Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Research Study Comparing a New Medicine Oral Semaglutide to Sitagliptin in People With Type 2 Diabetes (NCT NCT04017832)
NCT ID: NCT04017832
Last Updated: 2024-10-01
Results Overview
Change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26 in percentage (%) point of HbA1c is presented. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period and in-trial observation period. On-treatment without rescue medication observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization and the end date which was the first date of any of the following: the last dose of trial product plus 3 days or initiation of rescue medication. In-trial observation period: the time period where participants were considered to be in the trial, regardless of discontinuation of trial product or initiation of rescue medication.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
1441 participants
From baseline to week 26
2024-10-01
Participant Flow
The trial was conducted at 90 sites in 8 countries as follows: Brazil (3 sites), China (58 sites), Czech Republic (4 sites); Hong Kong (1 site), Romania (6 sites), Serbia (7 sites), Taiwan (4 sites), and South Africa (7 sites).
This was a 26-week, multicenter, multinational trial with four arms comparing efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide 3 milligram (mg), 7 mg and 14 mg once-daily with sitagliptin 100 mg once-daily. Out of 1441 participants randomized in the study, 1438 participants were exposed to trial product.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
361
|
360
|
361
|
359
|
|
Overall Study
Full Analysis Set
|
361
|
360
|
361
|
359
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Analysis Set
|
361
|
358
|
361
|
358
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
345
|
342
|
335
|
350
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
16
|
18
|
26
|
9
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
13
|
12
|
21
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Research Study Comparing a New Medicine Oral Semaglutide to Sitagliptin in People With Type 2 Diabetes
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=361 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=360 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=361 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=359 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Total
n=1441 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
53.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 • n=5 Participants
|
53.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 • n=7 Participants
|
53.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5 • n=5 Participants
|
52.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9 • n=4 Participants
|
53.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
152 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
147 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
146 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
156 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
601 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
209 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
213 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
215 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
203 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
840 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
69 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
344 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
341 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
346 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
341 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1372 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
73 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
65 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
67 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
59 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
264 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
272 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
270 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
271 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
271 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1084 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
NA
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed: number of participants with available data for each specified category.
Change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26 in percentage (%) point of HbA1c is presented. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period and in-trial observation period. On-treatment without rescue medication observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization and the end date which was the first date of any of the following: the last dose of trial product plus 3 days or initiation of rescue medication. In-trial observation period: the time period where participants were considered to be in the trial, regardless of discontinuation of trial product or initiation of rescue medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=344 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=340 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=332 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=350 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) (%)
On-treatment observation period
|
-0.8 Percentage point of HbA1C
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
-1.3 Percentage point of HbA1C
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
-1.6 Percentage point of HbA1C
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
-0.7 Percentage point of HbA1C
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Glycated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) (%)
In-trial observation period
|
-0.8 Percentage point of HbA1C
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
-1.3 Percentage point of HbA1C
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
-1.5 Percentage point of HbA1C
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
-0.7 Percentage point of HbA1C
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline to week 26 in millimole per liter (mmol/l) is presented. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization and the end date which was the first date of any of the following: the last dose of trial product plus 3 days or initiation of rescue medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=322 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=317 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=294 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=329 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
|
-1.03 mmol/l
Standard Deviation 2.11
|
-1.79 mmol/l
Standard Deviation 2.20
|
-2.00 mmol/l
Standard Deviation 2.42
|
-0.52 mmol/l
Standard Deviation 2.36
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in mean 7-point SMPG profile at week 26 is presented. SMPG was recorded at the following 7 time points: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after dinner and at bedtime. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization and the end date which was the first date of any of the following: the last dose of trial product plus 3 days or initiation of rescue medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=300 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=311 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=290 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=317 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) Profile: Mean 7-point Profile
|
-1.5 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
-2.3 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
-2.6 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
-1.2 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in 7-point SMPG: Mean postprandial increment (over all meals) at week 26 is presented. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization and the end date which was the first date of any of the following: the last dose of trial product plus 3 days or initiation of rescue medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=301 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=311 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=290 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=317 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in 7 Point SMPG Profile: Mean Postprandial Increment (Over All Meals)
|
-0.4 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.0
|
-0.9 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 1.9
|
-1.0 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
-0.6 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At week 26Population: FAS included all randomised participants. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c \<7.0% (53 mmol/mol) (ADA target) is presented in category "Yes" and participants who could not achieve HbA1C \<7.0 (53 mmol/mol) (ADA target) is presented in category "No". The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization and the end date which was the first date of any of the following: the last dose of trial product plus 3 days or initiation of rescue medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=321 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=315 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=298 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=334 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c <7.0 % (53 mmol/Mol) (American Diabetes Association [ADA] Target) (Yes/no)
Yes
|
139 Participants
|
213 Participants
|
226 Participants
|
122 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c <7.0 % (53 mmol/Mol) (American Diabetes Association [ADA] Target) (Yes/no)
No
|
182 Participants
|
102 Participants
|
72 Participants
|
212 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At week 26Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c equal to or below 6.5 percent (48 mmol/mol) (AACE target) (yes/no) is presented. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization and the end date which was the first date of any of the following: the last dose of trial product plus 3 days or initiation of rescue medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=321 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=315 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=298 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=334 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Equal to or Below 6.5 Percent (48 mmol/Mol) (American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Target) (Yes/no)
Yes
|
81 Participants
|
161 Participants
|
188 Participants
|
54 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Equal to or Below 6.5 Percent (48 mmol/Mol) (American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Target) (Yes/no)
No
|
240 Participants
|
154 Participants
|
110 Participants
|
280 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At week 26Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c reduction equal to or above 1 percent-point (10.9 mmol/mol) (yes/no) is presented. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization and the end date which was the first date of any of the following: the last dose of trial product plus 3 days or initiation of rescue medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=321 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=314 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=298 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=334 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction Equal to or Above 1 Percent-point (10.9 mmol/Mol) (Yes/no)
No
|
180 Participants
|
111 Participants
|
72 Participants
|
205 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction Equal to or Above 1 Percent-point (10.9 mmol/Mol) (Yes/no)
Yes
|
141 Participants
|
203 Participants
|
226 Participants
|
129 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 31Population: FAS included all randomized participants.
