Trial Outcomes & Findings for Retrospective Review of Integrity Implants FlareHawk® for Lumbar Fusion (NCT NCT04057235)

NCT ID: NCT04057235

Last Updated: 2020-04-21

Results Overview

Proportion of participants with radiographic arthrodesis at 12 months +/- 3 months as determined using plain radiographic images with assessment based on the Bridwell-Lenke grading system \[Bridwell and Lenke et al, 1995\].

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

129 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

12 months +/- 3 months

Results posted on

2020-04-21

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Single Retrospective Study Arm
Participants who previously underwent Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) or Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) surgery with the FlareHawk® expandable interbody fusion device.
Overall Study
STARTED
129
Overall Study
Had Radiographic Data
58
Overall Study
Had ODI Data
43
Overall Study
Had VAS Back Data
45
Overall Study
Had VAS Leg Data
45
Overall Study
COMPLETED
129
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Gender of one subject not recorded in patient chart

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Single Retrospective Study Arm
n=129 Participants
Participants who previously underwent TLIF or PLIF surgery with the FlareHawk® expandable interbody fusion device.
Age, Continuous
60.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 • n=129 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
72 Participants
n=128 Participants • Gender of one subject not recorded in patient chart
Sex: Female, Male
Male
56 Participants
n=128 Participants • Gender of one subject not recorded in patient chart
Region of Enrollment
United States
129 Participants
n=129 Participants
Body Mass Index (BMI)
31.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3 • n=129 Participants
Smoking Status
Non-smoker
73 Participants
n=125 Participants • Smoking status not available for 4 patients
Smoking Status
Active smoker
25 Participants
n=125 Participants • Smoking status not available for 4 patients
Smoking Status
Previous smoker
27 Participants
n=125 Participants • Smoking status not available for 4 patients
Co-Morbidities
Hypertension
53 Participants
n=129 Participants
Co-Morbidities
Diabetes
25 Participants
n=129 Participants
Co-Morbidities
Obesity (BMI >= 30)
61 Participants
n=129 Participants
Co-Morbidities
Hypercholesterolemia
8 Participants
n=129 Participants
Co-Morbidities
Coronary Heart Disease
9 Participants
n=129 Participants
Co-Morbidities
Hypothyroidism
6 Participants
n=129 Participants
Co-Morbidities
Active or History of Cancer
13 Participants
n=129 Participants
Baseline VAS Leg Pain
6.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9 • n=53 Participants • Baseline VAS Leg Pain score was not recorded in patient chart for some subjects
Baseline VAS Back Pain
7.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1 • n=57 Participants • Baseline VAS Back Pain score was not recorded in patient chart for some subjects
Baseline ODI
55.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.5 • n=56 Participants • Baseline ODI score was not recorded in patient chart for some subjects

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months +/- 3 months

Population: Participants who had radiographs available at 12 months follow-up

Proportion of participants with radiographic arthrodesis at 12 months +/- 3 months as determined using plain radiographic images with assessment based on the Bridwell-Lenke grading system \[Bridwell and Lenke et al, 1995\].

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Single Retrospective Study Arm
n=58 Participants
Participants who previously underwent TLIF or PLIF surgery with the FlareHawk® expandable interbody fusion device.
Radiographic Arthrodesis
56 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline to last available follow-up, with an average follow-up of 4.6 ± 4.4 months (range: 0.5-20.5 mo)

Population: Participants who had VAS Leg data available at both baseline and follow-up

Visual analog scale for measuring pain intensity related to leg pain. The scale is anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 10).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Single Retrospective Study Arm
n=45 Participants
Participants who previously underwent TLIF or PLIF surgery with the FlareHawk® expandable interbody fusion device.
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Leg Pain From Preoperative Baseline to Last Available Follow-up
-3.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline to last available follow-up, with an average follow-up of 4.4 ± 4.3 months (range: 0.5-20.5 mo)

Population: Participants who had VAS Back data at both baseline and follow-up

Visual analog scale for measuring pain intensity related to back pain. The scale is anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 10).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Single Retrospective Study Arm
n=45 Participants
Participants who previously underwent TLIF or PLIF surgery with the FlareHawk® expandable interbody fusion device.
Change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Back Pain From Preoperative Baseline to Last Available Follow-up
-3.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline to last available follow-up, with an average follow-up of 4.4 ± 3.8 months (range: 0.5-20.5 mo)

Population: Participants with both baseline and follow-up ODI data

ODI is used to quantify disability related to lower back pain. The final score/index ranges from 0-100. A score of 0-20 reflects minimal disability, 21-40 moderate disability, 41-60 severe disability, 61-80 crippled, and 81-100 bed-bound.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Single Retrospective Study Arm
n=43 Participants
Participants who previously underwent TLIF or PLIF surgery with the FlareHawk® expandable interbody fusion device.
Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) From Baseline to Last Available Follow-up
-14.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.1

Adverse Events

Single Retrospective Study Arm

Serious events: 3 serious events
Other events: 19 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Single Retrospective Study Arm
n=129 participants at risk
Participants who previously underwent TLIF or PLIF surgery with the FlareHawk® expandable interbody fusion device.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Subsequent surgical intervention
2.3%
3/129 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data were collected at the time of surgery (intraoperative adverse events) and through last patient follow-up, with an average follow-up time of 8.0 ± 4.9 months (range: 0.5-20.5 mo).
Adverse Events were not monitored/assessed with regard to specific Adverse Event Terms.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Single Retrospective Study Arm
n=129 participants at risk
Participants who previously underwent TLIF or PLIF surgery with the FlareHawk® expandable interbody fusion device.
General disorders
Mild to Moderate Adverse Events
14.7%
19/129 • Number of events 22 • Adverse event data were collected at the time of surgery (intraoperative adverse events) and through last patient follow-up, with an average follow-up time of 8.0 ± 4.9 months (range: 0.5-20.5 mo).
Adverse Events were not monitored/assessed with regard to specific Adverse Event Terms.

Additional Information

Lauren Kamer, Senior Director of Regulatory and Clinical Affairs

Integrity Implants Inc

Phone: +1.561.529.3861

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place