 to -15.45
|
-27.94 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -48.28 to -7.61
|
|
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 5
|
-35.86 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -57.79 to -13.92
|
-31.35 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -55.36 to -7.33
|
-42.78 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -60.71 to -24.86
|
-4.73 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -18.62 to 9.15
|
-31.27 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -53.2 to -9.35
|
-13.64 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -35.57 to 8.28
|
|
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 10
|
-23.52 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -46.52 to -0.53
|
-29.15 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -54.33 to -3.96
|
-37.78 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -56.57 to -18.99
|
-6.73 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -21.29 to 7.82
|
-37.27 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -60.26 to -14.29
|
-12.43 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -35.42 to 10.57
|
|
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 18
|
-12.69 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -34.99 to 9.61
|
-29.75 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -54.17 to -5.33
|
-28.45 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -46.67 to -10.22
|
-4.07 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -18.18 to 10.05
|
-42.61 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -64.9 to -20.31
|
-12.74 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -35.04 to 9.55
|
|
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 22
|
-12.69 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -35.17 to 9.79
|
-28.35 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -52.96 to -3.73
|
-30.34 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -48.71 to -11.97
|
-3.20 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -17.43 to 11.03
|
-44.61 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -67.08 to -22.14
|
-13.58 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -36.05 to 8.9
|
|
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 29
|
-12.69 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -35.28 to 9.9
|
-17.95 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -42.68 to 6.79
|
-23.89 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -42.35 to -5.43
|
-4.07 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -18.36 to 10.23
|
-44.94 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -67.52 to -22.36
|
-13.58 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -36.16 to 9.01
|
|
Change in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint in 15, 30, 45 Minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 Hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 Following the Initiation of Treatment and Compared to Baseline
Day 45
|
-12.69 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -34.93 to 9.55
|
-19.75 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -44.09 to 4.6
|
-23.34 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -41.51 to -5.16
|
-2.60 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -16.67 to 11.48
|
-46.94 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -69.17 to -24.71
|
-13.58 mm (VAS scale)
Interval -35.81 to 8.66
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 15, 30, 45 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 after the initiation of treatment with the test drugPopulation: The table shows the frequencies and proportions (%) of the number of valid observations. Values after the use of rescue medication and after withdrawal were imputed as failure.
Proportion of patients who assessed the response to therapy with the test drug as "Excellent" or "Good" in 15, 30, 45 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug. The patient's response to therapy was assessed in the form of frequency tables by assessment point and therapy group. The rates of the response were specified in the evaluation form as: "Excellent", "Good", "Fair", "Weak", "Poor" (where "excellent" represents the best possible response to treatment and "poor" indicates the worst treatment response).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 1/ 1 hour
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 2
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 45
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 1/15 minutes
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 1/30 minutes
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 1/45 minutes
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 1/ 1.5 hours
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 1/ 2 hours
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 1/ 4 hours
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 1/ 8 hours
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 3
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 4
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 5
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 6
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 10
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 15
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 18
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 22
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Proportion of Patients Who Assessed the Response to Therapy With the Test Drug as "Excellent" or "Good"
Day 29
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 24, 48, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drugPopulation: It should be noted that estimates following the use of the rescue medication or a prohibited analgesic were not included in the descriptive statistics, therefore, the number of patients with analyzable data in treatment groups decreased over time.
Change in the rate of swelling of the assessed joint evaluated in 24, 48, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug compared to baseline. The rates of swelling were specified in the evaluation form as: "absence" = no swelling, "mild" = palpable swelling, "moderate" = visible swelling, "severe" = bulging outside the joint (where "severe" represented the worst possible degree of swelling and "absence" was the best outcome).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 10 · moderate
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
22 · severe
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
29 · mild
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
29 · moderate
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
22 · absence
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
45 · mild
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Baseline · absence
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Baseline · mild
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Baseline · moderate
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Baseline · severe
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 2/ 24 hours · absence
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 2/ 24 hours · mild
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 2/ 24 hours · moderate
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 2/ 24 hours · severe
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 3/ 48 hours · absence
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 3/ 48 hours · mild
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 3/ 48 hours · moderate
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 3/ 48 hours · severe
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 4/ 72 hours · absence
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 4/ 72 hours · mild
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 4/ 72 hours · moderate
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 4/ 72 hours · severe
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 5 · absence
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 5 · mild
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 5 · moderate
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 5 · severe
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 6 · absence
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 6 · mild
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 6 · moderate
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 6 · severe
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 10 · absence
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 10 · mild
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 10 · severe
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 15 · absence
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 15 · mild
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 15 · moderate
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 15 · severe
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 18 · absence
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 18 · mild
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 18 · moderate
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 18 · severe
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
22 · mild
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
22 · moderate
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
29 · absence
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
29 · severe
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
45 · absence
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
45 · moderate
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Swelling of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
45 · severe
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 24, 48, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drugPopulation: It should be noted that estimates following the use of the rescue medication or a prohibited analgesic were not included in the descriptive statistics, therefore, the number of patients with analyzable data in treatment groups decreased over time.
Change in the rate of tenderness of the assessed joint evaluated in 24, 48, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug compared to baseline. Tenderness degrees: "absent" = no tenderness, "mild" = tenderness when touched, "moderate" = pain and flinching, "severe" = pain, flinching and withdrawal of the limb (where "severe" represents the worst possible degree of tenderness and "absent" is the best outcome).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Baseline · severe
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 2/ 24 hours · moderate
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 3/ 48 hours · absence
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 3/ 48 hours · mild
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 4/ 72 hours · absence
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 4/ 72 hours · mild
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 4/ 72 hours · severe
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 5 · mild
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 5 · moderate
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 10 · mild
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
22 · moderate
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
29 · absence
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
29 · mild
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
29 · severe
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
45 · mild
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
45 · moderate
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
45 · severe
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 18 · moderate
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 18 · severe
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
22 · absence
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
22 · mild
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
22 · severe
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
29 · moderate
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
45 · absence
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Baseline · absence
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Baseline · mild
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Baseline · moderate
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 2/ 24 hours · absence
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 2/ 24 hours · mild
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 2/ 24 hours · severe
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 3/ 48 hours · moderate
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 3/ 48 hours · severe
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 4/ 72 hours · moderate
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 5 · absence
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 5 · severe
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 6 · absence
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 6 · mild
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 6 · moderate
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 6 · severe
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 10 · absence
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 10 · moderate
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 10 · severe
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 15 · absence
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 15 · mild
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 15 · moderate
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 15 · severe
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 18 · absence
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Tenderness of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 18 · mild
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 24, 48, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drugPopulation: It should be noted that estimates following the use of the rescue medication or a prohibited analgesic were not included in the descriptive statistics, therefore, the number of patients with analyzable data in treatment groups decreased over time.
Change in the rate of erythema of the assessed joint evaluated in 24, 48, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug compared to baseline.The rates of "erythema" were specified as "absence", "presence", "impossible to evaluate".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 3/ 48 hours · evaluation impossible
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 10 · absence
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 18 · absence
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 18 · presence
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 18 · evaluation impossible
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
22 · absence
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
22 · evaluation impossible
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
29 · absence
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
29 · presence
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
22 · presence
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
29 · evaluation impossible
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
45 · absence
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
45 · presence
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
45 · evaluation impossible
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Baseline · absence
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Baseline · presence
|
5 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Baseline · evaluation impossible
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 2/ 24 hours · absence
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 2/ 24 hours · presence
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 2/ 24 hours · evaluation impossible
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 3/ 48 hours · absence
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 3/ 48 hours · presence
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 4/ 72 hours · absence
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 4/ 72 hours · presence
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 4/ 72 hours · evaluation impossible
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 5 · absence
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 5 · presence
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 5 · evaluation impossible
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 6 · absence
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 6 · presence
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 6 · evaluation impossible
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 10 · presence
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 10 · evaluation impossible
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 15 · absence
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 15 · presence
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Erythema of the Assessed Joint Evaluated After the Initiation of Treatment With the Test Drug
Day 15 · evaluation impossible
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and in 24, 48, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drugPopulation: It should be noted that estimates following the use of the rescue medication or a prohibited analgesic were not included in the descriptive statistics, therefore, the number of patients with analyzable data in treatment groups decreased over time.
Change in the rate of movement restrictions in the assessed joint evaluated in 24, 48, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug compared to baseline. For the assessment, the categorical scale consistent with the Form for evaluation (Investigator's Assessment) of the restriction of movements was used. The rates of movement restrictions (amplitude of movements) were specified in the evaluation form as "1 - Normal range", "2 - Slightly limited range", " 3 - Moderately limited range" ,"4 - Severely limited range" and "5 - Joint movement is impossible " (where higher score means worse outcome).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Baseline · 3
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 22 · 1
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Baseline · 5
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 2/ 24 hours · 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 2/ 24 hours · 2
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 2/ 24 hours · 3
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 2/ 24 hours · 4
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 3/ 48 hours · 4
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 3/ 48 hours · 5
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 4/ 72 hours · 1
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 4/ 72 hours · 5
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 5 · 1
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 5 · 2
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 5 · 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 5 · 4
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 29 · 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 6 · 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 6 · 4
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 6 · 5
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 10 · 1
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 10 · 4
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 15 · 1
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 15 · 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 15 · 3
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 15 · 5
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 18 · 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 18 · 3
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 18 · 5
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 22 · 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 22 · 3
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 22 · 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 29 · 3
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 3/ 48 hours · 3
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Baseline · 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Baseline · 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 4/ 72 hours · 2
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 4/ 72 hours · 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 4/ 72 hours · 4
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 5 · 5
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 6 · 1
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 6 · 2
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Baseline · 4
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 10 · 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 10 · 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 10 · 5
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 15 · 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 18 · 1
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 2/ 24 hours · 5
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 3/ 48 hours · 1
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 3/ 48 hours · 2
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 29 · 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 29 · 5
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 18 · 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 22 · 5
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 29 · 1
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 45 · 5
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 45 · 1
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 45 · 2
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 45 · 3
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Change in the Rate of Movement Restrictions in the Specified Timeframes After Initiation of Treatment
Day 45 · 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and one of the pain intensity measurements in accordance with the schedule: 15, 30, 45 minutes, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29 and 45 after the initiation of treatmentTime to achieve the 50% decrease in pain intensity in the assessed joint relative to the baseline VAS level. VAS is a hard copy 100 mm scale with the indications: "Absence of pain" on the left side of the scale (0 mm point) and "The most severe pain ever experienced" on the right side of the scale (100 mm point)). The better outcome would be "Absence of pain", the worse outcome would be "The most severe pain ever experienced".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Achieve the 50% Decrease in Pain Intensity in the Assessed Joint Relative to the Baseline
|
NA hours
Interval 0.8 to
No median estimate was obtained due to the small group sizes and the small number of events assessed.
