E-vone® Use Detect Falls Among hOspitalized Patients in geRiAtric Medicine
NCT ID: NCT04067193
Last Updated: 2019-10-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-10-30
2021-05-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Remote Monitoring and Analysis of Gait and Falls Within an Elderly Population
NCT03680014
Clinical Impact of a Digital Home-based Falls Prevention Program on Elderly People
NCT03750500
Promoting Fall Prevention Workshops
NCT04134585
Falls Prevention for Visually Impaired Older People
NCT04078529
Qoos Use Sustaining Health Among patIents hOspitalized in Geriatric mediciNe (QUSHION)
NCT04103827
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Preventive measures have been implemented to limit the recurrence of falls. Most of these preventive measures are secondary and tertiary prevention programs, such as MultiFactorial Interventions (MFIs). Home-based programs are under evaluation, but evidences of their effectiveness are currently controversial. Effects of prevention programs for in and outpatients remain modest. The objectives of these interventions are to decrease the frequency of falls but also to decrease the severity of falls.
The severity of falls is due to their physical complications (found in 50 to 55% of cases), their psychological complications (40%) but it is also reflected by the subsequent hospitalizations (20%), the acceleration of dependency (50%) and the institutionalizations (40%). Falls are complicated by death in 5% of cases.
In addition, the literature on fall complications is profuse. One of these complications is the hip fracture. Hip fracture is the main cause of mortality and loss of autonomy due to falls. However, in a previous study conducted by Bloch et al. in 2009 at Cochin Hospital, several indirect evidences tended to show that mortality from falls was related to the metabolic disorders linked to the extended stay on the ground, rather than to immediate traumatic consequences. As metabolic disorders reflects the time needed to be rescued, this article highlights the importance of using early warning systems to reduce the occurrence of such complications in old frail patients living alone, and unable to get up alone from the ground.
The most commonly used warning tools are remote assistance systems (necklace or bracelet) with a button to push in case of a fall. In the study conducted by Flemming et al. in 2008, when these systems are activated, the great majority of fallers are back on their feet within one hour after the alert. Nevertheless, of 143 old people living alone and unable to get up alone from the ground, only 28 were using a warning system. The reasons for non-use are as follows: the person does not have a warning remote assistance systems, the person owns a warning remote assistance systems but was not wearing it at the time of the fall, the person was wearing a warning remote assistance systems but was forgetting (or was in difficulty) to use it.
Many research projects on fall warning and detection systems have been initiated. In the 2018 meta-analysis by Nguyen et al., fall detection systems are divided into 2 groups: a pre and a post-fall group. In the latter group, the detection systems were mainly using 3D accelerators, gyroscopes, magnetometers or smartphones with the above-mentioned devices. However, to date, there is no reliable detection system on the market because some obstacles remain. These obstacles are concerning technology but also usability. Concerning technological issue, one of the problems remains the ability of devices to detect low kinetic falls, which is common in the elderly. Concerning usability, questions are for example the problem of the voluntary activation by the user of the most common devices, or the absence of wearing the device during numerous falls.
PARADE CONNECT would remove some of the usability obstacle typically associated with remote warning systems. Indeed, the system is activated independently of the will, cognitive state and consciousness of its user. The warning system is integrated into a shoe usually worn by the old people, with probably a less stigmatizing character of aging and loss of independence. This is why it seems important to us, as a first step, to evaluate its acceptability and usability by patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
old geriatric inpatients
usability assessment after 24 to 72 hours of possible use of the device (PARADE CONNECT shoes)
usability survey
usability survey composed of subpart: System Usability Scale, questions about ergonomic, questions about design, question about global satisfaction.
unformal caregivers
usability assessment after 24 to 72 hours of possible use of the device (PARADE CONNECT shoes) by their relative
usability survey
usability survey composed of subpart: System Usability Scale, questions about ergonomic, questions about design, question about global satisfaction.
professional caregivers
usability assessment after the possible use of the device (PARADE CONNECT shoes) by 40 hospitalzed old patients in the geriatrics ward
usability survey
usability survey composed of subpart: System Usability Scale, questions about ergonomic, questions about design, question about global satisfaction.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
usability survey
usability survey composed of subpart: System Usability Scale, questions about ergonomic, questions about design, question about global satisfaction.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aged 65 years old and over
* To be hospitalised in geriatric medicine department of Angers University Hospital
* Unformal caregivers :
* Family members or relatives
* Age 18 years and over
* Professional caregivers:
* geriatric medicine department's staff of Angers University Hospital
* aged of 18 years and over
Exclusion Criteria
* To have motor disability or walking contraindications
* To be under legal protection
* Refusal of participating
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Angers
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Cédric Annweiler, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Angers University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Angers University Hospital
Angers, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2019/49
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.