Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Obese Subjects With NASH

NCT ID: NCT04060368

Last Updated: 2020-09-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-06-01

Study Completion Date

2023-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the effect of ESG with OverStitch® system (Apollo Endosurgery, Austin, TX, USA) compared to LSG on 1) histological improvement in NASH; 2) all-cause mortality and liver-related outcomes In obese subjects with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).

Condition or disease: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with or without fibrosis Intervention/treatment: ESG with OverStitch® system vs LSG

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Experimental: Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty with OverStitch® system + Lifestyle modifications Comparator: Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy + Lifestyle modifications
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ESG Stitch® system + Lifestyle modifications

Endoscopic technique defined as a gastric restriction by means of continuous sutures of the entire gastric wall of the antrum and body, transmurally, in order to simulate a gastric sleeve, in the same way as sleeve gastrectomy surgery. Gastroplasty is performed using an endoscopic suture system (OverStitch, Apollo Endosurgery Inc., Austin, Texas, USA) inserted into a dual-channel endoscope (GIF-2T160, Olympus Medical Systems Corp., Tokyo, Japan).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) with OverStitch® system + Lifestyle modifications

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endoscopic technique defined as a gastric restriction by means of continuous sutures of the entire gastric wall of the antrum and body, transmurally, in order to simulate a gastric sleeve, in the same way as sleeve gastrectomy surgery. Gastroplasty is performed using an endoscopic suture system (OverStitch, Apollo Endosurgery Inc., Austin, Texas, USA) inserted into a dual-channel endoscope (GIF-2T160, Olympus Medical Systems Corp., Tokyo, Japan).

LSG + Lifestyle modifications

Minimally invasive surgical technique defined as a gastric restriction by means of an excision approximately 80% of the stomach along the greater curvature.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) + Lifestyle modifications

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Minimally invasive surgical technique defined as a gastric restriction by means of an excision approximately 80% of the stomach along the greater curvature.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) with OverStitch® system + Lifestyle modifications

Endoscopic technique defined as a gastric restriction by means of continuous sutures of the entire gastric wall of the antrum and body, transmurally, in order to simulate a gastric sleeve, in the same way as sleeve gastrectomy surgery. Gastroplasty is performed using an endoscopic suture system (OverStitch, Apollo Endosurgery Inc., Austin, Texas, USA) inserted into a dual-channel endoscope (GIF-2T160, Olympus Medical Systems Corp., Tokyo, Japan).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) + Lifestyle modifications

Minimally invasive surgical technique defined as a gastric restriction by means of an excision approximately 80% of the stomach along the greater curvature.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Subjects aged between 18 and 60 years (inclusive) at first screening visit.
2. Must provide signed written informed consent and agree to comply with the study protocol.
3. BMI between 35 and 45 kg/m2 with or without metabolic risk factors (type 2 diabetes, arterial hypertension, dyslipidaemia), and BMI between 30 and 34,9 kg/m2 with type 2 diabetes.
4. Histological confirmation of steatohepatitis in a diagnostic liver biopsy (biopsy obtained in the 6 months prior to randomization or during the selection period) with at least a score of 1 in each component of the NAS score (steatosis with a score of 0 to 3, degeneration by ballooning with a score of 0 to 2 and lobular inflammation with a score of 0 to 3) and:

* NAS score ≥ 4
* fibrosis \< 4 according to the staging system of CRN fibrosis on NASH
5. For patients with fibrosis ≤ 1, must be associated at least one of the following conditions: metabolic syndrome (NCEP ATP III definition), type 2 diabetes, HOMA-IR \>6
6. Absence of other well documented causes of chronic liver disease (alcoholic liver disease, viral hepatitis, cholestasis, autoimmune hepatitis, Wilson's disease, hemochromatosis, alpha 1 antitrypsin deficiency)
7. Patients agree to have 1 liver biopsy after 96 weeks after intervention

Exclusion Criteria

1. Known heart failure (Grade I to IV of the classification of the New York Heart Association).
2. History of efficient bariatric surgery within 10 years prior to Screening.
3. Patients with a history of clinically significant acute cardiac event in the 6 months prior to selection, such as: acute cardiovascular event, cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, or coronary heart disease (angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, revascularization procedures).
4. Weight loss of more than 5% in the 6 months prior to randomization.
5. Recent or current background of significant consumption of alcoholic beverages (\<5 years). In the case of men, significant consumption is usually defined as more than 30 g of pure alcohol per day. In the case of women, it is usually defined as more than 20 g of pure alcohol per day.
6. Liver cirrhosis.
7. Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension.
8. Esophagogastric varices.
9. Hepatocellular carcinoma
10. Portal thrombosis.
11. Pregnancy.
12. Refusal to give informed consent.
13. Any medical condition that could reduce life expectancy to less than 2 years, including known cancers.
14. Signs of any other unstable or clinically significant immunological, endocrine, hematological, gastrointestinal, neurological, neoplastic or psychiatric disease without treatment.
15. Instability or mental incompetence, so that the validity of the informed consent or the ability to comply with the study are uncertain.
16. Antibodies positive for the human immunodeficiency virus.
17. Descompensated liver disease with the following hematologic and biochemical criteria:

* Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and / or ALT\> 10 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
* Total bilirubin\> 25 μmol / l (1.5 mg / dl)
* Standardized international index\> 1.4
* Platelet count \<100 000 / mm3
18. Serum creatinine levels\> 135 μmol / l (\> 1.53 mg / dl) in men and\> 110 μmol / l (\> 1.24 mg / dl) in women.
19. Significant renal disease, including nephritic syndrome, chronic kidney disease (patients with markers of hepatic injury or estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] of less than 60 ml / min / 1.73 m2). If an abnormal value is obtained at the first screening visit, the eGFR measurement may be repeated before randomization within the following time frame: minimum 4 weeks after the initial test and maximum 2 weeks before the expected randomization. An abnormal repeated eGFR (less than 60 ml / min / 1.73 m2) leads to exclusion from the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

UECV

Dr. Javier Crespo

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospitl Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla

Santander, Cantabria, Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Javier Crespo, PROF

Role: CONTACT

+34942204089

Paula Iruzubieta, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+34942204089

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Paula Iruzubieta, PHD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cuadrado A, Orive A, Garcia-Suarez C, Dominguez A, Fernandez-Escalante JC, Crespo J, Pons-Romero F. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and hepatocellular carcinoma. Obes Surg. 2005 Mar;15(3):442-6. doi: 10.1381/0960892053576596.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15826485 (View on PubMed)

Singh S, Allen AM, Wang Z, Prokop LJ, Murad MH, Loomba R. Fibrosis progression in nonalcoholic fatty liver vs nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of paired-biopsy studies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Apr;13(4):643-54.e1-9; quiz e39-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.04.014. Epub 2014 Apr 24.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24768810 (View on PubMed)

Pais R, Charlotte F, Fedchuk L, Bedossa P, Lebray P, Poynard T, Ratziu V; LIDO Study Group. A systematic review of follow-up biopsies reveals disease progression in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver. J Hepatol. 2013 Sep;59(3):550-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.04.027. Epub 2013 May 9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23665288 (View on PubMed)

Vernon G, Baranova A, Younossi ZM. Systematic review: the epidemiology and natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in adults. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Aug;34(3):274-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04724.x. Epub 2011 May 30.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21623852 (View on PubMed)

Machado M, Marques-Vidal P, Cortez-Pinto H. Hepatic histology in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. J Hepatol. 2006 Oct;45(4):600-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.06.013. Epub 2006 Jul 25.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16899321 (View on PubMed)

Boza C, Riquelme A, Ibanez L, Duarte I, Norero E, Viviani P, Soza A, Fernandez JI, Raddatz A, Guzman S, Arrese M. Predictors of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in obese patients undergoing gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2005 Sep;15(8):1148-53. doi: 10.1381/0960892055002347.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16197788 (View on PubMed)

Lavin-Alconero L, Fernandez-Lanas T, Iruzubieta-Coz P, Arias-Loste MT, Rodriguez-Duque JC, Rivas C, Cagigal ML, Montalban C, Useros AL, Alvarez-Cancelo A, Garcia-Saiz M, Crespo-Garcia J. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in obese subjects with Non-Alcoholic SteatoHepatitis (NASH): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (TESLA-NASH study). Trials. 2021 Oct 30;22(1):756. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05695-7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34717726 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TESLA-NASH

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Gastric Procedures for Obesity
NCT01026181 COMPLETED
ESG With Fundal Mucosal Ablation
NCT06790329 RECRUITING NA