Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Trigger Trial (PCASTT-UK): Comparing Current Practice for Men With Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance (AS) to an AS Protocol With Standardised Triggers for Transitioning to Curative Treatment

NCT ID: NCT04029714

Last Updated: 2024-02-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

195 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-09-19

Study Completion Date

2033-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A large proportion of men with prostate cancer are overdiagnosed and overtreated mainly due to PSA testing. Active surveillance (AS) aims to reduce these harms by recommending curative treatment only when and if signs of tumour progression occur. There are however a number of uncertainties in AS, the most important being when to initiate treatment.

Therefore, the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group (SPCG) are running a large multi-centre randomised control trial (RCT) to test the safety of a standardized active surveillance protocol with specific triggers for repeat biopsies and initiation of curative treatment, compared to the current practice for active surveillance. They are recruiting in multiple sites in Sweden, Denmark and Finland. The primary aim is to reduce overtreatment and subsequent side effects, without increasing the risk of disease progression or prostate cancer mortality.

In the UK, there is also no set criteria for when to re-biopsy and/or initiate curative treatment for patients on AS and tends to be at the clinician's discretion. Thus, PCASTT-UK has been established to run as a parallel RCT and add to the findings from SPCG-17.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

STUDY HYPOTHESIS The aim of this trial is to test the safety of an Active Surveillance protocol comparing current practice to standardized triggers for initiation of curative treatment, based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging or biopsy pathology. The study hypothesis is that standardized triggers will reduce overtreatment without increasing disease progression and prostate cancer mortality.

STUDY DESIGN Randomized multi-centre open-label clinical trial.

INTERVENTIONS Patients within 12 months of a diagnosis of prostate cancer will be approached and consented to the study. Computerised randomisation (1:1) will assign participants to either the control (Arm 1) or intervention arm (Arm 2). In the control arm, patients will be treated according to active surveillance protocol at the trial centre; in the intervention arm patients will follow standardised active surveillance protocol applying specific criteria for repeat biopsies and the initiation of curative treatment. Patients are stratified by centre and Gleason score.

FOLLOW UP In both arms, patients will followed up for 10 years with the following schedule: a PSA test every 6 months, clinical examination (with PSA test) and Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaire annually, and MRI every second year. Re-biopsy and/or initiation of curative treatment depends on the trial arm patients are randomised to.

Repeat biopsies

Arm 1 (control arm): according to current practice (urologists' judgement)

Arm 2 (intervention arm): standardised triggers

* A systematic repeat biopsy if PSA density increases to \> 0.2 ng/ml/cc, and then at every 0.1 ng/ml/cc increase
* MRI progression in men with previously only Gleason grade 3+3: 5 mm or more increase in size in any dimension of a measurable lesion, increase in PI-RADS score to 3-5, a new lesion with PI-RADS score 3-5, or high or very high suspicion of extra-capsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion
* MRI progression in men with Gleason grade 3+4: 5 mm or more increase in size in any dimension of a measurable lesion, or a new lesion with PI-RADS score 3-5

Curative treatment

Arm 1 (control arm): According to current practice (urologists judgement)

Arm 2 (intervention arm): standardised triggers

* MRI progression in lesions with confirmed Gleason grade 4: increase in PI-RADS score to 4 or 5, or high or very high suspicion of extra-capsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion
* Pathological progression: Gleason pattern 5, primary Gleason pattern 4 in any core with 5 mm or more cancer, Gleason 3+4 in 3 or more cores or 30% if more than 10 cores are taken, or Gleason 3+4 in 10 mm or more cancer

Patients will remain on trial unless they end Active Surveillance due to initiation of treatment, development of metastases, transition to watchful waiting, or death of any cause. After the initiation of curative treatment, watchful waiting, or palliative treatment for cancer progression, the patient is treated according to the standard protocol of the participating centre.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1: Current practice for active surveillance

In this arm, patients are monitored according to current practice for active surveillance at the trial centre. Repeat biopsies (and/or other examinations) and initiation of curative treatment are performed according to the urologist's judgement.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Active Surveillance

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Active monitoring of prostate cancer and curative treatment if there are signs of tumor progression.

Arm 2: Standardized triggers for treatment

In this arm, patients are monitored according to a standardized active surveillance protocol with specific triggers for treatment. Repeat biopsies and curative treatment are only initiated if/when specific criteria are fulfilled.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Active Surveillance

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Active monitoring of prostate cancer and curative treatment if there are signs of tumor progression.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Active Surveillance

Active monitoring of prostate cancer and curative treatment if there are signs of tumor progression.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Recently (within 12 months) diagnosed adenocarcinoma of the prostate
* Tumour stage ≤ T2a, NX, M0 (former MX)
* PSA \<15ng/ml, PSA density ≤ 0.2 ng/ml/cm3
* Gleason pattern 3+3=6 (any number of cores, any cancer involvement) or Gleason pattern 3+4=7 (\<3 cores (or ≤30 % of cores if more than ten cores), \<10 mm cancer in one core)
* Life expectancy \>10 years with no upper age limit\*
* Candidate for curative treatment if progression occurs
* Signed written informed consent.

* There is no upper age limit; however the estimated remaining lifetime for the patient should be more than ten years. The potential life expectancy of the participants should be estimated based on age, co-morbidity and risk factors for death, such as frailty and smoking.

Exclusion Criteria

* Not eligible for AS according to above criteria
* Not competent in spoken or written English
Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

King's College London

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Uppsala University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bedford Hospital

Bedford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Epsom & St. Helier

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Guy's Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Queen Elizabeth Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Royal Mardsen Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

228445

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Sulphate Accumulation in Prostate
NCT02821728 COMPLETED NA
Effects of TNF Blockade on Human BPH/LUTS
NCT06062875 RECRUITING PHASE2