Time to rescue medication is presented as the number of participants who had taken rescue medication anytime from baseline to week 31. 'Rescue medication': use of new anti-diabetic medication as add-on to trial product and used for more than 21 days with the initiation at or after randomisation and before last day on trial product, and/or intensification of anti-diabetic medication (a more than 20% increase in dose relative to baseline) for more than 21 days with the intensification at or after randomisation and before last day on trial product. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization and the end date which was the first date of any of the following: the last dose of trial product plus 3 days or initiation of rescue medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=361 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=360 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=361 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=359 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Rescue Medication
|
5 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change in body weight from baseline to week 26 in kg is presented. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization and the end date which was the first date of any of the following: the last dose of trial product plus 3 days or initiation of rescue medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=322 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=319 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=300 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=335 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Body Weight (Kilogram [kg])
|
-1.4 Kilogram
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
-2.9 Kilogram
Standard Deviation 3.3
|
-3.8 Kilogram
Standard Deviation 3.7
|
-0.5 Kilogram
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Percentage change from baseline to week 26 in body weight is presented. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization and the end date which was the first date of any of the following: the last dose of trial product plus 3 days or initiation of rescue medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=322 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=319 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=300 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=335 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Body Weight
|
-2 Percentage change
Standard Deviation 4
|
-4 Percentage change
Standard Deviation 4
|
-5 Percentage change
Standard Deviation 5
|
-1 Percentage change
Standard Deviation 3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in BMI is presented. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization and the end date which was the first date of any of the following: the last dose of trial product plus 3 days or initiation of rescue medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=322 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=319 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=300 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=335 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Body Mass Index (BMI)
|
-0.5 Kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
-1.1 Kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
Standard Deviation 1.2
|
-1.4 Kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
-0.2 Kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
Standard Deviation 0.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in waist circumference is presented. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization and the end date which was the first date of any of the following: the last dose of trial product plus 3 days or initiation of rescue medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=322 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=320 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=300 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=335 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Waist Circumference
|
-1.6 Centimeter
Standard Deviation 4.0
|
-2.7 Centimeter
Standard Deviation 4.4
|
-3.7 Centimeter
Standard Deviation 4.1
|
-0.8 Centimeter
Standard Deviation 3.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in total cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) at week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to the end date which was the first date of any of the following: the last dose of trial product plus 3 days or initiation of rescue medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=316 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=316 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=296 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=330 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Fasting Lipid Profile: Total Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)
|
1.00 Ratio of total cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 15.78
|
0.96 Ratio of total cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17.34
|
0.96 Ratio of total cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17.86
|
0.99 Ratio of total cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 19.69
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in LDL cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) at week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to the end date which was the first date of any of the following: the last dose of trial product plus 3 days or initiation of rescue medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=315 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=314 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=295 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=327 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Fasting Lipid Profile: Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)
|
1.02 Ratio of LDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 25.63
|
0.98 Ratio of LDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 28.70
|
0.98 Ratio of LDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 28.95
|
1.01 Ratio of LDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 30.12
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in VLDL cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) at week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to the end date which was the first date of any of the following: the last dose of trial product plus 3 days or initiation of rescue medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=315 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=315 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=295 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=327 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Fasting Lipid Profile: Very-low-density Lipoprotein (VLDL) Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)
|
1.05 Ratio of VLDL cholesterol
Standard Deviation 0.45
|
0.94 Ratio of VLDL cholesterol
Standard Deviation 0.37
|
0.94 Ratio of VLDL cholesterol
Standard Deviation 0.41
|
0.98 Ratio of VLDL cholesterol
Standard Deviation 0.43
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in HDL Cholesterol (measured in mmol/L) at week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to the end date which was the first date of any of the following: the last dose of trial product plus 3 days or initiation of rescue medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=313 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=313 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=293 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=323 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Fasting Lipid Profile: High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline)
|
1.02 Ratio of HDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 13.25
|
1.01 Ratio of HDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 14.42
|
1.00 Ratio of HDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 14.82
|
1.00 Ratio of HDL cholesterol
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.03
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in triglycerides (measured in mmol/L) at week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to the end date which was the first date of any of the following: the last dose of trial product plus 3 days or initiation of rescue medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=315 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=315 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=295 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=327 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Fasting Lipid Profile: Triglycerides (Ratio to Baseline)
|
0.96 Ratio of triglycerides
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 43.41
|
0.86 Ratio of triglycerides
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 46.28
|
0.86 Ratio of triglycerides
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 46.40
|
0.91 Ratio of triglycerides
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 44.29
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in free fatty acids (measured in mmol/L) at week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to the end date which was the first date of any of the following: the last dose of trial product plus 3 days or initiation of rescue medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=308 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=308 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=290 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=318 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Fasting Lipid Profile: Free Fatty Acids (Ratio to Baseline)
|
0.95 Ratio of free fatty acids
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 56.36
|
0.89 Ratio of free fatty acids
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 56.46
|
0.87 Ratio of free fatty acids
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 66.18
|
0.96 Ratio of free fatty acids
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 62.50
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed: number of participants with available data for each specified category.
