Trial Outcomes & Findings for SAGE for the Early Detection of Cognitive Impairment at Primary Care Provider Visits (NCT NCT04063371)

NCT ID: NCT04063371

Last Updated: 2024-05-14

Results Overview

Number of participants in the intervention and the two control groups with diagnosis of a cognitive impairment disorder as measured by pharmacological interventions for the management of cognitive impairment.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

300 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

60 days

Results posted on

2024-05-14

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Control Group 1
At least one location will serve as the control office and will continue to conduct their visits including screening for cognitive impairment as they normally do using their usual method based on the primary care provider's normal practice.
Intervention Group
At least one different location will serve as the intervention office where all the providers, as their standard of care, use a standardized method for screening for cognitive impairment consisting of using the SAGE or eSAGE test and having a conversation with an individual who knows the patient well (if possible) to ascertain if a significant change (based on primary care provider opinion) occurred in the patient's cognitive skills over the previous year. Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (SAGE) or Electronic Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (eSAGE): The Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (SAGE) is a reliable and valid assessment that is used to detect MCI and early dementia. It is a pen and paper assessment that has 4 interchangeable versions. The digital version of SAGE (eSAGE; commercially known as BrainTest®) is made for tablet use, consists of the identical test questions as SAGE, and is strongly associated with the validated SAGE. Informant Conversation: If possible, the provider will have a conversation with an individual who knows the patient will to ascertain if a significant change (based on primary care provider opinion) occurred in the patient's cognitive skills over the previous year.
Control Group 2
Control group 2 consists of patients handled by the intervention office who did not complete the SAGE or eSAGE.
Overall Study
STARTED
100
100
100
Overall Study
COMPLETED
100
100
100
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

SAGE for the Early Detection of Cognitive Impairment at Primary Care Provider Visits

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Control Group 1
n=100 Participants
At least one location will serve as the control office and will continue to conduct their visits including screening for cognitive impairment as they normally do using their usual method based on the primary care provider's normal practice.
Intervention Group
n=100 Participants
At least one different location will serve as the intervention office where all the providers, as their standard of care, use a standardized method for screening for cognitive impairment consisting of using the SAGE or eSAGE test and having a conversation with an individual who knows the patient well (if possible) to ascertain if a significant change (based on primary care provider opinion) occurred in the patient's cognitive skills over the previous year. Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (SAGE) or Electronic Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (eSAGE): The Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (SAGE) is a reliable and valid assessment that is used to detect MCI and early dementia. It is a pen and paper assessment that has 4 interchangeable versions. The digital version of SAGE (eSAGE; commercially known as BrainTest®) is made for tablet use, consists of the identical test questions as SAGE, and is strongly associated with the validated SAGE. Informant Conversation: If possible, the provider will have a conversation with an individual who knows the patient will to ascertain if a significant change (based on primary care provider opinion) occurred in the patient's cognitive skills over the previous year.
Control Group 2
n=100 Participants
Control group 2 consists of patients handled by the intervention office who did not complete the SAGE or eSAGE.
Total
n=300 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
70.0781 years
n=93 Participants
71.46759 years
n=4 Participants
71.53598 years
n=27 Participants
70.88031 years
n=483 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
57 Participants
n=93 Participants
58 Participants
n=4 Participants
67 Participants
n=27 Participants
182 Participants
n=483 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
43 Participants
n=93 Participants
42 Participants
n=4 Participants
33 Participants
n=27 Participants
118 Participants
n=483 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
10 participants
n=93 Participants
16 participants
n=4 Participants
22 participants
n=27 Participants
48 participants
n=483 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
82 participants
n=93 Participants
83 participants
n=4 Participants
74 participants
n=27 Participants
239 participants
n=483 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
8 participants
n=93 Participants
1 participants
n=4 Participants
4 participants
n=27 Participants
13 participants
n=483 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
100 participants
n=93 Participants
100 participants
n=4 Participants
100 participants
n=27 Participants
300 participants
n=483 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 60 days

Number of participants in the intervention and the two control groups with diagnosis of a cognitive impairment disorder as measured by pharmacological interventions for the management of cognitive impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group 1
n=100 Participants
At least one location will serve as the control office and will continue to conduct their visits including screening for cognitive impairment as they normally do using their usual method based on the primary care provider's normal practice.
Intervention Group
n=100 Participants
At least one different location will serve as the intervention office where all the providers, as their standard of care, use a standardized method for screening for cognitive impairment consisting of using the SAGE or eSAGE test and having a conversation with an individual who knows the patient well (if possible) to ascertain if a significant change (based on primary care provider opinion) occurred in the patient's cognitive skills over the previous year. Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (SAGE) or Electronic Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (eSAGE): The Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (SAGE) is a reliable and valid assessment that is used to detect MCI and early dementia. It is a pen and paper assessment that has 4 interchangeable versions. The digital version of SAGE (eSAGE; commercially known as BrainTest®) is made for tablet use, consists of the identical test questions as SAGE, and is strongly associated with the validated SAGE. Informant Conversation: If possible, the provider will have a conversation with an individual who knows the patient will to ascertain if a significant change (based on primary care provider opinion) occurred in the patient's cognitive skills over the previous year.
Control Group 2
n=100 Participants
Control group 2 consists of patients handled by the intervention office who did not complete the SAGE or eSAGE.
Number of Participants With a Diagnosis of a Cognitive Impairment Disorder Measured by Pharmacological Interventions for the Management of Cognitive Impairment.
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 60 days

Number of participants in the intervention and the two control groups with any referral for further evaluation/management of potential cognitive impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group 1
n=100 Participants
At least one location will serve as the control office and will continue to conduct their visits including screening for cognitive impairment as they normally do using their usual method based on the primary care provider's normal practice.
Intervention Group
n=100 Participants
At least one different location will serve as the intervention office where all the providers, as their standard of care, use a standardized method for screening for cognitive impairment consisting of using the SAGE or eSAGE test and having a conversation with an individual who knows the patient well (if possible) to ascertain if a significant change (based on primary care provider opinion) occurred in the patient's cognitive skills over the previous year. Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (SAGE) or Electronic Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (eSAGE): The Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (SAGE) is a reliable and valid assessment that is used to detect MCI and early dementia. It is a pen and paper assessment that has 4 interchangeable versions. The digital version of SAGE (eSAGE; commercially known as BrainTest®) is made for tablet use, consists of the identical test questions as SAGE, and is strongly associated with the validated SAGE. Informant Conversation: If possible, the provider will have a conversation with an individual who knows the patient will to ascertain if a significant change (based on primary care provider opinion) occurred in the patient's cognitive skills over the previous year.
Control Group 2
n=100 Participants
Control group 2 consists of patients handled by the intervention office who did not complete the SAGE or eSAGE.
Number of Participants in the Intervention and Control Groups With Any Referral for Further Evaluation/Management of Potential Cognitive Impairment
2 participants
7 participants
0 participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 60 days

Number of participants in the intervention and the two control groups with at least one follow-up visit for additional investigation of a cognitive impairment disorder.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group 1
n=100 Participants
At least one location will serve as the control office and will continue to conduct their visits including screening for cognitive impairment as they normally do using their usual method based on the primary care provider's normal practice.
Intervention Group
n=100 Participants
At least one different location will serve as the intervention office where all the providers, as their standard of care, use a standardized method for screening for cognitive impairment consisting of using the SAGE or eSAGE test and having a conversation with an individual who knows the patient well (if possible) to ascertain if a significant change (based on primary care provider opinion) occurred in the patient's cognitive skills over the previous year. Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (SAGE) or Electronic Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (eSAGE): The Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (SAGE) is a reliable and valid assessment that is used to detect MCI and early dementia. It is a pen and paper assessment that has 4 interchangeable versions. The digital version of SAGE (eSAGE; commercially known as BrainTest®) is made for tablet use, consists of the identical test questions as SAGE, and is strongly associated with the validated SAGE. Informant Conversation: If possible, the provider will have a conversation with an individual who knows the patient will to ascertain if a significant change (based on primary care provider opinion) occurred in the patient's cognitive skills over the previous year.
Control Group 2
n=100 Participants
Control group 2 consists of patients handled by the intervention office who did not complete the SAGE or eSAGE.
Number of Participants in the Intervention and the Control Groups With at Least One Follow-up Visit for Additional Investigation of a Cognitive Impairment Disorder.
1 participants
4 participants
0 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 60 days

Population: The referrals that were investigated are listed in the rows below.100 subjects were analyzed in each group, but primary outcome measure 2 lists the total number of subjects in each group that had referrals. This secondary outcome measure lists the breakdown of the referrals. Some subjects had multiple referrals.

Number of referrals used for subjects in the intervention and two control groups for further evaluation/management of potential cognitive impairment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group 1
n=100 Participants
At least one location will serve as the control office and will continue to conduct their visits including screening for cognitive impairment as they normally do using their usual method based on the primary care provider's normal practice.
Intervention Group
n=100 Participants
At least one different location will serve as the intervention office where all the providers, as their standard of care, use a standardized method for screening for cognitive impairment consisting of using the SAGE or eSAGE test and having a conversation with an individual who knows the patient well (if possible) to ascertain if a significant change (based on primary care provider opinion) occurred in the patient's cognitive skills over the previous year. Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (SAGE) or Electronic Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (eSAGE): The Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (SAGE) is a reliable and valid assessment that is used to detect MCI and early dementia. It is a pen and paper assessment that has 4 interchangeable versions. The digital version of SAGE (eSAGE; commercially known as BrainTest®) is made for tablet use, consists of the identical test questions as SAGE, and is strongly associated with the validated SAGE. Informant Conversation: If possible, the provider will have a conversation with an individual who knows the patient will to ascertain if a significant change (based on primary care provider opinion) occurred in the patient's cognitive skills over the previous year.
Control Group 2
n=100 Participants
Control group 2 consists of patients handled by the intervention office who did not complete the SAGE or eSAGE.
Number of Referrals Used for Subjects in the Intervention and Control Groups for Further Evaluation/Management of Potential Cognitive Impairment.
neuropsychological testing
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Referrals Used for Subjects in the Intervention and Control Groups for Further Evaluation/Management of Potential Cognitive Impairment.
Lab work
1 participants
2 participants
0 participants
Number of Referrals Used for Subjects in the Intervention and Control Groups for Further Evaluation/Management of Potential Cognitive Impairment.
Neuroimaging
1 participants
4 participants
0 participants
Number of Referrals Used for Subjects in the Intervention and Control Groups for Further Evaluation/Management of Potential Cognitive Impairment.
neurology/psychiatry
2 participants
4 participants
0 participants
Number of Referrals Used for Subjects in the Intervention and Control Groups for Further Evaluation/Management of Potential Cognitive Impairment.
occupational therapy
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Referrals Used for Subjects in the Intervention and Control Groups for Further Evaluation/Management of Potential Cognitive Impairment.
physical therapy
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Referrals Used for Subjects in the Intervention and Control Groups for Further Evaluation/Management of Potential Cognitive Impairment.
speech therapy
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Referrals Used for Subjects in the Intervention and Control Groups for Further Evaluation/Management of Potential Cognitive Impairment.
counseling
0 participants
3 participants
0 participants
Number of Referrals Used for Subjects in the Intervention and Control Groups for Further Evaluation/Management of Potential Cognitive Impairment.
respite care
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Referrals Used for Subjects in the Intervention and Control Groups for Further Evaluation/Management of Potential Cognitive Impairment.
legal assistance
0 participants
2 participants
0 participants
Number of Referrals Used for Subjects in the Intervention and Control Groups for Further Evaluation/Management of Potential Cognitive Impairment.
day care
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Referrals Used for Subjects in the Intervention and Control Groups for Further Evaluation/Management of Potential Cognitive Impairment.
home health
0 participants
2 participants
0 participants
Number of Referrals Used for Subjects in the Intervention and Control Groups for Further Evaluation/Management of Potential Cognitive Impairment.
social work
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Referrals Used for Subjects in the Intervention and Control Groups for Further Evaluation/Management of Potential Cognitive Impairment.
financial planning
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Number of Referrals Used for Subjects in the Intervention and Control Groups for Further Evaluation/Management of Potential Cognitive Impairment.
cognitive research
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Referrals Used for Subjects in the Intervention and Control Groups for Further Evaluation/Management of Potential Cognitive Impairment.
other
1 participants
6 participants
0 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 60 days

Population: Since no participants were started on pharmacological interventions for the management of cognitive impairment (results of primary outcome measure 1) this outcome measure was not applicable. No data was analyzed since the subgroup in question did not exist. 100 subjects in each group were analyzed for primary outcome measure #1. This secondary outcome measure was intended to further analyze the subgroup. 0 is entered for these results since the subgroup did not exist.

