Trial Outcomes & Findings for Performance of the L-PLUS BGMS by Persons With Diabetes Mellitus (NCT NCT04033315)
NCT ID: NCT04033315
Last Updated: 2024-06-13
Results Overview
Accuracy of BGMS test with fingerstick blood. The results of the fingerstick meter test performed by the participant will be compared to results of the same blood on a laboratory reference analyzer using pre-specified accuracy criteria.
COMPLETED
130 participants
Day 1
2024-06-13
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Untrained Subjects With Diabetes Use the L-PLUS BGMS
Untrained subjects with Diabetes test capillary fingerstick and palm blood (and study staff test subject fingerstick blood) using the L-PLUS BGMS. All blood glucose results are compared to reference method results obtained with subject capillary plasma. Also, study staff test venous blood and blood glucose results are compared to reference method results obtained from subject venous plasma.
L-PLUS meter: Blood Glucose Monitoring System
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
130
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
129
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Performance of the L-PLUS BGMS by Persons With Diabetes Mellitus
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Untrained Subjects With Diabetes Use the L-PLUS BGMS
n=130 Participants
Untrained subjects with Diabetes test capillary fingerstick and palm blood (and study staff test subject fingerstick blood) using the L-PLUS BGMS. All blood glucose results are compared to reference method results obtained with subject capillary plasma. Also, study staff test venous blood and blood glucose results are compared to reference method results obtained from subject venous plasma.
L-PLUS meter: Blood Glucose Monitoring System
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
106 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
54.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
67 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
63 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
115 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
72 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
130 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1Population: Persons with diabetes perform finger stick tests.
Accuracy of BGMS test with fingerstick blood. The results of the fingerstick meter test performed by the participant will be compared to results of the same blood on a laboratory reference analyzer using pre-specified accuracy criteria.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Untrained Subjects With Diabetes Use the L-PLUS BGMS
n=128 Participants
Untrained subjects with Diabetes test capillary fingerstick and palm blood (and study staff test subject fingerstick blood) using the L-PLUS BGMS. All blood glucose results are compared to reference method results obtained with subject capillary plasma. Also, study staff test venous blood and blood glucose results are compared to reference method results obtained from subject venous plasma.
L-PLUS meter: Blood Glucose Monitoring System
|
|---|---|
|
Accuracy of BGMS Compared to the Reference Analyzer - Fingerstick Blood Test
|
127 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1Population: Persons test their blood from palm.
Accuracy of BGMS test with palm blood. The results of the palm blood meter test performed by the participant will be compared to results of the same blood on a laboratory reference analyzer using pre-specified accuracy criteria
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Untrained Subjects With Diabetes Use the L-PLUS BGMS
n=121 Participants
Untrained subjects with Diabetes test capillary fingerstick and palm blood (and study staff test subject fingerstick blood) using the L-PLUS BGMS. All blood glucose results are compared to reference method results obtained with subject capillary plasma. Also, study staff test venous blood and blood glucose results are compared to reference method results obtained from subject venous plasma.
L-PLUS meter: Blood Glucose Monitoring System
|
|---|---|
|
Accuracy of BGMS Compared to the Reference Analyzer - Palm Alternative Site Test (AST)
|
119 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 1Population: Venous blood is tested on each participant.
Accuracy of BGMS using venous blood compared to the reference analyzer for all subjects using pre-specified accuracy criteria
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Untrained Subjects With Diabetes Use the L-PLUS BGMS
n=129 Participants
Untrained subjects with Diabetes test capillary fingerstick and palm blood (and study staff test subject fingerstick blood) using the L-PLUS BGMS. All blood glucose results are compared to reference method results obtained with subject capillary plasma. Also, study staff test venous blood and blood glucose results are compared to reference method results obtained from subject venous plasma.
L-PLUS meter: Blood Glucose Monitoring System
|
|---|---|
|
Accuracy of BGMS Compared to the Reference Analyzer - Venous Blood
|
129 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Untrained Subjects With Diabetes Use the L-PLUS BGMS
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place