Trial Outcomes & Findings for Blu Light for Ulcers Reduction (NCT NCT04018924)
NCT ID: NCT04018924
Last Updated: 2021-05-19
Results Overview
The primary outcome of the study is the outcomes comparison as remaining wound area surface percentage difference of the lesion treated with EmoLED versus the lesion treated with SOC, both as difference on same patient and within the group of all recruited patients. The primary outcome is measured as the average of the ratio between final areas and initial areas; the ratio of 10 week wound surface area to initial wound surface area was multiplied by 100 to determine the percentage.
COMPLETED
NA
90 participants
10 weeks
2021-05-19
Participant Flow
The total number of participants is 90 and the patient is control of himself.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
All Participants
The patient is control of themselves so all participants received both interventions; for each patient are treated and evaluated two different wounds (or two different parts of wound).
Control wound:
After standard cleansing or debridement of all wounds, the wound is covered with hydro fibre medication and dressing or compressive dressing when needed on the whole wound (SOC). The medication and dressing are repeated once a week.
EmoLED treated wound:
After standard cleansing or debridement of all wounds, on wound or portion of wound selected for treatment is treated with EmoLED device. Then covered with hydro fibre medication and dressing or compressive dressing when needed on the whole wound (SOC). Treatment is repeated once a week.
Illumination with blue light (400-430nm) for 60 seconds with a power density of 120mW/sqcm (EmoLED device).
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
90
|
|
Overall Study
Standard Of Care Intervention
|
90
|
|
Overall Study
EmoLED Intervention
|
90
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
84
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
6
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
All Participants
n=90 Participants
The patient is control of themselves so all participants received both interventions; for each patient are treated and evaluated two different wounds (or two different parts of wound).
Control wound:
After standard cleansing or debridement of all wounds, the wound is covered with hydro fibre medication and dressing or compressive dressing when needed on the whole wound (SOC). The medication and dressing are repeated once a week.
EmoLED treated wound:
After standard cleansing or debridement of all wounds, on wound or portion of wound selected for treatment is treated with EmoLED device. Then covered with hydro fibre medication and dressing or compressive dressing when needed on the whole wound (SOC). Treatment is repeated once a week.
Illumination with blue light (400-430nm) for 60 seconds with a power density of 120mW/sqcm (EmoLED device).
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
Age groups · < 49 years
|
7 Participants
n=90 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Age groups · 50 < years < 59
|
12 Participants
n=90 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Age groups · 60 < years < 69
|
16 Participants
n=90 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Age groups · 70 < years < 79
|
28 Participants
n=90 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Age groups · 80 < years <89
|
26 Participants
n=90 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
Age groups · > 90 years
|
1 Participants
n=90 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
49 Participants
n=90 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
41 Participants
n=90 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Italy
|
90 participants
n=90 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 10 weeksPopulation: Non-compliant and dropout patients were excluded. Only patients whose images could be analyzed were considered in the analysis.
The primary outcome of the study is the outcomes comparison as remaining wound area surface percentage difference of the lesion treated with EmoLED versus the lesion treated with SOC, both as difference on same patient and within the group of all recruited patients. The primary outcome is measured as the average of the ratio between final areas and initial areas; the ratio of 10 week wound surface area to initial wound surface area was multiplied by 100 to determine the percentage.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=67 Participants
The patient is control of themselves so all participants received both interventions; for each patient are treated and evaluated two different wounds (or two different parts of wound).
Control wound:
After standard cleansing or debridement of all wounds, the wound is covered with hydro fibre medication and dressing or compressive dressing when needed on the whole wound (SOC). The medication and dressing are repeated once a week.
EmoLED treated wound:
After standard cleansing or debridement of all wounds, on wound or portion of wound selected for treatment is treated with EmoLED device. Then covered with hydro fibre medication and dressing or compressive dressing when needed on the whole wound (SOC). Treatment is repeated once a week.
Illumination with blue light (400-430nm) for 60 seconds with a power density of 120mW/sqcm (EmoLED device).
|
|---|---|
|
Size of Wound Remaining Compared to Initial Wound Size
EmoLED treated wound
|
42.58 percentage of the remaining area
Standard Deviation 39.7
|
|
Size of Wound Remaining Compared to Initial Wound Size
Control wound
|
53.78 percentage of the remaining area
Standard Deviation 84.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 10 weeks treatment or in case of adverse event until the patient status return to normalPopulation: All Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events were systemic and cannot be attributed to one or the other intervention, due to the fact that all patients are also control of themselves.
Presence of any Adverse event during treatment period and after
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=90 Participants
The patient is control of themselves so all participants received both interventions; for each patient are treated and evaluated two different wounds (or two different parts of wound).
Control wound:
After standard cleansing or debridement of all wounds, the wound is covered with hydro fibre medication and dressing or compressive dressing when needed on the whole wound (SOC). The medication and dressing are repeated once a week.
EmoLED treated wound:
After standard cleansing or debridement of all wounds, on wound or portion of wound selected for treatment is treated with EmoLED device. Then covered with hydro fibre medication and dressing or compressive dressing when needed on the whole wound (SOC). Treatment is repeated once a week.
Illumination with blue light (400-430nm) for 60 seconds with a power density of 120mW/sqcm (EmoLED device).
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
|
6 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 10 weeksPopulation: Non-compliant and dropout patients were excluded. Only patients whose images could be analyzed were considered in the analysis.
Outcomes comparison as percentage reduction of the lesion treated with EmoLED versus the lesion treated with SOC within ten weeks of the study. The measure of the outcome was calculated by the average of the medians of the weekly percentage reduction of the area, compared to the previous visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=67 Participants
The patient is control of themselves so all participants received both interventions; for each patient are treated and evaluated two different wounds (or two different parts of wound).
Control wound:
After standard cleansing or debridement of all wounds, the wound is covered with hydro fibre medication and dressing or compressive dressing when needed on the whole wound (SOC). The medication and dressing are repeated once a week.
EmoLED treated wound:
After standard cleansing or debridement of all wounds, on wound or portion of wound selected for treatment is treated with EmoLED device. Then covered with hydro fibre medication and dressing or compressive dressing when needed on the whole wound (SOC). Treatment is repeated once a week.
Illumination with blue light (400-430nm) for 60 seconds with a power density of 120mW/sqcm (EmoLED device).
|
|---|---|
|
Weekly Comparison of Healing Percentage
EmoLED treated wound
|
7.02 percentage of area reduction
Standard Deviation 4.19
|
|
Weekly Comparison of Healing Percentage
Control wound
|
3.06 percentage of area reduction
Standard Deviation 3.72
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 10 weeksPopulation: Non-compliant and dropout patients were excluded. Only patients whose images could be analyzed were considered in the analysis.
Time difference measured in weeks to reach the healing. The analysis was conducted deriving the Kaplan-Meyer curves from the analysis of the healing time. The K-M curves describe the probability of healing at each control time.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=67 Participants
The patient is control of themselves so all participants received both interventions; for each patient are treated and evaluated two different wounds (or two different parts of wound).
Control wound:
After standard cleansing or debridement of all wounds, the wound is covered with hydro fibre medication and dressing or compressive dressing when needed on the whole wound (SOC). The medication and dressing are repeated once a week.
EmoLED treated wound:
After standard cleansing or debridement of all wounds, on wound or portion of wound selected for treatment is treated with EmoLED device. Then covered with hydro fibre medication and dressing or compressive dressing when needed on the whole wound (SOC). Treatment is repeated once a week.
Illumination with blue light (400-430nm) for 60 seconds with a power density of 120mW/sqcm (EmoLED device).
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Recovered Wounds at 10 Weeks
EmoLED treated wound
|
24 percentage of probability of recovery
|
|
Percentage of Recovered Wounds at 10 Weeks
Control wound
|
18 percentage of probability of recovery
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 1 and Week 10Population: The analysis was carried out considering the subjects who have 11 assessments, until yhe 10th week. The pain cannot be attributable to one or the other intervention because the patient is control of themselves, so pain cannot be perceived separately by the individual.
pre-treatment evaluation with Visual Analogic Scale (0-10 scale with 0 as no pain and 10 as extreme pain) and comparison with the same scale measured at each treatment. The result is measured by writing the averages of Week 1 and of Week 10.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
All Participants
n=45 Participants
The patient is control of themselves so all participants received both interventions; for each patient are treated and evaluated two different wounds (or two different parts of wound).
Control wound:
After standard cleansing or debridement of all wounds, the wound is covered with hydro fibre medication and dressing or compressive dressing when needed on the whole wound (SOC). The medication and dressing are repeated once a week.
EmoLED treated wound:
After standard cleansing or debridement of all wounds, on wound or portion of wound selected for treatment is treated with EmoLED device. Then covered with hydro fibre medication and dressing or compressive dressing when needed on the whole wound (SOC). Treatment is repeated once a week.
Illumination with blue light (400-430nm) for 60 seconds with a power density of 120mW/sqcm (EmoLED device).
|
|---|---|
|
Pain Change
Visit 10
|
4.6 units on a scale
|
|
Pain Change
Visit 0
|
7.2 units on a scale
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 20 weeksPopulation: It was at the discretion of the patient's willingness to continue the observation time after the 10 weeks of treatment. None of the patients that presented an unhealed area over the 10-week period decided to continue.
At the discretion of the patient's willingness to continue to visit the study site; observation of the unhealed area(s) over the 10-week period is extended until healing or up to 20 weeks.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
All Participants
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
All Participants
n=90 participants at risk
The patient is control of themselves so all participants received both interventions; for each patient are treated and evaluated two different wounds (or two different parts of wound).
Control wound:
After standard cleansing or debridement of all wounds, the wound is covered with hydro fibre medication and dressing or compressive dressing when needed on the whole wound (SOC). The medication and dressing are repeated once a week.
EmoLED treated wound:
After standard cleansing or debridement of all wounds, on wound or portion of wound selected for treatment is treated with EmoLED device. Then covered with hydro fibre medication and dressing or compressive dressing when needed on the whole wound (SOC). Treatment is repeated once a week.
Illumination with blue light (400-430nm) for 60 seconds with a power density of 120mW/sqcm (EmoLED device).
|
|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
POA with critical stenosis
|
1.1%
1/90 • 15 months
Adverse Events reported in this study cannot be attributed to one or the other intervention, due to the fact that they are systemic and all patients are also control of themselves.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction and heart failure
|
1.1%
1/90 • 15 months
Adverse Events reported in this study cannot be attributed to one or the other intervention, due to the fact that they are systemic and all patients are also control of themselves.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
1.1%
1/90 • 15 months
Adverse Events reported in this study cannot be attributed to one or the other intervention, due to the fact that they are systemic and all patients are also control of themselves.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperthermia/ Erysipelas
|
1.1%
1/90 • 15 months
Adverse Events reported in this study cannot be attributed to one or the other intervention, due to the fact that they are systemic and all patients are also control of themselves.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia
|
1.1%
1/90 • 15 months
Adverse Events reported in this study cannot be attributed to one or the other intervention, due to the fact that they are systemic and all patients are also control of themselves.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
All Participants
n=90 participants at risk
The patient is control of themselves so all participants received both interventions; for each patient are treated and evaluated two different wounds (or two different parts of wound).
Control wound:
After standard cleansing or debridement of all wounds, the wound is covered with hydro fibre medication and dressing or compressive dressing when needed on the whole wound (SOC). The medication and dressing are repeated once a week.
EmoLED treated wound:
After standard cleansing or debridement of all wounds, on wound or portion of wound selected for treatment is treated with EmoLED device. Then covered with hydro fibre medication and dressing or compressive dressing when needed on the whole wound (SOC). Treatment is repeated once a week.
Illumination with blue light (400-430nm) for 60 seconds with a power density of 120mW/sqcm (EmoLED device).
|
|---|---|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Fistulae
|
1.1%
1/90 • 15 months
Adverse Events reported in this study cannot be attributed to one or the other intervention, due to the fact that they are systemic and all patients are also control of themselves.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place