Cross-cultural Adaptation to the Spanish Population and Validation of the BESTest and Mini-BESTest
NCT ID: NCT04052087
Last Updated: 2022-07-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
104 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-03-15
2022-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objective: The purpose of the present project adapt and verify the validity of the scale MiniBESTest, version of the BESTest, in patients with BDA in subacute and chronic stage, since that is postulated as a brief tool and covering the peculiarities of the specific alterations of the patient after suffering brain damage.
Methodology: Between September 2019 and December 2020 will be transcultural adaptation to the BDA and validation of psychometric scale Mini-BESTest in three phases. 60 subjects who receive treatment in the center of attention State reference to brain damage (CEADAC), together with the comunidad de Madrid private neurological rehabilitation centers will be recruited.
Results: validity and reliability parameters shall be calculated by means of descriptive statistics for each item of the scales and the set of scale score. You will also analyze the internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha, the interclass correlation coefficient will be used to determine the reliability, and the items will be scanned with the Pearson coefficient: \> 0.20, among other parameters.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cognitive Impairment and Balance in Elderly
NCT02051270
Comparative Utility of Clinical Balance Measures in Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT02696538
Assessment of Postural Control and Balance in the Older Adult
NCT06844578
Effect of Referent Type on Balance in Action Observation.
NCT06206668
Transtibial Amputee Balance Training: A Randomised Controlled Trial
NCT02572011
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
After verifying that there are no parallel studies on the subject in progress, the possible participants will be informed of the development of the investigation (ANNEX 1), who must sign the informed consent (ANNEX 2) before being recruited into the study. In addition, a coding sheet (ANNEX 3) of the participants will be filled in so that from now on the data related to the proper name does not appear but with a number that ensures the protection of their data.
The participants will be all users of CEADAC and the selection criteria to enter to participate in the study will be: adults who had suffered a ABI at least 2 months ago, that their disability before suffering it was less than or equal to three on the scale modified by Rankin, who have an absence of cognitive impairment according to the Minimental State Examination scale, that is, a score in it greater than 24, without previous diseases that alter the balance, that were clinically stable and without fever, with the ability to walk with help technical or without it, and that they gave their informed consent.
On the other hand, those people with medical contraindications for physical tests (acute musculoskeletal or peripheral nervous system disorders), who did not understand the instructions, severe aphasias or with subjects with acute processes of any added pathology will be excluded.
The study was developed in 3 phases:
Phase 1: Transcultural adaptation process. Phase 2: Pre-Test: collected , as well as the ease of interpretation of the results.
Phase 3: Psychometric validation process.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
OTHER
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Adults who had suffered a BDA, at least 2 months before.
* The disability before suffering BDA was less than or equal to three on the scale modified Rankin.
* Lack of cognitive impairment scale Minimental State Examination, with a score is \> 24.
* No previous diseases that alter the balance.
* Clinically stable and without fever-
* Ability to walk with technical support or without it.
* Signing an informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Not understand the instructions.
* Subjects with severe aphasia.
* Subjects with acute processes of any added pathology.
16 Years
54 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Castilla-La Mancha
OTHER
University of Alcala
OTHER
Centro de Referencia Estatal de Atención Al Daño Cerebral
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
MARTA FERNANDEZ HONTORIA
Physical Therapist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Cristina Lirio Romero, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Castilla-La Mancha
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ceadac
Madrid, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Ceadac
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.