Number of participants with pharmacological interventions for the management of the cognitive impairment in the two subgroups of the intervention arm with and without additional inputs from informants

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 60 days

Population: Only the SAGE was utilized in this trial. eSAGE was not utilized. 93 SAGEs were graded by the providers. The others were completed and were reviewed by the provider but did not have the provider's score documented. The researchers re-graded the 93 SAGEs and documented scoring discrepancies between the 2 offices. The included results represent the total score difference between the research office and the provider. The SAGE is scored from 0-22 with 0 being the lowest score.

Differences of SAGE and eSAGE scoring between intervention office and research site.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group 1
n=93 SAGE tests
At least one location will serve as the control office and will continue to conduct their visits including screening for cognitive impairment as they normally do using their usual method based on the primary care provider's normal practice.
Intervention Group
At least one different location will serve as the intervention office where all the providers, as their standard of care, use a standardized method for screening for cognitive impairment consisting of using the SAGE or eSAGE test and having a conversation with an individual who knows the patient well (if possible) to ascertain if a significant change (based on primary care provider opinion) occurred in the patient's cognitive skills over the previous year. Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (SAGE) or Electronic Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (eSAGE): The Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (SAGE) is a reliable and valid assessment that is used to detect MCI and early dementia. It is a pen and paper assessment that has 4 interchangeable versions. The digital version of SAGE (eSAGE; commercially known as BrainTest®) is made for tablet use, consists of the identical test questions as SAGE, and is strongly associated with the validated SAGE. Informant Conversation: If possible, the provider will have a conversation with an individual who knows the patient will to ascertain if a significant change (based on primary care provider opinion) occurred in the patient's cognitive skills over the previous year.
Control Group 2
Control group 2 consists of patients handled by the intervention office who did not complete the SAGE or eSAGE.
Scoring
-7 score difference
1 SAGEs
Scoring
-5 score difference
1 SAGEs
Scoring
-4 score difference
7 SAGEs
Scoring
-3 score difference
13 SAGEs
Scoring
-2 score difference
22 SAGEs
Scoring
-1 score difference
25 SAGEs
Scoring
0 score difference
19 SAGEs
Scoring
+1 score difference
3 SAGEs
Scoring
+3 score difference
2 SAGEs

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 60 days

Results of the questionnaire to evaluate the practicality and ease of use of the SAGE and eSAGE test by primary care providers and staff.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control Group 1
n=7 Participants
At least one location will serve as the control office and will continue to conduct their visits including screening for cognitive impairment as they normally do using their usual method based on the primary care provider's normal practice.
Intervention Group
At least one different location will serve as the intervention office where all the providers, as their standard of care, use a standardized method for screening for cognitive impairment consisting of using the SAGE or eSAGE test and having a conversation with an individual who knows the patient well (if possible) to ascertain if a significant change (based on primary care provider opinion) occurred in the patient's cognitive skills over the previous year. Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (SAGE) or Electronic Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (eSAGE): The Self-Administered Gerocognitive Examination (SAGE) is a reliable and valid assessment that is used to detect MCI and early dementia. It is a pen and paper assessment that has 4 interchangeable versions. The digital version of SAGE (eSAGE; commercially known as BrainTest®) is made for tablet use, consists of the identical test questions as SAGE, and is strongly associated with the validated SAGE. Informant Conversation: If possible, the provider will have a conversation with an individual who knows the patient will to ascertain if a significant change (based on primary care provider opinion) occurred in the patient's cognitive skills over the previous year.
Control Group 2
Control group 2 consists of patients handled by the intervention office who did not complete the SAGE or eSAGE.
Questionnaires
Would recommend the SAGE test during office visits for other colleagues
6 Participants
Questionnaires
Would not recommend the SAGE test during office visits for other colleagues
1 Participants

Adverse Events

Control Group 1

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Intervention Group

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Control Group 2

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Douglas Scharre

The Ohio State University

Phone: 614-293-4969

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place