Revision of Antifungal Strategies Definitions for Invasive Fungal Infections in Hematological Malignancies

NCT ID: NCT04024995

Last Updated: 2022-10-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

513 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-09-01

Study Completion Date

2021-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate invasive fungal infections (IFI) according to clinicians' opinion vs the opinion of an independent board of experts. The primary output of this study is the evaluation of inter-raters agreement. Secondary objectives are: evaluation of IFI incidence; description of clinical and laboratory features; frequencies of different antifungal treatments; description of outcome; impact on the treatment of underlying hematological malignancy. This is a multicenter, non-interventional observational, prospective study. The duration of the study will be 18 months. The study will recruit all consecutive eligible patients in each participating center, during a period of 6 months until at least 600 patients with acute myeloid leukemia are registered, that represented the highest risk category. Other disease types that fulfill the eligibility criteria in the participating centers during the same period will also be recruited in the study.

The clinical, microbiological, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures operated on these patients will be collected.

An eCRF will be compiled for all patients:

T0: at the start of antifungal treatment, information will be collected regarding hematological malignancy, status of the disease at onset of infection and phase of treatment, last chemotherapy regimen, comorbidities and risk factors; previous IFI, neutropenia, antifungal and antibiotic prophylaxis and the kind of IFI clinicians retain the patient suffer (possible/probable/proven) and the kind of antifungal treatment started (empiric/pre-emptive/target); diagnostic work-up done, positive microbiology and biomarkers, positive radiological findings; antifungal treatment.

T1: at 30-40 days (or before if the patient unfortunately died) a second form must be completed with information regarding any changes in/additional diagnostic work-up done, positive microbiology and biomarkers, positive radiological findings; any changes in antifungal treatment; outcome.

At that time, the local physician must state any revision of his diagnostic classification between the moment in which antifungal treatment was started and the moment of evaluation of the outcome in order to estimate the differences regarding the level of evidence of diagnosis and treatment of IFI during time.

Each case will be examined blinded by 2 different experts, who will review all records based on the existing guidelines, their own experience and the information that was known at the two time points, which may confirm or not the decision of local physician.

The sample size will be driven by the AML patients (approximately 60-70% of the patients). Sample will be described in its clinical and demographic features via descriptive statistics. Quantitative variables will be summarized with the following measures: minimum, maximum, range, mean and standard deviation. Qualitative variables will be represented by frequencies tables.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Primary objective The primary objective of this study is to evaluate IFI according to clinicians' opinion vs the opinion of an independent board of experts. The independent panel, confirming or not the decision of local physician, will review all cases (blind central review). The primary output of this study is the evaluation of inter-raters agreement.

Secondary objectives:

Evaluation of IFI incidence Description of clinical and laboratory features Frequencies of different antifungal treatments Description of outcome Impact on the treatment of underlying hematological malignancy

Study design This is a multicenter, non-interventional observational, prospective study.

The duration of the study will be 18 months. The schedule for the study will be the following:

Observation and data collection: 6 months Revision board: 6 months Data elaboration and paper: 6 months

Materials and methods The study will recruit all consecutive eligible patients in each participating center, during a period of 6 months until at least 600 AML patients are registered, that represented the highest risk category of patients for IFI. Other disease types that fulfill the eligibility criteria in the participating centers during the same period will also be recruited in the study.

We do not expect that diagnostic work-up would significantly vary among the participating centers. Minimal diagnostic work up must include:

Blood cultures for fungal infection; Chest High Resolution CT-scan; Serum galactomannan; Sinus CT-scan (if indicated); Bronchoalveolar lavage (if indicated);

Centers participating to the study will be selected on the basis of a questionnaire that evaluate their availability to participate to the survey (see Appendix 1).

The clinical, microbiological, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures operated on these patients will be collected.

An electronic CRF will be compiled for all patients at two different time points: T0 and T1.

T0: at the start of antifungal treatment (study entry), information will be collected regarding:

Hematological malignancy, status of the disease at onset of infection and phase of treatment, last chemotherapy regimen, comorbidities and risk factors (previous allogeneic stem cell transplantation); Previous IFI, neutropenia, antifungal and antibiotic prophylaxis: the local physicians must define the kind of IFI they retain the patient suffer (possible/probable/proven) and the kind of antifungal treatment started (empiric/pre-emptive/target); Diagnostic work-up done, positive microbiology and biomarkers, positive radiological findings; Antifungal treatment.

T1: at 30-40 days (or before if the patient unfortunately died) a second form must be completed with information regarding:

any changes in/additional diagnostic work-up done, positive microbiology and biomarkers, positive radiological findings; any changes in antifungal treatment; outcome. At that time, the local physician must state any revision of his diagnostic classification between the moment in which antifungal treatment was started and the moment of evaluation of the outcome (30 days) in order to estimate the differences regarding the level of evidence of diagnosis and treatment of IFI during time.

Independent central review board The experts (each case will be examined blinded by 2 different experts). The experts will review all records based on the existing guidelines, their own experience and based on the information that was known at the two time points, which may confirm or not the decision of local physician.

Statistical considerations Sample size dimension The sample size will be driven by the AML patients (approximately 60-70% of the patients): Statistical analysis Sample will be described in its clinical and demographic features via descriptive statistics. Quantitative variables will be summarized with the following measures: minimum, maximum, range, mean and standard deviation. Qualitative variables will be represented by frequencies tables (absolute and percentage) The primary object of the study will be achieved evaluating Fleiss' Kappa. Secondary objectives will be using descriptive statistics techniques (already described above) recruit all eligible patients during a period of 6 months until at least 600 AML patients are recruited.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Invasive Fungal Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients with hematologic malignancies at any stage of the disease (acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, multiple myeloma, myelodysplastic syndromes, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, high and low grade non Hodgkin lymphoma, chronic myeloprolipherative disorders, Hodgkin lymphoma);
* Only inpatients will be eligible;
* Patient that start IV antifungal treatment (irrespective of previous prophylaxis);
* Informed consent signed.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with previous or undergoing allogeneic or autologous transplant will be excluded from the study, due to different clinical profiles and risk factors;
* Patients treated, after prophylaxis with oral antifungals
* Patients treated in outpatient clinic or Day hospital
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sorveglianza Epidemiologica Infezioni Fungine Emopatie Maligne

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

LIVIO PAGANO

Associate professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Livio Pagano

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS-UCSC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S. Orsola Malpighi

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

ASST-Spedali Civili

Brescia, , Italy

Site Status

AOUC Carreggi

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

AOU Policlinico Federico II

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia

Perugia, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena IFO

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Ospedale Infantile Regina Margherita

Torino, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine

Udine, , Italy

Site Status

Osp. di Circolo-Fondazione Macchi

Varese, , Italy

Site Status

AOUI Verona

Verona, , Italy

Site Status

Ospedale Donna Bambino

Verona, , Italy

Site Status

Ospedale San Bortolo- AULSS 8 Berica

Vicenza, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

De Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, Stevens DA, Edwards JE, Calandra T, Pappas PG, Maertens J, Lortholary O, Kauffman CA, Denning DW, Patterson TF, Maschmeyer G, Bille J, Dismukes WE, Herbrecht R, Hope WW, Kibbler CC, Kullberg BJ, Marr KA, Munoz P, Odds FC, Perfect JR, Restrepo A, Ruhnke M, Segal BH, Sobel JD, Sorrell TC, Viscoli C, Wingard JR, Zaoutis T, Bennett JE; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jun 15;46(12):1813-21. doi: 10.1086/588660.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18462102 (View on PubMed)

Mercier T, Maertens J. Clinical considerations in the early treatment of invasive mould infections and disease. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Mar 1;72(suppl_1):i29-i38. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx031.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28355465 (View on PubMed)

Maccioni F, Vetere S, De Felice C, Al Ansari N, Micozzi A, Gentile G, Foa R, Girmenia C. Pulmonary fungal infections in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: is it the time to revise the radiological diagnostic criteria? Mycoses. 2016 Jun;59(6):357-64. doi: 10.1111/myc.12480. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26865204 (View on PubMed)

Cornely OA, Maertens J, Winston DJ, Perfect J, Ullmann AJ, Walsh TJ, Helfgott D, Holowiecki J, Stockelberg D, Goh YT, Petrini M, Hardalo C, Suresh R, Angulo-Gonzalez D. Posaconazole vs. fluconazole or itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 25;356(4):348-59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061094.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17251531 (View on PubMed)

Pagano L, Verga L, Busca A, Martino B, Mitra ME, Fanci R, Ballanti S, Picardi M, Castagnola C, Cattaneo C, Nadali G, Nosari A, Candoni A, Caira M, Salutari P, Lessi F, Aversa F, Tumbarello M. Systemic antifungal treatment after posaconazole prophylaxis: results from the SEIFEM 2010-C survey. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Nov;69(11):3142-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku227. Epub 2014 Jun 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24948702 (View on PubMed)

Facchinelli D, Marchesini G, Nadali G, Pagano L. Invasive Fungal Infections in Patients with Chronic Lymphoproliferative Disorders in the Era of Target Drugs. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 1;10(1):e2018063. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2018.063. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30416695 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REDEFI-SEIFEM

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.