Sensory Neuromodulation Protocol for the Treatment of Post-stroke Oropharyngeal Dysphagia.
NCT ID: NCT04052178
Last Updated: 2019-08-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
36 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-02-10
2018-12-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Aim: To evaluate the effect of different neurostimulation techniques on the neurophysiological and biomechanical swallowing mechanisms of patients with dysphagia associated with chronic stroke and select those techniques with the best results to be evaluated in the second phase of the study (medium-term effects).
Outcome measures:
* Videofluoroscopy: prevalence of impaired efficacy and safety of swallow (penetrations and aspirations), penetration aspiration scale (PAS: from 0 to 8), biomechanical parameters (time to laryngeal vestibule closure, upper esophageal sphincter opening).
* Pharyngeal sensory evoked potentials (pSEP): latency and amplitude of obtained evoked potentials. Higher latency (0 onwards) means worse outcome and higher amplitude (0 onwards) means better outcome.
* Pharyngeal motor evoked potentials (pMEP): latency, amplitude, duration and area of obtained evoked potentials. Higher latency (0 onwards) means worse outcome and higher amplitude (0 onwards) means better outcome.
Treatments and patients: 36 post-stroke patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia (PAS superior or equal to 2) randomized patients in 3 treatment arms (3 groups of 12 patients).
* Active and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): 90% of the resting motor threshold, 1250 pulses, 5 Hz.
* Active and sham Intrapharyngeal Electrical Stimulation (PES): 75% of tolerance threshold, pulses of 0.2 ms, 5 Hz, 10 min.
* Oral Capsaicin (active intervention, 10-5M, TRPV1 agonist) and placebo solution (sham): 100 mL, single administration.
Administration of study therapies:
The study will be performed in two visits separated for one week. In each visit patients will randomly receive active or sham treatment and a pre-post evaluation of biomechanics of deglutition (with VFS) and neurophysiological mechanisms (swallowing afferent and efferent pathways) will be performed in each visit.
Acute randomized administration -\> 1 active session (pre/post evaluation with VFS/pSEP/pMEP) + 1 separate control session 1 week apart (pre/post evaluation with VFS/pSEP/pMEP).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Treatment of Chronic Post-stroke Oropharyngeal Dysphagia With Paired Stimulation
NCT05720871
Effect of Afferent Oropharyngeal Pharmacological and Electrical Stimulation on Swallow Response and on Activation of Human Cortex in Stroke Patients With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia
NCT01777672
Treatment of Acute Post-stroke Oropharyngeal Dysphagia With Paired Stimulation
NCT05735626
Cortical Neuromodulation in Post Stroke Dysphagia
NCT01345890
Taste Stimulation for Post-stroke Dysphagia
NCT05989100
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rtMS)
Acute repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the pharyngeal sensory cortex. Applied intensity 90% of the resting motor threshold, 1250 pulses at 5 Hz.
Each treatment arm was placebo/sham compared with a time separation of one week. The assignment to either active or sham was randomized.
rTMS active and sham
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the pharyngeal sensory cortex.
Intrapharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES)
Intrapharyngeal electrical stimulation applied to an intensity of 75% of the tolerance threshold with 0.2 ms pulses at 5 Hz during 10 min.
Each treatment arm was placebo/sham compared with a time separation of one week. The assignment to either active or sham was randomized.
PES active and sham
Intrapharyngeal electrical stimulation with a catheter delivering electrical pulses.
Capsaicin
100 mL of oral capsaicin solution at a concentration of 10-5M.
Each treatment arm was placebo/sham compared with a time separation of one week. The assignment to either active or sham was randomized
Capsaicin active and placebo
Capsaicin solution (TRPV1 agonist) at a concentration of 10-5M or placebo solution.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
rTMS active and sham
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the pharyngeal sensory cortex.
PES active and sham
Intrapharyngeal electrical stimulation with a catheter delivering electrical pulses.
Capsaicin active and placebo
Capsaicin solution (TRPV1 agonist) at a concentration of 10-5M or placebo solution.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with a diagnosis of stroke of more than 3 months of evolution.
* Patients with clinical signs of dysphagia according to the volume viscosity swallowing test (V-VST).
* Patients capable of complying with the study protocol.
* Explained study and signed informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Pacemaker or implanted defibrillator carriers.
* Implanted electrode carriers or other stimulation systems.
* Implant carriers or metal plates on the head or neck.
* Cochlear implant carriers.
* Medication pump carriers.
* History of hearing loss associated with noise.
* Cardiopulmonary instability.
* Oropharyngeal dysphagia of structural causes.
* History of head and neck surgery.
* Alcohol or drug dependence.
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
* Participate or have participated in another clinical interventionist trial in the 4 weeks prior to inclusion.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital de Mataró
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Pere Clave
Academic Director of Research and Development of the Hospital de Mataró
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pere Clavé, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital de Mataró
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FIS2014
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.