Does Size Matter: A Single Case Experimental Design of Limiting the Depth of Penetration During Intercourse

NCT ID: NCT04052217

Last Updated: 2019-08-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-03-01

Study Completion Date

2019-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Our hypothesis is that reducing the length of the penis does not lead to loss of sexual satisfaction or emotional closeness in the female partner. This will be investigated by a single case experimental design in 12 couples.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators will conduct a single case experimental design (SCED), in which a woman acts as her own control with a reversal design between randomly allocated phases. These include a control phase (A) and phases with various sizes of penile rings (B, C, and D).

The male participant will be asked to measure the length and girth of their erect penis using standardized instructions and flexible tape measure before the start of the experiment. This will partly determine the inner circumference of the ring provided. The male participant will be given instructions on how to use the penile rings and ensure that the female participant is blind to the size of the ring used.

There will be randomization (a) to the phase (the size of ring) and (b) the number of times of intercourse within a phase. The male partner will be blind to ratings made by the female partner. There is no carry over effect from one phase to another. The randomization of the phase means less guessing of the size of the ring, and less interaction with moderators (e.g. menstrual cycle, alcohol, holiday or life events randomly spread across phases). In a SCED, one then replicates in Case 2, Case 3 etc and a meta-analysis is conducted of all the single cases.

Randomisation will occur to either

1. Phase A "Normal" intercourse with very thin (less than 0.5cm) ring randomised to either 3, 4 or 5 episodes of intercourse)
2. Phase B - 1" ring randomised to either 3, 4, or 5 episodes of intercourse)
3. Phase C - 1.5" ring randomised to either 3, 4, or 5 episodes of intercourse)
4. Phase D - 2" ring randomised to either 3, 4, or 5 episodes of intercourse) The male partner will be kept informed by text or email or phone (whichever is convenient) of when to change the size of ring and the number of times it should be used. The female partner will be asked to be blind to the size of ring used after each episode of intercourse. Blindness will be tested by asking if the female partner "saw" the size of the ring or whether she was able to guess when a change in the size of the ring occurred.

Measures:

The investigators will use a Visual Analogue Scale (0-100) for the female participant ratings of (a) sexual pleasure and (b) how emotionally connected she felt to her partner (c) any adverse experiences.

The female participant will be asked to rate the degree of change (positive or negative) that would be significant for them e.g. a drop of rating 65 to 45) The female participant will be asked to rate satisfaction and emotional closeness as soon as possible after intercourse. The investigators will ask all participants to enter the data directly onto web based capture of data. This will be anonymized so that they will be identified by a character.

The male participant will be asked to confirm the size of the ring used and any other comments.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peyronie Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Single Case Experimental Design
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Masking of female participant

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control Ring

"Normal" intercourse with very thin (less than 0.5cm) ring randomised to either 3, 4 or 5 episodes of intercourse (Phase A)

Group Type OTHER

Penile Ring

Intervention Type DEVICE

Penile Ring at base of penis

1" RIng

Intercourse wearing a 1" ring. Randomised to either 3, 4, or 5 episodes of intercourse (Phase B)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Penile Ring

Intervention Type DEVICE

Penile Ring at base of penis

1.5" Ring

Intercourse wearing a 1.5" ring randomised to either 3, 4, or 5 episodes of intercourse (Phase C)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Penile Ring

Intervention Type DEVICE

Penile Ring at base of penis

2" Ring

Intercourse with a 2" ring randomised to either 3, 4, or 5 episodes of intercourse (Phase D)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Penile Ring

Intervention Type DEVICE

Penile Ring at base of penis

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Penile Ring

Penile Ring at base of penis

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Heterosexual couples in a stable relationship (defined as 6 months or more)
2. Having regular intercourse (defined as on average twice a week).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Any current sexual dysfunction in either partner
2. Any current emotional disorder in either partner
3. Men with a micro-penis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

King's College London

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre for Anxiety Disorders and Trauma

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HR-16/17-2018

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

L-Arginine and Erectile Dysfunction
NCT00777075 COMPLETED PHASE4
PRP for Treatment of Peyronie's Disease
NCT04512287 COMPLETED PHASE2
Penile Injection Anxiety
NCT00582231 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING