Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of GS-248 (NCT NCT04036227)
NCT ID: NCT04036227
Last Updated: 2023-10-11
Results Overview
AEs were assessed as 'unlikely', 'possibly' or 'probably' related to the IMP. 'Possibly' and 'probably' were categorized as treatment related.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
72 participants
AEs were collected from the start of IMP administration until the end-of-study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part 1 (SAD) and 20 days in Part 2 (MAD).
2023-10-11
Participant Flow
Subjects were recruited from CTC's database of healthy volunteers and from advertising in media (including social media). Screening visits were performed at CTC research clinic. Part I (SAD): Recruitment period started 19JUN2019 and lasted until 15OCT2019. Part II (MAD): Recruitment period started in August 2019 (when first SAD cohorts had been completed) and lasted until 25NOV2019.
Part I (SAD): 92 subjects screened, 48 randomised to 6 dosing groups each of which included placebo. Did not meet the eligibility criteria=12, withdrew consent prior to randomisation=20, reserves=6, other reasons=6. Part II (MAD): 49 subjects screened, 24 randomised to 3 dosing groups each of which included placebo. Did not meet the eligibility criteria=11, withdrew consent prior to randomisation=9, reserve=1, other reasons=4.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Part I (SAD): 1 mg
Single dose (actual dose) of 1 mg GS-248 oral solution.
|
Part I (SAD): 5 mg
Single dose (actual dose) of 5 mg GS-248 oral solution.
|
Part I (SAD): 8 mg
Single dose (actual dose) of 8 mg GS-248 oral solution.
|
Part I (SAD): 40 mg
Single dose (actual dose) of 40 mg GS-248 oral solution.
|
Part I (SAD): 100 mg
Single dose (actual dose) of 100 mg GS-248 oral solution.
|
Part I (SAD): 300 mg
Single dose (actual dose) of 300 mg GS-248 oral solution.
|
Part I (SAD): Placebo
Matching placebo oral solution
Placebo: Placebo oral solution with the same composition to match active drug
|
Part II (MAD): 20 mg
Multiple ascending doses for 10 days with actual dose of 20 mg. Dose were finally selected based on results from Part I.
|
Part II (MAD): 60 mg
Multiple ascending doses for 10 days with actual dose of 60 mg.
|
Part II (MAD): 180 mg
Multiple ascending doses for 10 days with actual dose of 180 mg.
|
Part II (MAD): Placebo
Matching placebo oral solution
Placebo: Placebo oral solution with the same composition to match active drug
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Part I (SAD): 1 mg
STARTED
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part I (SAD): 1 mg
COMPLETED
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part I (SAD): 1 mg
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part I (SAD): 5 mg
STARTED
|
0
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part I (SAD): 5 mg
COMPLETED
|
0
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part I (SAD): 5 mg
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part I (SAD): 8 mg
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part I (SAD): 8 mg
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part I (SAD): 8 mg
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part I (SAD): 40 mg
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part I (SAD): 40 mg
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part I (SAD): 40 mg
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part I (SAD): 100 mg
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part I (SAD): 100 mg
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part I (SAD): 100 mg
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part I (SAD): 300 mg
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part I (SAD): 300 mg
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part I (SAD): 300 mg
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part I (SAD): Placebo
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
12
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part I (SAD): Placebo
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
12
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part I (SAD): Placebo
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part II (MAD): 20 mg
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part II (MAD): 20 mg
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part II (MAD): 20 mg
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part II (MAD): 60 mg
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part II (MAD): 60 mg
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part II (MAD): 60 mg
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Part II (MAD): 180 mg
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
0
|
|
Part II (MAD): 180 mg
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
0
|
|
Part II (MAD): 180 mg
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Part II (MAD): Placebo
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
|
Part II (MAD): Placebo
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
|
Part II (MAD): Placebo
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Part I (SAD-cohorts) and Part II (MAD-cohorts) analysed separately.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Part I (SAD): 1 mg
n=6 Participants
Single dose of 1 mg GS-248 oral solution.
|
Part I (SAD): 5 mg
n=6 Participants
Single dose of 5 mg GS-248 oral solution.
|
Part I (SAD): 8 mg
n=6 Participants
Single dose of 8 mg GS-248 oral solution.
|
Part I (SAD): 40 mg
n=6 Participants
Single dose of 40 mg GS-248 oral solution.