SF-36 v2.0 is a 36-item, patient-reported survey of patient health. SF-36 measures the participant's overall Health Related Quality of Life on 8 domains (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health) and two component summary scores (physical component summary and mental component summary). Range of score for domains and component summary scores : 1-100 (Higher scores indicated a better health state). A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. Outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to end date which was first date of any of following: the last dose of trial product plus 3 days or initiation of rescue medication.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=322 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=320 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=299 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=334 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Short Form-36 Version 2 (SF-36v2) (Acute Version) Health Survey
Physical Function
|
0.20 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.63
|
0.48 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.95
|
0.93 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.51
|
0.31 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.25
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Short Form-36 Version 2 (SF-36v2) (Acute Version) Health Survey
Role Physical
|
-0.47 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.72
|
-0.41 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.82
|
0.28 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.11
|
0.24 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.27
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Short Form-36 Version 2 (SF-36v2) (Acute Version) Health Survey
Bodily Pain
|
-0.06 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.44
|
-0.37 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.08
|
0.51 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.03
|
0.22 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.44
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Short Form-36 Version 2 (SF-36v2) (Acute Version) Health Survey
General Health
|
1.47 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.54
|
1.04 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.09
|
1.95 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.44
|
0.95 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.19
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Short Form-36 Version 2 (SF-36v2) (Acute Version) Health Survey
Vitality
|
0.44 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.68
|
0.84 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.64
|
1.21 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.66
|
0.33 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.28
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Short Form-36 Version 2 (SF-36v2) (Acute Version) Health Survey
Social Function
|
0.49 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.14
|
-0.36 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.45
|
0.17 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.92
|
0.10 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.36
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Short Form-36 Version 2 (SF-36v2) (Acute Version) Health Survey
Role Emotional
|
0.06 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.80
|
-0.66 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.37
|
0.23 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.26
|
0.03 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.40
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Short Form-36 Version 2 (SF-36v2) (Acute Version) Health Survey
Mental Health
|
0.51 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.01
|
0.33 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.71
|
0.70 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.34
|
-0.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.13
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Short Form-36 Version 2 (SF-36v2) (Acute Version) Health Survey
Physical Component
|
0.15 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.32
|
0.29 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.74
|
0.98 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.00
|
0.69 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.62
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Short Form-36 Version 2 (SF-36v2) (Acute Version) Health Survey
Mental Component
|
0.50 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.71
|
-0.07 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.50
|
0.44 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.75
|
-0.39 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.64
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At week 26Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved body weight loss equal to or above 3 percent (yes/no) is presented. The outcome data was evaluated based on In-trial observation period: This observation period represented the time period where participants were considered to be in the trial, regardless of discontinuation of trial product or initiation of rescue medication. The in-trial observation period started at randomisation (as registered in the IWRS) and ended at the date of: The last direct participant-site contact, which was scheduled to take place 5 weeks after planned last dose of trial product at the follow-up visit; withdrawal for participants who withdrew their informed consent; The last participant-investigator contact as defined by the investigator for participants who were lost to follow-up; Death for participants who died before any of the above.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=343 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=339 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=332 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=350 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Body Weight Loss Equal to or Above 3 Percent (Yes/no)
Yes
|
109 Participants
|
175 Participants
|
199 Participants
|
68 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Body Weight Loss Equal to or Above 3 Percent (Yes/no)
No
|
234 Participants
|
164 Participants
|
133 Participants
|
282 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At week 26Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved body weight loss equal to or above 5 percent (yes/no) is presented. The outcome data was evaluated based on In-trial observation period: This observation period represented the time period where participants were considered to be in the trial, regardless of discontinuation of trial product or initiation of rescue medication. The in-trial observation period started at randomisation (as registered in the IWRS) and ended at the date of: The last direct participant-site contact, which was scheduled to take place 5 weeks after planned last dose of trial product at the follow-up visit; withdrawal for participants who withdrew their informed consent; The last participant-investigator contact as defined by the investigator for participants who were lost to follow-up; Death for participants who died before any of the above.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=343 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=342 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=333 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=351 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Body Weight Loss Equal to or Above 5 Percent (Yes/no)
Yes
|
55 Participants
|
107 Participants
|
149 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Body Weight Loss Equal to or Above 5 Percent (Yes/no)
No
|
288 Participants
|
235 Participants
|
184 Participants
|
323 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At week 26Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved body weight loss equal to or above 10 percent (yes/no). The outcome data was evaluated based on In-trial observation period: This observation period represented the time period where participants were considered to be in the trial, regardless of discontinuation of trial product or initiation of rescue medication. The in-trial observation period started at randomisation (as registered in the IWRS) and ended at the date of: The last direct participant-site contact, which was scheduled to take place 5 weeks after planned last dose of trial product at the follow-up visit; withdrawal for participants who withdrew their informed consent; The last participant-investigator contact as defined by the investigator for participants who were lost to follow-up; Death for participants who died before any of the above.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=343 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=342 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=333 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=351 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Body Weight Loss Equal to or Above 10 Percent (Yes/no)
Yes
|
5 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
42 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved Body Weight Loss Equal to or Above 10 Percent (Yes/no)
No
|
338 Participants
|
318 Participants
|
291 Participants
|
349 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At week 26Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c \< 7.0 percent (53 mmol/mol) without hypoglycaemia (treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes) and no body weight gain (yes/no) at week 26 is presented. The outcome data was evaluated based on In-trial observation period: This observation period represented the time period where participants were considered to be in the trial, regardless of discontinuation of trial product or initiation of rescue medication. The in-trial observation period started at randomisation (as registered in the IWRS) and ended at the date of: The last direct participant-site contact, which was scheduled to take place 5 weeks after planned last dose of trial product at the follow-up visit; withdrawal for participants who withdrew their informed consent; The last participant-investigator contact as defined by the investigator for participants who were lost to follow-up; Death for participants who died before any of the above.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=344 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=339 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=332 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=350 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0 Percent (53 mmol/Mol) Without Hypoglycaemia (Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes) and no Body Weight Gain (Yes/no)
Yes
|
114 Participants
|
195 Participants
|
222 Participants
|
79 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Below 7.0 Percent (53 mmol/Mol) Without Hypoglycaemia (Treatment-emergent Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes) and no Body Weight Gain (Yes/no)
No
|
230 Participants
|
144 Participants
|
110 Participants
|
271 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At week 26Population: FAS included all randomized participants. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c reduction equal to or above 1 percent-point (10.9 mmol/mol) and body weight loss equal to or above 3 percent (yes/no) is presented. The outcome data was evaluated based on In-trial observation period: This observation period represented the time period where participants were considered to be in the trial, regardless of discontinuation of trial product or initiation of rescue medication. The in-trial observation period started at randomisation (as registered in the IWRS) and ended at the date of: The last direct participant-site contact, which was scheduled to take place 5 weeks after planned last dose of trial product at the follow-up visit; withdrawal for participants who withdrew their informed consent; The last participant-investigator contact as defined by the investigator for participants who were lost to follow-up; Death for participants who died before any of the above.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=344 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=339 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=332 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=350 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction Equal to or Above 1 Percent-point (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Body Weight Loss Equal to or Above 3 Percent (Yes/no)
Yes
|
64 Participants
|
128 Participants
|
159 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Reduction Equal to or Above 1 Percent-point (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Body Weight Loss Equal to or Above 3 Percent (Yes/no)
No
|
280 Participants
|
211 Participants
|
173 Participants
|
317 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 31Population: Safety analysis set (SAS) included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom or disease temporally associated with the use of a product, whether or not considered related to the product. AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs). The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to the first date of any of the following: follow-up visit, premature follow-up visit, last date on trial product plus 38 days or the end of the in-trial observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=361 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=358 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=361 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=358 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events During Exposure to Trial Product
|
635 Events
|
741 Events
|
793 Events
|
643 Events
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 31Population: SAS included all all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
Number of treatment-emergent severe or blood glucose (BG) confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes during exposure to trial product is presented. Severe: requiring assistance from another person for recovery. 'BG-confirmed': hypoglycaemic episode with a plasma glucose value \< 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL); The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to the first date of any of the following: follow-up visit, premature follow-up visit, last date on trial product plus 38 days or the end of the in-trial observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=361 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=358 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=361 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=358 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Treatment-emergent Severe or Blood Glucose Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During Exposure to Trial Product
|
2 Episodes
|
2 Episodes
|
2 Episodes
|
1 Episodes
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: SAS included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in hematology parameters such as basophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, and neutrophils were reported. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to the first date of any of the following: follow-up visit, premature follow-up visit, last date on trial product plus 38 days or the end of the in-trial observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=310 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=305 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=290 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=320 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Haematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and Neutrophils
Basophils
|
0.01 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
0.01 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
0.00 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
0.00 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Haematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and Neutrophils
Eosinophils
|
0.00 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.00 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
-0.01 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.25
|
-0.00 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Haematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and Neutrophils
Lymphocytes
|
-0.03 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.46
|
0.01 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.40
|
0.00 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.52
|
0.00 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.39
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Haematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and Neutrophils
Monocytes
|
0.01 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
0.01 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
0.01 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
0.02 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Haematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, and Neutrophils
Neutrophils
|
0.03 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
0.13 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
0.10 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 1.22
|
0.31 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: SAS included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in Haematocrit at week 26 is reported as ratio to baseline. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to the first date of any of the following: follow-up visit, premature follow-up visit, last date on trial product plus 38 days or the end of the in-trial observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=310 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=306 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=290 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=320 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Haematology Parameter: Haematocrit (Ratio to Baseline)
|
1.01 Ratio of haematocrit
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 6.76
|
1.00 Ratio of haematocrit
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 6.64
|
1.00 Ratio of haematocrit
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 6.21
|
1.00 Ratio of haematocrit
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 6.35
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: SAS included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in Haemoglobin at week 26 is reported as ratio to baseline. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to the first date of any of the following: follow-up visit, premature follow-up visit, last date on trial product plus 38 days or the end of the in-trial observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=310 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=306 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=290 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=320 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Haematology Parameter: Haemoglobin (Ratio to Baseline)
|
1.00 Ratio of haemoglobin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 5.71
|
1.00 Ratio of haemoglobin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 6.04
|
1.00 Ratio of haemoglobin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 5.47
|
1.00 Ratio of haemoglobin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 6.11
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: SAS included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in Leucocytes at week 26 is reported as ratio to baseline. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to the first date of any of the following: follow-up visit, premature follow-up visit, last date on trial product plus 38 days or the end of the in-trial observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=310 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=306 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=290 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=320 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Haematology Parameter: Leucocytes (Ratio to Baseline)
|
1.01 Ratio of leucocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 19.28
|
1.02 Ratio of leucocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 19.54
|
1.01 Ratio of leucocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.24
|
1.04 Ratio of leucocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17.87
