Sensory Neuromodulation Protocol for the Treatment of Post-stroke Oropharyngeal Dysphagia.

NCT ID: NCT04052178

Last Updated: 2019-08-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-02-10

Study Completion Date

2018-12-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Study design: Multicenter, experimental, randomized, crossed, double blind study (patient and results analysis).

Aim: To evaluate the effect of different neurostimulation techniques on the neurophysiological and biomechanical swallowing mechanisms of patients with dysphagia associated with chronic stroke and select those techniques with the best results to be evaluated in the second phase of the study (medium-term effects).

Outcome measures:

* Videofluoroscopy: prevalence of impaired efficacy and safety of swallow (penetrations and aspirations), penetration aspiration scale (PAS: from 0 to 8), biomechanical parameters (time to laryngeal vestibule closure, upper esophageal sphincter opening).
* Pharyngeal sensory evoked potentials (pSEP): latency and amplitude of obtained evoked potentials. Higher latency (0 onwards) means worse outcome and higher amplitude (0 onwards) means better outcome.
* Pharyngeal motor evoked potentials (pMEP): latency, amplitude, duration and area of obtained evoked potentials. Higher latency (0 onwards) means worse outcome and higher amplitude (0 onwards) means better outcome.

Treatments and patients: 36 post-stroke patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia (PAS superior or equal to 2) randomized patients in 3 treatment arms (3 groups of 12 patients).

* Active and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): 90% of the resting motor threshold, 1250 pulses, 5 Hz.
* Active and sham Intrapharyngeal Electrical Stimulation (PES): 75% of tolerance threshold, pulses of 0.2 ms, 5 Hz, 10 min.
* Oral Capsaicin (active intervention, 10-5M, TRPV1 agonist) and placebo solution (sham): 100 mL, single administration.

Administration of study therapies:

The study will be performed in two visits separated for one week. In each visit patients will randomly receive active or sham treatment and a pre-post evaluation of biomechanics of deglutition (with VFS) and neurophysiological mechanisms (swallowing afferent and efferent pathways) will be performed in each visit.

Acute randomized administration -\> 1 active session (pre/post evaluation with VFS/pSEP/pMEP) + 1 separate control session 1 week apart (pre/post evaluation with VFS/pSEP/pMEP).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Swallowing Disorder Dysphagia Stroke Neurophysiologic Abnormality

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rtMS)

Acute repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on the pharyngeal sensory cortex. Applied intensity 90% of the resting motor threshold, 1250 pulses at 5 Hz.

Each treatment arm was placebo/sham compared with a time separation of one week. The assignment to either active or sham was randomized.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

rTMS active and sham

Intervention Type DEVICE

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the pharyngeal sensory cortex.

Intrapharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES)

Intrapharyngeal electrical stimulation applied to an intensity of 75% of the tolerance threshold with 0.2 ms pulses at 5 Hz during 10 min.

Each treatment arm was placebo/sham compared with a time separation of one week. The assignment to either active or sham was randomized.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PES active and sham

Intervention Type DEVICE

Intrapharyngeal electrical stimulation with a catheter delivering electrical pulses.

Capsaicin

100 mL of oral capsaicin solution at a concentration of 10-5M.

Each treatment arm was placebo/sham compared with a time separation of one week. The assignment to either active or sham was randomized

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Capsaicin active and placebo

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Capsaicin solution (TRPV1 agonist) at a concentration of 10-5M or placebo solution.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

rTMS active and sham

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the pharyngeal sensory cortex.

Intervention Type DEVICE

PES active and sham

Intrapharyngeal electrical stimulation with a catheter delivering electrical pulses.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Capsaicin active and placebo

Capsaicin solution (TRPV1 agonist) at a concentration of 10-5M or placebo solution.

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation Intrapharyngeal electrical stimulation TRPV1 agonist (capsaicin at 10-5M) or placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients older than 18 years.
* Patients with a diagnosis of stroke of more than 3 months of evolution.
* Patients with clinical signs of dysphagia according to the volume viscosity swallowing test (V-VST).
* Patients capable of complying with the study protocol.
* Explained study and signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* History of severe neurodegenerative, digestive diseases, epilepsy or previous seizures.
* Pacemaker or implanted defibrillator carriers.
* Implanted electrode carriers or other stimulation systems.
* Implant carriers or metal plates on the head or neck.
* Cochlear implant carriers.
* Medication pump carriers.
* History of hearing loss associated with noise.
* Cardiopulmonary instability.
* Oropharyngeal dysphagia of structural causes.
* History of head and neck surgery.
* Alcohol or drug dependence.
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
* Participate or have participated in another clinical interventionist trial in the 4 weeks prior to inclusion.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital de Mataró

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Pere Clave

Academic Director of Research and Development of the Hospital de Mataró

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pere Clavé, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital de Mataró

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FIS2014

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.