|
8.0 hours
Interval 4.0 to
No CI estimate was obtained due to the small group sizes and the small number of events assessed.
|
47.3 hours
Interval 0.8 to
No CI estimate was obtained due to the small group sizes and the small number of events assessed.
|
NA hours
Interval 0.8 to
No median estimate was obtained due to the small group sizes and the small number of events assessed.
|
6.0 hours
Interval 0.3 to
No CI estimate was obtained due to the small group sizes and the small number of events assessed.
|
NA hours
Interval 1.5 to
No median estimate was obtained due to the small group sizes and the small number of events assessed.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: from the date/time of IP administration (first dose) to the date/time of the first use of the rescue medication, up to day 60Population: Patient 01003 was excluded from the analysis of the endpoint due to the use of prohibited therapy (methylprednisolone 125 mg, IV, daily from the 2nd day of therapy until the end of the study).
Time to use of the rescue medication was calculated as the time in hours from the date/time of administration (first dose) of the investigational product to the date/time of the first use of the rescue medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=14 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Use of the Rescue Medication
|
84.6 hours
Interval 22.7 to
No CI estimate was obtained due to the small group sizes and the small number of events assessed.
|
NA hours
Interval 3.0 to
No median estimate was obtained due to the small group sizes and the small number of events assessed.
|
NA hours
Interval 4.4 to
No median estimate was obtained due to the small group sizes and the small number of events assessed.
|
23.7 hours
Interval 21.3 to 24.5
|
NA hours
Interval 3.1 to
No median estimate was obtained due to the small group sizes and the small number of events assessed.
|
71.8 hours
Interval 24.4 to
No CI estimate was obtained due to the small group sizes and the small number of events assessed.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 72 hours after the initiation of treatment with the test drugPopulation: Patient 01003 was excluded from the analysis of the endpoint due to the use of prohibited therapy (methylprednisolone 125 mg, IV, daily from the 2nd day of therapy until the end of the study).
The proportion of patients who received the rescue medication within 72 hours of starting the investigational product therapy
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=14 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Patients Who Received a Rescue Therapy Agent
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to day 60Population: Patient 01003 was excluded from the analysis of the endpoint due to the use of prohibited therapy (methylprednisolone 125 mg, IV, daily from the 2nd day of therapy until the end of the study).
The proportion of patients who received the rescue medication over the entire treatment period
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=14 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Patients Who Received a Rescue Therapy Agent
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 15, 29 and 45 days following the initiation of treatment with the test drugPopulation: It should be noted that estimates following the use of the rescue medication or a prohibited analgesic were not included in the descriptive statistics.
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) parameters in 15, 29 and 45 days following the initiation of treatment with the test drug as compared to baseline. (The result for each of the 8 categories ("Dressing and Grooming", "Arising", "Eating", "Walking", "Hygiene", "Reach", "Grip", "Activities") of the HAQ questionnaire was calculated as the maximum score of responses (on an ordinal scale from 0 (best) to 3 (worst): without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3)) to questions included in this category. If the patient required outside help or any of the specified aids or devices to perform actions related to a certain category, then this category was assigned "2" points, if the point was not equal to "3", i.e. points "0" and "1" increased to "2". The sum of points for the evaluated categories was calculated and divided by the number of categories, which gives a disability index in the range of 0 to 3.)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Disability Index
Baseline value
|
1.1 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.649
|
1.6 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.615
|
1.32 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.577
|
1.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.802
|
1.23 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.578
|
1.75 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.806
|
|
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Disability Index
Change Day 15
|
-0.63 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-1.06 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.619
|
-0.56 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.342
|
-0.75 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-0.63 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.685
|
-0.88 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
|
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Disability Index
Change Day 29
|
-0.63 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.53
|
-0.38 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.144
|
-0.13 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-1.09 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.672
|
-1.25 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
|
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Disability Index
Change Day 45
|
-0.63 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-0.56 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.619
|
-0.44 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.298
|
-0.38 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-1.42 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.382
|
-1.38 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 15, 29 and 45 days following the initiation of treatment with the test drugPopulation: It should be noted that estimates following the use of the rescue medication or a prohibited analgesic were not included in the descriptive statistics.
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) parameters in 15, 29 and 45 days following the initiation of treatment with the test drug as compared to baseline. The result was calculated as the maximum score of responses (on an ordinal scale from 0 to 3) to questions included in this category. Patients were asked about their ability to complete these tasks in the past week using the following categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst). If the patient required outside help or any of the specified aids or devices to perform actions related to a certain category, then this category was assigned "2" points, if the point was not equal to "3", i.e. points "0" and "1" increased to "2".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Arising
Baseline value
|
0.7 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
1.4 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.55
|
1.2 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
0.9 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
1.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.52
|
1.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
|
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Arising
Change Day 15
|
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.55
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
|
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Arising
Change Day 29
|
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-1.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
|
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Arising
Change Day 45
|
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.0
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-1.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 15, 29 and 45 days following the initiation of treatment with the test drugPopulation: It should be noted that estimates following the use of the rescue medication or a prohibited analgesic were not included in the descriptive statistics.