|
Part I (SAD): 100 mg
n=6 Participants
Single dose of 100 mg GS-248 oral solution.
|
Part I (SAD): 300 mg
n=6 Participants
Single dose of 300 mg GS-248 oral solution.
|
Part I (SAD): Placebo
n=12 Participants
Single dose of matching placebo oral solution.
|
Part II (MAD): 20 mg
n=6 Participants
Multiple ascending doses for 10 days with 20 mg.
|
Part II (MAD): 60 mg
n=6 Participants
Multiple ascending doses for 10 days with 60 mg.
|
Part II (MAD): 180 mg
n=6 Participants
Multiple ascending doses for 10 days with 180 mg.
|
Part II (MAD): Placebo
n=6 Participants
Multiple ascending doses for 10 days with matching placebo oral solution.
|
Total
n=72 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
Part I (SAD)
|
40.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.5 • n=6 Participants • Part I (SAD-cohorts) and Part II (MAD-cohorts) analysed separately.
|
33.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8 • n=6 Participants • Part I (SAD-cohorts) and Part II (MAD-cohorts) analysed separately.
|
36.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.4 • n=6 Participants • Part I (SAD-cohorts) and Part II (MAD-cohorts) analysed separately.
|
41.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.9 • n=6 Participants • Part I (SAD-cohorts) and Part II (MAD-cohorts) analysed separately.
|
50.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 • n=6 Participants • Part I (SAD-cohorts) and Part II (MAD-cohorts) analysed separately.
|
33.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.0 • n=6 Participants • Part I (SAD-cohorts) and Part II (MAD-cohorts) analysed separately.
|
32.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1 • n=12 Participants • Part I (SAD-cohorts) and Part II (MAD-cohorts) analysed separately.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
37.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.8 • n=48 Participants • Part I (SAD-cohorts) and Part II (MAD-cohorts) analysed separately.
|
|
Age, Continuous
Part II (MAD)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
56.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2 • n=6 Participants • Part I (SAD-cohorts) and Part II (MAD-cohorts) analysed separately.
|
58.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.0 • n=6 Participants • Part I (SAD-cohorts) and Part II (MAD-cohorts) analysed separately.
|
58.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2 • n=6 Participants • Part I (SAD-cohorts) and Part II (MAD-cohorts) analysed separately.
|
59.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9 • n=6 Participants • Part I (SAD-cohorts) and Part II (MAD-cohorts) analysed separately.
|
58.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6 • n=24 Participants • Part I (SAD-cohorts) and Part II (MAD-cohorts) analysed separately.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Part I (SAD) · Female
|
2 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
3 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
1 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
3 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
4 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
4 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
3 Participants
n=12 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
20 Participants
n=48 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Part I (SAD) · Male
|
4 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
3 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
5 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
3 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
2 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
2 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
9 Participants
n=12 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
28 Participants
n=48 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Part II (MAD) · Female
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
4 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
4 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
4 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
3 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
15 Participants
n=24 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Part II (MAD) · Male
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
2 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
2 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
2 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
3 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
9 Participants
n=24 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Part I (SAD) · Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
1 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=12 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
1 Participants
n=48 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Part I (SAD) · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
6 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
6 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
6 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
5 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
6 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
6 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
12 Participants
n=12 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
47 Participants
n=48 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Part I (SAD) · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=12 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=48 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Part II (MAD) · Hispanic or Latino
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Part II (MAD) · Not Hispanic or Latino
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
6 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
6 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
6 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
6 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
24 Participants
n=24 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Part II (MAD) · Unknown or Not Reported
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
part I (MAD) · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=12 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=48 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
part I (MAD) · Asian
|
2 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
1 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
1 Participants
n=12 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
4 Participants
n=48 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
part I (MAD) · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=12 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=48 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
part I (MAD) · Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=12 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=48 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
part I (MAD) · White
|
4 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
5 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
6 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
6 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
6 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
6 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
11 Participants
n=12 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
44 Participants
n=48 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
part I (MAD) · More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=12 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=48 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
part I (MAD) · Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=12 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=48 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part II (MAD) · American Indian or Alaska Native
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part II (MAD) · Asian
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part II (MAD) · Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part II (MAD) · Black or African American
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part II (MAD) · White
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
6 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
6 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
6 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
