Trial Outcomes & Findings for Risk-Guided Cardioprotection With Carvedilol in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Doxorubicin and/or Trastuzumab (NCT NCT04023110)
NCT ID: NCT04023110
Last Updated: 2025-10-09
Results Overview
LVEF by echocardiogram. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is defined as the left ventricular stroke volume (left ventricular end diastolic volume minus the left ventricular end systolic volume) divided by the left ventricular end diastolic volume. This fraction is multiplied by 100 to yield the LVEF, and is defined as a % (the unit of measure) (J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015;28:1-39.). 2D left ventricular volumes are estimated according to the biplane method of disks (modified Simpson's rule), as recommended by societal guidelines. Higher values are generally considered more favorable.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
68 participants
up to 24 months
2025-10-09
Participant Flow
The cardiotoxicity risk score was calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression with race, systolic blood pressure, left ventricular ejection fraction, systemic cancer therapy, smoking status, diabetes and hypertension as selected predictors (PMID 4012740). A threshold of 4.5% risk of cardiac dysfunction at 1 year was set to prioritize sensitivity. 49 patients were classified as low risk and 19 as elevated risk. 13 elevated risk patients were randomized to carvedilol and 6 to usual care.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Elevated Risk / Carvedilol
Patients determined to be elevated risk and randomized to carvedilol (elevated risk/carvedilol arm) initiated carvedilol at a dose of 3.125 mg twice daily on the evening of the first cancer therapy cycle and continued for 12 months. Dose adjustments were based on tolerability and targeted parameters as determined by the study physician, and carvedilol was titrated to maximum tolerated dose by the participant or to a SBP of 110-120mmHg or heart rate (HR) of 50-55 beats per minute. Titration steps were predefined at doses of 6.25 mg, 12.5 mg, and up to 25 mg twice daily. Clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data were collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9 12 and 24 months.
|
Elevated Risk/Usual Care
Patients with elevated risk who were randomized to the Elevated Risk/Usual Care arm were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
Low Risk / Non-randomized
Patients who did not meet the threshold for elevated risk were not randomized, but were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
13
|
6
|
49
|
|
Overall Study
12 Month
|
10
|
6
|
47
|
|
Overall Study
24 Month
|
10
|
6
|
47
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
10
|
6
|
47
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
0
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Risk-Guided Cardioprotection With Carvedilol in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Doxorubicin and/or Trastuzumab
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Elevated Risk / Carvedilol
n=13 Participants
Patients determined to be elevated risk and randomized to carvedilol (elevated risk/carvedilol arm) initiated carvedilol at a dose of 3.125 mg twice daily on the evening of the first cancer therapy cycle and continued for 12 months. Dose adjustments were based on tolerability and targeted parameters as determined by the study physician, and carvedilol was titrated to maximum tolerated dose by the participant or to a SBP of 110-120mmHg or heart rate (HR) of 50-55 beats per minute. Titration steps were predefined at doses of 6.25 mg, 12.5 mg, and up to 25 mg twice daily. Clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data were collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9 12 and 24 months.
|
Elevated Risk/Usual Care
n=6 Participants
Patients with elevated risk who were randomized to the Elevated Risk/Usual Care arm were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
Low Risk / Non-randomized
n=49 Participants
Patients who did not meet the threshold for elevated risk were not randomized, but were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
Total
n=68 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
47 years
n=93 Participants
|
51 years
n=4 Participants
|
52 years
n=27 Participants
|
52 years
n=483 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
13 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
68 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
13 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
67 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
3 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
7 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP)
|
127 mmHg
n=93 Participants
|
121 mmHg
n=4 Participants
|
125 mmHg
n=27 Participants
|
125 mmHg
n=483 Participants
|
|
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
|
61.1 percent
n=93 Participants
|
59.6 percent
n=4 Participants
|
61.9 percent
n=27 Participants
|
61.2 percent
n=483 Participants
|
|
Systemic Cancer Therapy (Anthracyclines and Her2 targeted agents)
Doxorubicin
|
10 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Systemic Cancer Therapy (Anthracyclines and Her2 targeted agents)
Her2 Targeted
|
2 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Systemic Cancer Therapy (Anthracyclines and Her2 targeted agents)
Doxorubicin + Her2 Targeted
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Smoking Status
|
6 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Diabetes
|
2 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
|
Hypertension (HTN)
|
2 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 24 monthsPopulation: Exploratory cardiac efficacy by cardiac function (LVEF) was analyzed, evaluating the three groups according to the treatment the participants actually received ("as treated"). After randomization, three participants refused carvedilol but agreed to remain on study for follow-up, and one participant assigned to usual care started carvedilol for clinical indications at the baseline visit. As a result, there were 11 participants treated with carvedilol and 8 treated as per usual care.
LVEF by echocardiogram. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is defined as the left ventricular stroke volume (left ventricular end diastolic volume minus the left ventricular end systolic volume) divided by the left ventricular end diastolic volume. This fraction is multiplied by 100 to yield the LVEF, and is defined as a % (the unit of measure) (J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015;28:1-39.). 2D left ventricular volumes are estimated according to the biplane method of disks (modified Simpson's rule), as recommended by societal guidelines. Higher values are generally considered more favorable.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Elevated Risk / Carvedilol
n=11 Participants
Carvedilol will be initiated at 3.125mg twice daily and uptitrated as tolerated in a stepwise fashion to a maximum dose of 25mg twice daily or to a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 110-120mmHg or heart rate (HR) of 50-55 beats per minute (bpm). Patients will start carvedilol in the evening after first dose of chemotherapy and will continue on medication for 12 months.
Clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data will be collected on all patients at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
Elevated Risk/Usual Care
n=8 Participants
Patients with elevated risk who were randomized to the Elevated Risk/Usual Care arm were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
Low Risk / Non-randomized
n=49 Participants
Patients who did not meet the threshold for elevated risk were not randomized, but were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Baseline
|
61.1 percent
Interval 59.7 to 64.9
|
59.0 percent
Interval 57.2 to 60.4
|
61.9 percent
Interval 60.0 to 65.0
|
|
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
12 Month
|
58.4 percent
Interval 57.4 to 59.3
|
60.4 percent
Interval 59.1 to 61.9
|
59.7 percent
Interval 56.9 to 62.3
|
|
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
24 Month
|
61.7 percent
Interval 57.3 to 62.3
|
61.7 percent
Interval 59.4 to 62.5
|
60.3 percent
Interval 58.0 to 62.6
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: Adherence to the carvedilol intervention was calculated only among the elevated-risk carvedilol group.
Rate of compliance with prescribed dose of carvedilol assessed based on pill count. Patients in the elevated-risk carvedilol group were asked to bring their study medications to all study visits and remaining pills were counted by the study coordinator to determine how many pills had been taken. Treatment adherence was calculated as the ratio of number of pills taken to expected number of pills taken, and is reported as a percentage. An adherence rate closer to 100 is better. Treatment adherence is reported only for those patients who were assigned to the elevated risk/carvedilol group, and therefore expected to take study medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Elevated Risk / Carvedilol
n=13 Participants
Carvedilol will be initiated at 3.125mg twice daily and uptitrated as tolerated in a stepwise fashion to a maximum dose of 25mg twice daily or to a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 110-120mmHg or heart rate (HR) of 50-55 beats per minute (bpm). Patients will start carvedilol in the evening after first dose of chemotherapy and will continue on medication for 12 months.
Clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data will be collected on all patients at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
Elevated Risk/Usual Care
Patients with elevated risk who were randomized to the Elevated Risk/Usual Care arm were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
Low Risk / Non-randomized
Patients who did not meet the threshold for elevated risk were not randomized, but were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Adherence as Measured by Pill Count
|
93 percent of prescribed doses
Interval 0.0 to 99.4
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 12 monthsPopulation: Safety was analyzed, evaluating the three groups according to the treatment the participants actually received ("as treated"). After randomization, three participants refused carvedilol but agreed to remain on study for follow-up, and one participant assigned to usual care started carvedilol for clinical indications at the baseline visit. As a result, there were 11 participants treated with carvedilol and 8 treated as per usual care.
Targeted Adverse Events were prospectively assessed according to the CTCAE v5.0. The number of patients experiencing any adverse event (Grade 2-5) was tabulated by risk group and by treatment arm during carvedilol intervention (baseline - 12 months). In the CTCAE, grade refers to the severity of the event. Grade 2 events are moderate, or have non-urgent/non-invasive intervention indicated, or limit age-appropriate instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADL). Grade 3 events are severe/medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, or have hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated, or limit self-care ADLs. Grade 4 events have life-threatening consequences or have urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 indicates a death related to the adverse event.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Elevated Risk / Carvedilol
n=11 Participants
Carvedilol will be initiated at 3.125mg twice daily and uptitrated as tolerated in a stepwise fashion to a maximum dose of 25mg twice daily or to a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 110-120mmHg or heart rate (HR) of 50-55 beats per minute (bpm). Patients will start carvedilol in the evening after first dose of chemotherapy and will continue on medication for 12 months.
Clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data will be collected on all patients at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
Elevated Risk/Usual Care
n=8 Participants
Patients with elevated risk who were randomized to the Elevated Risk/Usual Care arm were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
Low Risk / Non-randomized
n=49 Participants
Patients who did not meet the threshold for elevated risk were not randomized, but were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Adverse Events
Grade 4 and Higher
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Adverse Events
Grade 5
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Adverse Events
Grade 2 and Higher
|
11 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
47 Participants
|
|
Adverse Events
Grade 3 and Higher
|
6 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 24 monthsPopulation: Exploratory cardiac efficacy by diastolic function was analyzed, evaluating the three groups according to the treatment the participants actually received ("as treated"). After randomization, three participants refused carvedilol but agreed to remain on study for follow-up, and one participant assigned to usual care started carvedilol for clinical indications at the baseline visit. As a result, there were 11 participants treated with carvedilol and 8 treated as per usual care.
E/e' is a measure of diastolic function derived from the ratio of the pulse wave Doppler interrogations of the mitral inflow at the mitral valve leaflet tips and at the lateral and septal mitral annulus via tissue Doppler imaging. This measure provided insight into myocardial relaxation, preload, and left ventricular filling pressures, with values \> 14 indicative of elevated filling pressure. This is core-lab quantified, blinded to patient and treatment characteristics.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Elevated Risk / Carvedilol
n=11 Participants
Carvedilol will be initiated at 3.125mg twice daily and uptitrated as tolerated in a stepwise fashion to a maximum dose of 25mg twice daily or to a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 110-120mmHg or heart rate (HR) of 50-55 beats per minute (bpm). Patients will start carvedilol in the evening after first dose of chemotherapy and will continue on medication for 12 months.
Clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data will be collected on all patients at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
Elevated Risk/Usual Care
n=8 Participants
Patients with elevated risk who were randomized to the Elevated Risk/Usual Care arm were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
Low Risk / Non-randomized
n=49 Participants
Patients who did not meet the threshold for elevated risk were not randomized, but were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Diastolic Function (E/e') by Echocardiogram
Baseline
|
7.86 ratio
Interval 6.89 to 8.6
|
6.85 ratio
Interval 6.07 to 7.78
|
7.64 ratio
Interval 6.54 to 8.7
|
|
Diastolic Function (E/e') by Echocardiogram
12 Month
|
8.22 ratio
Interval 7.65 to 9.18
|
8.24 ratio
Interval 6.79 to 8.82
|
7.06 ratio
Interval 6.46 to 8.45
|
|
Diastolic Function (E/e') by Echocardiogram
24 Month
|
8.25 ratio
Interval 7.05 to 8.67
|
7.90 ratio
Interval 7.2 to 8.68
|
7.04 ratio
Interval 6.43 to 7.99
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 24 monthsPopulation: Exploratory cardiac efficacy by ventricular arterial coupling was analyzed, evaluating the three groups according to the treatment the participants actually received ("as treated"). After randomization, three participants refused carvedilol but agreed to remain on study for follow-up, and one participant assigned to usual care started carvedilol for clinical indications at the baseline visit. As a result, there were 11 participants treated with carvedilol and 8 treated as per usual care.
Ventricular-arterial (VA) coupling, the ratio between effective arterial elastance (Ea), indicative of load, and end-systolic elastance (Ees), indicative of LV contractility, was also quantified. Ea/Ees is a measure of cardiac efficiency, with normal values of 0.8-1.0, and lower numbers typically indicative of greater efficiency and higher values reflective of worse function. This is core-lab quantified, blinded to patient and treatment characteristics.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Elevated Risk / Carvedilol
n=11 Participants
Carvedilol will be initiated at 3.125mg twice daily and uptitrated as tolerated in a stepwise fashion to a maximum dose of 25mg twice daily or to a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 110-120mmHg or heart rate (HR) of 50-55 beats per minute (bpm). Patients will start carvedilol in the evening after first dose of chemotherapy and will continue on medication for 12 months.
Clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data will be collected on all patients at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
Elevated Risk/Usual Care
n=8 Participants
Patients with elevated risk who were randomized to the Elevated Risk/Usual Care arm were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
Low Risk / Non-randomized
n=49 Participants
Patients who did not meet the threshold for elevated risk were not randomized, but were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Ventricular-arterial Coupling Measured by Echocardiogram
12 Month
|
0.83 ratio
Interval 0.64 to 0.94
|
0.88 ratio
Interval 0.84 to 0.89
|
0.82 ratio
Interval 0.71 to 0.93
|
|
Ventricular-arterial Coupling Measured by Echocardiogram
Baseline
|
0.76 ratio
Interval 0.62 to 0.83
|
0.84 ratio
Interval 0.68 to 0.95
|
0.71 ratio
Interval 0.58 to 0.92
|
|
Ventricular-arterial Coupling Measured by Echocardiogram
24 Month
|
0.83 ratio
Interval 0.78 to 0.94
|
0.78 ratio
Interval 0.74 to 0.89
|
0.82 ratio
Interval 0.71 to 0.96
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 24 monthsPopulation: Exploratory cardiac efficacy by longitudinal strain was analyzed, evaluating the three groups according to the treatment the participants actually received ("as treated"). After randomization, three participants refused carvedilol but agreed to remain on study for follow-up, and one participant assigned to usual care started carvedilol for clinical indications at the baseline visit. As a result, there were 11 participants treated with carvedilol and 8 treated as per usual care.
Global longitudinal strain (GLS, %) averaged from 3 apical views (left ventricular apical 4-chamber, 2-chamber, and 3-chamber) was obtained using speckle-tracking technology using Tomtec Imaging Systems. GLS is a more sensitive measure of cardiac function, with values greater than -16% (e.g., -15%) for GLS associated with worse outcomes. Circumferential strain (GCS, %) from the short axis view (mid left ventricle) was obtained using speckle-tracking technology using Tomtec Imaging Systems. Circumferential strain is a more sensitive measure of cardiac function, with values or greater than -20% (e.g., -19%) associated with worse outcomes. GLS and GCS are core-lab quantified, blinded to patient and treatment characteristics.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Elevated Risk / Carvedilol
n=11 Participants
Carvedilol will be initiated at 3.125mg twice daily and uptitrated as tolerated in a stepwise fashion to a maximum dose of 25mg twice daily or to a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 110-120mmHg or heart rate (HR) of 50-55 beats per minute (bpm). Patients will start carvedilol in the evening after first dose of chemotherapy and will continue on medication for 12 months.
Clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data will be collected on all patients at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
Elevated Risk/Usual Care
n=8 Participants
Patients with elevated risk who were randomized to the Elevated Risk/Usual Care arm were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
Low Risk / Non-randomized
n=49 Participants
Patients who did not meet the threshold for elevated risk were not randomized, but were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac Strain Measurements by Echocardiogram
Baseline GLS
|
-20.7 percent
Interval -21.8 to -20.2
|
-20.5 percent
Interval -23.0 to -20.1
|
-21.8 percent
Interval -22.9 to -20.6
|
|
Cardiac Strain Measurements by Echocardiogram
12 Month GLS
|
-21.1 percent
Interval -22.6 to -20.0
|
-20.0 percent
Interval -21.6 to -19.4
|
-21.3 percent
Interval -23.2 to -19.8
|
|
Cardiac Strain Measurements by Echocardiogram
24 Month GLS
|
-22.0 percent
Interval -22.9 to -20.3
|
-22.1 percent
Interval -25.3 to -20.2
|
-21.3 percent
Interval -22.6 to -20.0
|
|
Cardiac Strain Measurements by Echocardiogram
Baseline GCS
|
-29.0 percent
Interval -34.4 to -24.3
|
-24.4 percent
Interval -27.5 to -22.7
|
-27.9 percent
Interval -30.6 to -23.4
|
|
Cardiac Strain Measurements by Echocardiogram
12 Month GCS
|
-24.3 percent
Interval -25.3 to -22.9
|
-26.2 percent
Interval -30.1 to -23.6
|
-25.2 percent
Interval -28.2 to -21.9
|
|
Cardiac Strain Measurements by Echocardiogram
24 Month GCS
|
-25.0 percent
Interval -27.9 to -22.5
|
-24.7 percent
Interval -29.7 to -22.3
|
-27.2 percent
Interval -31.1 to -23.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 24 monthsPopulation: Exploratory cardiac efficacy was analyzed, evaluating the three groups according to the treatment the participants actually received ("as treated"). After randomization, three participants refused carvedilol but agreed to remain on study for follow-up, and one participant assigned to usual care started carvedilol for clinical indications at the baseline visit. As a result, there were 11 participants treated with carvedilol and 8 treated as per usual care.
Frequency of individuals with cardiac dysfunction, as defined by reduction in LVEF of \>/= 10% to \< 50%.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Elevated Risk / Carvedilol
n=11 Participants
Carvedilol will be initiated at 3.125mg twice daily and uptitrated as tolerated in a stepwise fashion to a maximum dose of 25mg twice daily or to a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 110-120mmHg or heart rate (HR) of 50-55 beats per minute (bpm). Patients will start carvedilol in the evening after first dose of chemotherapy and will continue on medication for 12 months.
Clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data will be collected on all patients at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
Elevated Risk/Usual Care
n=8 Participants
Patients with elevated risk who were randomized to the Elevated Risk/Usual Care arm were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
Low Risk / Non-randomized
n=49 Participants
Patients who did not meet the threshold for elevated risk were not randomized, but were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Frequency of Individuals With Cardiac Dysfunction
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 24 monthsPopulation: Exploratory cardiac efficacy was analyzed, evaluating the three groups according to the treatment the participants actually received ("as treated"). After randomization, three participants refused carvedilol but agreed to remain on study for follow-up, and one participant assigned to usual care started carvedilol for clinical indications at the baseline visit. As a result, there were 11 participants treated with carvedilol and 8 treated as per usual care.
Change in the cardiac biomarker of injury hsTnT over time, defined as a continuous variable. hsTnT is a biomarker that is indicative of cardiac injury, with higher values associated with more severe injury. This is core-lab quantified, blinded to patient and treatment characteristics.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Elevated Risk / Carvedilol
n=11 Participants
Carvedilol will be initiated at 3.125mg twice daily and uptitrated as tolerated in a stepwise fashion to a maximum dose of 25mg twice daily or to a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 110-120mmHg or heart rate (HR) of 50-55 beats per minute (bpm). Patients will start carvedilol in the evening after first dose of chemotherapy and will continue on medication for 12 months.
Clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data will be collected on all patients at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
Elevated Risk/Usual Care
n=8 Participants
Patients with elevated risk who were randomized to the Elevated Risk/Usual Care arm were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
Low Risk / Non-randomized
n=49 Participants
Patients who did not meet the threshold for elevated risk were not randomized, but were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
High-sensitivity Troponin (hsTnT) Level
Baseline
|
6.1 ng/L
Interval 4.7 to 7.3
|
8.0 ng/L
Interval 6.4 to 8.4
|
5.7 ng/L
Interval 4.1 to 8.0
|
|
High-sensitivity Troponin (hsTnT) Level
12 Month
|
7.4 ng/L
Interval 6.4 to 8.0
|
6.2 ng/L
Interval 4.2 to 8.7
|
7.2 ng/L
Interval 5.6 to 9.4
|
|
High-sensitivity Troponin (hsTnT) Level
24 Month
|
7.0 ng/L
Interval 5.6 to 8.0
|
6.0 ng/L
Interval 4.7 to 7.3
|
6.4 ng/L
Interval 5.3 to 8.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 24 monthsPopulation: Exploratory cardiac efficacy was analyzed, evaluating the three groups according to the treatment the participants actually received ("as treated"). After randomization, three participants refused carvedilol but agreed to remain on study for follow-up, and one participant assigned to usual care started carvedilol for clinical indications at the baseline visit. As a result, there were 11 participants treated with carvedilol and 8 treated as per usual care.
Change in the cardiac biomarker, NT-proBNP over time, defined as a continuous variable. NTproBNP is a biomarker that is indicative of neurohormonal stress, with higher levels associated with more neurohormonal stress. This is core-lab quantified, blinded to patient and treatment characteristics.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Elevated Risk / Carvedilol
n=11 Participants
Carvedilol will be initiated at 3.125mg twice daily and uptitrated as tolerated in a stepwise fashion to a maximum dose of 25mg twice daily or to a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 110-120mmHg or heart rate (HR) of 50-55 beats per minute (bpm). Patients will start carvedilol in the evening after first dose of chemotherapy and will continue on medication for 12 months.
Clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data will be collected on all patients at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
Elevated Risk/Usual Care
n=8 Participants
Patients with elevated risk who were randomized to the Elevated Risk/Usual Care arm were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
Low Risk / Non-randomized
n=49 Participants
Patients who did not meet the threshold for elevated risk were not randomized, but were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuetic Peptide (NTproBNP) Level
Baseline
|
88.4 ng/L
Interval 57.1 to 100.1
|
54.8 ng/L
Interval 43.2 to 74.3
|
98.4 ng/L
Interval 35.5 to 161.6
|
|
N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuetic Peptide (NTproBNP) Level
12 Month
|
126.8 ng/L
Interval 23.2 to 143.9
|
32.6 ng/L
Interval 19.6 to 82.7
|
52.0 ng/L
Interval 25.3 to 108.9
|
|
N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuetic Peptide (NTproBNP) Level
24 Month
|
81.7 ng/L
Interval 54.9 to 110.5
|
53.9 ng/L
Interval 33.6 to 91.6
|
46.6 ng/L
Interval 30.1 to 113.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 24 MonthsPopulation: Exploratory cardiac efficacy was analyzed, evaluating the three groups according to the treatment the participants actually received ("as treated"). After randomization, three participants refused carvedilol but agreed to remain on study for follow-up, and one participant assigned to usual care started carvedilol for clinical indications at the baseline visit. As a result, there were 11 participants treated with carvedilol and 8 treated as per usual care.
LV mass by echocardiogram. Measurements of left ventricular mass (g) provided insight into cardiac structure, size, and remodeling. LV mass was calculated by the area-length method, as recommended by societal guidelines. This is core-lab quantified, blinded to patient and treatment characteristics.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Elevated Risk / Carvedilol
n=11 Participants
Carvedilol will be initiated at 3.125mg twice daily and uptitrated as tolerated in a stepwise fashion to a maximum dose of 25mg twice daily or to a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 110-120mmHg or heart rate (HR) of 50-55 beats per minute (bpm). Patients will start carvedilol in the evening after first dose of chemotherapy and will continue on medication for 12 months.
Clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data will be collected on all patients at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
Elevated Risk/Usual Care
n=8 Participants
Patients with elevated risk who were randomized to the Elevated Risk/Usual Care arm were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
Low Risk / Non-randomized
n=49 Participants
Patients who did not meet the threshold for elevated risk were not randomized, but were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Left Ventricular Mass
Baseline
|
110.6 g
Interval 87.0 to 124.9
|
95.3 g
Interval 87.2 to 103.6
|
98 g
Interval 84.5 to 120.0
|
|
Left Ventricular Mass
12 Month
|
92.2 g
Interval 75.4 to 103.6
|
98.4 g
Interval 90.2 to 138.0
|
94.5 g
Interval 84.2 to 112.2
|
|
Left Ventricular Mass
24 Month
|
80.2 g
Interval 65.6 to 91.9
|
96.9 g
Interval 85.8 to 120.8
|
97.8 g
Interval 90.0 to 108.5
|
Adverse Events
Elevated Risk / Carvedilol
Elevated Risk/Usual Care
Low Risk / Non-randomized
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Elevated Risk / Carvedilol
n=11 participants at risk
Patients determined to be elevated risk and randomized to carvedilol (elevated risk/carvedilol arm) initiated carvedilol at a dose of 3.125 mg twice daily on the evening of the first cancer therapy cycle and continued for 12 months. Dose adjustments were based on tolerability and targeted parameters as determined by the study physician, and carvedilol was titrated to maximum tolerated dose by the participant or to a SBP of 110-120mmHg or heart rate (HR) of 50-55 beats per minute. Titration steps were predefined at doses of 6.25 mg, 12.5 mg, and up to 25 mg twice daily. Clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data were collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9 12 and 24 months.
|
Elevated Risk/Usual Care
n=8 participants at risk
Patients with elevated risk who were randomized to the Elevated Risk/Usual Care arm were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
Low Risk / Non-randomized
n=49 participants at risk
Patients who did not meet the threshold for elevated risk were not randomized, but were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Disease Progression
|
9.1%
1/11 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
0.00%
0/8 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
0.00%
0/49 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac Arrest
|
0.00%
0/11 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
0.00%
0/8 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
2.0%
1/49 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Elevated Risk / Carvedilol
n=11 participants at risk
Patients determined to be elevated risk and randomized to carvedilol (elevated risk/carvedilol arm) initiated carvedilol at a dose of 3.125 mg twice daily on the evening of the first cancer therapy cycle and continued for 12 months. Dose adjustments were based on tolerability and targeted parameters as determined by the study physician, and carvedilol was titrated to maximum tolerated dose by the participant or to a SBP of 110-120mmHg or heart rate (HR) of 50-55 beats per minute. Titration steps were predefined at doses of 6.25 mg, 12.5 mg, and up to 25 mg twice daily. Clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data were collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9 12 and 24 months.
|
Elevated Risk/Usual Care
n=8 participants at risk
Patients with elevated risk who were randomized to the Elevated Risk/Usual Care arm were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
Low Risk / Non-randomized
n=49 participants at risk
Patients who did not meet the threshold for elevated risk were not randomized, but were followed with clinical, echocardiographic, and biomarker data collected at baseline and standardized time intervals during and after therapy at approximately 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
81.8%
9/11 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
37.5%
3/8 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
61.2%
30/49 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
36.4%
4/11 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
50.0%
4/8 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
46.9%
23/49 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
|
Investigations
Ejection Fraction Decreased
|
0.00%
0/11 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
0.00%
0/8 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
16.3%
8/49 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
|
Investigations
Electrocardiogram T Wave Abnormal
|
0.00%
0/11 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
0.00%
0/8 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
16.3%
8/49 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thromboembolic Event
|
0.00%
0/11 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
12.5%
1/8 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
12.2%
6/49 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/11 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
0.00%
0/8 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
8.2%
4/49 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/11 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
0.00%
0/8 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
6.1%
3/49 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial Infarction
|
0.00%
0/11 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
0.00%
0/8 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
6.1%
3/49 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Pre-Syncope
|
9.1%
1/11 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
12.5%
1/8 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
2.0%
1/49 • 24 months
Adverse Events were assessed and graded according to the CTCAE v5.0. At each visit, patients were assessed for grade 2 and higher targeted adverse events (bradycardia, fatigue, and hypotension) as well as cardiovascular events and events ending in death using chart review and patient interview. All SAEs and AEs collected as part of the study and consistent with reporting requirements are reported.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place