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) parameters in 15, 29 and 45 days following the initiation of treatment with the test drug as compared to baseline. The result was calculated as the maximum score of responses (on an ordinal scale from 0 to 3) to questions included in this category. Patients were asked about their ability to complete these tasks in the past week using the following categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst). If the patient required outside help or any of the specified aids or devices to perform actions related to a certain category, then this category was assigned "2" points, if the point was not equal to "3", i.e. points "0" and "1" increased to "2".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Eating
Baseline value
|
0.8 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
0.7 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
0.7 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
1.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.37
|
|
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Eating
Change Day 15
|
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
-0.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.52
|
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
|
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Eating
Change Day 29
|
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
-0.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
|
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Eating
Change Day 45
|
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
-0.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-1.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 15, 29 and 45 days following the initiation of treatment with the test drugPopulation: It should be noted that estimates following the use of the rescue medication or a prohibited analgesic were not included in the descriptive statistics.
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) parameters in 15, 29 and 45 days following the initiation of treatment with the test drug as compared to baseline. The result was calculated as the maximum score of responses (on an ordinal scale from 0 to 3) to questions included in this category. Patients were asked about their ability to complete these tasks in the past week using the following categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst). If the patient required outside help or any of the specified aids or devices to perform actions related to a certain category, then this category was assigned "2" points, if the point was not equal to "3", i.e. points "0" and "1" increased to "2".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Walking
Baseline value
|
1.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
1.6 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.14
|
1.8 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.67
|
1.4 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
1.8 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.75
|
1.8 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
|
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Walking
Change Day 15
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-1.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
-0.7 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-1.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
|
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Walking
Change Day 29
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
-0.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-1.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
-2.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
|
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Walking
Change Day 45
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
-0.8 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-1.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
-2.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 15, 29 and 45 days following the initiation of treatment with the test drugPopulation: It should be noted that estimates following the use of the rescue medication or a prohibited analgesic were not included in the descriptive statistics.
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) parameters in 15, 29 and 45 days following the initiation of treatment with the test drug as compared to baseline. The result was calculated as the maximum score of responses (on an ordinal scale from 0 to 3) to questions included in this category. Patients were asked about their ability to complete these tasks in the past week using the following categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst). If the patient required outside help or any of the specified aids or devices to perform actions related to a certain category, then this category was assigned "2" points, if the point was not equal to "3", i.e. points "0" and "1" increased to "2".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Hygiene
Change Day 15
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-2.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.55
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-0.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
|
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Hygiene
Change Day 29
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-1.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
|
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Hygiene
Change Day 45
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-1.7 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
|
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Hygiene
Baseline value
|
1.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
2.2 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.45
|
1.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.2 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
1.2 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.98
|
1.7 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.03
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 15, 29 and 45 days following the initiation of treatment with the test drugPopulation: It should be noted that estimates following the use of the rescue medication or a prohibited analgesic were not included in the descriptive statistics.
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) parameters in 15, 29 and 45 days following the initiation of treatment with the test drug as compared to baseline. The result was calculated as the maximum score of responses (on an ordinal scale from 0 to 3) to questions included in this category. Patients were asked about their ability to complete these tasks in the past week using the following categories: without any difficulty (0); with some difficulty (1); with much difficulty (2); and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst). If the patient required outside help or any of the specified aids or devices to perform actions related to a certain category, then this category was assigned "2" points, if the point was not equal to "3", i.e. points "0" and "1" increased to "2".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Grip
Baseline value
|
1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
1.2 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
0.4 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.73
|
1.4 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.63
|
1.2 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
|
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Grip
Change Day 15
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
-0.2 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.41
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
|
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Grip
Change Day 29
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-0.5 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
-0.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.82
|
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
|
Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Parameters: Grip
Change Day 45
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.41
|
0.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
-1.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
-1.3 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
0.0 units of the HAQ index
Standard Deviation NA
small group size
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and in 2,8,24,48,72 hours,on Days 5,6,10,15,18,22,29,45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug and on the follow-up visit (in case of premature withdrawal of patient)Including area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (AUC0-tau)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=3 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetics (PK) - Area Under the Plasma concentration-of RPH-104 Under the Subcutaneous Administration
|
1620000 h*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.5
|
3230000 h*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 38.2
|
—
|
38000 h*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 124
|
762000 h*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 152
|
845000 h*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 45
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and in 2,8,24,48,72 hours,on Days 5,6,10,15,18,22,29,45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug and on the follow-up visit (in case of premature withdrawal of patient)Including Area under the active substance concentration-time curve from zero (before drug administration) to infinity (AUC0-∞)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=3 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=14 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetics (PK) - Area Under the Active Substance Concentration- of RPH-104 Under the Subcutaneous Administration
|
1720000 h*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 37.1
|
3380000 h*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 38.1
|
—
|
47900 h*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 97.9
|
816000 h*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 155
|
901000 h*ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 44.3
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and in 2,8,24,48,72 hours,on Days 5,6,10,15,18,22,29,45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug and on the follow-up visit (in case of premature withdrawal of patient)Including Maximum concentration of the active substance (Cmax)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=4 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetics (PK) - Maximum Concentration of the Active Substance -of RPH-104 Under the Subcutaneous Administration
|
4860 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 18
|
9760 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 38.2
|
—
|
142 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 110
|
2220 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 155
|
2380 ng/mL
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 47.7
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and in 2,8,24,48,72 hours,on Days 5,6,10,15,18,22,29,45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug and on the follow-up visit (in case of premature withdrawal of patient)Including elimination constant (Kel)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=3 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=14 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetics (PK) of RPH-104 Under the Subcutaneous Administration
|
0.00317 1/h
Standard Deviation 0.000575
|
0.00294 1/h
Standard Deviation 0.000311
|
—
|
0.00298 1/h
Standard Deviation 0.000573
|
0.00314 1/h
Standard Deviation 0.000622
|
0.00304 1/h
Standard Deviation 0.000241
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and in 2,8,24,48,72 hours,on Days 5,6,10,15,18,22,29,45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug and on the follow-up visit (in case of premature withdrawal of patient)Including Time to reach maximum concentration of the active substance (tmax)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=4 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetics (PK) -Time to Reach Maximum Concentration of the Active Substance - of RPH-104 Under the Subcutaneous Administration
|
82.7 hours
Interval 24.0 to 122.0
|
94.4 hours
Interval 72.0 to 96.1
|
—
|
93.7 hours
Interval 8.0 to 120.0
|
47.5 hours
Interval 21.3 to 72.1
|
84.8 hours
Interval 47.1 to 120.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and in 2,8,24,48,72 hours,on Days 5,6,10,15,18,22,29,45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug and on the follow-up visit (in case of premature withdrawal of patient)Including terminal half-life (T 1/2)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=3 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=14 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Pharmacokinetics (PK) - Terminal Half-life -of RPH-104 Under the Subcutaneous Administration
|
231 hours
Interval 168.0 to 264.0
|
241 hours
Interval 212.0 to 261.0
|
—
|
248 hours
Interval 153.0 to 285.0
|
235 hours
Interval 170.0 to 274.0
|
223 hours
Interval 205.0 to 256.0
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and in 24, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 after the initiation of treatment with the test drugPopulation: Number of valid observations is presented.
Change in the serum rate of high-sensitive CRP (hs-CRP) in 24, 72 hours, on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug compared to baseline
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Serum Rate of High-sensitive CRP (Hs-CRP) in Specified Timeframes
Day 4/ 72 hours
|
11.846 mg/L
Standard Deviation 6.1780
|
8.678 mg/L
Standard Deviation 10.5037
|
9.279 mg/L
Standard Deviation 8.1642
|
33.894 mg/L
Standard Deviation 35.0873
|
3.408 mg/L
Standard Deviation 0.8120
|
12.900 mg/L
Standard Deviation 9.3579
|
|
Change in the Serum Rate of High-sensitive CRP (Hs-CRP) in Specified Timeframes
Baseline value
|
37.908 mg/L
Standard Deviation 25.5594
|
35.396 mg/L
Standard Deviation 32.4800
|
15.769 mg/L
Standard Deviation 18.0878
|
36.673 mg/L
Standard Deviation 31.3545
|
8.295 mg/L
Standard Deviation 6.6212
|
10.105 mg/L
Standard Deviation 14.2834
|
|
Change in the Serum Rate of High-sensitive CRP (Hs-CRP) in Specified Timeframes
Day 2/ 24 hours
|
28.864 mg/L
Standard Deviation 16.1194
|
12.000 mg/L
Standard Deviation 11.5518
|
22.716 mg/L
Standard Deviation 26.9958
|
35.468 mg/L
Standard Deviation 32.2025
|
20.338 mg/L
Standard Deviation 33.3728
|
24.483 mg/L
Standard Deviation 16.3543
|
|
Change in the Serum Rate of High-sensitive CRP (Hs-CRP) in Specified Timeframes
Day 5
|
8.696 mg/L
Standard Deviation 3.6468
|
6.178 mg/L
Standard Deviation 6.4262
|
8.877 mg/L
Standard Deviation 6.3308
|
32.279 mg/L
Standard Deviation 32.6858
|
3.090 mg/L
Standard Deviation 0.9076
|
7.142 mg/L
Standard Deviation 5.7071
|
|
Change in the Serum Rate of High-sensitive CRP (Hs-CRP) in Specified Timeframes
Day 6
|
4.604 mg/L
Standard Deviation 1.3871
|
3.190 mg/L
Standard Deviation 3.0165
|
8.417 mg/L
Standard Deviation 7.0440
|
29.065 mg/L
Standard Deviation 28.1288
|
2.710 mg/L
Standard Deviation 1.6140
|
3.650 mg/L
Standard Deviation 2.8445
|
|
Change in the Serum Rate of High-sensitive CRP (Hs-CRP) in Specified Timeframes
Day 15
|
5.115 mg/L
Standard Deviation 3.5382
|
4.042 mg/L
Standard Deviation 6.1199
|
6.579 mg/L
Standard Deviation 4.4134
|
21.017 mg/L
Standard Deviation 28.4384
|
2.642 mg/L
Standard Deviation 1.4322
|
3.304 mg/L
Standard Deviation 5.8018
|
|
Change in the Serum Rate of High-sensitive CRP (Hs-CRP) in Specified Timeframes
Day 29
|
5.014 mg/L
Standard Deviation 2.8480
|
10.998 mg/L
Standard Deviation 17.3463
|
7.595 mg/L
Standard Deviation 7.9870
|
16.811 mg/L
Standard Deviation 26.3922
|
7.532 mg/L
Standard Deviation 13.0615
|
2.750 mg/L
Standard Deviation 2.9068
|
|
Change in the Serum Rate of High-sensitive CRP (Hs-CRP) in Specified Timeframes
Day 45
|
3.093 mg/L
Standard Deviation 0.5652
|
14.500 mg/L
Standard Deviation 19.2882
|
11.734 mg/L
Standard Deviation 11.4627
|
24.958 mg/L
Standard Deviation 29.4450
|
3.570 mg/L
Standard Deviation 2.1907
|
2.445 mg/L
Standard Deviation 1.8315
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and in 24, 72 hours and on Day 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drugPopulation: Number of valid observations is presented.
Change in the rate of serum amyloid protein A in 24, 72 hours and on Day 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug as compared to baseline
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Rate of Serum Amyloid Protein A in the Specified Timeframes
Day 2/ 24 hours
|
15581.486 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 13271.7115
|
3659.778 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 3244.2099
|
7294.631 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 5163.5001
|
17424.060 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 17167.2073
|
11078.300 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 19281.3822
|
20104.555 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 15608.3760
|
|
Change in the Rate of Serum Amyloid Protein A in the Specified Timeframes
Day 5
|
8228.272 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 7624.1329
|
5952.460 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 10455.6856
|
8252.633 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 8121.6203
|
17360.201 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 15874.5237
|
1195.975 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 393.6981
|
5680.190 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 5708.9022
|
|
Change in the Rate of Serum Amyloid Protein A in the Specified Timeframes
Day 15
|
4582.338 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 5995.5993
|
2732.598 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1325.3698
|
6031.146 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 10261.9489
|
9272.782 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 11297.9676
|
1525.612 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 502.8845
|
8899.982 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 17399.0042
|
|
Change in the Rate of Serum Amyloid Protein A in the Specified Timeframes
Baseline value
|
16168.130 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 12937.7377
|
16291.605 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 17949.6741
|
5033.151 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 3384.3761
|
13493.687 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 14565.0449
|
2516.606 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1367.7981
|
16764.020 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 14525.1072
|
|
Change in the Rate of Serum Amyloid Protein A in the Specified Timeframes
Day 4/ 72 hours
|
14419.760 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 11828.2546
|
10596.423 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 16813.3253
|
7362.322 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 9834.7459
|
17588.735 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 16623.4301
|
1171.203 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 400.3851
|
12162.612 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 12060.2753
|
|
Change in the Rate of Serum Amyloid Protein A in the Specified Timeframes
Day 6
|
5799.608 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 5562.9980
|
6117.777 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 8569.9756
|
6165.779 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 5356.4841
|
18553.955 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 15454.2373
|
1847.923 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1646.0125
|
4781.173 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 6120.5728
|
|
Change in the Rate of Serum Amyloid Protein A in the Specified Timeframes
Day 29
|
3626.702 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 2740.1283
|
3618.843 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 3147.2319
|
3779.410 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 2727.9500
|
8918.439 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 12001.1492
|
4255.756 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 6845.1947
|
1645.107 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1044.8811
|
|
Change in the Rate of Serum Amyloid Protein A in the Specified Timeframes
Day 45
|
1567.040 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1421.4541
|
9885.230 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 15228.9607
|
7289.553 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 7189.8429
|
13858.845 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 16512.5575
|
2086.198 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 2799.5039
|
1269.680 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 695.3511
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and in 24, 72 hours and on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drugPopulation: Number of valid observations is presented. (IL-1a values \<1.10 were replaced with 1.09 for graphical representation and statistical analysis.)
Change in the serum rates of IL-1α in 24, 72 hours and on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug as compared to baseline
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1α
Day 2/ 24 hours
|
1.782 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.5474
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.097 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0163
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1α
Baseline value
|
1.752 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.5390
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1α
Day 4/ 72 hours
|
1.688 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.3372
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1α
Day 5
|
1.790 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.5652
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1α
Day 6
|
1.612 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.1672
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1α
Day 15
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.132 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.1525
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1α
Day 29
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.097 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0258
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1α
Day 45
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
1.090 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and in 24, 72 hours and on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drugPopulation: Number of valid observations is presented. (IL-1β \<0.30 values were replaced with 0.29, IL-1β \> 500.00 values were replaced with 500.01 for graphical presentation and statistical analysis.)
Change in the serum rates of IL-1β in 24, 72 hours and on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug as compared to baseline
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1β
Day 2/ 24 hours
|
1.100 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.8112
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
33.885 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 128.9519
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1β
Day 15
|
1.965 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 3.3500
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
38.730 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 138.5974
|
1.222 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 2.0840
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1β
Day 29
|
1.746 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 3.2557
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
33.811 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 128.9724
|
1.320 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 2.3032
|
0.417 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.3103
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1β
Baseline value
|
2.558 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 3.5248
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
39.035 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 138.5078
|
1.080 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.9351
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1β
Day 4/ 72 hours
|
2.112 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 4.0741
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
33.759 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 128.9859
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1β
Day 5
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
33.753 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 128.9873
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1β
Day 6
|
2.362 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 4.6331
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
33.998 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 128.9231
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-1β
Day 45
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
0.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and in 24, 72 hours and on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drugPopulation: Number of valid observations is presented. (IL-1RA values \<30.00 were replaced with 29.99 for graphical representation and statistical analysis.)
Change in the serum rates of IL-1RA in 24, 72 hours and on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug as compared to baseline
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Interleukin -1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1RA)
Day 6
|
180.492 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 112.2664
|
29.990 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2426.761 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1452.6687
|
1407.230 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 927.8243
|
214.610 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 125.9518
|
203.688 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 133.0562
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Interleukin -1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1RA)
Day 15
|
645.085 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 300.6542
|
257.492 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 166.0738
|
2249.794 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1459.3243
|
1620.332 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 935.4363
|
374.900 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 96.9459
|
474.542 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 214.5880
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Interleukin -1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1RA)
Baseline value
|
2240.155 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 937.1988
|
2619.456 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 2706.3397
|
2090.721 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1240.5717
|
2400.500 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1495.1100
|
1448.978 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 527.8658
|
1671.010 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1225.2673
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Interleukin -1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1RA)
Day 2/ 24 hours
|
29.990 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
29.990 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2483.891 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1786.0361
|
1700.180 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1448.4981
|
229.842 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 291.9887
|
153.098 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 145.3780
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Interleukin -1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1RA)
Day 4/ 72 hours
|
157.654 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 227.2334
|
29.990 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2297.651 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1361.7429
|
1295.743 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 916.8659
|
156.216 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 110.6281
|
140.108 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 123.8956
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Interleukin -1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1RA)
Day 5
|
87.214 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 79.7269
|
29.990 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2417.991 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1416.8428
|
1364.993 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1106.8245
|
187.223 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 109.9846
|
154.463 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 124.6690
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Interleukin -1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1RA)
Day 29
|
686.992 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 305.9470
|
471.178 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 267.8262
|
1870.815 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1032.8765
|
1928.417 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1048.0875
|
563.892 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 142.6097
|
583.062 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 269.1237
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Interleukin -1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1RA)
Day 45
|
711.997 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 285.9941
|
518.063 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 201.1455
|
1969.547 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1352.6193
|
1806.647 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 858.8185
|
915.010 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 177.2813
|
808.212 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 354.6509
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and in 24, 72 hours and on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drugPopulation: Number of valid observations is presented. (IL-6 values \<0.92 were replaced with 0.913, IL-6 values \>200.00 were replaced with 200.01 for graphical representation and statistical analysis.)
Change in the serum rates of IL-6 in 24, 72 hours and on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug as compared to baseline
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-6
Day 5
|
1.396 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.5031
|
4.905 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 7.5114
|
1.823 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.6473
|
23.999 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 37.5678
|
2.695 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 2.2949
|
2.378 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.9432
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-6
Day 29
|
1.482 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.5334
|
17.903 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 31.1335
|
5.304 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 7.4387
|
18.643 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 50.4658
|
2.758 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.7315
|
3.278 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 4.2245
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-6
Day 45
|
1.537 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.3911
|
3.753 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.6094
|
2.607 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.9663
|
6.466 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 9.1261
|
4.608 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 5.8999
|
3.370 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 4.5051
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-6
Baseline value
|
5.623 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 6.8564
|
13.666 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 11.9695
|
6.058 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 6.9686
|
26.035 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 39.1257
|
5.005 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 4.6022
|
34.307 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 54.3264
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-6
Day 2/ 24 hours
|
6.284 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 11.1153
|
9.065 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 12.5843
|
2.361 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.2039
|
27.030 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 42.9908
|
2.084 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.8930
|
37.788 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 72.3187
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-6
Day 4/ 72 hours
|
3.142 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 3.7290
|
4.698 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 7.3223
|
1.702 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.1067
|
14.943 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 29.9008
|
2.236 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.8533
|
2.145 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.9961
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-6
Day 6
|
1.272 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.3636
|
6.220 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 9.8491
|
2.157 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 2.1250
|
8.391 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 13.3742
|
3.565 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 3.5282
|
2.965 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 3.4991
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-6
Day 15
|
1.793 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.5907
|
12.858 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 25.3149
|
2.036 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.2089
|
10.595 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 14.4444
|
2.870 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.5838
|
2.434 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.7929
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and in 24, 72 hours and on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drugPopulation: Number of valid observations is presented. (IL-8 values \<2.00 were replaced with 1.99 for graphical representation and statistical analysis.)
Change in the serum rates of IL-8 in 24, 72 hours and on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug as compared to baseline
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-8
Day 5
|
10.518 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 6.8098
|
11.190 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 4.4376
|
15.188 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 12.3696
|
13.521 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 7.8988
|
4.313 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 2.6941
|
8.032 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 4.9402
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-8
Day 6
|
7.594 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 5.9449
|
10.745 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 6.3010
|
19.881 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 21.0673
|
16.969 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 16.9723
|
8.015 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 4.6897
|
7.937 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 5.3199
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-8
Day 15
|
16.395 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 19.5556
|
3.060 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 2.3926
|
34.770 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 66.4033
|
9.765 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 9.3536
|
20.884 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 31.6507
|
11.520 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 7.4313
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-8
Day 45
|
7.223 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 3.0891
|
7.927 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 5.3051
|
11.763 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 11.1239
|
12.664 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 7.2467
|
5.468 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 4.1120
|
5.807 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 5.8272
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-8
Baseline value
|
18.305 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 21.8921
|
12.318 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 12.5702
|
10.863 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 7.1505
|
12.384 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 5.8297
|
21.964 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 24.8759
|
9.277 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 4.5347
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-8
Day 2/ 24 hours
|
12.304 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 9.9136
|
2.668 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 1.3550
|
17.141 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 13.6494
|
8.228 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 7.1217
|
9.304 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 9.7609
|
9.030 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 5.5014
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-8
Day 4/ 72 hours
|
5.952 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 4.4991
|
8.148 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 5.6025
|
15.980 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 11.7350
|
15.601 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 19.4714
|
8.708 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 5.8951
|
9.020 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 6.2030
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: IL-8
Day 29
|
8.596 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 9.2114
|
9.243 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 5.1441
|
8.554 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 7.6207
|
19.766 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 20.8879
|
25.622 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 36.4743
|
8.003 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 6.1368
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and in 24, 72 hours and on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drugPopulation: Number of valid observations is presented. (TNF-α values \<2.30 were replaced with 2.29 for graphical representation and statistical analysis.)
Change in the serum rates of TNF-α in 24, 72 hours and on Days 5, 6, 15, 29 and 45 following the initiation of treatment with the test drug as compared to baseline
Outcome measures
| Measure |
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 Participants
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 Participants
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 Participants
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 Participants
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF-α)
Day 2/ 24 hours
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF-α)
Day 29
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF-α)
Baseline value
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF-α)
Day 4/ 72 hours
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF-α)
Day 5
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF-α)
Day 6
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF-α)
Day 15
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
|
Change in the Serum Rates of Cytokines: Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF-α)
Day 45
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
2.290 pg/mL
Standard Deviation 0.0000
|
Adverse Events
RPH - 4 mg
RPH - 20 mg
RPH - 40 mg
RPH - 80 mg
RPH - 160 mg
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 participants at risk
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 participants at risk
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 participants at risk
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 participants at risk
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 participants at risk
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 participants at risk
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
drug-induced liver injury
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Investigations
Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex test positive
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
pulmonary fibrosis
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
RPH - 4 mg
n=15 participants at risk
RPH-104, 4 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 20 mg
n=6 participants at risk
RPH-104, 20 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 40 mg
n=6 participants at risk
RPH-104, 40 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection.
1 mL of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 80 mg
n=6 participants at risk
RPH-104, 80 mg, subcutaneous single-dose injection. 2 mL (whole vial) of 40 mg/mL RPH-104 solution is injected.
|
RPH - 160 mg
n=5 participants at risk
RPH-104, 160 mg, two subcutaneous injections of 80 mg administered at different injection sites.
1 vial of 2mL 40 mg/mL solution per each site
|
Voltaren® (Diclofenac)
n=9 participants at risk
Voltaren® (diclofenac) orally with water at the dose 50 mg thrice daily for 3 days (150 mg total daily dose), then 25 mg thrice daily for 9 days (75 mg total daily dose) (Voltaren®: Enteric-coated tablets, 25 mg and 50 mg)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukocytosis
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus bradycardia
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diverticulum intestinal
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric disorder
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal scarring
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis chronic
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
General disorders
Administration site haemorrhage
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site erythema
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pruritus
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis chronic
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Genitourinary chlamydia infection
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Mycoplasma infection
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ureaplasma infection
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Investigations
Bilirubin conjugated increased
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Investigations
Blood bilirubin increased
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Investigations
Blood cholesterol increased
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Investigations
Blood triglycerides increased
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Investigations
Blood urea increased
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Investigations
Blood uric acid increased
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Investigations
C-reactive protein increased
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Investigations
Creatinine renal clearance decreased
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Investigations
Hepatic enzyme increased
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Investigations
Lymphocyte count increased
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Investigations
Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex test positive
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil percentage decreased
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
13.3%
2/15 • Number of events 2 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthritis
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Gouty arthritis
|
33.3%
5/15 • Number of events 5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Investigations
Joint swelling
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Daydreaming
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Micturition disorder
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Proteinuria
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Balanoposthitis
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis allergic
|
0.00%
0/15 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
6.7%
1/15 • Number of events 1 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/6 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/5 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
0.00%
0/9 • The safety of the investigational product was assessed over a 60-day period of therapy and follow-up. The tables show AEs that developed from the start of therapy.
The safety population included all subjects who received at least one dose of the investigational product. This population was used for all treatment safety assessments. The safety analysis of data was performed based on the actual treatment received by the patients.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Any study related information could be made public available only after Sponsors written permission.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER