Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Obese Subjects With NASH
NCT ID: NCT04060368
Last Updated: 2020-09-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-06-01
2023-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Condition or disease: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with or without fibrosis Intervention/treatment: ESG with OverStitch® system vs LSG
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Gastric Recalibration After Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty
NCT04945473
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty
NCT02948621
Safety, Tolerability, and Sustained Weight Loss of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty With Diet Modification and Exercise
NCT03206905
ESG vs LSG: Short-term Nutritional Outcomes
NCT04264364
Glucose-homeostasis After Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty
NCT04063098
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ESG Stitch® system + Lifestyle modifications
Endoscopic technique defined as a gastric restriction by means of continuous sutures of the entire gastric wall of the antrum and body, transmurally, in order to simulate a gastric sleeve, in the same way as sleeve gastrectomy surgery. Gastroplasty is performed using an endoscopic suture system (OverStitch, Apollo Endosurgery Inc., Austin, Texas, USA) inserted into a dual-channel endoscope (GIF-2T160, Olympus Medical Systems Corp., Tokyo, Japan).
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) with OverStitch® system + Lifestyle modifications
Endoscopic technique defined as a gastric restriction by means of continuous sutures of the entire gastric wall of the antrum and body, transmurally, in order to simulate a gastric sleeve, in the same way as sleeve gastrectomy surgery. Gastroplasty is performed using an endoscopic suture system (OverStitch, Apollo Endosurgery Inc., Austin, Texas, USA) inserted into a dual-channel endoscope (GIF-2T160, Olympus Medical Systems Corp., Tokyo, Japan).
LSG + Lifestyle modifications
Minimally invasive surgical technique defined as a gastric restriction by means of an excision approximately 80% of the stomach along the greater curvature.
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) + Lifestyle modifications
Minimally invasive surgical technique defined as a gastric restriction by means of an excision approximately 80% of the stomach along the greater curvature.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) with OverStitch® system + Lifestyle modifications
Endoscopic technique defined as a gastric restriction by means of continuous sutures of the entire gastric wall of the antrum and body, transmurally, in order to simulate a gastric sleeve, in the same way as sleeve gastrectomy surgery. Gastroplasty is performed using an endoscopic suture system (OverStitch, Apollo Endosurgery Inc., Austin, Texas, USA) inserted into a dual-channel endoscope (GIF-2T160, Olympus Medical Systems Corp., Tokyo, Japan).
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) + Lifestyle modifications
Minimally invasive surgical technique defined as a gastric restriction by means of an excision approximately 80% of the stomach along the greater curvature.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Must provide signed written informed consent and agree to comply with the study protocol.
3. BMI between 35 and 45 kg/m2 with or without metabolic risk factors (type 2 diabetes, arterial hypertension, dyslipidaemia), and BMI between 30 and 34,9 kg/m2 with type 2 diabetes.
4. Histological confirmation of steatohepatitis in a diagnostic liver biopsy (biopsy obtained in the 6 months prior to randomization or during the selection period) with at least a score of 1 in each component of the NAS score (steatosis with a score of 0 to 3, degeneration by ballooning with a score of 0 to 2 and lobular inflammation with a score of 0 to 3) and:
* NAS score ≥ 4
* fibrosis \< 4 according to the staging system of CRN fibrosis on NASH
5. For patients with fibrosis ≤ 1, must be associated at least one of the following conditions: metabolic syndrome (NCEP ATP III definition), type 2 diabetes, HOMA-IR \>6
6. Absence of other well documented causes of chronic liver disease (alcoholic liver disease, viral hepatitis, cholestasis, autoimmune hepatitis, Wilson's disease, hemochromatosis, alpha 1 antitrypsin deficiency)
7. Patients agree to have 1 liver biopsy after 96 weeks after intervention
Exclusion Criteria
2. History of efficient bariatric surgery within 10 years prior to Screening.
3. Patients with a history of clinically significant acute cardiac event in the 6 months prior to selection, such as: acute cardiovascular event, cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, or coronary heart disease (angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, revascularization procedures).
4. Weight loss of more than 5% in the 6 months prior to randomization.
5. Recent or current background of significant consumption of alcoholic beverages (\<5 years). In the case of men, significant consumption is usually defined as more than 30 g of pure alcohol per day. In the case of women, it is usually defined as more than 20 g of pure alcohol per day.
6. Liver cirrhosis.
7. Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension.
8. Esophagogastric varices.
9. Hepatocellular carcinoma
10. Portal thrombosis.
11. Pregnancy.
12. Refusal to give informed consent.
13. Any medical condition that could reduce life expectancy to less than 2 years, including known cancers.
14. Signs of any other unstable or clinically significant immunological, endocrine, hematological, gastrointestinal, neurological, neoplastic or psychiatric disease without treatment.
15. Instability or mental incompetence, so that the validity of the informed consent or the ability to comply with the study are uncertain.
16. Antibodies positive for the human immunodeficiency virus.
17. Descompensated liver disease with the following hematologic and biochemical criteria:
* Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and / or ALT\> 10 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Total bilirubin\> 25 μmol / l (1.5 mg / dl)
* Standardized international index\> 1.4
* Platelet count \<100 000 / mm3
18. Serum creatinine levels\> 135 μmol / l (\> 1.53 mg / dl) in men and\> 110 μmol / l (\> 1.24 mg / dl) in women.
19. Significant renal disease, including nephritic syndrome, chronic kidney disease (patients with markers of hepatic injury or estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] of less than 60 ml / min / 1.73 m2). If an abnormal value is obtained at the first screening visit, the eGFR measurement may be repeated before randomization within the following time frame: minimum 4 weeks after the initial test and maximum 2 weeks before the expected randomization. An abnormal repeated eGFR (less than 60 ml / min / 1.73 m2) leads to exclusion from the study.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
UECV
Dr. Javier Crespo
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospitl Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla
Santander, Cantabria, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Paula Iruzubieta, PHD
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cuadrado A, Orive A, Garcia-Suarez C, Dominguez A, Fernandez-Escalante JC, Crespo J, Pons-Romero F. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and hepatocellular carcinoma. Obes Surg. 2005 Mar;15(3):442-6. doi: 10.1381/0960892053576596.
Singh S, Allen AM, Wang Z, Prokop LJ, Murad MH, Loomba R. Fibrosis progression in nonalcoholic fatty liver vs nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of paired-biopsy studies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Apr;13(4):643-54.e1-9; quiz e39-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.04.014. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
Pais R, Charlotte F, Fedchuk L, Bedossa P, Lebray P, Poynard T, Ratziu V; LIDO Study Group. A systematic review of follow-up biopsies reveals disease progression in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver. J Hepatol. 2013 Sep;59(3):550-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.04.027. Epub 2013 May 9.
Vernon G, Baranova A, Younossi ZM. Systematic review: the epidemiology and natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in adults. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Aug;34(3):274-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04724.x. Epub 2011 May 30.
Machado M, Marques-Vidal P, Cortez-Pinto H. Hepatic histology in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. J Hepatol. 2006 Oct;45(4):600-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.06.013. Epub 2006 Jul 25.
Boza C, Riquelme A, Ibanez L, Duarte I, Norero E, Viviani P, Soza A, Fernandez JI, Raddatz A, Guzman S, Arrese M. Predictors of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in obese patients undergoing gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2005 Sep;15(8):1148-53. doi: 10.1381/0960892055002347.
Lavin-Alconero L, Fernandez-Lanas T, Iruzubieta-Coz P, Arias-Loste MT, Rodriguez-Duque JC, Rivas C, Cagigal ML, Montalban C, Useros AL, Alvarez-Cancelo A, Garcia-Saiz M, Crespo-Garcia J. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in obese subjects with Non-Alcoholic SteatoHepatitis (NASH): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (TESLA-NASH study). Trials. 2021 Oct 30;22(1):756. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05695-7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TESLA-NASH
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.