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: SAS included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in thrombocytes at week 26 is reported as ratio to baseline. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to the first date of any of the following: follow-up visit, premature follow-up visit, last date on trial product plus 38 days or the end of the in-trial observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=305 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=305 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=285 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=316 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Haematology Parameter: Thrombocytes (Ratio to Baseline)
|
0.99 Ratio of thrombocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 14.53
|
0.99 Ratio of thrombocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.65
|
0.99 Ratio of thrombocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.65
|
0.97 Ratio of thrombocytes
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 15.65
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: SAS included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in calcium (total) (measured in mmol/L) at week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to the first date of any of the following: follow-up visit, premature follow-up visit, last date on trial product plus 38 days or the end of the in-trial observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=320 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=322 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=301 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=336 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Biochemistry Parameter: Calcium (Total) (Ratio to Baseline)
|
0.98 Ratio of calcium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 4.40
|
0.98 Ratio of calcium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 4.74
|
0.99 Ratio of calcium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 4.80
|
0.98 Ratio of calcium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 4.40
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: SAS included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in potassium (measured in mmol/L) at week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to the first date of any of the following: follow-up visit, premature follow-up visit, last date on trial product plus 38 days or the end of the in-trial observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=319 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=322 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=301 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=335 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Biochemistry Parameter: Potassium (Ratio to Baseline)
|
1.00 Ratio of potassium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 8.51
|
1.00 Ratio of potassium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 8.34
|
1.00 Ratio of potassium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 8.96
|
1.01 Ratio of potassium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 9.28
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: SAS included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in sodium (measured in mmol/L) at week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to the first date of any of the following: follow-up visit, premature follow-up visit, last date on trial product plus 38 days or the end of the in-trial observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=319 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=322 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=301 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=335 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Biochemistry Parameter: Sodium (Ratio to Baseline)
|
1.00 Ratio of sodium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 1.58
|
1.00 Ratio of sodium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 1.40
|
1.00 Ratio of sodium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 1.49
|
1.00 Ratio of sodium
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 1.59
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: SAS included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in urea (measured in mmol/L) at week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to the first date of any of the following: follow-up visit, premature follow-up visit, last date on trial product plus 38 days or the end of the in-trial observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=320 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=322 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=301 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=336 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Biochemistry Parameter: Urea (Ratio to Baseline)
|
1.00 Ratio of urea
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 26.29
|
0.99 Ratio of urea
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 25.61
|
0.98 Ratio of urea
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 23.78
|
1.03 Ratio of urea
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 22.67
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: SAS included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in Albumin (measured in grams per deciliter \[g/dL\]) at week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to the first date of any of the following: follow-up visit, premature follow-up visit, last date on trial product plus 38 days or the end of the in-trial observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=320 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=323 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=303 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=337 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Biochemistry Parameter: Albumin (Ratio to Baseline)
|
0.99 Ratio of albumin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 4.40
|
0.99 Ratio of albumin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 4.57
|
0.99 Ratio of albumin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 5.22
|
0.99 Ratio of albumin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 5.05
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: SAS included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in calcitonin (measured in picograms per milliliter \[pg/ml\]) at week 26 is presented as ratio to baseline. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to the first date of any of the following: follow-up visit, premature follow-up visit, last date on trial product plus 38 days or the end of the in-trial observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=324 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=324 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=301 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=335 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Calcitonin (Ratio to Baseline)
|
1.00 Ratio of calcitonin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 38.33
|
1.05 Ratio of calcitonin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 35.56
|
1.02 Ratio of calcitonin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.49
|
1.01 Ratio of calcitonin
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 31.96
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: SAS included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
Change from baseline in pulse rate is presented. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to the first date of any of the following: follow-up visit, premature follow-up visit, last date on trial product plus 38 days or the end of the in-trial observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=361 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=358 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=361 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=358 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Vital Signs: Pulse Rate
|
78 Beats per minute (beats/min)
Standard Deviation 10
|
78 Beats per minute (beats/min)
Standard Deviation 11
|
78 Beats per minute (beats/min)
Standard Deviation 10
|
78 Beats per minute (beats/min)
Standard Deviation 10
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: SAS included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
Change from baseline in systolic blood pressure is presented. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to the first date of any of the following: follow-up visit, premature follow-up visit, last date on trial product plus 38 days or the end of the in-trial observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=361 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=358 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=361 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=358 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Vital Signs: Systolic Blood Pressure
|
131 Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 16
|
132 Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 15
|
130 Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 14
|
130 Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 14
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: SAS included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
Change from baseline in diastolic blood pressure is presented. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to the first date of any of the following: follow-up visit, premature follow-up visit, last date on trial product plus 38 days or the end of the in-trial observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=361 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=358 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=361 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=358 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Vital Signs: Diastolic Blood Pressure
|
83 Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 10
|
84 Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 9
|
83 Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 10
|
83 Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Standard Deviation 9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: SAS included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Overall Number of Participants Analyzed: participants with available data for this outcome measure and Number Analyzed: number of participants with available data for each specified category.
Change from baseline in ECG category at week 26 is presented. Change from baseline results are presented as shift in findings categorized as: normal, abnormal and not clinically significant (NCS), and abnormal and clinically significant (CS). The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to the first date of any of the following: follow-up visit, premature follow-up visit, last date on trial product plus 38 days or the end of the in-trial observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=328 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=328 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=303 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=344 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Category
Normal (Baseline) to normal (week 26)
|
174 Participants
|
163 Participants
|
165 Participants
|
175 Participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Category
Normal (Baseline) to abnormal NCS (week 26)
|
21 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Category
Normal (Baseline) to abnormal CS (week 26)
|
8 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Category
Abnormal NCS (Baseline) to normal (week 26)
|
26 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
43 Participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Category
Abnormal NCS (Baseline) to abnormal NCS (week 26)
|
56 Participants
|
61 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
64 Participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Category
Abnormal NCS (Baseline) to abnormal CS (week 26)
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Category
Abnormal CS (Baseline) to normal (week 26)
|
8 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Category
Abnormal CS (Baseline) to abnormal NCS (week 26)
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Category
Abnormal CS (Baseline) to abnormal CS (week 26)
|
27 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and week 26Population: SAS included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number Analyzed: number of participants with available data for each specified category.
The physical examination values for different body systems at baseline and week 26 are presented. The investigator interpreted the results and categorised them as: normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS. The physical examination are presented for the following body systems: cardiovascular system; central and peripheral nervous system; gastrointestinal system, including mouth; general appearance; head, ears, eyes, nose, throat, neck; lymph node palpation; musculoskeletal system; respiratory system; skin; and thyroid gland. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to the first date of any of the following: follow-up visit, premature follow-up visit, last date on trial product plus 38 days or the end of the in-trial observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=361 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=358 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=361 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=358 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Physical Examination Category
Central and Peripheral Nervous System - Abnormal NCS (Week 26)
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Cardiovascular system - Normal (Baseline)
|
354 Participants
|
353 Participants
|
355 Participants
|
356 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Cardiovascular system - abnormal NCS (Baseline)
|
5 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Cardiovascular system - Abnormal CS (Baseline)
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Cardiovascular system -Normal (Week 26)
|
319 Participants
|
322 Participants
|
301 Participants
|
339 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Cardiovascular system - Abnormal NCS (Week 26)
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Cardiovascular system - Abnormal CS (Week 26)
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Central and Peripheral Nervous System - Normal (Baseline)
|
355 Participants
|
351 Participants
|
358 Participants
|
357 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Central and Peripheral Nervous System - Abnormal NCS (Baseline)
|
2 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Central and Peripheral Nervous System - Abnormal CS (Baseline)
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Central and Peripheral Nervous System - Normal (Week 26)
|
322 Participants
|
321 Participants
|
302 Participants
|
339 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Central and Peripheral Nervous System - Abnormal CS (Week 26)
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Gastrointestinal System incl. Mouth - Normal (Baseline)
|
350 Participants
|
343 Participants
|
353 Participants
|
346 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Gastrointestinal System incl. Mouth - Abnormal NCS (Baseline)
|
10 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Gastrointestinal System incl. Mouth - Abnormal CS (Baseline)
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Gastrointestinal System incl. Mouth - Normal (Week 26)
|
314 Participants
|
315 Participants
|
300 Participants
|
329 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Gastrointestinal System incl. Mouth - Abnormal NCS (Week 26)
|
12 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Gastrointestinal System incl. Mouth - Abnormal CS (Week 26)
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
General Appearance - Normal (Baseline)
|
329 Participants
|
325 Participants
|
328 Participants
|
328 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
General Appearance - Abnormal NCS (Baseline)
|
25 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
General Appearance - Abnormal CS (Baseline)
|
7 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
General Appearance - Normal (Week 26)
|
300 Participants
|
295 Participants
|
280 Participants
|
313 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
General Appearance - Abnormal NCS (Week 26)
|
21 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
General Appearance - Abnormal CS (Week 26)
|
6 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, Neck - Normal (Baseline)
|
348 Participants
|
349 Participants
|
351 Participants
|
344 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, Neck - Abnormal NCS (Baseline)
|
9 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, Neck - Abnormal CS (Baseline)
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, Neck - Normal (Week 26)
|
322 Participants
|
319 Participants
|
297 Participants
|
330 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, Neck - Abnormal NCS (Week 26)
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Head, Ears, Eyes, Nose, Throat, Neck - Abnormal CS (Week 26)
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Lymph Node Palpation - Normal (Baseline)
|
361 Participants
|
353 Participants
|
357 Participants
|
357 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Lymph Node Palpation - Abnormal NCS (Baseline)
|
0 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Lymph Node Palpation - Abnormal CS (Baseline)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Lymph Node Palpation - Normal (Week 26)
|
325 Participants
|
323 Participants
|
304 Participants
|
341 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Lymph Node Palpation - Abnormal NCS (Week 26)
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Lymph Node Palpation - Abnormal CS (Week 26)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Musculoskeletal System - Normal (Baseline)
|
344 Participants
|
345 Participants
|
351 Participants
|
352 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Musculoskeletal System - Abnormal NCS (Baseline)
|
13 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Musculoskeletal System - Abnormal CS (Baseline)
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Musculoskeletal System - Normal (Week 26)
|
314 Participants
|
319 Participants
|
301 Participants
|
335 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Musculoskeletal System - Abnormal NCS (Week 26)
|
6 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Musculoskeletal System - Abnormal CS (Week 26)
|
6 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Respiratory System - Normal (Baseline)
|
355 Participants
|
355 Participants
|
359 Participants
|
357 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Respiratory System -Abnormal NCS (Baseline)
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Respiratory System - Abnormal CS (Baseline)
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Respiratory System - Normal (Week 26)
|
324 Participants
|
325 Participants
|
305 Participants
|
341 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Respiratory System - Abnormal NCS (Week 26)
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Respiratory System - Abnormal CS (Week 26)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Skin - Normal (Baseline)
|
282 Participants
|
282 Participants
|
296 Participants
|
277 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Skin - Abnormal NCS (Baseline)
|
71 Participants
|
65 Participants
|
54 Participants
|
65 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Skin - Abnormal CS (Baseline)
|
8 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Skin - Normal (Week 26)
|
260 Participants
|
263 Participants
|
256 Participants
|
267 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Skin - Abnormal NCS (Week 26)
|
60 Participants
|
52 Participants
|
42 Participants
|
60 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Skin - Abnormal CS (Week 26)
|
7 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Thyroid Gland - Normal (Baseline)
|
356 Participants
|
351 Participants
|
358 Participants
|
350 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Thyroid Gland - Abnormal NCS (Baseline)
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Thyroid Gland - Abnormal CS (Baseline)
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Thyroid Gland - Normal (Week 26)
|
322 Participants
|
319 Participants
|
304 Participants
|
337 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Thyroid Gland - Abnormal NCS (Week 26)
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Physical Examination Category
Thyroid Gland - Abnormal CS (Week 26)
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 26Population: SAS included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product. Number Analyzed: number of participants with available data for each specified category.
The eye examination category at baseline and week 26 are presented. The investigator interpreted the results and categorised them as: normal, abnormal NCS or abnormal CS. The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to the first date of any of the following: follow-up visit, premature follow-up visit, last date on trial product plus 38 days or the end of the in-trial observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=361 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=358 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=361 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=358 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Eye Examination Category
Right Eye Ophthalmoscopy - Normal (Week 26)
|
223 Participants
|
218 Participants
|
220 Participants
|
233 Participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Eye Examination Category
Right Eye Ophthalmoscopy - Abnormal NCS (Week 26)
|
49 Participants
|
49 Participants
|
45 Participants
|
43 Participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Eye Examination Category
Right Eye Ophthalmoscopy - Abnormal CS (Week 26)
|
53 Participants
|
55 Participants
|
36 Participants
|
59 Participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Eye Examination Category
Left Eye Ophthalmoscopy - Normal (Baseline)
|
245 Participants
|
240 Participants
|
254 Participants
|
248 Participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Eye Examination Category
Left Eye Ophthalmoscopy - Abnormal NCS (Baseline)
|
60 Participants
|
51 Participants
|
61 Participants
|
52 Participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Eye Examination Category
Left Eye Ophthalmoscopy - Abnormal CS (Baseline)
|
56 Participants
|
67 Participants
|
46 Participants
|
58 Participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Eye Examination Category
Left Eye Ophthalmoscopy - Normal (Week 26)
|
221 Participants
|
226 Participants
|
217 Participants
|
240 Participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Eye Examination Category
Left Eye Ophthalmoscopy -Abnormal NCS (Week 26)
|
49 Participants
|
44 Participants
|
50 Participants
|
39 Participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Eye Examination Category
Left Eye Ophthalmoscopy - Abnormal CS (Week 26)
|
55 Participants
|
53 Participants
|
34 Participants
|
56 Participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Eye Examination Category
Right Eye Ophthalmoscopy - Normal (Baseline)
|
240 Participants
|
234 Participants
|
257 Participants
|
240 Participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Eye Examination Category
Right Eye Ophthalmoscopy - Abnormal NCS (Baseline)
|
64 Participants
|
54 Participants
|
56 Participants
|
53 Participants
|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 26 in Eye Examination Category
Right Eye Ophthalmoscopy - Abnormal CS (Baseline)
|
57 Participants
|
69 Participants
|
48 Participants
|
65 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to week 31Population: SAS included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
Number of participants with treatment-emergent severe or blood glucose (BG) confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes during exposure to trial product is presented. Severe: requiring assistance from another person for recovery. 'BG-confirmed': hypoglycaemic episode with a plasma glucose value \< 3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL); The outcome data was evaluated based on the on-treatment observation period: from date of first dose of trial product following randomization up to the first date of any of the following: follow-up visit, premature follow-up visit, last date on trial product plus 38 days or the end of the in-trial observation period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=361 Participants
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=358 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=361 Participants
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=358 Participants
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Severe or Blood Glucose Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes During Exposure to Trial Product
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
Sitagliptin 100 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=361 participants at risk
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=358 participants at risk
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=361 participants at risk
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=358 participants at risk
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Anal abscess
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
0.55%
2/361 • Number of events 2 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19 pneumonia
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.56%
2/358 • Number of events 2 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Calculus urinary
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral infarction
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.55%
2/361 • Number of events 2 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular insufficiency
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Cervical dysplasia
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Chronic gastritis
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon adenoma
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.56%
2/358 • Number of events 2 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Dacryocystitis
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Eye disorders
Dacryostenosis acquired
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dementia
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetic ketoacidosis
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Eye disorders
Diabetic retinopathy
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Facial bones fracture
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Fracture treatment
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic function abnormal
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic steatosis
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Humerus fracture
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infected skin ulcer
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal hernia
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Interstitial lung disease
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic stroke
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Keratitis viral
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lacrimal gland abscess
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung adenocarcinoma
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Eye disorders
Macular fibrosis
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuralgia
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoporosis
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal compression fracture
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Stab wound
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Sudden hearing loss
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ulna fracture
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Umbilical hernia
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Ureterolithiasis
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.56%
2/358 • Number of events 2 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
0.28%
1/361 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Vertebrobasilar insufficiency
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/361 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.00%
0/358 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Oral Semaglutide 3 mg
n=361 participants at risk
Participants received semaglutide 3 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to sitagliptin orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 7 mg
n=358 participants at risk
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 0 to week 4 and 7 mg from week 5 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Oral Semaglutide 14 mg
n=361 participants at risk
Participants received oral semaglutide tablets once daily in a dose escalation manner from week 0 to week 26: 3 mg from week 1 to week 4, 7 mg from week 5 to week 8 and 14 mg from week 9 to week 26. Participants also received placebo matched to sitagliptin 100 mg for 26 weeks.
|
Sitagliptin 100 mg
n=358 participants at risk
Participants received oral sitagliptin 100 mg tablet and placebo tablet matched to oral semaglutide orally once daily for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
6.1%
22/361 • Number of events 22 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
8.4%
30/358 • Number of events 30 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
9.4%
34/361 • Number of events 39 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
1.4%
5/358 • Number of events 5 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
8.3%
30/361 • Number of events 31 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
8.9%
32/358 • Number of events 40 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
13.3%
48/361 • Number of events 57 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
4.5%
16/358 • Number of events 17 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Investigations
Lipase increased
|
4.2%
15/361 • Number of events 15 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
4.7%
17/358 • Number of events 22 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
5.8%
21/361 • Number of events 23 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
3.4%
12/358 • Number of events 16 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
10.0%
36/361 • Number of events 38 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
10.9%
39/358 • Number of events 42 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
12.2%
44/361 • Number of events 50 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
3.9%
14/358 • Number of events 15 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
7.2%
26/361 • Number of events 27 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
7.0%
25/358 • Number of events 29 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
8.6%
31/361 • Number of events 35 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
7.8%
28/358 • Number of events 35 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
4.4%
16/361 • Number of events 17 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
5.0%
18/358 • Number of events 30 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
8.0%
29/361 • Number of events 38 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
0.28%
1/358 • Number of events 1 • From baseline to week 31
AEs with onset during the on-treatment period correspond to TEAEs. On-treatment observation period represented the time period where participants were considered treated with the trial product following randomization. Results are based on the SAS which included all participants exposed to at least one dose of trial product.
|
Additional Information
Clinical Reporting Anchor and Disclosure (2834)
Novo Nordisk A/S
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee At the end of the trial, one or more scientific publications may be prepared collaboratively by the investigator(s) and Novo Nordisk. Novo Nordisk reserves the right to postpone publication and/or communication for up to 60 days to protect intellectual property.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER