Trial Outcomes & Findings for Feasibility and Effect of a Strategy-Based Cognitive Intervention for Parkinson Disease (NCT NCT04048122)
NCT ID: NCT04048122
Last Updated: 2024-11-08
Results Overview
BGSI is a structured interview schedule was used to record participant ratings of performance and satisfaction in reaching specific goals, and to record additional ratings of goal attainment. This instrument rates goal attainment on a ten point scale (1-10) with a higher score indicating higher goal attainment.
COMPLETED
NA
57 participants
Pre-cognitive treatment intervention; one week post- cognitive treatment intervention (11 to 13 weeks after the pre-cognitive intervention treatment session); and at 3-months follow-up after the post- cognitive treatment treatment session.
2024-11-08
Participant Flow
Participants were recruited between November 2019 and January 2022 from the university movement disorders clinic, other research studies, and the community.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Control
This treatment is task-oriented training, a widely-used approach in neurorehabilitation, that parallels the cognitive process training used in PD to-date but with simulated functional tasks (vs. computer or paper \& pencil tasks). It has the same basic protocol as MC, but it is therapist-directed, and the OT does not address strategies, metacognition, generalization, or use mediation or action plans. The OT selects treatment activities based on the client's cognitive profile and goals from a published set of activities designed for use in cognitive interventions. Graded task practice with OT feedback on performance accuracy is used to produce neurocognitive improvement (or possibly independent strategy development). The OT assigns practice of specific cognitively challenging everyday life activities for homework (but without action plans).
|
Multicontext (MC)
This treatment focuses on improving functional performance by enhancing the generation and use of strategies-which can be internal (e.g., self-talk, planning) or external (e.g., checklist, alarm)-to circumvent cognitive processing limitations caused by PD. It uses a standardized approach across and within sessions for all clients while being tailored to each client's cognitive problems and goals. Treatment sessions consist of a review of prior sessions and learning, homework review, treatment activities, homework provision, and session recap. Each session's treatment activities are selected collaboratively based on the client's goals and preferences and the OT's assessment of the client's cognitive and functional status. They involve the performance of simulated functional activities with OT mediation to help the client anticipate performance problems, generate and use strategies to support performance, evaluate and modify performance and strategy use, and transfer these principles to other activities.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
28
|
29
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
25
|
26
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Feasibility and Effect of a Strategy-Based Cognitive Intervention for Parkinson Disease
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Control
n=28 Participants
This treatment is task-oriented training, a widely-used approach in neurorehabilitation, that parallels the cognitive process training used in PD to-date but with simulated functional tasks (vs. computer or paper \& pencil tasks). It has the same basic protocol as MC, but it is therapist-directed, and the OT does not address strategies, metacognition, generalization, or use mediation or action plans. The OT selects treatment activities based on the client's cognitive profile and goals from a published set of activities designed for use in cognitive interventions. Graded task practice with OT feedback on performance accuracy is used to produce neurocognitive improvement (or possibly independent strategy development). The OT assigns practice of specific cognitively challenging everyday life activities for homework (but without action plans).
|
Multicontext (MC)
n=29 Participants
This treatment focuses on improving functional performance by enhancing the generation and use of strategies-which can be internal (e.g., self-talk, planning) or external (e.g., checklist, alarm)-to circumvent cognitive processing limitations caused by PD. It uses a standardized approach across and within sessions for all clients while being tailored to each client's cognitive problems and goals. Treatment sessions consist of a review of prior sessions and learning, homework review, treatment activities, homework provision, and session recap. Each session's treatment activities are selected collaboratively based on the client's goals and preferences and the OT's assessment of the client's cognitive and functional status. They involve the performance of simulated functional activities with OT mediation to help the client anticipate performance problems, generate and use strategies to support performance, evaluate and modify performance and strategy use, and transfer these principles to other activities.
|
Total
n=57 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
69.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7 • n=5 Participants
|
71 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8 • n=7 Participants
|
70.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
|
25 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7 • n=5 Participants
|
26 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2 • n=7 Participants
|
25.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre-cognitive treatment intervention; one week post- cognitive treatment intervention (11 to 13 weeks after the pre-cognitive intervention treatment session); and at 3-months follow-up after the post- cognitive treatment treatment session.BGSI is a structured interview schedule was used to record participant ratings of performance and satisfaction in reaching specific goals, and to record additional ratings of goal attainment. This instrument rates goal attainment on a ten point scale (1-10) with a higher score indicating higher goal attainment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control
n=25 Participants
This treatment is task-oriented training, a widely-used approach in neurorehabilitation, that parallels the cognitive process training used in PD to-date but with simulated functional tasks (vs. computer or paper \& pencil tasks). It has the same basic protocol as MC, but it is therapist-directed, and the OT does not address strategies, metacognition, generalization, or use mediation or action plans. The OT selects treatment activities based on the client's cognitive profile and goals from a published set of activities designed for use in cognitive interventions. Graded task practice with OT feedback on performance accuracy is used to produce neurocognitive improvement (or possibly independent strategy development). The OT assigns practice of specific cognitively challenging everyday life activities for homework (but without action plans).
|
Multicontext (MC)
n=26 Participants
This treatment focuses on improving functional performance by enhancing the generation and use of strategies-which can be internal (e.g., self-talk, planning) or external (e.g., checklist, alarm)-to circumvent cognitive processing limitations caused by PD. It uses a standardized approach across and within sessions for all clients while being tailored to each client's cognitive problems and goals. Treatment sessions consist of a review of prior sessions and learning, homework review, treatment activities, homework provision, and session recap. Each session's treatment activities are selected collaboratively based on the client's goals and preferences and the OT's assessment of the client's cognitive and functional status. They involve the performance of simulated functional activities with OT mediation to help the client anticipate performance problems, generate and use strategies to support performance, evaluate and modify performance and strategy use, and transfer these principles to other activities.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Bangor Goal Setting Interview (BGSI) Goal Attainment
Pre-treatment
|
4.5 score on a scale
Standard Error .3
|
4.6 score on a scale
Standard Error .3
|
|
Change in Bangor Goal Setting Interview (BGSI) Goal Attainment
Post-treatment
|
5.9 score on a scale
Standard Error .2
|
7.4 score on a scale
Standard Error .2
|
|
Change in Bangor Goal Setting Interview (BGSI) Goal Attainment
Follow-up
|
5.6 score on a scale
Standard Error .3
|
6.9 score on a scale
Standard Error .3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Administered one time, one week post- cognitive treatment intervention.Assesses client satisfaction with intervention provided one week after the cognitive intervention, approximately 11 to 13 weeks). Scores can range from 0 to 32, with a higher score indicating higher satisfaction with the intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control
n=25 Participants
This treatment is task-oriented training, a widely-used approach in neurorehabilitation, that parallels the cognitive process training used in PD to-date but with simulated functional tasks (vs. computer or paper \& pencil tasks). It has the same basic protocol as MC, but it is therapist-directed, and the OT does not address strategies, metacognition, generalization, or use mediation or action plans. The OT selects treatment activities based on the client's cognitive profile and goals from a published set of activities designed for use in cognitive interventions. Graded task practice with OT feedback on performance accuracy is used to produce neurocognitive improvement (or possibly independent strategy development). The OT assigns practice of specific cognitively challenging everyday life activities for homework (but without action plans).
|
Multicontext (MC)
n=26 Participants
This treatment focuses on improving functional performance by enhancing the generation and use of strategies-which can be internal (e.g., self-talk, planning) or external (e.g., checklist, alarm)-to circumvent cognitive processing limitations caused by PD. It uses a standardized approach across and within sessions for all clients while being tailored to each client's cognitive problems and goals. Treatment sessions consist of a review of prior sessions and learning, homework review, treatment activities, homework provision, and session recap. Each session's treatment activities are selected collaboratively based on the client's goals and preferences and the OT's assessment of the client's cognitive and functional status. They involve the performance of simulated functional activities with OT mediation to help the client anticipate performance problems, generate and use strategies to support performance, evaluate and modify performance and strategy use, and transfer these principles to other activities.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire
|
28.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3
|
29.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Each of the 10 cognitive treatment intervention sessions. These treatment sessions will be 1 to 1.5 hours in length, and be delivered once a week, to be completed within a 12-week time frame.Population: A random sample of \~3 treatment sessions per participant.
Measures adherence (1=absent, 2=present) and competence (0=absent, 1=little evidence, 2=adequate/proficient) of the therapist to the MC treatment components (Anticipation, Strategy Generation, Task Challenges, Strategy Post Discussion, Strategy Application). Higher scores are better. This will be completed by a blind rater.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control
n=67 Treatment sessions
This treatment is task-oriented training, a widely-used approach in neurorehabilitation, that parallels the cognitive process training used in PD to-date but with simulated functional tasks (vs. computer or paper \& pencil tasks). It has the same basic protocol as MC, but it is therapist-directed, and the OT does not address strategies, metacognition, generalization, or use mediation or action plans. The OT selects treatment activities based on the client's cognitive profile and goals from a published set of activities designed for use in cognitive interventions. Graded task practice with OT feedback on performance accuracy is used to produce neurocognitive improvement (or possibly independent strategy development). The OT assigns practice of specific cognitively challenging everyday life activities for homework (but without action plans).
|
Multicontext (MC)
n=71 Treatment sessions
This treatment focuses on improving functional performance by enhancing the generation and use of strategies-which can be internal (e.g., self-talk, planning) or external (e.g., checklist, alarm)-to circumvent cognitive processing limitations caused by PD. It uses a standardized approach across and within sessions for all clients while being tailored to each client's cognitive problems and goals. Treatment sessions consist of a review of prior sessions and learning, homework review, treatment activities, homework provision, and session recap. Each session's treatment activities are selected collaboratively based on the client's goals and preferences and the OT's assessment of the client's cognitive and functional status. They involve the performance of simulated functional activities with OT mediation to help the client anticipate performance problems, generate and use strategies to support performance, evaluate and modify performance and strategy use, and transfer these principles to other activities.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Fidelity Scale
Anticipation Adherence
|
1.0 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation 0
|
1.8 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .38
|
|
Treatment Fidelity Scale
Strategy Generation Adherence
|
1.0 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .03
|
1.8 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .38
|
|
Treatment Fidelity Scale
Task Challenges Adherence
|
1.1 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .15
|
1.9 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .29
|
|
Treatment Fidelity Scale
Strategy Post Adherence
|
1.1 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .23
|
1.9 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .21
|
|
Treatment Fidelity Scale
Strategy Application Adherence
|
1.0 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .10
|
1.9 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .24
|
|
Treatment Fidelity Scale
Anticipation Proficiency
|
0 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .03
|
1.5 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .77
|
|
Treatment Fidelity Scale
Strategy Generation Proficiency
|
0 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .03
|
1.5 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .75
|
|
Treatment Fidelity Scale
Task Challenges Proficiency
|
.05 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .15
|
1.7 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .60
|
|
Treatment Fidelity Scale
Strategy Post Proficiency
|
.09 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .25
|
1.7 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .49
|
|
Treatment Fidelity Scale
Strategy Application Proficiency
|
.02 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .10
|
1.7 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .47
|
Adverse Events
Control
Multicontext (MC)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Control
n=28 participants at risk
This treatment is task-oriented training, a widely-used approach in neurorehabilitation, that parallels the cognitive process training used in PD to-date but with simulated functional tasks (vs. computer or paper \& pencil tasks). It has the same basic protocol as MC, but it is therapist-directed, and the OT does not address strategies, metacognition, generalization, or use mediation or action plans. The OT selects treatment activities based on the client's cognitive profile and goals from a published set of activities designed for use in cognitive interventions. Graded task practice with OT feedback on performance accuracy is used to produce neurocognitive improvement (or possibly independent strategy development). The OT assigns practice of specific cognitively challenging everyday life activities for homework (but without action plans).
|
Multicontext (MC)
n=29 participants at risk
This treatment focuses on improving functional performance by enhancing the generation and use of strategies-which can be internal (e.g., self-talk, planning) or external (e.g., checklist, alarm)-to circumvent cognitive processing limitations caused by PD. It uses a standardized approach across and within sessions for all clients while being tailored to each client's cognitive problems and goals. Treatment sessions consist of a review of prior sessions and learning, homework review, treatment activities, homework provision, and session recap. Each session's treatment activities are selected collaboratively based on the client's goals and preferences and the OT's assessment of the client's cognitive and functional status. They involve the performance of simulated functional activities with OT mediation to help the client anticipate performance problems, generate and use strategies to support performance, evaluate and modify performance and strategy use, and transfer these principles to other activities.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney infection
|
0.00%
0/28 • For each participant, from their first treatment session to their post-treatment assessment, so up to 13 weeks. Adverse events were only monitored/ assessed up to their post-treatment assessment.
At each study visit, the investigator will inquire about the occurrence of AE/SAEs since the last visit. In addition, an AE/SAE may occur during a study visit or come to the attention of study personnel in communications with study participants between visits (e.g., calling to cancel an appointment). All events will be captured on the AE/SAE Report Forms.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • For each participant, from their first treatment session to their post-treatment assessment, so up to 13 weeks. Adverse events were only monitored/ assessed up to their post-treatment assessment.
At each study visit, the investigator will inquire about the occurrence of AE/SAEs since the last visit. In addition, an AE/SAE may occur during a study visit or come to the attention of study personnel in communications with study participants between visits (e.g., calling to cancel an appointment). All events will be captured on the AE/SAE Report Forms.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Control
n=28 participants at risk
This treatment is task-oriented training, a widely-used approach in neurorehabilitation, that parallels the cognitive process training used in PD to-date but with simulated functional tasks (vs. computer or paper \& pencil tasks). It has the same basic protocol as MC, but it is therapist-directed, and the OT does not address strategies, metacognition, generalization, or use mediation or action plans. The OT selects treatment activities based on the client's cognitive profile and goals from a published set of activities designed for use in cognitive interventions. Graded task practice with OT feedback on performance accuracy is used to produce neurocognitive improvement (or possibly independent strategy development). The OT assigns practice of specific cognitively challenging everyday life activities for homework (but without action plans).
|
Multicontext (MC)
n=29 participants at risk
This treatment focuses on improving functional performance by enhancing the generation and use of strategies-which can be internal (e.g., self-talk, planning) or external (e.g., checklist, alarm)-to circumvent cognitive processing limitations caused by PD. It uses a standardized approach across and within sessions for all clients while being tailored to each client's cognitive problems and goals. Treatment sessions consist of a review of prior sessions and learning, homework review, treatment activities, homework provision, and session recap. Each session's treatment activities are selected collaboratively based on the client's goals and preferences and the OT's assessment of the client's cognitive and functional status. They involve the performance of simulated functional activities with OT mediation to help the client anticipate performance problems, generate and use strategies to support performance, evaluate and modify performance and strategy use, and transfer these principles to other activities.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Falls
|
28.6%
8/28 • Number of events 15 • For each participant, from their first treatment session to their post-treatment assessment, so up to 13 weeks. Adverse events were only monitored/ assessed up to their post-treatment assessment.
At each study visit, the investigator will inquire about the occurrence of AE/SAEs since the last visit. In addition, an AE/SAE may occur during a study visit or come to the attention of study personnel in communications with study participants between visits (e.g., calling to cancel an appointment). All events will be captured on the AE/SAE Report Forms.
|
51.7%
15/29 • Number of events 42 • For each participant, from their first treatment session to their post-treatment assessment, so up to 13 weeks. Adverse events were only monitored/ assessed up to their post-treatment assessment.
At each study visit, the investigator will inquire about the occurrence of AE/SAEs since the last visit. In addition, an AE/SAE may occur during a study visit or come to the attention of study personnel in communications with study participants between visits (e.g., calling to cancel an appointment). All events will be captured on the AE/SAE Report Forms.
|
Additional Information
Dr. Erin Foster
Washington University School of Medicine
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place