Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Test the Pharmacodynamic, Pharmacokinetic, Safety, and Tolerability of Padsevonil in Healthy Study Participants Receiving Either Ethanol or Cannabidiol (NCT NCT04039919)
NCT ID: NCT04039919
Last Updated: 2021-06-18
Results Overview
Smooth pursuit to assess eye movement coordination and attention to evaluate the ethanol effect. The average percentage of smooth pursuit for all stimulus frequencies was used as a parameter. Participants received either ethanol or placebo on Day 1 of Period 1 or on Day 3 of Period 2. Therefore, the results were summarized by treatment.
TERMINATED
PHASE1
40 participants
Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 hours postdose on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2
2021-06-18
Participant Flow
The study started to enroll participants in July 2019 and concluded in May 2020.
Participant Flow refers to the All Study Participants Set which included all participants who have signed the Informed Consent form (ICF).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Part A: Treatment Sequence A
Participants received ethanol 0.6 grams per liter (g/L) intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 during Treatment Period 1 (TP1), followed by placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP2, then padsevonil (PSL) oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3, PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4, PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5, and then PSL 100 mg BID oral tablets on Day 9 during TP6. There was a washout of at least 2 days between Treatment Periods 2 and 3.
|
Part A: Treatment Sequence B
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1, followed by placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP2, then PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3, PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 5 during TP4, PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 7 during TP5, and then PSL 100 mg BID oral tablets on Day 9 during TP6. There was a washout of at least 2 days between Treatment Periods 2 and 3.
|
Part A: Treatment Sequence C
Participants received placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1, followed by ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP2, then PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3, PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4, PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5, and then PSL 100 mg BID oral tablets on Day 9 during TP6. There was a washout of at least 2 days between Treatment Periods 2 and 3.
|
Part A: Treatment Sequence D
Participants received placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1, followed by ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP2, then PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3, PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 5 during TP4, PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 7 during TP5, and then PSL 100 mg BID oral tablets on Day 9 during TP6. There was a washout of at least 2 days between Treatment Periods 2 and 3.
|
Part B: Cannabidiol (CBD)
Participants received a single oral dose of CBD 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) solution, under fasted condition on Day 1 during TP1.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Period 1
STARTED
|
7
|
6
|
5
|
6
|
16
|
|
Treatment Period 1
COMPLETED
|
6
|
6
|
5
|
6
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period 1
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
16
|
|
Treatment Period 2
STARTED
|
6
|
6
|
5
|
6
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period 2
COMPLETED
|
6
|
6
|
5
|
6
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period 2
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period 3
STARTED
|
6
|
6
|
5
|
6
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period 3
COMPLETED
|
6
|
6
|
5
|
6
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period 3
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period 4
STARTED
|
6
|
6
|
5
|
6
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period 4
COMPLETED
|
6
|
6
|
5
|
6
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period 4
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period 5
STARTED
|
6
|
6
|
5
|
6
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period 5
COMPLETED
|
5
|
6
|
5
|
6
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period 5
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period 6
STARTED
|
5
|
6
|
5
|
6
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period 6
COMPLETED
|
5
|
6
|
5
|
6
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period 6
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Part A: Treatment Sequence A
Participants received ethanol 0.6 grams per liter (g/L) intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 during Treatment Period 1 (TP1), followed by placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP2, then padsevonil (PSL) oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3, PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4, PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5, and then PSL 100 mg BID oral tablets on Day 9 during TP6. There was a washout of at least 2 days between Treatment Periods 2 and 3.
|
Part A: Treatment Sequence B
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1, followed by placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP2, then PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3, PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 5 during TP4, PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 7 during TP5, and then PSL 100 mg BID oral tablets on Day 9 during TP6. There was a washout of at least 2 days between Treatment Periods 2 and 3.
|
Part A: Treatment Sequence C
Participants received placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1, followed by ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP2, then PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3, PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4, PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5, and then PSL 100 mg BID oral tablets on Day 9 during TP6. There was a washout of at least 2 days between Treatment Periods 2 and 3.
|
Part A: Treatment Sequence D
Participants received placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1, followed by ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP2, then PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3, PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 5 during TP4, PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 7 during TP5, and then PSL 100 mg BID oral tablets on Day 9 during TP6. There was a washout of at least 2 days between Treatment Periods 2 and 3.
|
Part B: Cannabidiol (CBD)
Participants received a single oral dose of CBD 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) solution, under fasted condition on Day 1 during TP1.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Period 1
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period 1
Sponsor's decision
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
16
|
|
Treatment Period 5
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Test the Pharmacodynamic, Pharmacokinetic, Safety, and Tolerability of Padsevonil in Healthy Study Participants Receiving Either Ethanol or Cannabidiol
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Part A: Treatment Sequence A
n=7 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 grams per liter (g/L) intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 during Treatment Period 1 (TP1), followed by placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP2, then padsevonil (PSL) oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3, PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4, PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5, and then PSL 100 mg BID oral tablets on Day 9 during TP6. There was a washout of at least 2 days between Treatment Periods 2 and 3.