6 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
24 Participants
n=24 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part II (MAD) · More than one race
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Part II (MAD) · Unknown or Not Reported
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
0 Participants
n=24 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
|
6 participants
n=6 Participants
|
6 participants
n=6 Participants
|
6 participants
n=6 Participants
|
6 participants
n=6 Participants
|
6 participants
n=6 Participants
|
6 participants
n=6 Participants
|
12 participants
n=12 Participants
|
6 participants
n=6 Participants
|
6 participants
n=6 Participants
|
6 participants
n=6 Participants
|
6 participants
n=6 Participants
|
72 participants
n=72 Participants
|
|
BMI
Part I (SAD)
|
22.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
25.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.9 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
25.2 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
25.7 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
26.0 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
22.0 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.0 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
24.0 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.0 • n=12 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
24.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2 • n=48 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
BMI
Part II (MAD)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
26.0 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
23.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
24.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
25.8 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
24.9 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5 • n=24 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Height
Part I (SAD)
|
171.3 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
169.0 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.0 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
178.0 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
176.7 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
176.2 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
173.3 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
175.7 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 • n=12 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
174.1 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6 • n=48 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Height
Part II (MAD)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
171.0 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
171.7 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.0 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
172.2 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
176.0 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
172.7 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7 • n=24 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Weight
Part I (SAD)
|
65.7 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
72.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.9 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
79.8 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
81.0 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.0 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
81.0 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.0 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
66.3 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
74.7 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8 • n=12 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
74.4 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5 • n=48 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
|
Weight
Part II (MAD)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
76.2 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.0 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
69.8 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
72.3 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
81.0 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.2 • n=6 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
74.8 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7 • n=24 Participants • The demographics and baseline characteristics for subjects included in the different Part I (SAD) cohorts (dose level 1-300 mg) and Part II (MAD) cohorts (dose levels 20-180 mg) are presented separately since subjects were only included in one cohort.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: AEs were collected from the start of IMP administration until the end-of-study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part 1 (SAD) and 20 days in Part 2 (MAD).Population: All subjects who have been randomised and received at least one dose of IMP.
AEs were assessed as 'unlikely', 'possibly' or 'probably' related to the IMP. 'Possibly' and 'probably' were categorized as treatment related.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GS-248 1 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 1 mg SAD
|
GS-248 5 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 5 mg SAD
|
GS-248 8 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 8 mg SAD
|
GS-248 40 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 40 mg SAD
|
GS-248 100 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 100 mg SAD
|
GS-248 300 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 300 mg SAD
|
Placebo (SAD)
n=12 Participants
Part I; Placebo (SAD)
|
GS-248 20 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 20 mg MAD
|
GS-248 60 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 60 mg MAD
|
GS-248 180 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 180 mg MAD
|
Placebo (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; Placebo (MAD)
|
Placebo (MAD)
Part II; Placebo MAD
|
Total (MAD)
All participants in Part II (MAD), both GS-248 and placebo.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Treatment Related Adverse Events
|
3 Number of events
|
4 Number of events
|
0 Number of events
|
3 Number of events
|
2 Number of events
|
1 Number of events
|
4 Number of events
|
1 Number of events
|
12 Number of events
|
9 Number of events
|
0 Number of events
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12-lead ECG was measured at pre-defined timepoints from the screening visit until the end-of-study visit, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).Population: All subjects who have been randomised and received at least one dose of IMP.
Single 12-lead ECG was recorded in supine position after 10 minutes of rest using an ECG machine. Heart rate and PQ/PR, QRS, QT and QTcF intervals were recorded. Ambulatory ECG telemetry was used for cardiac surveillance up to 24 h after IMP administration in the SAD part of the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GS-248 1 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 1 mg SAD
|
GS-248 5 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 5 mg SAD
|
GS-248 8 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 8 mg SAD
|
GS-248 40 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 40 mg SAD
|
GS-248 100 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 100 mg SAD
|
GS-248 300 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 300 mg SAD
|
Placebo (SAD)
n=12 Participants
Part I; Placebo (SAD)
|
GS-248 20 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 20 mg MAD
|
GS-248 60 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 60 mg MAD
|
GS-248 180 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 180 mg MAD
|
Placebo (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; Placebo (MAD)
|
Placebo (MAD)
Part II; Placebo MAD
|
Total (MAD)
All participants in Part II (MAD), both GS-248 and placebo.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Clinically Significant Changes in ECG
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
1 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Vital signs was checked at pre-defined timepoints from the screening visit until the end-of-study visit, an average of 10 days in Part 1 (SAD) and 20 days in Part 2 (MAD).Population: All subjects who have been randomised and received at least one dose of IMP.
