Trial Outcomes & Findings for Feasibility and Effect of a Strategy-Based Cognitive Intervention for Parkinson Disease (NCT NCT04048122)

NCT ID: NCT04048122

Last Updated: 2024-11-08

Results Overview

BGSI is a structured interview schedule was used to record participant ratings of performance and satisfaction in reaching specific goals, and to record additional ratings of goal attainment. This instrument rates goal attainment on a ten point scale (1-10) with a higher score indicating higher goal attainment.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

57 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Pre-cognitive treatment intervention; one week post- cognitive treatment intervention (11 to 13 weeks after the pre-cognitive intervention treatment session); and at 3-months follow-up after the post- cognitive treatment treatment session.

Results posted on

2024-11-08

Participant Flow

Participants were recruited between November 2019 and January 2022 from the university movement disorders clinic, other research studies, and the community.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Control
This treatment is task-oriented training, a widely-used approach in neurorehabilitation, that parallels the cognitive process training used in PD to-date but with simulated functional tasks (vs. computer or paper \& pencil tasks). It has the same basic protocol as MC, but it is therapist-directed, and the OT does not address strategies, metacognition, generalization, or use mediation or action plans. The OT selects treatment activities based on the client's cognitive profile and goals from a published set of activities designed for use in cognitive interventions. Graded task practice with OT feedback on performance accuracy is used to produce neurocognitive improvement (or possibly independent strategy development). The OT assigns practice of specific cognitively challenging everyday life activities for homework (but without action plans).
Multicontext (MC)
This treatment focuses on improving functional performance by enhancing the generation and use of strategies-which can be internal (e.g., self-talk, planning) or external (e.g., checklist, alarm)-to circumvent cognitive processing limitations caused by PD. It uses a standardized approach across and within sessions for all clients while being tailored to each client's cognitive problems and goals. Treatment sessions consist of a review of prior sessions and learning, homework review, treatment activities, homework provision, and session recap. Each session's treatment activities are selected collaboratively based on the client's goals and preferences and the OT's assessment of the client's cognitive and functional status. They involve the performance of simulated functional activities with OT mediation to help the client anticipate performance problems, generate and use strategies to support performance, evaluate and modify performance and strategy use, and transfer these principles to other activities.
Overall Study
STARTED
28
29
Overall Study
COMPLETED
25
26
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
3
3

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Feasibility and Effect of a Strategy-Based Cognitive Intervention for Parkinson Disease

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Control
n=28 Participants
This treatment is task-oriented training, a widely-used approach in neurorehabilitation, that parallels the cognitive process training used in PD to-date but with simulated functional tasks (vs. computer or paper \& pencil tasks). It has the same basic protocol as MC, but it is therapist-directed, and the OT does not address strategies, metacognition, generalization, or use mediation or action plans. The OT selects treatment activities based on the client's cognitive profile and goals from a published set of activities designed for use in cognitive interventions. Graded task practice with OT feedback on performance accuracy is used to produce neurocognitive improvement (or possibly independent strategy development). The OT assigns practice of specific cognitively challenging everyday life activities for homework (but without action plans).
Multicontext (MC)
n=29 Participants
This treatment focuses on improving functional performance by enhancing the generation and use of strategies-which can be internal (e.g., self-talk, planning) or external (e.g., checklist, alarm)-to circumvent cognitive processing limitations caused by PD. It uses a standardized approach across and within sessions for all clients while being tailored to each client's cognitive problems and goals. Treatment sessions consist of a review of prior sessions and learning, homework review, treatment activities, homework provision, and session recap. Each session's treatment activities are selected collaboratively based on the client's goals and preferences and the OT's assessment of the client's cognitive and functional status. They involve the performance of simulated functional activities with OT mediation to help the client anticipate performance problems, generate and use strategies to support performance, evaluate and modify performance and strategy use, and transfer these principles to other activities.
Total
n=57 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
69.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7 • n=5 Participants
71 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8 • n=7 Participants
70.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
29 Participants
n=7 Participants
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
55 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
25 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7 • n=5 Participants
26 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2 • n=7 Participants
25.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5 • n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre-cognitive treatment intervention; one week post- cognitive treatment intervention (11 to 13 weeks after the pre-cognitive intervention treatment session); and at 3-months follow-up after the post- cognitive treatment treatment session.

BGSI is a structured interview schedule was used to record participant ratings of performance and satisfaction in reaching specific goals, and to record additional ratings of goal attainment. This instrument rates goal attainment on a ten point scale (1-10) with a higher score indicating higher goal attainment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control
n=25 Participants
This treatment is task-oriented training, a widely-used approach in neurorehabilitation, that parallels the cognitive process training used in PD to-date but with simulated functional tasks (vs. computer or paper \& pencil tasks). It has the same basic protocol as MC, but it is therapist-directed, and the OT does not address strategies, metacognition, generalization, or use mediation or action plans. The OT selects treatment activities based on the client's cognitive profile and goals from a published set of activities designed for use in cognitive interventions. Graded task practice with OT feedback on performance accuracy is used to produce neurocognitive improvement (or possibly independent strategy development). The OT assigns practice of specific cognitively challenging everyday life activities for homework (but without action plans).
Multicontext (MC)
n=26 Participants
This treatment focuses on improving functional performance by enhancing the generation and use of strategies-which can be internal (e.g., self-talk, planning) or external (e.g., checklist, alarm)-to circumvent cognitive processing limitations caused by PD. It uses a standardized approach across and within sessions for all clients while being tailored to each client's cognitive problems and goals. Treatment sessions consist of a review of prior sessions and learning, homework review, treatment activities, homework provision, and session recap. Each session's treatment activities are selected collaboratively based on the client's goals and preferences and the OT's assessment of the client's cognitive and functional status. They involve the performance of simulated functional activities with OT mediation to help the client anticipate performance problems, generate and use strategies to support performance, evaluate and modify performance and strategy use, and transfer these principles to other activities.
Change in Bangor Goal Setting Interview (BGSI) Goal Attainment
Pre-treatment
4.5 score on a scale
Standard Error .3
4.6 score on a scale
Standard Error .3
Change in Bangor Goal Setting Interview (BGSI) Goal Attainment
Post-treatment
5.9 score on a scale
Standard Error .2
7.4 score on a scale
Standard Error .2
Change in Bangor Goal Setting Interview (BGSI) Goal Attainment
Follow-up
5.6 score on a scale
Standard Error .3
6.9 score on a scale
Standard Error .3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Administered one time, one week post- cognitive treatment intervention.

Assesses client satisfaction with intervention provided one week after the cognitive intervention, approximately 11 to 13 weeks). Scores can range from 0 to 32, with a higher score indicating higher satisfaction with the intervention.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control
n=25 Participants
This treatment is task-oriented training, a widely-used approach in neurorehabilitation, that parallels the cognitive process training used in PD to-date but with simulated functional tasks (vs. computer or paper \& pencil tasks). It has the same basic protocol as MC, but it is therapist-directed, and the OT does not address strategies, metacognition, generalization, or use mediation or action plans. The OT selects treatment activities based on the client's cognitive profile and goals from a published set of activities designed for use in cognitive interventions. Graded task practice with OT feedback on performance accuracy is used to produce neurocognitive improvement (or possibly independent strategy development). The OT assigns practice of specific cognitively challenging everyday life activities for homework (but without action plans).
Multicontext (MC)
n=26 Participants
This treatment focuses on improving functional performance by enhancing the generation and use of strategies-which can be internal (e.g., self-talk, planning) or external (e.g., checklist, alarm)-to circumvent cognitive processing limitations caused by PD. It uses a standardized approach across and within sessions for all clients while being tailored to each client's cognitive problems and goals. Treatment sessions consist of a review of prior sessions and learning, homework review, treatment activities, homework provision, and session recap. Each session's treatment activities are selected collaboratively based on the client's goals and preferences and the OT's assessment of the client's cognitive and functional status. They involve the performance of simulated functional activities with OT mediation to help the client anticipate performance problems, generate and use strategies to support performance, evaluate and modify performance and strategy use, and transfer these principles to other activities.
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire
28.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3
29.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Each of the 10 cognitive treatment intervention sessions. These treatment sessions will be 1 to 1.5 hours in length, and be delivered once a week, to be completed within a 12-week time frame.

Population: A random sample of \~3 treatment sessions per participant.

Measures adherence (1=absent, 2=present) and competence (0=absent, 1=little evidence, 2=adequate/proficient) of the therapist to the MC treatment components (Anticipation, Strategy Generation, Task Challenges, Strategy Post Discussion, Strategy Application). Higher scores are better. This will be completed by a blind rater.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Control
n=67 Treatment sessions
This treatment is task-oriented training, a widely-used approach in neurorehabilitation, that parallels the cognitive process training used in PD to-date but with simulated functional tasks (vs. computer or paper \& pencil tasks). It has the same basic protocol as MC, but it is therapist-directed, and the OT does not address strategies, metacognition, generalization, or use mediation or action plans. The OT selects treatment activities based on the client's cognitive profile and goals from a published set of activities designed for use in cognitive interventions. Graded task practice with OT feedback on performance accuracy is used to produce neurocognitive improvement (or possibly independent strategy development). The OT assigns practice of specific cognitively challenging everyday life activities for homework (but without action plans).
Multicontext (MC)
n=71 Treatment sessions
This treatment focuses on improving functional performance by enhancing the generation and use of strategies-which can be internal (e.g., self-talk, planning) or external (e.g., checklist, alarm)-to circumvent cognitive processing limitations caused by PD. It uses a standardized approach across and within sessions for all clients while being tailored to each client's cognitive problems and goals. Treatment sessions consist of a review of prior sessions and learning, homework review, treatment activities, homework provision, and session recap. Each session's treatment activities are selected collaboratively based on the client's goals and preferences and the OT's assessment of the client's cognitive and functional status. They involve the performance of simulated functional activities with OT mediation to help the client anticipate performance problems, generate and use strategies to support performance, evaluate and modify performance and strategy use, and transfer these principles to other activities.
Treatment Fidelity Scale
Anticipation Adherence
1.0 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation 0
1.8 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .38
Treatment Fidelity Scale
Strategy Generation Adherence
1.0 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .03
1.8 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .38
Treatment Fidelity Scale
Task Challenges Adherence
1.1 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .15
1.9 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .29
Treatment Fidelity Scale
Strategy Post Adherence
1.1 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .23
1.9 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .21
Treatment Fidelity Scale
Strategy Application Adherence
1.0 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .10
1.9 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .24
Treatment Fidelity Scale
Anticipation Proficiency
0 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .03
1.5 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .77
Treatment Fidelity Scale
Strategy Generation Proficiency
0 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .03
1.5 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .75
Treatment Fidelity Scale
Task Challenges Proficiency
.05 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .15
1.7 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .60
Treatment Fidelity Scale
Strategy Post Proficiency
.09 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .25
1.7 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .49
Treatment Fidelity Scale
Strategy Application Proficiency
.02 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .10
1.7 Score on fidelity scale
Standard Deviation .47

Adverse Events

Control

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 8 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Multicontext (MC)

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 15 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Control
n=28 participants at risk
This treatment is task-oriented training, a widely-used approach in neurorehabilitation, that parallels the cognitive process training used in PD to-date but with simulated functional tasks (vs. computer or paper \& pencil tasks). It has the same basic protocol as MC, but it is therapist-directed, and the OT does not address strategies, metacognition, generalization, or use mediation or action plans. The OT selects treatment activities based on the client's cognitive profile and goals from a published set of activities designed for use in cognitive interventions. Graded task practice with OT feedback on performance accuracy is used to produce neurocognitive improvement (or possibly independent strategy development). The OT assigns practice of specific cognitively challenging everyday life activities for homework (but without action plans).
Multicontext (MC)
n=29 participants at risk
This treatment focuses on improving functional performance by enhancing the generation and use of strategies-which can be internal (e.g., self-talk, planning) or external (e.g., checklist, alarm)-to circumvent cognitive processing limitations caused by PD. It uses a standardized approach across and within sessions for all clients while being tailored to each client's cognitive problems and goals. Treatment sessions consist of a review of prior sessions and learning, homework review, treatment activities, homework provision, and session recap. Each session's treatment activities are selected collaboratively based on the client's goals and preferences and the OT's assessment of the client's cognitive and functional status. They involve the performance of simulated functional activities with OT mediation to help the client anticipate performance problems, generate and use strategies to support performance, evaluate and modify performance and strategy use, and transfer these principles to other activities.
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney infection
0.00%
0/28 • For each participant, from their first treatment session to their post-treatment assessment, so up to 13 weeks. Adverse events were only monitored/ assessed up to their post-treatment assessment.
At each study visit, the investigator will inquire about the occurrence of AE/SAEs since the last visit. In addition, an AE/SAE may occur during a study visit or come to the attention of study personnel in communications with study participants between visits (e.g., calling to cancel an appointment). All events will be captured on the AE/SAE Report Forms.
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • For each participant, from their first treatment session to their post-treatment assessment, so up to 13 weeks. Adverse events were only monitored/ assessed up to their post-treatment assessment.
At each study visit, the investigator will inquire about the occurrence of AE/SAEs since the last visit. In addition, an AE/SAE may occur during a study visit or come to the attention of study personnel in communications with study participants between visits (e.g., calling to cancel an appointment). All events will be captured on the AE/SAE Report Forms.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Control
n=28 participants at risk
This treatment is task-oriented training, a widely-used approach in neurorehabilitation, that parallels the cognitive process training used in PD to-date but with simulated functional tasks (vs. computer or paper \& pencil tasks). It has the same basic protocol as MC, but it is therapist-directed, and the OT does not address strategies, metacognition, generalization, or use mediation or action plans. The OT selects treatment activities based on the client's cognitive profile and goals from a published set of activities designed for use in cognitive interventions. Graded task practice with OT feedback on performance accuracy is used to produce neurocognitive improvement (or possibly independent strategy development). The OT assigns practice of specific cognitively challenging everyday life activities for homework (but without action plans).
Multicontext (MC)
n=29 participants at risk
This treatment focuses on improving functional performance by enhancing the generation and use of strategies-which can be internal (e.g., self-talk, planning) or external (e.g., checklist, alarm)-to circumvent cognitive processing limitations caused by PD. It uses a standardized approach across and within sessions for all clients while being tailored to each client's cognitive problems and goals. Treatment sessions consist of a review of prior sessions and learning, homework review, treatment activities, homework provision, and session recap. Each session's treatment activities are selected collaboratively based on the client's goals and preferences and the OT's assessment of the client's cognitive and functional status. They involve the performance of simulated functional activities with OT mediation to help the client anticipate performance problems, generate and use strategies to support performance, evaluate and modify performance and strategy use, and transfer these principles to other activities.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Falls
28.6%
8/28 • Number of events 15 • For each participant, from their first treatment session to their post-treatment assessment, so up to 13 weeks. Adverse events were only monitored/ assessed up to their post-treatment assessment.
At each study visit, the investigator will inquire about the occurrence of AE/SAEs since the last visit. In addition, an AE/SAE may occur during a study visit or come to the attention of study personnel in communications with study participants between visits (e.g., calling to cancel an appointment). All events will be captured on the AE/SAE Report Forms.
51.7%
15/29 • Number of events 42 • For each participant, from their first treatment session to their post-treatment assessment, so up to 13 weeks. Adverse events were only monitored/ assessed up to their post-treatment assessment.
At each study visit, the investigator will inquire about the occurrence of AE/SAEs since the last visit. In addition, an AE/SAE may occur during a study visit or come to the attention of study personnel in communications with study participants between visits (e.g., calling to cancel an appointment). All events will be captured on the AE/SAE Report Forms.

Additional Information

Dr. Erin Foster

Washington University School of Medicine

Phone: 314-286-1638

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place