|
Part A: Treatment Sequence B
n=6 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1, followed by placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP2, then PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3, PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 5 during TP4, PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 7 during TP5, and then PSL 100 mg BID oral tablets on Day 9 during TP6. There was a washout of at least 2 days between Treatment Periods 2 and 3.
|
Part A: Treatment Sequence C
n=5 Participants
Participants received placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1, followed by ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP2, then PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3, PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4, PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5, and then PSL 100 mg BID oral tablets on Day 9 during TP6. There was a washout of at least 2 days between Treatment Periods 2 and 3.
|
Part A: Treatment Sequence D
n=6 Participants
Participants received placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1, followed by ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP2, then PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3, PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 5 during TP4, PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 7 during TP5, and then PSL 100 mg BID oral tablets on Day 9 during TP6. There was a washout of at least 2 days between Treatment Periods 2 and 3.
|
Part B: Cannabidiol (CBD)
n=16 Participants
Participants received a single oral dose of CBD 10 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) solution, under fasted condition on Day 1 during TP1.
|
Total Title
n=40 Participants
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
30.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9 • n=5 Participants
|
30.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1 • n=7 Participants
|
28.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.0 • n=5 Participants
|
30.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.1 • n=4 Participants
|
27.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3 • n=21 Participants
|
29.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2 • n=10 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other or Mixed
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 hours postdose on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all study participants that were randomized, received study medication, and had at least one valid post-baseline primary pharmacodynamic assessment observation. Here, n (number analyzed) signifies participants evaluable at specified time points only.
Smooth pursuit to assess eye movement coordination and attention to evaluate the ethanol effect. The average percentage of smooth pursuit for all stimulus frequencies was used as a parameter. Participants received either ethanol or placebo on Day 1 of Period 1 or on Day 3 of Period 2. Therefore, the results were summarized by treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=24 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
n=23 Participants
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
Predose
|
44.838 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 9.110
|
43.252 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 8.688
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
0.5 hour
|
38.046 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 8.674
|
43.661 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 9.345
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
1 hour
|
37.604 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 8.574
|
43.748 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 10.298
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
2 hours
|
37.300 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 8.778
|
42.930 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 9.636
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
3 hours
|
36.726 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 7.441
|
42.809 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 10.639
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
4 hours
|
36.822 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 8.405
|
42.478 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 9.351
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
5 hours
|
35.913 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 7.359
|
42.622 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 9.200
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
6 hours
|
40.570 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 9.353
|
43.300 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 8.960
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
8 hours
|
41.948 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 10.245
|
44.026 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 10.085
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
10 hours
|
43.491 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 8.928
|
43.504 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 11.394
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 hours postdose on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5Population: FAS consisted of all study participants that were randomized, received study medication, and had at least one valid post-baseline primary pharmacodynamic assessment observation. Here, Number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for the assessment.
Smooth pursuit to assess eye movement coordination and attention to evaluate the ethanol effect. The average percentage of smooth pursuit for all stimulus frequencies was used as a parameter. Participants received either ethanol or placebo on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5. Therefore, the results were summarized by treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=23 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
n=22 Participants
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
Predose
|
41.107 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 9.930
|
41.402 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 8.500
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
0.5 hour
|
32.591 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 7.140
|
39.655 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 9.703
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
1 hour
|
30.874 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 6.790
|
35.814 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 7.893
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
2 hours
|
28.309 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 5.321
|
36.036 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 9.172
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
3 hours
|
28.530 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 6.881
|
36.727 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 9.512
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
4 hours
|
30.400 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 9.466
|
36.668 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 8.411
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
5 hours
|
30.239 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 6.750
|
35.714 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 8.865
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
6 hours
|
33.761 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 8.383
|
38.945 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 9.676
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
8 hours
|
35.604 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 8.894
|
37.973 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 8.849
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
10 hours
|
38.570 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 10.683
|
38.591 percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation 9.508
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose up to 12 hours postdosePopulation: Analysis of this outcome measure was not performed because the study was terminated. At that time, Part A had been completed, and 16 study participants had been treated with CBD in Treatment Period 1 of Part B.
Cmax is maximum observed plasma concentration at steady state of padsevonil.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose up to 12 hours postdosePopulation: Pharmacokinetic Set (PKS) included all study participants that received at least one dose of active study drug and have at least one observable pharmacokinetic measurement.
Cmax is maximum observed plasma concentration at steady state of CBD.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=16 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration at Steady State (Cmax,ss) of Cannabidiol During Part B
|
NA nanograms per milliliter
Analysis of this outcome measure was not performed because the study was terminated. At that time, Part A had been completed, and 16 study participants had been treated with CBD in Treatment Period 1 of Part B.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose up to 12 hours post dosePopulation: Analysis of this outcome measure was not performed because the study was terminated. At that time, Part A had been completed, and 16 study participants had been treated with CBD in Treatment Period 1 of Part B.
AUCtau is the area under the curve over a dosing interval of padsevonil.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose up to 12 hours postdosePopulation: PKS included all study participants that received at least one dose of active study drug and have at least one observable pharmacokinetic measurement.
AUCtau is the area under the curve over a dosing interval of CBD.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=16 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Curve Over a Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Cannabidiol During Part B
|
NA hours*nanogram per milliliter
Analysis of this outcome measure was not performed because the study was terminated. At that time, Part A had been completed, and 16 study participants had been treated with CBD in Treatment Period 1 of Part B.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: -0.4, -0.3, -0.2, -0.16, -0.08, Predose, 0.16, 0.3, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 7 and 8 hours postdose on Day 1 of Period 1 or on Day 3 of Period 2Population: PKS included all study participants that received at least one dose of active study drug and have at least one observable pharmacokinetic measurement.
Continuous infusion of ethanol began with a 30 minute loading phase (prior to 0 hours) and was continued for 5 hours with adjustments during the infusion. Participants received either ethanol on Day 1 of Period 1 or on Day 3 of Period 2. Therefore, the results were summarized by treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=21 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
-0.4 hour
|
0.290 grams per liter
Interval 0.254 to 0.333
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
-0.3 hour
|
0.428 grams per liter
Interval 0.379 to 0.483
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
-0.2 hour
|
0.477 grams per liter
Interval 0.446 to 0.511
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
-0.16 hour
|
0.530 grams per liter
Interval 0.499 to 0.564
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
-0.08 hour
|
0.562 grams per liter
Interval 0.539 to 0.585
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
Predose
|
0.555 grams per liter
Interval 0.538 to 0.571
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
0.16 hour
|
0.578 grams per liter
Interval 0.558 to 0.599
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
0.3 hour
|
0.592 grams per liter
Interval 0.574 to 0.611
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
0.5 hour
|
0.574 grams per liter
Interval 0.552 to 0.598
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
1 hour
|
0.552 grams per liter
Interval 0.525 to 0.581
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
1.5 hours
|
0.557 grams per liter
Interval 0.533 to 0.583
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
2 hours
|
0.568 grams per liter
Interval 0.544 to 0.593
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
2.5 hours
|
0.574 grams per liter
Interval 0.547 to 0.601
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
3 hours
|
0.572 grams per liter
Interval 0.544 to 0.602
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
3.5 hours
|
0.574 grams per liter
Interval 0.556 to 0.593
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
4 hours
|
0.593 grams per liter
Interval 0.575 to 0.612
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
4.5 hours
|
0.603 grams per liter
Interval 0.583 to 0.624
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
5 hours
|
0.590 grams per liter
Interval 0.575 to 0.605
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
6 hours
|
0.356 grams per liter
Interval 0.322 to 0.394
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
7 hours
|
0.172 grams per liter
Interval 0.139 to 0.213
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
8 hours
|
0.105 grams per liter
Interval 0.073 to 0.151
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: -0.4, -0.3, -0.2, -0.16, -0.08, Predose, 0.16, 0.3, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 7 and 8 hours postdose on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5Population: PKS included all study participants that received at least one dose of active study drug and have at least one observable pharmacokinetic measurement. Here, n (number analyzed) signifies participants evaluable at specified time points only.
Continuous infusion of ethanol began with a 30 minute loading phase (prior to 0 hours) and was continued for 5 hours with adjustments during the infusion. Participants received either ethanol on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5. Therefore, the results were summarized by treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=21 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
-0.4 hour
|
0.321 grams per liter
Interval 0.281 to 0.367
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
-0.3 hour
|
0.464 grams per liter
Interval 0.417 to 0.516
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
-0.2 hour
|
0.499 grams per liter
Interval 0.451 to 0.553
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
-0.16 hour
|
0.524 grams per liter
Interval 0.492 to 0.558
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
-0.08 hour
|
0.505 grams per liter
Interval 0.468 to 0.545
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
Predose
|
0.499 grams per liter
Interval 0.467 to 0.533
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
0.16 hour
|
0.591 grams per liter
Interval 0.567 to 0.617
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
0.3 hour
|
0.622 grams per liter
Interval 0.606 to 0.639
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
0.5 hour
|
0.608 grams per liter
Interval 0.591 to 0.624
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
1 hour
|
0.581 grams per liter
Interval 0.56 to 0.603
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
1.5 hours
|
0.566 grams per liter
Interval 0.544 to 0.588
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
2 hours
|
0.566 grams per liter
Interval 0.54 to 0.593
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
2.5 hours
|
0.579 grams per liter
Interval 0.55 to 0.608
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
3 hours
|
0.608 grams per liter
Interval 0.585 to 0.631
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
3.5 hours
|
0.602 grams per liter
Interval 0.582 to 0.623
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
4 hours
|
0.612 grams per liter
Interval 0.593 to 0.632
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
4.5 hours
|
0.610 grams per liter
Interval 0.59 to 0.631
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
5 hours
|
0.613 grams per liter
Interval 0.59 to 0.637
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
6 hours
|
0.373 grams per liter
Interval 0.338 to 0.411
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
7 hours
|
0.199 grams per liter
Interval 0.171 to 0.232
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Breath Concentration of Ethanol Over Time on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
8 hours
|
0.084 grams per liter
Interval 0.066 to 0.108
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 12 hours postdose on Day 5Population: PKS included all study participants that received at least one dose of active study drug and have at least one observable pharmacokinetic measurement. Here, Number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for the assessment.