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse were measured in supine position after 10 minutes of rest. Body temperature was measured orally using a digital thermometer.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GS-248 1 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 1 mg SAD
|
GS-248 5 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 5 mg SAD
|
GS-248 8 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 8 mg SAD
|
GS-248 40 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 40 mg SAD
|
GS-248 100 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 100 mg SAD
|
GS-248 300 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 300 mg SAD
|
Placebo (SAD)
n=12 Participants
Part I; Placebo (SAD)
|
GS-248 20 mg (MAD)
n=48 Participants
Part II; GS-248 20 mg MAD
|
GS-248 60 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 60 mg MAD
|
GS-248 180 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 180 mg MAD
|
Placebo (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; Placebo (MAD)
|
Placebo (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; Placebo MAD
|
Total (MAD)
n=24 Participants
All participants in Part II (MAD), both GS-248 and placebo.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
0 Number of abnormal CS events
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Blood samples were collected at pre-defined timepoints from the screening visit until the end-of-study visit, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).Population: All subjects who have been randomised and received at least one dose of IMP.
Blood samples for analysis of clinical chemistry, haematology and coagulation parameters.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GS-248 1 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 1 mg SAD
|
GS-248 5 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 5 mg SAD
|
GS-248 8 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 8 mg SAD
|
GS-248 40 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 40 mg SAD
|
GS-248 100 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 100 mg SAD
|
GS-248 300 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 300 mg SAD
|
Placebo (SAD)
n=12 Participants
Part I; Placebo (SAD)
|
GS-248 20 mg (MAD)
n=48 Participants
Part II; GS-248 20 mg MAD
|
GS-248 60 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 60 mg MAD
|
GS-248 180 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 180 mg MAD
|
Placebo (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; Placebo (MAD)
|
Placebo (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; Placebo MAD
|
Total (MAD)
n=24 Participants
All participants in Part II (MAD), both GS-248 and placebo.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Clinically Significant Changes in Safety Laboratory Parameters
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Physical examination was performed at pre-defined timepoints from the screening visit until the end-of- study visit, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).Population: All subjects who have been randomised and received at least one dose of IMP.
A complete physical examination included assessments of the head, eyes, ears, nose, throat, skin, thyroid, neurological, lungs, cardiovascular, abdomen (liver and spleen), lymph nodes and extremities.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GS-248 1 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 1 mg SAD
|
GS-248 5 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 5 mg SAD
|
GS-248 8 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 8 mg SAD
|
GS-248 40 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 40 mg SAD
|
GS-248 100 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 100 mg SAD
|
GS-248 300 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 300 mg SAD
|
Placebo (SAD)
n=12 Participants
Part I; Placebo (SAD)
|
GS-248 20 mg (MAD)
n=48 Participants
Part II; GS-248 20 mg MAD
|
GS-248 60 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 60 mg MAD
|
GS-248 180 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 180 mg MAD
|
Placebo (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; Placebo (MAD)
|
Placebo (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; Placebo MAD
|
Total (MAD)
n=24 Participants
All participants in Part II (MAD), both GS-248 and placebo.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Clinically Significant Changes in Physical Examination
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: SAD: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 hours post-dose; MAD Day 1-3 (first dose) and Day 10-12 (last dose): pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 hours post-dose.Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of the study drug and provided at least one evaluable plasma concentration profile without any AEs or protocol deviations judged to affect the PK analysis.
Maximum plasma concentration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GS-248 1 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 1 mg SAD
|
GS-248 5 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 5 mg SAD
|
GS-248 8 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 8 mg SAD
|
GS-248 40 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 40 mg SAD
|
GS-248 100 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 100 mg SAD
|
GS-248 300 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 300 mg SAD
|
Placebo (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; Placebo (SAD)
|
GS-248 20 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 20 mg MAD
|
GS-248 60 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 60 mg MAD
|
GS-248 180 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 180 mg MAD
|
Placebo (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; Placebo (MAD)
|
Placebo (MAD)
n=5 Participants
Part II; Placebo MAD
|
Total (MAD)
All participants in Part II (MAD), both GS-248 and placebo.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cmax:
|
1.247 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.9537
|
8.975 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 4.971
|
11.82 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 4.365
|
145.3 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 69.75
|
263.3 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 65.07
|
818.3 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 783.3
|
41.47 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 18.45
|
231.8 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 187.3
|
478.5 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 310.0
|
43.93 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 30.10
|
176.5 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 83.04
|
903.0 nmol/L
Standard Deviation 590.6
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: SAD: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 hours post-dose; MAD: Day 1-3 (first dose) Day 10-12 (last dose): pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 hours post-dose.Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of the study drug and provided at least one evaluable plasma concentration profile without any AEs or protocol deviations judged to affect the PK analysis.
Time to Cmax.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GS-248 1 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 1 mg SAD
|
GS-248 5 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 5 mg SAD
|
GS-248 8 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 8 mg SAD
|
GS-248 40 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 40 mg SAD
|
GS-248 100 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 100 mg SAD
|
GS-248 300 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 300 mg SAD
|
Placebo (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; Placebo (SAD)
|
GS-248 20 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 20 mg MAD
|
GS-248 60 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 60 mg MAD
|
GS-248 180 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 180 mg MAD
|
Placebo (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; Placebo (MAD)
|
Placebo (MAD)
n=5 Participants
Part II; Placebo MAD
|
Total (MAD)
All participants in Part II (MAD), both GS-248 and placebo.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Tmax:
|
1.500 hours
Interval 1.0 to 1.5
|
2.500 hours
Interval 1.5 to 3.0
|
1.000 hours
Interval 1.0 to 2.0
|
1.000 hours
Interval 0.5 to 1.5
|
1.000 hours
Interval 0.5 to 1.5
|
1.500 hours
Interval 1.0 to 2.0
|
1.000 hours
Interval 0.5 to 2.0
|
1.000 hours
Interval 0.5 to 1.0
|
1.108 hours
Interval 0.517 to 2.0
|
2.000 hours
Interval 1.0 to 2.0
|
1.000 hours
Interval 0.5 to 2.02
|
2.000 hours
Interval 1.02 to 2.05
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: SAD: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 hours post-dose); MAD: Day 1-3 and Day 10-12: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 hours post-dose.Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of the study drug and provided at least one evaluable plasma concentration profile without any AEs or protocol deviations judged to affect the PK analysis.
Terminal elimination half-life
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GS-248 1 mg (SAD)
n=3 Participants
Part I; GS-248 1 mg SAD
|
GS-248 5 mg (SAD)
n=4 Participants
Part I; GS-248 5 mg SAD
|
GS-248 8 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 8 mg SAD
|
GS-248 40 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 40 mg SAD
|
GS-248 100 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 100 mg SAD
|
GS-248 300 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 300 mg SAD
|
Placebo (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; Placebo (SAD)
|
GS-248 20 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 20 mg MAD
|
GS-248 60 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 60 mg MAD
|
GS-248 180 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 180 mg MAD
|
Placebo (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; Placebo (MAD)
|
Placebo (MAD)
n=5 Participants
Part II; Placebo MAD
|
Total (MAD)
All participants in Part II (MAD), both GS-248 and placebo.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
T½:
|
4.539 hours
Standard Deviation 2.435
|
1.089 hours
Standard Deviation 0.1879
|
1.660 hours
Standard Deviation 0.3684
|
9.220 hours
Standard Deviation 6.697
|
9.513 hours
Standard Deviation 3.683
|
11.14 hours
Standard Deviation 1.630
|
3.469 hours
Standard Deviation 2.073
|
6.705 hours
Standard Deviation 3.120
|
11.86 hours
Standard Deviation 10.76
|
6.504 hours
Standard Deviation 3.980
|
18.00 hours
Standard Deviation 8.750
|
15.01 hours
Standard Deviation 5.225
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: SAD: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 hours post-dose); MAD: Day 1-3 and Day 10-12: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 hours post-dose.Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of the study drug and provided at least one evaluable plasma concentration profile without any AEs or protocol deviations judged to affect the PK analysis.
Area under the concentration time curve from the time of dosing to the time of the last observation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GS-248 1 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 1 mg SAD
|
GS-248 5 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 5 mg SAD
|
GS-248 8 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 8 mg SAD
|
GS-248 40 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 40 mg SAD
|
GS-248 100 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 100 mg SAD
|
GS-248 300 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 300 mg SAD
|
Placebo (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; Placebo (SAD)
|
GS-248 20 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 20 mg MAD
|
GS-248 60 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 60 mg MAD
|
GS-248 180 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 180 mg MAD
|
Placebo (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; Placebo (MAD)
|
Placebo (MAD)
n=5 Participants
Part II; Placebo MAD
|
Total (MAD)
All participants in Part II (MAD), both GS-248 and placebo.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUC0-t:
|
2.437 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 1.846
|
30.57 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 22.88
|
39.08 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 13.40
|
478.6 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 285.3
|
879.8 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 380.0
|
2667 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 2850
|
180.1 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 75.75
|
655.8 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 473.7
|
1735 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 1164
|
211.0 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 115.5
|
650.5 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 267.2
|
4798 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 3702
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: SAD: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 hours post-doseArea under the curve from time 0 to infinity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GS-248 1 mg (SAD)
n=3 Participants
Part I; GS-248 1 mg SAD
|
GS-248 5 mg (SAD)
n=4 Participants
Part I; GS-248 5 mg SAD
|
GS-248 8 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 8 mg SAD
|
GS-248 40 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 40 mg SAD
|
GS-248 100 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 100 mg SAD
|
GS-248 300 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 300 mg SAD
|
Placebo (SAD)
Part I; Placebo (SAD)
|
GS-248 20 mg (MAD)
Part II; GS-248 20 mg MAD
|
GS-248 60 mg (MAD)
Part II; GS-248 60 mg MAD
|
GS-248 180 mg (MAD)
Part II; GS-248 180 mg MAD
|
Placebo (MAD)
Part II; Placebo (MAD)
|
Placebo (MAD)
Part II; Placebo MAD
|
Total (MAD)
All participants in Part II (MAD), both GS-248 and placebo.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUC 0-inf
|
8.542 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.8438
|
40.22 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 24.62
|
41.77 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 13.80
|
489.3 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 282.3
|
894.7 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 380.8
|
2713 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 2906
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: MAD: Day 10-12: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 hours post-dose.Area under the plasma concentration curve during a dosing interval at steady state.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GS-248 1 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 1 mg SAD
|
GS-248 5 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 5 mg SAD
|
GS-248 8 mg (SAD)
n=5 Participants
Part I; GS-248 8 mg SAD
|
GS-248 40 mg (SAD)
Part I; GS-248 40 mg SAD
|
GS-248 100 mg (SAD)
Part I; GS-248 100 mg SAD
|
GS-248 300 mg (SAD)
Part I; GS-248 300 mg SAD
|
Placebo (SAD)
Part I; Placebo (SAD)
|
GS-248 20 mg (MAD)
Part II; GS-248 20 mg MAD
|
GS-248 60 mg (MAD)
Part II; GS-248 60 mg MAD
|
GS-248 180 mg (MAD)
Part II; GS-248 180 mg MAD
|
Placebo (MAD)
Part II; Placebo (MAD)
|
Placebo (MAD)
Part II; Placebo MAD
|
Total (MAD)
All participants in Part II (MAD), both GS-248 and placebo.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AUCss
|
205.9 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 103.4
|
604.6 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 233.1
|
4046 h*nmol/L
Standard Deviation 2823
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: SAD: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 hours post-dose); MAD Day 1-3 and Day 10-12: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 hours post-dose.Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of the study drug and provided at least one evaluable plasma concentration profile without any AEs or protocol deviations judged to affect the PK analysis.
Apparent total body clearance following extravascular administration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GS-248 1 mg (SAD)
n=3 Participants
Part I; GS-248 1 mg SAD
|
GS-248 5 mg (SAD)
n=4 Participants
Part I; GS-248 5 mg SAD
|
GS-248 8 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 8 mg SAD
|
GS-248 40 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 40 mg SAD
|
GS-248 100 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 100 mg SAD
|
GS-248 300 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 300 mg SAD
|
Placebo (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; Placebo (SAD)
|
GS-248 20 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 20 mg MAD
|
GS-248 60 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 60 mg MAD
|
GS-248 180 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 180 mg MAD
|
Placebo (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; Placebo (MAD)
|
Placebo (MAD)
n=5 Participants
Part II; Placebo MAD
|
Total (MAD)
All participants in Part II (MAD), both GS-248 and placebo.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Clearance (CL)/F:
|
173.7 L/h
Standard Deviation 17.51
|
228.2 L/h
Standard Deviation 102.7
|
304.8 L/h
Standard Deviation 83.80
|
161.4 L/h
Standard Deviation 92.39
|
184.8 L/h
Standard Deviation 58.74
|
318.2 L/h
Standard Deviation 223.4
|
187.0 L/h
Standard Deviation 79.05
|
190.2 L/h
Standard Deviation 109.1
|
181.2 L/h
Standard Deviation 101.4
|
175.4 L/h
Standard Deviation 81.81
|
166.2 L/h
Standard Deviation 63.62
|
97.59 L/h
Standard Deviation 74.02
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: SAD: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 hours post-dose); MAD: Day 1-3 and Day 10-12: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 hours post-dose.Population: All subjects who received at least one dose of the study drug and provided at least one evaluable plasma concentration profile without any AEs or protocol deviations judged to affect the PK analysis.
Apparent volume of distribution following extravascular administration
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GS-248 1 mg (SAD)
n=3 Participants
Part I; GS-248 1 mg SAD
|
GS-248 5 mg (SAD)
n=4 Participants
Part I; GS-248 5 mg SAD
|
GS-248 8 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 8 mg SAD
|
GS-248 40 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 40 mg SAD
|
GS-248 100 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 100 mg SAD
|
GS-248 300 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 300 mg SAD
|
Placebo (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; Placebo (SAD)
|
GS-248 20 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 20 mg MAD
|
GS-248 60 mg (MAD)
n=5 Participants
Part II; GS-248 60 mg MAD
|
GS-248 180 mg (MAD)
Part II; GS-248 180 mg MAD
|
Placebo (MAD)
Part II; Placebo (MAD)
|
Placebo (MAD)
Part II; Placebo MAD
|
Total (MAD)
All participants in Part II (MAD), both GS-248 and placebo.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Vz/F:
|
1097 L
Standard Deviation 516.4
|
341.9 L
Standard Deviation 120.5
|
719.7 L
Standard Deviation 192.1
|
2117 L
Standard Deviation 2445
|
2378 L
Standard Deviation 918.8
|
4856 L
Standard Deviation 3394
|
1354 L
Standard Deviation 392.3
|
3945 L
Standard Deviation 1685
|
2157 L
Standard Deviation 2139
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: MAD: Day 1-3 and Day 10-12: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 hours post-dose.Outcome measures
| Measure |
GS-248 1 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 1 mg SAD
|
GS-248 5 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 5 mg SAD
|
GS-248 8 mg (SAD)
n=5 Participants
Part I; GS-248 8 mg SAD
|
GS-248 40 mg (SAD)
Part I; GS-248 40 mg SAD
|
GS-248 100 mg (SAD)
Part I; GS-248 100 mg SAD
|
GS-248 300 mg (SAD)
Part I; GS-248 300 mg SAD
|
Placebo (SAD)
Part I; Placebo (SAD)
|
GS-248 20 mg (MAD)
Part II; GS-248 20 mg MAD
|
GS-248 60 mg (MAD)
Part II; GS-248 60 mg MAD
|
GS-248 180 mg (MAD)
Part II; GS-248 180 mg MAD
|
Placebo (MAD)
Part II; Placebo (MAD)
|
Placebo (MAD)
Part II; Placebo MAD
|
Total (MAD)
All participants in Part II (MAD), both GS-248 and placebo.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Accumulation Ratio AUC 0-ss
|
1.148 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.3148
|
1.171 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.5541
|
2.390 ratio
Standard Deviation 1.135
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: At 24h after first dose Day 1 and at 24 hours after last dose Day 10.Population: All subjects who were randomised, received at least one dose of IMP and who had at least one post-baseline assessment of efficacy data.
Ex vivo determination of mPGES-1 activity in a Whole Blood Assay (WBA) measured as percent change from baseline of Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) levels after lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GS-248 1 mg (SAD)
n=5 Participants
Part I; GS-248 1 mg SAD
|
GS-248 5 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 5 mg SAD
|
GS-248 8 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 8 mg SAD
|
GS-248 40 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 40 mg SAD
|
GS-248 100 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 100 mg SAD
|
GS-248 300 mg (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; GS-248 300 mg SAD
|
Placebo (SAD)
n=6 Participants
Part I; Placebo (SAD)
|
GS-248 20 mg (MAD)
n=14 Participants
Part II; GS-248 20 mg MAD
|
GS-248 60 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 60 mg MAD
|
GS-248 180 mg (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; GS-248 180 mg MAD
|
Placebo (MAD)
n=5 Participants
Part II; Placebo (MAD)
|
Placebo (MAD)
n=6 Participants
Part II; Placebo MAD
|
Total (MAD)
All participants in Part II (MAD), both GS-248 and placebo.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
mPGES-1 Activity
|
7.2 Relative change from baseline (%)
Standard Deviation 98.8
|
-97.1 Relative change from baseline (%)
Standard Deviation 12.1
|
-108.3 Relative change from baseline (%)
Standard Deviation 11.5
|
-105.2 Relative change from baseline (%)
Standard Deviation 11.6
|
-65.9 Relative change from baseline (%)
Standard Deviation 20.2
|
-94.9 Relative change from baseline (%)
Standard Deviation 9.3
|
-104.3 Relative change from baseline (%)
Standard Deviation 6.8
|
9.8 Relative change from baseline (%)
Standard Deviation 59.6
|
-86.9 Relative change from baseline (%)
Standard Deviation 26.8
|
-104.3 Relative change from baseline (%)
Standard Deviation 13.9
|
-109.8 Relative change from baseline (%)
Standard Deviation 7.8
|
18.6 Relative change from baseline (%)
Standard Deviation 57.7
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Part I (SAD): 1 mg
Part I (SAD): 5 mg
Part I (SAD): 8 mg
Part I (SAD): 40 mg
Part I (SAD): 100 mg
Part I (SAD): 300 mg
Part I (SAD): Placebo
Part II (MAD): 20 mg
Part II (MAD): 60 mg
Part II (MAD): 180 mg
Part II (MAD): Placebo
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Part I (SAD): 1 mg
n=6 participants at risk
Single dose (actual dose) of 1 mg GS-248 oral solution.
|
Part I (SAD): 5 mg
n=6 participants at risk
Single dose (actual dose) of 5 mg GS-248 oral solution.
|
Part I (SAD): 8 mg
n=6 participants at risk
Single dose (actual dose) of 8 mg GS-248 oral solution.
|
Part I (SAD): 40 mg
n=6 participants at risk
Single dose (actual dose) of 40 mg GS-248 oral solution.
|
Part I (SAD): 100 mg
n=6 participants at risk
Single dose (actual dose) of 100 mg GS-248 oral solution.
|
Part I (SAD): 300 mg
n=6 participants at risk
Single dose (actual dose) of 300 mg GS-248 oral solution.
|
Part I (SAD): Placebo
n=12 participants at risk
Matching placebo oral solution
Placebo: Placebo oral solution with the same composition to match active drug
|
Part II (MAD): 20 mg
n=6 participants at risk
Multiple ascending doses for 10 days with actual dose of 20 mg.
|
Part II (MAD): 60 mg
n=6 participants at risk
Multiple ascending doses for 10 days with actual dose of 60 mg.
|
Part II (MAD): 180 mg
n=6 participants at risk
Multiple ascending doses for 10 days with actual dose of 180 mg.
|
Part II (MAD): Placebo
n=6 participants at risk
Matching placebo oral solution
Placebo: Placebo oral solution with the same composition to match active drug
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 5 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
50.0%
3/6 • Number of events 3 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
2/12 • Number of events 4 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 3 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lip dry
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Paraesthesia oral
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasopharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
General disorders
Vessel puncture site thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
8.3%
1/12 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Dysmenorrhoea
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hot flush
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 2 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis contact
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash maculo-papular
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Swelling face
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
General disorders
Peripheral swelling
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 2 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear discomfort
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Tinnitus
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye pruritus
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Glucose tolerance impaired
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/12 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
0.00%
0/6 • AEs (including serious AEs [SAEs]) were collected from the start of IMP application until the end-of- study visit of each part, an average of 10 days in Part I (SAD) and 20 days in Part II (MAD).
The grading of the severity/intensity (grade 1 to grade 5) of AEs followed the common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) v5.0. AEs were assessed as unlikely, possibly or probably related to the IMP
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Any confidential information relating to the IMP or the study, including any data and results from the study, will be the exclusive property of the Sponsor. The Investigator and any other persons involved in the study are responsible for protecting the confidentiality of this proprietary information belonging to the Sponsor. The results from this study may be submitted for publication at the discretion of the Sponsor.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER