Revision of Antifungal Strategies Definitions for Invasive Fungal Infections in Hematological Malignancies
NCT ID: NCT04024995
Last Updated: 2022-10-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
513 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-09-01
2021-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The clinical, microbiological, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures operated on these patients will be collected.
An eCRF will be compiled for all patients:
T0: at the start of antifungal treatment, information will be collected regarding hematological malignancy, status of the disease at onset of infection and phase of treatment, last chemotherapy regimen, comorbidities and risk factors; previous IFI, neutropenia, antifungal and antibiotic prophylaxis and the kind of IFI clinicians retain the patient suffer (possible/probable/proven) and the kind of antifungal treatment started (empiric/pre-emptive/target); diagnostic work-up done, positive microbiology and biomarkers, positive radiological findings; antifungal treatment.
T1: at 30-40 days (or before if the patient unfortunately died) a second form must be completed with information regarding any changes in/additional diagnostic work-up done, positive microbiology and biomarkers, positive radiological findings; any changes in antifungal treatment; outcome.
At that time, the local physician must state any revision of his diagnostic classification between the moment in which antifungal treatment was started and the moment of evaluation of the outcome in order to estimate the differences regarding the level of evidence of diagnosis and treatment of IFI during time.
Each case will be examined blinded by 2 different experts, who will review all records based on the existing guidelines, their own experience and the information that was known at the two time points, which may confirm or not the decision of local physician.
The sample size will be driven by the AML patients (approximately 60-70% of the patients). Sample will be described in its clinical and demographic features via descriptive statistics. Quantitative variables will be summarized with the following measures: minimum, maximum, range, mean and standard deviation. Qualitative variables will be represented by frequencies tables.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Seifem Surveillance of Antifungal Combination Therapy In Hematologic Italian Centers
NCT00906633
Fungemia in Hematologic Malignancies
NCT02451592
Pre-hospital Risk Factors for Invasive Fungal Infection
NCT01315925
Historical Control Study of Refractory IFI or Patients Intolerant to Standard Antifungal Therapy in Patients With Invasive Fungal Infections (Study P02387)
NCT00230243
Optimized Diagnostics for Improved Therapy Stratification in Invasive Fungal Infections
NCT02492594
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Secondary objectives:
Evaluation of IFI incidence Description of clinical and laboratory features Frequencies of different antifungal treatments Description of outcome Impact on the treatment of underlying hematological malignancy
Study design This is a multicenter, non-interventional observational, prospective study.
The duration of the study will be 18 months. The schedule for the study will be the following:
Observation and data collection: 6 months Revision board: 6 months Data elaboration and paper: 6 months
Materials and methods The study will recruit all consecutive eligible patients in each participating center, during a period of 6 months until at least 600 AML patients are registered, that represented the highest risk category of patients for IFI. Other disease types that fulfill the eligibility criteria in the participating centers during the same period will also be recruited in the study.
We do not expect that diagnostic work-up would significantly vary among the participating centers. Minimal diagnostic work up must include:
Blood cultures for fungal infection; Chest High Resolution CT-scan; Serum galactomannan; Sinus CT-scan (if indicated); Bronchoalveolar lavage (if indicated);
Centers participating to the study will be selected on the basis of a questionnaire that evaluate their availability to participate to the survey (see Appendix 1).
The clinical, microbiological, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures operated on these patients will be collected.
An electronic CRF will be compiled for all patients at two different time points: T0 and T1.
T0: at the start of antifungal treatment (study entry), information will be collected regarding:
Hematological malignancy, status of the disease at onset of infection and phase of treatment, last chemotherapy regimen, comorbidities and risk factors (previous allogeneic stem cell transplantation); Previous IFI, neutropenia, antifungal and antibiotic prophylaxis: the local physicians must define the kind of IFI they retain the patient suffer (possible/probable/proven) and the kind of antifungal treatment started (empiric/pre-emptive/target); Diagnostic work-up done, positive microbiology and biomarkers, positive radiological findings; Antifungal treatment.
T1: at 30-40 days (or before if the patient unfortunately died) a second form must be completed with information regarding:
any changes in/additional diagnostic work-up done, positive microbiology and biomarkers, positive radiological findings; any changes in antifungal treatment; outcome. At that time, the local physician must state any revision of his diagnostic classification between the moment in which antifungal treatment was started and the moment of evaluation of the outcome (30 days) in order to estimate the differences regarding the level of evidence of diagnosis and treatment of IFI during time.
Independent central review board The experts (each case will be examined blinded by 2 different experts). The experts will review all records based on the existing guidelines, their own experience and based on the information that was known at the two time points, which may confirm or not the decision of local physician.
Statistical considerations Sample size dimension The sample size will be driven by the AML patients (approximately 60-70% of the patients): Statistical analysis Sample will be described in its clinical and demographic features via descriptive statistics. Quantitative variables will be summarized with the following measures: minimum, maximum, range, mean and standard deviation. Qualitative variables will be represented by frequencies tables (absolute and percentage) The primary object of the study will be achieved evaluating Fleiss' Kappa. Secondary objectives will be using descriptive statistics techniques (already described above) recruit all eligible patients during a period of 6 months until at least 600 AML patients are recruited.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Only inpatients will be eligible;
* Patient that start IV antifungal treatment (irrespective of previous prophylaxis);
* Informed consent signed.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients treated, after prophylaxis with oral antifungals
* Patients treated in outpatient clinic or Day hospital
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sorveglianza Epidemiologica Infezioni Fungine Emopatie Maligne
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
LIVIO PAGANO
Associate professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Livio Pagano
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS-UCSC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S. Orsola Malpighi
Bologna, , Italy
ASST-Spedali Civili
Brescia, , Italy
AOUC Carreggi
Florence, , Italy
AOU Policlinico Federico II
Napoli, , Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia
Perugia, , Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini
Rome, , Italy
Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS
Rome, , Italy
Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena IFO
Rome, , Italy
Ospedale Infantile Regina Margherita
Torino, , Italy
Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine
Udine, , Italy
Osp. di Circolo-Fondazione Macchi
Varese, , Italy
AOUI Verona
Verona, , Italy
Ospedale Donna Bambino
Verona, , Italy
Ospedale San Bortolo- AULSS 8 Berica
Vicenza, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
De Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, Stevens DA, Edwards JE, Calandra T, Pappas PG, Maertens J, Lortholary O, Kauffman CA, Denning DW, Patterson TF, Maschmeyer G, Bille J, Dismukes WE, Herbrecht R, Hope WW, Kibbler CC, Kullberg BJ, Marr KA, Munoz P, Odds FC, Perfect JR, Restrepo A, Ruhnke M, Segal BH, Sobel JD, Sorrell TC, Viscoli C, Wingard JR, Zaoutis T, Bennett JE; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jun 15;46(12):1813-21. doi: 10.1086/588660.
Mercier T, Maertens J. Clinical considerations in the early treatment of invasive mould infections and disease. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Mar 1;72(suppl_1):i29-i38. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx031.
Maccioni F, Vetere S, De Felice C, Al Ansari N, Micozzi A, Gentile G, Foa R, Girmenia C. Pulmonary fungal infections in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: is it the time to revise the radiological diagnostic criteria? Mycoses. 2016 Jun;59(6):357-64. doi: 10.1111/myc.12480. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
Cornely OA, Maertens J, Winston DJ, Perfect J, Ullmann AJ, Walsh TJ, Helfgott D, Holowiecki J, Stockelberg D, Goh YT, Petrini M, Hardalo C, Suresh R, Angulo-Gonzalez D. Posaconazole vs. fluconazole or itraconazole prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 25;356(4):348-59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061094.
Pagano L, Verga L, Busca A, Martino B, Mitra ME, Fanci R, Ballanti S, Picardi M, Castagnola C, Cattaneo C, Nadali G, Nosari A, Candoni A, Caira M, Salutari P, Lessi F, Aversa F, Tumbarello M. Systemic antifungal treatment after posaconazole prophylaxis: results from the SEIFEM 2010-C survey. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Nov;69(11):3142-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku227. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
Facchinelli D, Marchesini G, Nadali G, Pagano L. Invasive Fungal Infections in Patients with Chronic Lymphoproliferative Disorders in the Era of Target Drugs. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 1;10(1):e2018063. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2018.063. eCollection 2018.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REDEFI-SEIFEM
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.