Cmax,ss is the maximum observed plasma concentration at steady state of padsevonil.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=20 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
n=21 Participants
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration at Steady State (Cmax,ss) of Padsevonil During Part A
|
832.9 nanograms per milliliter
Interval 488.3 to 1421.0
|
1077 nanograms per milliliter
Interval 778.6 to 1489.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 12 hours postdose on Day 5Population: PKS included all study participants that received at least one dose of active study drug and have at least one observable pharmacokinetic measurement. Here, Number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for the assessment.
AUC0-tau is the area under the curve over a dosing interval of padsevonil.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=20 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
n=20 Participants
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Curve Over a Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Padsevonil During Part A
|
3504 hours*nanogram per milliliter
Interval 2010.0 to 6109.0
|
4289 hours*nanogram per milliliter
Interval 2904.0 to 6335.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose up to 12 hours postdosePopulation: Analysis of this outcome measure was not performed because the study was terminated. At that time, Part A had been completed, and 16 study participants had been treated with CBD in Treatment Period 1 of Part B.
t1/2 is the apparent terminal half-life of padsevonil.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose up to 12 hours postdosePopulation: PKS included all study participants that received at least one dose of active study drug and have at least one observable pharmacokinetic measurement.
t1/2 is the apparent terminal half-life of CBD.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=16 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Half-life (t1/2) of Cannabidiol During Part B
|
NA hours
Analysis of this outcome measure was not performed because the study was terminated. At that time, Part A had been completed, and 16 study participants had been treated with CBD in Treatment Period 1 of Part B.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose up to 12 hours postdosePopulation: Analysis of this outcome measure was not performed because the study was terminated. At that time, Part A had been completed, and 16 study participants had been treated with CBD in Treatment Period 1 of Part B.
CLss/F is the apparent total body clearance at steady state following extravascular administration of padsevonil.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose up to 12 hours postdosePopulation: PKS included all study participants that received at least one dose of active study drug and have at least one observable pharmacokinetic measurement.
CLss/F is the apparent total body clearance at steady state following extravascular administration of CBD.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=16 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Apparent Total Body Clearance at Steady State (CLss/F) of Cannabidiol During Part B
|
NA liter per hour
Analysis of this outcome measure was not performed because the study was terminated. At that time, Part A had been completed, and 16 study participants had been treated with CBD in Treatment Period 1 of Part B.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Treatment Period 1: Screening, Day 1 and Day 2Population: FAS consisted of all study participants that were randomized, received study medication, and had at least one valid post-baseline primary pharmacodynamic assessment observation.
Smooth pursuit to assess eye movement coordination and attention to evaluate the ethanol effect. The average percentage of smooth pursuit for all stimulus frequencies was used as a parameter.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=16 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements During Part B
|
NA percentage of eye movements
Standard Deviation NA
Analysis of this outcome measure was not performed because the study was terminated. At that time, Part A had been completed, and 16 study participants had been treated with CBD in Treatment Period 1 of Part B.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 hours postdose on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2Population: FAS consisted of all study participants that were randomized, received study medication, and had at least one valid post-baseline primary pharmacodynamic assessment observation. Here, n (number analyzed) signifies participants evaluable at specified time points only.
Sixteen saccades were recorded with interstimulus intervals varying randomly. Average values of latency (reaction time), saccadic peak velocity of all correct saccades, and inaccuracy of all saccades were used as parameters. Participants received either ethanol or placebo on Day 1 of Period 1 or on Day 3 of Period 2. Therefore, the results were summarized by treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=24 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
n=23 Participants
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Saccadic Peak Velocity to Assess Sedation on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
Predose
|
497.873 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 36.988
|
502.917 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 32.543
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Saccadic Peak Velocity to Assess Sedation on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
0.5 hour
|
471.465 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 37.890
|
502.427 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 47.354
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Saccadic Peak Velocity to Assess Sedation on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
1 hour
|
458.726 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 34.284
|
488.761 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 35.226
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Saccadic Peak Velocity to Assess Sedation on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
2 hours
|
455.138 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 34.045
|
484.243 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 37.299
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Saccadic Peak Velocity to Assess Sedation on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
3 hours
|
455.445 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 43.890
|
479.852 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 33.906
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Saccadic Peak Velocity to Assess Sedation on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
4 hours
|
459.700 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 54.621
|
468.029 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 36.669
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Saccadic Peak Velocity to Assess Sedation on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
5 hours
|
447.909 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 29.508
|
484.778 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 32.631
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Saccadic Peak Velocity to Assess Sedation on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
6 hours
|
466.417 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 37.985
|
479.150 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 37.994
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Saccadic Peak Velocity to Assess Sedation on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
8 hours
|
474.283 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 33.625
|
486.883 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 38.078
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Saccadic Peak Velocity to Assess Sedation on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
10 hours
|
484.513 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 33.232
|
489.495 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 38.495
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 hours postdose on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5Population: FAS consisted of all study participants that were randomized, received study medication, and had at least one valid post-baseline primary pharmacodynamic assessment observation. Here, n (number analyzed) signifies participants evaluable at specified time points only.
Sixteen saccades were recorded with interstimulus intervals varying randomly. Average values of latency (reaction time), saccadic peak velocity of all correct saccades, and inaccuracy of all saccades were used as parameters. Participants received either ethanol or placebo on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5. Therefore, the results were summarized by treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=23 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
n=23 Participants
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Saccadic Peak Velocity to Assess Sedation on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
6 hours
|
436.268 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 55.152
|
470.576 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 47.370
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Saccadic Peak Velocity to Assess Sedation on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
Predose
|
481.335 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 40.894
|
466.509 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 43.334
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Saccadic Peak Velocity to Assess Sedation on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
0.5 hour
|
434.465 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 48.160
|
454.980 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 35.882
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Saccadic Peak Velocity to Assess Sedation on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
1 hour
|
405.517 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 50.706
|
427.505 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 42.232
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Saccadic Peak Velocity to Assess Sedation on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
2 hours
|
414.268 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 61.752
|
418.748 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 49.071
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Saccadic Peak Velocity to Assess Sedation on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
3 hours
|
401.548 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 46.004
|
423.543 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 51.720
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Saccadic Peak Velocity to Assess Sedation on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
4 hours
|
410.386 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 47.324
|
442.152 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 46.641
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Saccadic Peak Velocity to Assess Sedation on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
5 hours
|
418.252 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 41.277
|
450.319 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 38.954
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Saccadic Peak Velocity to Assess Sedation on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
8 hours
|
480.891 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 41.106
|
467.162 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 37.902
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Saccadic Peak Velocity to Assess Sedation on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
10 hours
|
474.209 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 41.119
|
466.933 degrees per second
Standard Deviation 43.241
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Treatment Period 1: Screening, Day 1 and Day 2Population: FAS consisted of all study participants that were randomized, received study medication, and had at least one valid post-baseline primary pharmacodynamic assessment observation.
Sixteen saccades were recorded with interstimulus intervals varying randomly. Average values of latency (reaction time), saccadic peak velocity of all correct saccades, and inaccuracy of all saccades were used as parameters.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=16 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Saccadic Peak Velocity to Assess Sedation During Part B
|
NA degrees per second
Standard Deviation NA
Analysis of this outcome measure was not performed because the study was terminated. At that time, Part A had been completed, and 16 study participants had been treated with CBD in Treatment Period 1 of Part B.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 hours postdose on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2Population: FAS consisted of all study participants that were randomized, received study medication, and had at least one valid post-baseline primary pharmacodynamic assessment observation. Here, n (number analyzed) signifies participants evaluable at specified time points only.
The adaptive tracking test was performed as originally described by Borland and Nicholson (Borland and Nicholson, 1984). Performance was scored after a fixed period of 3.5 minutes and reflected visuo-motor control and vigilance. The average performance scores were used in the analysis. Participants received either ethanol or placebo on Day 1 of Period 1 or on Day 3 of Period 2. Therefore, the results were summarized by treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=24 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
n=23 Participants
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adaptive Tracking to Assess Visuo-Motor Control and Vigilance on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
Predose
|
32.3704 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 5.5709
|
32.0037 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 5.6751
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Adaptive Tracking to Assess Visuo-Motor Control and Vigilance on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
0.5 hour
|
29.0825 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 4.8924
|
32.0770 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 5.7220
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Adaptive Tracking to Assess Visuo-Motor Control and Vigilance on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
1 hour
|
28.7825 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 5.0093
|
32.0530 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 5.6913
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Adaptive Tracking to Assess Visuo-Motor Control and Vigilance on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
2 hours
|
27.6325 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 4.6875
|
32.6526 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 5.5194
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Adaptive Tracking to Assess Visuo-Motor Control and Vigilance on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
3 hours
|
26.5765 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 5.9118
|
32.3087 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 6.0354
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Adaptive Tracking to Assess Visuo-Motor Control and Vigilance on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
4 hours
|
26.4087 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 6.5784
|
31.8835 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 6.0274
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Adaptive Tracking to Assess Visuo-Motor Control and Vigilance on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
5 hours
|
27.9500 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 5.1829
|
32.0752 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 5.8386
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Adaptive Tracking to Assess Visuo-Motor Control and Vigilance on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
6 hours
|
28.9587 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 5.6291
|
32.0757 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 5.6722
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Adaptive Tracking to Assess Visuo-Motor Control and Vigilance on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
8 hours
|
31.0778 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 5.7553
|
32.0300 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 5.8507
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Adaptive Tracking to Assess Visuo-Motor Control and Vigilance on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
10 hours
|
32.5391 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 5.2327
|
33.3322 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 5.9769
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 hours on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5Population: FAS consisted of all study participants that were randomized, received study medication, and had at least one valid post-baseline primary pharmacodynamic assessment observation. Here, Number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for the assessment.
The adaptive tracking test was performed as originally described by Borland and Nicholson (Borland and Nicholson, 1984). Performance was scored after a fixed period of 3.5 minutes and reflected visuo-motor control and vigilance. The average performance scores were used in the analysis. Participants received either ethanol or placebo on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5. Therefore, the results were summarized by treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=23 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
n=22 Participants
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adaptive Tracking to Assess Visuo-Motor Control and Vigilance on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
6 hours
|
26.3652 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 6.5759
|
30.3214 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 6.4549
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Adaptive Tracking to Assess Visuo-Motor Control and Vigilance on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
Predose
|
30.5017 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 7.0354
|
29.0691 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 7.1405
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Adaptive Tracking to Assess Visuo-Motor Control and Vigilance on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
0.5 hour
|
23.3339 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 6.4727
|
25.8650 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 7.7624
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Adaptive Tracking to Assess Visuo-Motor Control and Vigilance on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
1 hour
|
19.4317 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 7.5471
|
20.5714 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 7.7253
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Adaptive Tracking to Assess Visuo-Motor Control and Vigilance on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
2 hours
|
17.1617 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 6.8895
|
19.3395 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 7.8659
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Adaptive Tracking to Assess Visuo-Motor Control and Vigilance on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
3 hours
|
18.4870 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 6.9150
|
25.0859 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 7.2415
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Adaptive Tracking to Assess Visuo-Motor Control and Vigilance on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
4 hours
|
18.8713 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 7.9952
|
27.5827 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 6.8106
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Adaptive Tracking to Assess Visuo-Motor Control and Vigilance on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
5 hours
|
20.4422 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 8.3476
|
29.4377 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 6.5829
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Adaptive Tracking to Assess Visuo-Motor Control and Vigilance on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
8 hours
|
30.3570 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 6.3134
|
31.3282 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 5.9957
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Adaptive Tracking to Assess Visuo-Motor Control and Vigilance on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
10 hours
|
30.6039 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 6.5557
|
31.9223 percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation 7.1749
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Treatment Period 1: Screening, Day 1 and Day 2Population: FAS consisted of all study participants that were randomized, received study medication, and had at least one valid post-baseline primary pharmacodynamic assessment observation.
The adaptive tracking test was performed as originally described by Borland and Nicholson (Borland and Nicholson, 1984). Performance was scored after a fixed period of 3.5 minutes and reflected visuo-motor control and vigilance.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=16 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adaptive Tracking to Assess Visuo-Motor Control and Vigilance During Part B
|
NA percentage of time correctly tracked
Standard Deviation NA
Analysis of this outcome measure was not performed because the study was terminated. At that time, Part A had been completed, and 16 study participants had been treated with CBD in Treatment Period 1 of Part B.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 hours postdose on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2Population: FAS consisted of all study participants that were randomized, received study medication, and had at least one valid post-baseline primary pharmacodynamic assessment observation. Here, n (number analyzed) signifies participants evaluable at specified time points only.
Body Sway test measured the study participant's body movements in a single direction. Body sway was measured by CHCR NeuroCart. Study participants were asked to stand erect and motionless with their eyes closed. The amplitude and direction of any Body Sway was recorded for 1 minute. Participants received either ethanol or placebo on Day 1 of Period 1 or on Day 3 of Period 2. Therefore, the results were summarized by treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=24 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
n=23 Participants
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Body Sway to Assess Postural Stability on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
Predose
|
234.258 millimeters
Standard Deviation 131.198
|
219.348 millimeters
Standard Deviation 123.362
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Sway to Assess Postural Stability on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
0.5 hour
|
390.671 millimeters
Standard Deviation 293.387
|
238.083 millimeters
Standard Deviation 108.227
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Sway to Assess Postural Stability on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
1 hour
|
379.246 millimeters
Standard Deviation 226.889
|
235.613 millimeters
Standard Deviation 115.707
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Sway to Assess Postural Stability on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
2 hours
|
410.292 millimeters
Standard Deviation 307.000
|
258.348 millimeters
Standard Deviation 133.061
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Sway to Assess Postural Stability on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
3 hours
|
392.813 millimeters
Standard Deviation 300.259
|
251.109 millimeters
Standard Deviation 141.894
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Sway to Assess Postural Stability on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
4 hours
|
410.500 millimeters
Standard Deviation 277.375
|
241.361 millimeters
Standard Deviation 123.019
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Sway to Assess Postural Stability on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
5 hours
|
380.043 millimeters
Standard Deviation 238.041
|
240.322 millimeters
Standard Deviation 131.546
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Sway to Assess Postural Stability on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
6 hours
|
298.445 millimeters
Standard Deviation 177.888
|
285.191 millimeters
Standard Deviation 193.643
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Sway to Assess Postural Stability on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
8 hours
|
254.830 millimeters
Standard Deviation 134.773
|
252.930 millimeters
Standard Deviation 166.126
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Sway to Assess Postural Stability on Day 1 of Period 1 or Day 3 of Period 2 During Part A
10 hours
|
244.057 millimeters
Standard Deviation 146.336
|
239.283 millimeters
Standard Deviation 138.579
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 10 hours on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5Population: FAS consisted of all study participants that were randomized, received study medication, and had at least one valid post-baseline primary pharmacodynamic assessment observation. Here, Number of participants analyzed signifies participants who were evaluable for the assessment and n (number analyzed) signifies participants evaluable at specified time points only.
Body Sway test measured the study participant's body movements in a single direction. Body sway was measured by CHCR NeuroCart. Study participants were asked to stand erect and motionless with their eyes closed. The amplitude and direction of any Body Sway was recorded for 1 minute. Participants received either ethanol or placebo on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5. Therefore, the results were summarized by treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=23 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
n=22 Participants
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Body Sway to Assess Postural Stability on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
Predose
|
294.843 millimeters
Standard Deviation 227.524
|
317.484 millimeters
Standard Deviation 321.623
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Sway to Assess Postural Stability on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
0.5 hour
|
746.161 millimeters
Standard Deviation 648.448
|
661.550 millimeters
Standard Deviation 943.498
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Sway to Assess Postural Stability on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
1 hour
|
1091.639 millimeters
Standard Deviation 965.116
|
863.255 millimeters
Standard Deviation 986.913
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Sway to Assess Postural Stability on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
2 hours
|
1170.452 millimeters
Standard Deviation 1118.424
|
712.391 millimeters
Standard Deviation 646.223
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Sway to Assess Postural Stability on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
3 hours
|
924.800 millimeters
Standard Deviation 873.486
|
499.077 millimeters
Standard Deviation 353.668
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Sway to Assess Postural Stability on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
4 hours
|
903.100 millimeters
Standard Deviation 888.205
|
406.586 millimeters
Standard Deviation 279.517
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Sway to Assess Postural Stability on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
5 hours
|
666.987 millimeters
Standard Deviation 735.498
|
353.905 millimeters
Standard Deviation 277.036
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Sway to Assess Postural Stability on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
6 hours
|
489.261 millimeters
Standard Deviation 431.766
|
335.400 millimeters
Standard Deviation 256.120
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Sway to Assess Postural Stability on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
8 hours
|
314.713 millimeters
Standard Deviation 242.121
|
277.614 millimeters
Standard Deviation 189.464
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Body Sway to Assess Postural Stability on Day 5 of Period 4 or Day 7 of Period 5 During Part A
10 hours
|
274.696 millimeters
Standard Deviation 180.248
|
247.100 millimeters
Standard Deviation 137.795
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Treatment Period 1: Screening, Day 1 and Day 2Population: FAS consisted of all study participants that were randomized, received study medication, and had at least one valid post-baseline primary pharmacodynamic assessment observation.
Body Sway test measured the study participant's body movements in a single direction. Body sway was measured by CHCR NeuroCart. Study participants were asked to stand erect and motionless with their eyes closed. The amplitude and direction of any Body Sway was recorded for 1 minute.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=16 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Body Sway to Assess Postural Stability During Part B
|
NA millimeters
Standard Deviation NA
Analysis of this outcome measure was not performed because the study was terminated. At that time, Part A had been completed, and 16 study participants had been treated with CBD in Treatment Period 1 of Part B.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Screening up to the Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26)Population: Safety Set consisted of all study participants who were randomized and had received at least 1 dose (any amount) of study medication.
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=24 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
n=23 Participants
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
n=24 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
n=23 Participants
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
n=23 Participants
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
n=23 Participants
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events During Part A
|
8 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Screening up to the Safety Follow-up visit of Part B (up to Day 66)Population: Safety Set consisted of all study participants who were randomized and had received at least 1 dose (any amount) of study medication.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=16 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
n=16 Participants
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events During Part B
|
2 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Screening up to the Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26)Population: Safety Set consisted of all study participants who were randomized and had received at least 1 dose (any amount) of study medication.
A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, is life-threatening, required in patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, is an infection that requires treatment parenteral antibiotics, other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardize the participants, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=24 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
n=23 Participants
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
n=24 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
n=23 Participants
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
n=23 Participants
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
n=23 Participants
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events During Part A
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Screening up to the Safety Follow-up visit of Part B (up to Day 66)Population: Safety Set consisted of all study participants who were randomized and had received at least 1 dose (any amount) of study medication.
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, is life-threatening, required in patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, is an infection that requires treatment parenteral antibiotics, other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardize the participants, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=16 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
n=16 Participants
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events During Part B
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26)Population: Safety Set consisted of all study participants who were randomized and had received at least 1 dose (any amount) of study medication.
Treatment-related adverse event was an adverse event for which a causal relationship between the product and the occurrence is suspected.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=23 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
n=24 Participants
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
n=23 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
n=23 Participants
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
n=23 Participants
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events During Part A
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part B (up to Day 66)Population: Safety Set consisted of all study participants who were randomized and had received at least 1 dose (any amount) of study medication.
Treatment-related adverse event was an adverse event for which a causal relationship between the product and the occurrence is suspected.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=16 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-related Adverse Events During Part B
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26)Population: Safety Set consisted of all study participants who were randomized and had received at least 1 dose (any amount) of study medication.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=24 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
n=23 Participants
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
n=24 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
n=23 Participants
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
n=23 Participants
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
n=23 Participants
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of the Study During Part A
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part B (up to Day 66)Population: Safety Set consisted of all study participants who were randomized and had received at least 1 dose (any amount) of study medication.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A: Ethanol (FAS)
n=16 Participants
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the FAS.
|
Part A: Placebo (FAS)
n=16 Participants
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Full Analysis Set (FAS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of the Study During Part B
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Part A: Pre-treatment (SS)
Part A: Placebo (SS)
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
Part A: PSL (SS)
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
Part B: Pre-treatment (SS)
Part B: CBD (SS)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Part A: Pre-treatment (SS)
n=24 participants at risk
Participants with adverse events with a start date prior to the first dose of treatment were summarized in this group for Part A. Participants formed SS.
|
Part A: Placebo (SS)
n=23 participants at risk
Participants received matching placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the Safety Set (SS).
|
Part A: Ethanol (SS)
n=24 participants at risk
Participants received ethanol 0.6 g/L IV infusion on Day 1 during TP1 in Treatment Sequence A and B and on Day 1 during TP2 in Treatment Sequence C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL (SS)
n=23 participants at risk
Participants received PSL 100 mg or 200 mg oral tablets BID on Day 1 to 4 during TP3 in Treatment Sequence A, B, C and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Ethanol (SS)
n=23 participants at risk
Participants received PSL 200 mg BID oral tablets + Ethanol IV infusion on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part A: PSL + Placebo (SS)
n=23 participants at risk
Participants received PSL oral tablets 100 mg or 200 mg + Placebo (for ethanol IV infusion) on Day 7 during TP5 in Treatment Sequence A and C and on Day 5 during TP4 in Treatment Sequence B and D. Participants formed the SS.
|
Part B: Pre-treatment (SS)
n=16 participants at risk
Participants with adverse events with a start date prior to the first dose of treatment were summarized in this group for Part B. Participants formed SS.
|
Part B: CBD (SS)
n=16 participants at risk
Participants received a single oral dose of CBD 10 mg/kg solution, under fasted condition on Day 1 during TP1. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
8.7%
2/23 • Number of events 2 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
12.5%
2/16 • Number of events 2 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
8.3%
2/24 • Number of events 2 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
21.7%
5/23 • Number of events 6 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
34.8%
8/23 • Number of events 8 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
8.7%
2/23 • Number of events 3 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
31.2%
5/16 • Number of events 5 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
4.2%
1/24 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
8.7%
2/23 • Number of events 3 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
8.3%
2/24 • Number of events 2 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
8.3%
2/24 • Number of events 2 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
39.1%
9/23 • Number of events 11 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
13.0%
3/23 • Number of events 4 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
8.7%
2/23 • Number of events 2 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
12.5%
2/16 • Number of events 2 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
General disorders
Feeling Drunk
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
16.7%
4/24 • Number of events 4 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
13.0%
3/23 • Number of events 3 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
General disorders
Infusion site bruising
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
8.7%
2/23 • Number of events 2 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
General disorders
Infusion site pain
|
4.2%
1/24 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
37.5%
9/24 • Number of events 9 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
56.5%
13/23 • Number of events 13 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
8.7%
2/23 • Number of events 2 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
13.0%
3/23 • Number of events 4 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Anterograde amnesia
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
21.7%
5/23 • Number of events 5 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ataxia
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
26.1%
6/23 • Number of events 7 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
8.7%
2/23 • Number of events 2 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
8.7%
2/23 • Number of events 2 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Disturbance in attention
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
8.7%
2/23 • Number of events 2 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
25.0%
6/24 • Number of events 7 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
73.9%
17/23 • Number of events 30 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
30.4%
7/23 • Number of events 7 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
12.5%
2/16 • Number of events 2 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Head discomfort
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
8.7%
2/23 • Number of events 2 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
4.2%
1/24 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
20.8%
5/24 • Number of events 5 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
30.4%
7/23 • Number of events 13 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
30.4%
7/23 • Number of events 10 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
12.5%
2/16 • Number of events 2 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
18.8%
3/16 • Number of events 3 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Slow response to stimuli
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
13.0%
3/23 • Number of events 3 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
13.0%
3/23 • Number of events 3 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
12.5%
3/24 • Number of events 3 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
87.0%
20/23 • Number of events 43 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
65.2%
15/23 • Number of events 23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
60.9%
14/23 • Number of events 26 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Speech disorder
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
8.7%
2/23 • Number of events 2 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sudden onset of sleep
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
65.2%
15/23 • Number of events 33 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
26.1%
6/23 • Number of events 9 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
13.0%
3/23 • Number of events 3 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Tremor
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
17.4%
4/23 • Number of events 4 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Agitation
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
21.7%
5/23 • Number of events 5 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
13.0%
3/23 • Number of events 3 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
13.0%
3/23 • Number of events 4 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Bradyphrenia
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
8.7%
2/23 • Number of events 2 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depressed mood
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
8.7%
2/23 • Number of events 3 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
8.7%
2/23 • Number of events 2 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Illusion
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
13.0%
3/23 • Number of events 4 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
4.2%
1/24 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
21.7%
5/23 • Number of events 5 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
8.7%
2/23 • Number of events 2 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Negative thoughts
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
8.7%
2/23 • Number of events 2 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Nightmare
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
8.7%
2/23 • Number of events 2 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Panic attack
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
13.0%
3/23 • Number of events 3 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Paranoia
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
8.7%
2/23 • Number of events 2 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hiccups
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
13.0%
3/23 • Number of events 5 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
4.3%
1/23 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
General disorders
Catheter site inflammation
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Seasonal allergy
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in jaw
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Yawning
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/24 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/23 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
0.00%
0/16 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
6.2%
1/16 • Number of events 1 • From Screening up to Safety Follow-up visit of Part A (up to Day 26) and of Part B (up to Day 66)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or trial participant that is administered a drug or biologic (medicinal product) or that is using a medical device. The event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with that treatment or usage.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60