Auditory Steady State Response vsAuditory Brainstem Response
NCT ID: NCT04040517
Last Updated: 2019-07-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
40 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-12-01
2021-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2. All infants who do not pass the initial hearing screening and the subsequent rescreening should have appropriate audiological and medical evaluations to confirm the presence of hearing loss at no later than 3 months of age.
3. All infants with confirmed permanent hearing loss should receive early intervention services as soon as possible after diagnosis but at no later than 6 months of age. A simplified, single point of entry into an intervention system that is appropriate for children with hearing loss is optimal.
The importance of early identification and habilitation of hearing loss for improved access to auditory stimuli and for positive prognosis of speech and language is well established in the literature . Auditory brain stem response (ABR) is the most commonlly used test in clinical practice to estimate the degree of hearing loss, but the auditory brainstem response (ABR) cannot differentiate between severe and profound SNHL \[5\], whereas the ASSR can provide threshold information in a frequency-specific manner at intensity levels of 120 dB and higher. This intensity stimulation advantage uniquely qualifies the ASSR for investigation of residual hearing in young and difficult-to-test cochlear implant candidates.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Evoked potential audiometer
The ASSR \[ steady state response\] test stimuli are modulated pure tones with insert earphone..
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* normal middle ear function
Exclusion Criteria
* Preserved otoacuastic emission ,
* Preserved ABR waves .
1 Day
4 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmed Galal Ibrahem
resident doctor Alazhar university - Assiut
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wadhera R, Hernot S, Gulati SP, Kalra V. A controlled comparison of auditory steady-state responses and pure-tone audiometry in patients with hearing loss. Ear Nose Throat J. 2017 Oct-Nov;96(10-11):E47-E52. doi: 10.1177/0145561317096010-1109.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17100772
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id