Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
3 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-10-01
2025-05-12
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
It is not known if scheduled NSAID therapy will reduce, increase, or have no effect on the occurrence of refractory Lyme arthritis cases. The hypothesis of the study is that prescribing scheduled NSAIDs at the time of diagnosis of Lyme arthritis can prevent the development of the excessive inflammatory phase and decrease the number of patients with antibiotic-refractory Lyme arthritis, or at least decrease the duration of persistent Lyme arthritis symptoms.
The pilot study design randomizes patients to scheduled NSAIDs, scheduled acetaminophen, or scheduled NSAIDs x 1 week than acetaminophen. Primary outcomes are duration of arthritis symptoms, number of refractory cases, side effects and compliance.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact Of RA Therapy Compliance On Patient-Reported Outcomes
NCT01438892
A Rheumatoid Arthritis Study in Participants
NCT01202760
A Non-Interventional Study in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Are Treated With RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab)
NCT01893255
A Study of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) Given Subcutaneously in Combination With Traditional DMARDs in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
NCT01232569
Concomitant Use of Apremilast for the Treatment of Active RA Despite TNF-Inhibition and Methotrexate- CATARA
NCT01204138
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Demonstrate feasibility to ensure adequate patient enrollment and symptomatic follow-up of patients with Lyme arthritis.
2. Develop pilot data necessary for sample size and power calculations:
The purpose of the research study is to evaluate whether there is symptomatic benefit of schedule NSAID therapy in patients with Lyme arthritis diagnosis.
1. Quantification of antibiotic-refractory Lyme arthritis in our population
2. Symptomatic outcomes of patients with Lyme arthritis on scheduled NSAIDs versus those not placed on scheduled NSAIDs (duration to resolution and number of patients with resistant arthritis)
3. Assess side effects of patients with Lyme arthritis placed on scheduled NSAIDs versus those not placed on scheduled NSAIDs
4. Assess changes in resources (follow-up visits, further prescriptions) required for patients taking scheduled NSAIDs versus not taking scheduled NSAIDs
Background:
Lyme disease is the systemic tick-borne disease caused by Borrelia burgdorferi infection, and is endemic to an expanding portion of the United States. Lyme arthritis is a common presentation of Lyme disease. While Lyme arthritis resolves with appropriate antimicrobial treatment in a majority of patients, 10-20% of patients develop antibiotic-refractory Lyme arthritis with prolonged inflammatory arthritis. Research suggests excessive up-regulation of the inflammatory process in patients with prolonged symptoms. The over-expressed pro- inflammatory cell mediators are downstream of NSAID inhibition, which would suggest NSAIDs may be beneficial in these patients. In fact, there is data that NSAIDs and/or disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) may be beneficial in refractory Lyme arthritis cases, once diagnosed as refractory.
The hypothesis of the study is that prescribing scheduled NSAIDs at the time of diagnosis can prevent the development of the excessive inflammatory phase and decrease the number of patients with antibiotic-refractory Lyme arthritis, or at least decrease the duration of persistent Lyme arthritis symptoms. There are no known methods to identify patients who will develop antibiotic-refractory Lyme arthritis. This work is important to delineate optimal timing and duration of NSAIDs given the research that shows the anti- inflammatory effects during healing can potentially delay recovery.
Significance:
While antibiotic-refractory Lyme arthritis has been studied at a microbiologic/cytokine level as well as evaluated in terms of treatment once patients have been deemed antibiotic refractory, to our knowledge there are no published studies evaluating prevention.
With no literature looking at the question of NSAIDs for the prevention of antibiotic- refractory Lyme arthritis, this pilot study is needed to adequately calculate sample size and power calculations for a large-scale multicenter study. There is anecdotal data from the Rheumatology and Infectious Disease departments at the UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh that early scheduled NSAIDs may decrease refractory cases, but there has been no formal evaluation into this question. Retrospective evaluation is challenging since the medications in question (NSAIDs) are over the counter, and clinicians may recommend scheduled or intermittent NSAID therapy without documentation, and certainly without prescriptions in the medical record. Many patients with refractory Lyme arthritis are placed on NSAIDs, but given the question of delayed healing with inhibition of prostaglandins during the healing phase of inflammation, the question of whether NSAIDs are beneficial in patients to prevent refractory arthritis is worthwhile rather than the current process of variable NSAID prescription.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
NSAID
Naproxen at weight based standard dose given bid daily until symptoms resolve
Naproxen
Patients will be randomized to an NSAID (naproxen)
Acetaminophen
Acetaminophen at weight based standard dose given qid until symptoms resolve
Acetaminophen
Patients will be randomized to acetaminophen
NSAID first, then Acetaminophen
Naproxen at weight based standard dose given bid for one week, then acetaminophen at weight based standard dose given qid until symptoms resolve
Naproxen
Patients will be randomized to an NSAID (naproxen)
Acetaminophen
Patients will be randomized to acetaminophen
Standard Care
Symptom observation only
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Naproxen
Patients will be randomized to an NSAID (naproxen)
Acetaminophen
Patients will be randomized to acetaminophen
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Undergoing Lyme disease testing (Lyme test positive)
Exclusion Criteria
Underlying diagnosis of rheumatoid or recurrent arthritis Already on scheduled NSAIDs
Anything that restricts the prescription of naproxen or acetaminophen:
* Hypersensitivity to naproxen (for example: anaphylactic reactions, serious skin reactions) or any component of the formulation; history of aspirin induced asthma, urticaria, or allergic-type reactions after taking aspirin or other NSAIDs, underlying kidney or liver impairment
* Already taking daily NSAIDs (naproxen or ibuprofen) or daily acetaminophen
* Hypersensitivity to acetaminophen or any component of the formulation; severe liver impairment or severe active liver disease
3 Years
17 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Desiree Neville, MD
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Desiree Neville, MD
Assistant Professor of Pediatric Emergency Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Desiree NW Neville, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Pittsburgh
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY20040185
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.